One of the things I learned as a child from my caregivers was to “speak the truth and speak it ever cost it what it will he who hides the wrong he did does the wrong thing still”>
Now I’m a man I still hear the same refrain today , mostly from rich white men who refer to themselves as Christian Conservatives.
I have always considered myself a Christian by faith even before I gave my life to the lord, because I was raised in a Christian home. It was that fundamental belief in God which prevented me from stealing, killing, and doing other things some find socially unacceptable.
As I deliberated for myself the merits of giving my life to Christ I sought to find ways to be Christ-like . I wanted to do the things Christ told us to do. I thought about Matthew 26:11 a woman broke an Alabaster box of precious ointment, she then used the ointment to wash Jesus’ feet then used her hair to dry them.
His disciples were not pleased but Jesus knowing their thoughts said unto them …10“Why do you bother the woman? For she has done a good deed to Me. 11“For you always have the poor with you; but you do not always have Me. 12“For when she poured this perfume on My body, she did it to prepare Me for burial.…
I will not talk about my interpretation of Conservatism suffice to say that Merriam-Webster.com. characterizes it this way.
CONSERVATISM<>A political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage).
On the basis of what Christ wants us to do I consider myself a Christian despite my filthy-rags dispositionn at times. I also see certain elements of my personal belief system in Merriam Webster’s eloquent characterization of Conservatism.
I am not particularly sold on the concept of individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage.
I do believe Government has a role to play in helping those who are unable to help themselves, not those who refuse to help themselves.
Despite my best efforts I haven’t found much commonality with the political right’s protestations of either Christianity or Conservatism and my ideas of either.
The Bible says by their fruits you shall know them.Matthew 7:20 …19“Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.20“So then, you will know them by their fruits. 21“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.…
I don’t want to judge who fit the bill of a christian and who doesn’t but when a philosophical perspective espouses Christian principles yet does everything antithetical to the faith I feel duty bound to at least say to people unconvinced or confused at the disconnect between words and deeds that they are charlatans and impostors.
♦The Political right espouses the right to life, I am not opposed, it is never man’s right to take life. Yet their defense of life stops after a woman gives birth.
They steadfastly believe a woman absolutely have no right to terminate a pregnancy even pregnancies which emanated from rapes or incestuous assaults.
Now Like I said previously I refuse to play God it’s above my pay-grade to decide who live or die like some white people believe when they deny taxpayers funds to help care for children after birth.
They oppose food-stamps and other benefits which would give babies the most basic sustenance.
They oppose every other forms of Governmental assistance which would sustain life even to those who cannot help themselves.
Where is the christian empathy and love
Yet they want massive buildup of military arsenal at the expense of social programs which would aid the least able to take care of themselves.
Ironically they have no problem giving lucrative tax-breaks to mega corporations which absolutely does not need the money.
And this is just on the charity end of the spectrum.
In order to elicit sympathy from them one has to be white Anglo-Saxon regardless of the travesty being visited on the victim. Where is their empathy for their fellow man? Where is their fidelity and obedience to the teachings of Jesus Christ?
In order to make Jesus palatable to themselves they had to change perceptions of what Jesus looked like. So Jesus Christ could not continue to be a dark-skinned Jewish man he had to be recreated to look like a long haired white male> Without equivocation that level of insecurity and hatred has got to be genetic.
♦ One of the amazing things to me is their disgusting inability to speak the truth . This is not a question of Left and Right , it’s a issue of White.
How do you straight faced call yourself a Christian then lie through your teeth ?
If God was vengeful where would these white men be?
Dr. John Henrik Clarke . born January 1, 1915 died July 16, 1998 Writer ‚Historian Professor, Hunter College in New York and at Cornell University.
When the early Europeans first met Africans, at the crossroads of history, it was a respectful meeting and the Africans were not slaves. Their nations were old before Europe was born. In this period of history, what was to be later known as “Africa” was an unknown place to the people who would someday be called, “Europeans.” Only the people of some of the Mediterranean Islands and a few states of what would become the Greek and Roman areas knew of parts of North Africa, and that was a land of mystery. After the rise and decline of Greek civilization and the Roman destruction of the city of Carthage, they made the conquered territories into a province which they called Africa, a word derived from “afri” and the name of a group of people about whom little is known. At first the word applied only to the Roman colonies in North Africa. There was a time when all dark-skinned people were called Ethiopians, for the Greeks referred to Africa.
Why Africana History? by Dr. John Henrik Clarke.
The unmitigated gall to copy an entire people’s history then do everything in their power to remove every trace of the greatness and grace of our ancestors is dumbfounding.
Black Lives matter Activists are now somehow anti-law enforcement? Why would any Black person be for a Law Enforcement model which kills their sons and daughters aunts and uncles and gets away with it.
What unvarnished arrogance?
Students don’t have the right to rise up on University Campuses and speak out against racial oppression in their Schools, their communities, their country, because some white guy decides who should speak and who shouldn’t?
On what Planet is this sustainable and without consequence?
When students at Dartmouth protest in solidarity with students of Mizzou and Yale white people get into chatt rooms and use all kinds of condescending language , clearly what they want is for black people to shut up and endure another 400 hundred years of tyranny.
Instead of relating to the obscene pogrom which have been visited on African people in this country and around the world and still continue today as some whites have done the majority of them wants silence.
Who the hell do they thing they are?
They engineer wars across the Globe . They engineer overthrow of governments with whom they disagree then label freedom fighters terrorists.
How sustainable will this continue to be? How many more years will the black and brown people of the Globe lay dormant even with the ravages of genocide inflicted on them through artificial diseases ‚wars and other methods of extermination? Do they think we are too stupid to understand whats going on ?
There is no Christian in their brand of Conservatism let’s be clear about that. In the same way there was no Christianity in their hearts when they interacted with the Africans and Native Indians then mercilessly massacred them, there is no Christianity in their hearts today.
They are the sons and daughters of darkness and the sooner we speak to these truths the better.
When Black people rise up and say Black lives matter what the hell is their problem ? All these people are saying is “our lives matter too” ! Their lives have always mattered.
We do not need them to validate this movement, and we certainly do not need the validation and support of those whom Professor Clarke so appropriately refer to as “white butt kissers”.
The fact that they are up in arms is that it’s causing them some disquiet, some discomfort, on that basis alone Black Lives Matter must not only continue it must intensify.
For hundreds of years they have massacred and raped with impunity, they have intimidated and wreaked all kinds of genocide and terror and Blacks people stood silently by and allowed them to get away with it.
It must end. Why would they not be indignant now they have always had things their way ? “Yes massa suh” !!