Driving While Black Has Actually Gotten More Dangerous In The Last 15 Years

th (24)Walter Scott’s death in South Carolina, at the hands of now-fired North Charleston police offi­cer Michael Slager, is one of sev­er­al instances from the past year when a black man was killed after being pulled over while dri­ving. No one knows exact­ly how often traf­fic stops turn dead­ly, but stud­ies in Arizona, Missouri, Texas, Washington have con­sis­tent­ly shown that cops stop and search black dri­vers at a high­er rate than white dri­vers. Last week, a team of researchers in North Carolina found that traf­fic stops in Charlotte, the state’s largest city, showed a sim­i­lar racial dis­par­i­ty — and that the gap has been widen­ing over time.

The researchers at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill ana­lyzed more than 1.3 mil­lion traf­fic stops and search­es by Charlotte-Mecklenburg police offi­cers for a 12-year peri­od begin­ning in 2002, when the state began requir­ing police to col­lect such sta­tis­tics. In their analy­sis of the data, col­lect­ed and made pub­lic by the state’s Department of Justice, the researchers found that black dri­vers, despite mak­ing up less than one-third of the city’s dri­ving pop­u­la­tion, were twice as like­ly to be sub­ject to traf­fic stops and search­es as whites. Young black men in Charlotte were three times as like­ly to get pulled over and searched than the city-wide aver­age. Here’s a chart from the Charlotte Observer’s report detail­ing the findings:

Michael Gordon and David Puckett, Charlotte Observer
Not only did the researchers iden­ti­fy these gaps: they showed that the gaps have been grow­ing. Black dri­vers in Charlotte are more like­ly than whites to get pulled over and searched today than they were in 2002, the researchers found. They not­ed sim­i­lar widen­ing racial gaps among traf­fic stops and search­es in Durham, Raleigh, and else­where in the state.

Black dri­vers in Charlotte were much more like­ly to get stopped for minor vio­la­tions involv­ing seat belts, vehi­cle reg­is­tra­tion, and equip­ment, where, as the Observer’s Michael Gordon points out, “police have more dis­cre­tion in pulling some­one over.” (Scott was stopped in North Charleston due to a bro­ken brake light.) White dri­vers, mean­while, were stopped more often for obvi­ous safe­ty vio­la­tions, such as speed­ing, run­ning red lights and stop signs, and dri­ving under the influ­ence. Still, black dri­vers — except those sus­pect­ed of intox­i­cat­ed dri­ving — were always more like­ly to get searched than whites, no mat­ter the rea­son for the stop.

The find­ings in North Carolina echo those of a 2014 study by researchers at the University of Kansas, who found that Kansas City’s black dri­vers were stopped at near­ly three times the rate of whites fin­gered for sim­i­lar­ly minor violations.

Frank Baumgartner, the lead author of the UNC-Chapel Hill study, told Mother Jonesthat offi­cers through­out the state were twice as like­ly to use force against black dri­vers than white dri­vers. Of the esti­mat­ed 18 mil­lion stops that took place between 2002 and 2013 in North Carolina that were ana­lyzed by Baumgartner’s team, less than one per­cent involved the use of force. While offi­cers are required to report whether force was encoun­tered or deployed, and whether there were any injuries, “we don’t know if the injuries are seri­ous, and we don’t know if a gun was fired,” he says.http://​www​.moth​er​jones​.com/​k​e​v​i​n​-​d​r​u​m​/​2​0​1​5​/​0​4​/​n​o​r​t​h​-​c​a​r​o​l​i​n​a​-​t​r​a​f​f​i​c​-​s​t​ops