GLEANER PICKS SIDE:

The Following is the full edi­to­r­i­al com­men­tary from the Jamaica Daily Gleaner regard­ing the impasse involv­ing INDECOM’s Terrence Williams and the Police Federation

MR TERRENCE Williams must stand his ground and resist those in the con­stab­u­lary, and its aux­il­iaries, who want to see him go.

Until there are cred­i­ble rea­sons for us to do oth­er­wise, Mr Williams has the sup­port of this news­pa­per. We expect, too, that he will find sim­i­lar sup­port from Mr Owen Ellington, the reform-mind­ed police chief, whose efforts have, up to now, found favour with us.

More impor­tant­ly, the Government must reject any pres­sure to act against Terrence Williams.

Additionally, Constable Franz Morrison, the chair­man of the Police Federation — the union for the rank-and-file mem­bers of the con­stab­u­lary — if he har­bours notions of him­self as a pro­gres­siveleader, would wel­come aggres­sive over­sight from an agency like INDECOM, which Mr Williams heads. Apparently, we expect a high­er qual­i­ty of lead­er­ship than Mr Morrison demands of him­self, or which he seems to believe his con­stituents deserve.

INDECOM (Independent Commission of Investigations), it is recalled, was estab­lished by Parliament in 2010 to inves­ti­gate cas­es of shoot­ings, as well as oth­er com­plaints of abuse against cit­i­zens by the secu­ri­ty forces. It was the out­come of years of accu­sa­tionsof extra­ju­di­cial killings and oth­er mis­be­hav­iour, par­tic­u­lar­ly by the police, and loss of pub­lic con­fi­dence in the con­stab­u­lary’s abil­i­ty to impar­tial­ly inves­ti­gate itself.

Unsurprisingly, in its short life, INDECOM has had an uneasy rela­tion­ship with the con­stab­u­lary, and some in the judi­cial process, over its attempt to assert its inde­pen­dence in ful­fill­ing its mandate.

Mr Williams has, for instance, com­plained of attempts by police offi­cers to mus­cle his inves­ti­ga­tors out of crime scenes where there have been police shoot­ings and the death of civil­ians, and where INDECOM ought to have prime author­i­ty. Such actions are apart from the test­ing in the courts by the Police Federation, the Police Officers’ Association and the Special Constables’ Association of INDECOM’s pow­ers of arrest.

Judicial chal­lenges are one thing. What Mr Morrison’s crowd is now attempt­ing is quite anoth­er. They are attempt­ing to rile the pub­lic and mem­bers of par­lia­ment into a mood of no con­fi­dence in Mr Williams so as to have the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al rescind his appoint­ment. Or, prefer­ably, he resigns.

The ‘offence’

Mr Williams’ ‘offence’ is that he recent­ly appeared at a press con­fer­ence, host­ed by a human-rights group, to express his con­cern at the spate of police homi­cides — near­ly two dozen in less than a month.

According to the Police Federation’s Mr Morrison, such a con­cern ren­dered Mr Williams inca­pable of “impar­tial­ly inves­ti­gat­ing any inci­dent involv­ing police offi­cers”. So, accord­ing to Mr David White, the fed­er­a­tion’s gen­er­al sec­re­tary, they have writ­ten to the prime min­is­ter, the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al and the Parliament to have Mr Williams “removed”.

The real aim of the cam­paign is trans­par­ent­ly ludi­crous. It has lit­tle to do about Mr Williams’ atten­dance at the press con­fer­ence or the remarks he may have made, and every­thing to do with a wish to elim­i­nate any body that would hold the con­stab­u­lary account­able for its behaviour.

If it was­n’t these com­ments, it would be some oth­er, and who­ev­er replaces Mr Williams will face the same chal­lenges until there is a change of the cul­ture of impuni­ty that per­vades the police force.

