The attack on Haitian Immigrants in Springfield Ohio is not a mis­take it is a well designed dis­in­for­ma­tion cam­paign against a group of peo­ple that the Trump cam­paign believes he can demo­nize which will rile up his base of racist people.
Both Donald Trump and JD Vance knew it was not true that Haitians in that town were eat­ing peo­ple’s cats and dogs. Never mind that Vance is the US Senator from that very state. But Vance though a Yale Law School grad­u­ate delib­er­ate­ly chose to say that the Haitians in Springfield are from Asia- So much for the sup­posed supe­ri­or­i­ty of Ivy-League education.
The Trump/​Vance Campaign is a white suprema­cist cam­paign that aims to tap into the most vio­lent ele­ments of the American pop­u­la­tion to enrage them to the point they will intim­i­date oth­ers from going to the polls or even plant yard signs on their front lawns.
Every action tak­en by the Republican Party and the Trump cam­paign is intend­ed to pre­vent Black peo­ple from ben­e­fit­ting from any pol­i­cy in the United States. They see the data that shows the num­ber of white peo­ple dwin­dling and the num­ber of black and brown peo­ple increasing.

The Policy posi­tions that are front and cen­ter makes the point. Force women to have babies even if it kills them on the one hand and stop peo­ple of col­or from enter­ing the coun­try on the other.
The bel­li­cose rhetoric about bloody depor­ta­tions is only a pre­cur­sor to what Republicans have in mind for the country.
Demonizing black peo­ple have always been at the cen­ter of Republican pol­i­cy agen­da. They trot out their most heat­ed rhetoric against blacks every elec­tion cycle, but none in our life­time has been as heat­ed and dan­ger­ous as this one and with this fas­cist ticket.
Sadly, there are still Black peo­ple who sup­port the Republican Party which sad­ly is like the trees believ­ing the Axe is their friend because the angle is made of wood.
The Republicans are against Reparations.
Their cam­paign to do away with Social Security which is [not] an enti­tle­ment pro­gram is based sole­ly on the fact that old­er Black peo­ple also ben­e­fit from it.
They oppose relief of stu­dent loan debt by argu­ing that oth­ers in the past paid their stu­dent loans debt. Factually, poli­cies change all the time some­times peo­ple in the past ben­e­fit, some­times peo­ple in the present time ben­e­fit. Their goal is to do as much as pos­si­ble to keep the chains of pover­ty on peo­ple of color.
(1)

Trump’s Project 2025 allies are plot­ting to rip away Black women’s repro­duc­tive health care by ban­ning abor­tion nation­wide and restrict­ing access to con­tra­cep­tion and med­ica­tion abortion.

Their “Project 2025” blue­print includes pro­pos­als to require cov­er­age of nat­ur­al fam­i­ly plan­ning meth­ods and remove require­ments that insur­ance cov­er cer­tain emer­gency con­tra­cep­tion.” 

“As part of their 2025 wish list, con­ser­v­a­tives want to over­haul which forms of birth con­trol insur­ance com­pa­nies must cov­er for patients at no cost under the Affordable Care Act. For instance, they have draft­ed plans to allow insur­ers to drop cov­er­age of the emer­gency con­tra­cep­tive pill Ella, which some on the right believe is an abor­ti­fa­cient.

Women of col­or advo­cat­ing for abor­tion access point­ed out that restrict­ing access to mifepri­s­tone could wors­en racial health dis­par­i­ties. They argue that indi­vid­u­als of col­or and preg­nant peo­ple from mar­gin­al­ized com­mu­ni­ties are more like­ly to face sys­temic bar­ri­ers that lim­it their access to abor­tion and oth­er repro­duc­tive health care. As a result, they rely on meth­ods like med­ica­tion abortion.”

(2Some Republican-led states also are tar­get­ing in vit­ro fer­til­iza­tion as part of their wider strug­gle to lim­it repro­duc­tive rights, tear­ing open a ‘Pandora’s Box for Black women,’ who are plagued by infer­til­i­ty more than oth­er groups.

roject 2025 wants to take Trump’s dis­as­trous tax cuts — which rigged the econ­o­my for the ultra-rich and left work­ing Black fam­i­lies behind — even furtherProject 2025 wants to end Medicare as we know it, and they and oth­er MAGA Republicans want to gut Medicaid and restrict access to afford­able health care.

