One’s worldview while in college, campaigning for office, and being a member of parliament representing a garrison community in Jamaica is a far cry from governing as Prime Minister. And so, as my granddad would say, it is never too late for a shower of rain; it was not totally unexpected that Holness, a product of Spanish Town, schooled in the Intellectual ghetto, and MP for a garrison could rise to the occasion, matured by the high office he holds. Not everyone can rise to the high office they hold; we saw what occurred in the United States during the four years after President Barack Obama left office. Much to his credit, Prime Minister Andrew Holness has matured, at least insofar as recognizing that high violent crime rates and a prosperous Jamaica are mutually exclusive. Let me be clear: Holness is nowhere near where he needs to be regarding reining in the country’s rampant criminality, but he is starting to get the picture. In 2021, Haitian President Jovenel Moïse was assassinated at his private home in the hills overlooking Port-au-Prince. After this heinous act, I noticed a marked yet welcome change in the tone and text of the Jamaican Prime minister on the issue of crime. I welcomed the change and congratulated the PM for coming to the party, albeit late.
And so, speaking in Manchester on changes to the new road traffic act, the prime minister spoke to“decades of breakdown in standards, rules, and expectations.“The hardships we now experience are precise because we do not have an even system of law and order that everyone can benefit from said Holness. This writer has written several articles in which I have laid out the many ways a crime-ridden society impoverishes everyone except those benefitting from crime. I am thrilled to see the PM now acknowledging those realities. The Prime Minister spoke to what he characterized as” an unfortunate presentation” in reference to the nonsensical debate about child restraints in motor vehicles. (1) the brouhaha is another example of rushed legislation that is poorly thought out and not properly debated using data and expertise. Much like the INDECOM Act, it was poorly thought through and written and had to be revised. We continue to challenge those badly written laws as well. (2) The Prime Minister should never apologize or be intimidated by those who would question his newfound commitment to the rule of law.
Jamaicans obey laws when they leave Jamaica; they act the way they do in Jamaica because they are allowed to. “I don’t want to be seen as the prime minister who is trying to stop people from eating a food as there are those who will try to craft that narrative — pitting law and order against survival — that if we enforce the law, if we create order, then people won’t survive, and that is in the minds of many Jamaicans,” said Holness. This is where I parted company with the PM; you do not lead by worrying about the noise in the peanut gallery. You do not spit on your finger but hold it up to the wind to see what direction to take. He also spoke about the silent majority. He asserted that the silent majority agrees with setting the country on a firm footing based on the rule of law. It should not matter who agrees or disagrees when you know in your gut that what you are doing is the right thing. Setting the country on a footing based on the rule of law is non-negotiable if Jamaica is to succeed. .…
Mike Beckles is a former Police Detective, businessman, freelance writer, black achiever honoree, and creator of the blog mikebeckles.com.