Jamaica’s high crime rate and the dif­fi­cul­ties faced by the con­stab­u­lary notwith­stand­ing, 951 police homi­cides in four years is unac­cept­able. With that, Mr Morrison should agree.jamaica​glean​er​.com

Terrence Williams

Here’s my response:

The Editorial board from its recent utter­ances, includ­ing this one, and the nar­ra­tive it advances, fur­ther demon­strates that the cul­ture it sup­ports is an alien one far removed from real­i­ty. As such, no respon­si­ble par­ty need take any of the utter­ances made by this board seri­ous­ly. On every issue to include this one, you are wrong. Clearly it can­not escape any­one with a mod­icum of intel­lect, that the Commissioner of INDECOM in his capac­i­ty as inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tor ‚must be judi­cious with whom he appears and/​or asso­ciates. Particularly on top­i­cal , sen­si­tive issues like the cas­es his office or he will have to inves­ti­gate. Taking into account the per­cep­tion around JFJ, as a crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group, whether one dis­agrees or not. Let me inform you and your friends who feel com­pelled to tell offi­cers what is right for them. Justice must not only be done it must appear to be done. Police offi­cers will no longer allow elit­ists to tell them how they should go about look­ing out for their inter­ests. Your argu­ments are disin­gen­u­ous, and are intend­ed to mis­lead . You should be ashamed to use this well-regard­ed medi­um to spout lies, innu­en­dos , and mis­in­for­ma­tion to fur­ther your indi­vid­ual agen­da. You are a disgrace.

ONE MORE THING:

Let me instruct you on what is con­sid­ered ludi­crous. As a stu­dent in detec­tive train­ing I was told that no greater task could any per­son be giv­en than be asked to bring to jus­tice the ille­git­i­mate killer of anoth­er human being. I took that charge seri­ous­ly as a detec­tive. Any per­son charged with inves­ti­ga­tions must not only be impar­tial they must also appear to be impar­tial. As such an inves­ti­ga­tor can­not stand with those on the out­side shout­ing extra-judi­cial killings when he is the one tasked with mak­ing an informed deter­mi­na­tion as it relates to the facts. By your utter­ances here you have zero under­stand­ing of how inves­ti­ga­tions are done, yet you have not felt restrained from tak­ing sides despite your demon­strat­ed igno­rance of such sub­ject. Investigators must approach each case with an open mind , and fol­low the evi­dence wher­ev­er it leads, a real inves­ti­ga­tor knows that if one is biased one way or anoth­er, one may find evi­dence to sub­stan­ti­ate any mind­set, as such it can­not be overem­pha­sized that inves­ti­ga­tors have an open mind, even when it seem that there is over­whelm­ing evi­dence to sub­stan­ti­ate the call for blood. As inju­di­cious and just plain wrong as Terrence Williams’ appear­ance with JFJ was, your attempt at obfus­ca­tion and dis­hon­esty is dan­ger­ous­ly decep­tive and unpatriotic.

This juve­nile attempt at opin­ion shap­ing fell flat,succeeding sole­ly in reveal­ing the writer to be an elit­ist who did not both­er to do any research before attempt­ing to shape pop­u­lar per­cep­tions. The prob­lem with the writer of this spiel is one that is now prov­ing to be one that many in Jamaica is hav­ing a hard time assim­i­lat­ing at this time.I speak of a more edu­cat­ed, force­ful police depart­ment even at the low­est rank who are deter­mined they will not be told to sit down.

Traditionalists like the writer of this piece of garbage, now find them­selves in a quandary deal­ing with the chil­dren of the poor­est of the poor, who are pre­pared to stand their ground and test every­thing in the courts. And by the way they have the pow­er of arrest. This was not in the game-plan, the cod­ed writ­ings of this per­son, whom one could rea­son­ably con­strue to be a fool , drips with ven­omous anger at the temer­i­ty of the police to chal­lenge them and their friends. The rigid caste sys­tem is unrav­el­ing in front of their very eyes, those aspir­ing to the upper lev­els , have a vest­ed inter­est in main­tain­ing that sys­tem, now that they have climbed to the top of the heap. And they do not want change in Jamaica. After all, if the poor is giv­en a chance to free them­selves from pover­ty, and illit­er­a­cy who will they lord over?

Ha ha I love it ‚.