Project 2025 men­tions that states should have the abil­i­ty to impose work require­ments on Medicaid, which helps to cov­er med­ical costs for low-income peo­ple. Several Republican-led states, includ­ing Idaho, Missouri, and South Dakota, are already mak­ing plans to restruc­ture their Medicaid pro­grams — just in case Trump wins in November. Research shows that man­dat­ing work require­ments only fuels racial inequal­i­ty, giv­en the dis­crim­i­na­tion against Black Americans that exists in the low-wage mar­ket. Compared with white Americans, Black Americans are about half as like­ly to be called back for an entry-lev­el job, mean­ing that they’d be dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly bur­dened by work require­ments. Plus, reforms to Medicaid and oth­er social safe­ty net pro­grams have long been tied to stereo­types that por­tray Black Americans as lazy or schem­ing — recall the ‘wel­fare queen’ trope of the 1970s.

Project 2025 wants to roll back sev­er­al Biden-Harris admin­is­tra­tion edu­ca­tion poli­cies that help Black Americans achieve equal oppor­tu­ni­ty, includ­ing stu­dent debt relief and the Title I Program

Project 2025 advo­cates for rolling back the Biden administration’s more recent stu­dent debt relief efforts, which are root­ed in the pow­er that the Higher Education Act of 1965 grants to the U.S. Department of Education to ‘com­pro­mise, waive, or release loans.’ The pol­i­cy agen­da claims that the admin­is­tra­tion is ‘act­ing out­side of statu­to­ry author­i­ty.’ The admin­is­tra­tion has elim­i­nat­ed some $138 bil­lion worth of stu­dent loan debt so far. This month, it announced new plans that would tar­get the ‘dis­pro­por­tion­ate debt bur­den’ faced by Black bor­row­ers, who also would bear the brunt of any large-scale debt reg­u­la­tion reversal.”

“Project 2025 Wants to End Public Education.

Fifty eight 58 per­cent of African-American chil­dren can’t swim. That’s almost dou­ble the rate of white children. 
African-American chil­dren drown at near­ly three times the over­all rate. 
In the north thou­sands and thou­sands of pools were built but Blacks were rel­e­gat­ed to small indoor pools if any at all. In some munic­i­pal­i­ties city offi­cials and the police, yes the police, as you would have imag­ined encour­aged white swim­mers to beat black when they enter the pools instead of post­ing ‘whites only signs’, and that’s exact­ly what they did. 

According to Dr. JEFF WILTSE(U.S. History, University of Montana; Author, “Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America”): Cities like Pittsburgh, did not have an offi­cial pol­i­cy of racial seg­re­ga­tion at its pools. But rather, the police and the city offi­cials allowed, and in some cas­es encour­aged, white swim­mers to lit­er­al­ly beat black swim­mers out of the water, as a means of seg­re­gat­ing pools, as a means of intim­i­dat­ing them from try­ing to access pools.

Built in 1919, the Fairground Park pool in St. Louis, Missouri, was the largest in the coun­try and prob­a­bly the world, with a sandy beach, an elab­o­rate div­ing board, and a report­ed capac­i­ty of ten thou­sand swim­mers. When a new city admin­is­tra­tion changed the parks pol­i­cy in 1949 to allow Black swim­mers, the first inte­grat­ed swim end­ed in blood­shed. On June 21, two hun­dred white res­i­dents sur­round­ed the pool with “bats, clubs, bricks and knives” to men­ace the first thir­ty or so Black swim­mers. Over the course of the day, a white mob that grew to five thou­sand attacked every Black per­son in sight around the Fairground Park. After the Fairground Park Riot, as it was known, the city returned to a seg­re­ga­tion pol­i­cy using pub­lic safe­ty as a jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, but a suc­cess­ful NAACP law­suit reopened the pool to all St. Louisans the fol­low­ing sum­mer. On the first day of inte­grat­ed swim­ming, July 19, 1950, only sev­en white swim­mers at­tended, join­ing three brave Black swim­mers under the shouts of two hun­dred white pro­test­ers. That first inte­grat­ed sum­mer, Fairground logged just 10,000 swims — down from 313,000 the pre­vi­ous sum­mer. The city closed the pool for good six years lat­er. Racial hatred led to St. Louis drain­ing one of the most prized pub­lic pools in the world.
Instead of shar­ing the pool they drained the pool/.

