Disrespect Horrible , But Free-speech Sacrosanct

The lat­est brouha­ha sur­round­ing peo­ple mak­ing out­bursts at pub­lic fig­ures, par­tic­u­lar­ly the prime min­is­ter, should be met with laugh­ter, skep­ti­cism, and ridicule.
Laughter because Jamaican peo­ple have nev­er been shy about express­ing them­selves with a few choice pieces of dirty or bloody fab­ric, so what’s new?
Skepticism because peo­ple vow that the police are doing what­ev­er they do to embar­rass the prime min­is­ter. As such, there is this grand con­spir­a­cy to embar­rass Brogad), real­ly my people?
Is the Prime Minister embar­rassed by all the good work that the police do? Think about what you are think­ing and say­ing because of your politics.
Ridicule, because a few stu­pid police offi­cers who do not know their role or what their pow­ers are, decid­ed to inter­act with mem­bers of the pub­lic out­side the bounds of their author­i­ty, does that tar and feath­er the entire force?

The right to free­dom of speech is not grant­ed by any gov­ern­ment; it is a right bestowed upon all of us by our cre­ator. Notwithstanding, that right comes with some stip­u­la­tions. That is where human laws come in to offer guardrails.
For exam­ple, shout­ing bomb on a crowd­ed air­plane or in a crowd­ed the­ater or oth­er pub­lic spaces can lead to a stam­pede, result­ing in injuries and death. That is the rea­son that in some coun­tries, there are laws against such behavior.
So let us exam­ine the lat­est iter­a­tion that gen­er­at­ed this new out­rage at the prime min­is­ter. To begin with, I hard­ly believe the poor prime min­is­ter had any idea that some sil­ly police offi­cers were about to stu­pid­ly remove Shaquille Higgins from his home in Moneague Saint Ann, arrest and coerce an apol­o­gy out of him aimed at appeas­ing the prime min­is­ter or worse to embar­rass him.
Full dis­clo­sure, I have not heard the con­tent of the video in which mis­ter Higgins alleged­ly berat­ed the PM using some unseem­ly language.
‘If’ mis­ter Higgins uttered threats at the prime min­is­ter, the police had every right to inter­vene to warn mis­ter Higgins not to car­ry out those threats, as well as to inves­ti­gate whether he had the means to deliv­er on what­ev­er threats he may have made.
On the oth­er hand, it would be inter­est­ing to hear the side of the offi­cers who went to his home, took him into cus­tody and had him do a mean cul­pa to the prime minister.
At the same time, the offi­cers should explain what laws they used to appre­hend and force an apol­o­gy out of mis­ter Higgins.
There is no doubt that we Jamaicans are often rude, uncouth, coarse, and undu­ly dis­re­spect­ful. Still, unless those dis­re­spect­ful and uncouth actions play out in pub­lic, in which case the police have a role in enforc­ing the dis­or­der­ly con­duct statutes, offi­cers have no role.
If they are uttered on social media sites, it is up to those plat­forms to [police] those vio­la­tions by cen­sor­ing those kinds of speech. Unless, of course, there are direct threats in them aimed at someone.
As much as I despise the undu­ly coarse lan­guage, I believe more in the right to free speech. We do not need police to be enter­ing peo­ple’s homes to arrest them because they say things about politi­cians that are not nice.
Jamaica emerged from a dark peri­od where peo­ple’s doors would be bro­ken down by polit­i­cal thugs who would mur­der them for say­ing things against the oth­er party.
Thankfully those days are behind us.….….….….….… somewhat.
We do not need the police to take over and con­tin­ue those practices.

.

.

.

.

LIKE AND SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.