Trump’s Racist lies about Haitians in Springfield Ohio eat­ing cats and dogs though proven to be a bla­tant lie, does not mat­ter to Trump, Vance or the Fascists inbreds who fol­low them. Springfield is every small town in America that used to have white pick­et fences and homoge­nous white pop­u­la­tions. They are now becom­ing mixed race communities.
It’s not about Springfield Ohio, it is about every small town across America that has seen racial integration.
Wait.….…what year are we in? Oh, it’s 2024 and this is the con­ver­sa­tions we are hav­ing. The very same con­ver­sa­tions blacks were hav­ing before the Civil Rights fights of the 1960s.
Then black men got fat and com­fort­able. They fight among them­selves, dis­re­spect their allies and pay homage to their enemies.
Most of the edu­cat­ed women have fig­ured it out and a few of the men but by and large most Black American are clueless.

Portage County Sheriff Bruce Zachowski appar­ent­ly said on Facebook offi­cials could send “the Illegal human ‘Locust’” to homes sup­port­ing the vice president.

America is at a piv­otal inter­sec­tion as it relates to its iden­ti­ty. For most of the two hun­dred and forty-eight years that the nation exist­ed, white men have main­tained con­trol and direc­tion­al auton­o­my over the coun­try through a well-exe­cut­ed set of strate­gies that includes all kinds of bar­bar­ic prac­tices, includ­ing slav­ery and all of its geno­ci­dal offshoots.
Throughout that time, they (white men) have main­tained a sys­tem in which they ben­e­fit across all stra­ta of American life while tight­en­ing the screws on main­tain­ing con­trol, even as cur­rent data points to the excit­ing dynam­ic of America becom­ing a major­i­ty-minor­i­ty nation.
In Texas, minor­i­ty groups with Hispanics as the dom­i­nant group already make up six­ty per­cent of that state’s population. 
The Republican fight to stop the inevitable from becom­ing inevitable is at the fore­front of the widen­ing under­stand­ing gap between the coun­try’s two polit­i­cal parties. 
With alter­nate immi­gra­tion sce­nar­ios, the whole United States is pro­ject­ed to become major­i­ty-minor­i­ty some­time between 2041 and 2046.
As a con­se­quence, White men and the women who love them, afraid of the prospect of los­ing the built-in white priv­i­lege they have enjoyed for the dura­tion of the Republic, have moved en-masse to the Republican par­ty and have solid­i­fied behind a white suprema­cist con­vict­ed felon.
A clos­er look at the wedge issues that the Republicans have been using points direct­ly to the con­cerns white Republicans have that the nation mov­ing to a plu­ral­is­tic soci­ety will relieve them of white privilege.
Hence, (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN), let us ensure that we take America back to when we could say and do what­ev­er we want­ed and no one could stop us.

Let’s look at the issues they are cham­pi­oning toward that end.
(1) Immigration
(2) Anti-Abortion
(3) Woke
(4) Book burning
(5) J D Vance’s attack on women who do not have children
(6) Trump’s race dur­ing his pres­i­den­cy to place polit­i­cal hacks on the Federal bench to usurp the will of the peo­ple through their legislators

Stop peo­ple of col­or from enter­ing the Country, and force women to have babies even if they are raped or are vic­tims of incest. Black and brown babies born as a con­se­quence already face built-in ear­ly crim­i­nal­iza­tion by the police from ear­ly child­hood. There are more than enough pris­ons to hold them. They are dis­man­tling pub­lic edu­ca­tion and burn­ing books to turn back the enlight­en­ment of black peo­ple in particular.
They fun­da­men­tal­ly believe these actions will stop the chang­ing racial dynam­ics in the coun­try. This explains the sol­id block of loy­al sup­port Trump enjoys.
White men will nev­er admit to the unearned priv­i­leges they enjoy sole­ly based on their skin col­or. Still, they will assail any­one who has a bite of the American dream through doors forced open through pro­grams such as the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiative.
Legacy and oth­er priv­i­leges that are rou­tine for white peo­ple are far more ques­tion­able, as in many cas­es, the recip­i­ents are not wor­thy of the insti­tu­tions they are allowed in. People of col­or, on the oth­er hand, who ben­e­fit from DEI or oth­er ini­tia­tives must first be super qual­i­fied even to be con­sid­ered for a place in those same institutions.
Most impor­tant­ly, we must seri­ous­ly con­sid­er any­one who has prob­lems with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

Facing the very dis­tinct prospect of whites becom­ing a minor­i­ty, the Republican par­ty has embarked on the process­es I out­lined, but that is only the begin­ning. The Judges and Justices farmed and placed on the Federal courts at all lev­els is insur­ance that even as whites become numer­i­cal­ly few­er, the voic­es of the mass­es will be drowned out by the courts. Eileen Cannon and oth­ers at the District lev­el, sev­er­al Appellate cir­cuits, and the reac­tionar­ies on the high­est court have demon­strat­ed that they are pre­pared to shred the Constitution in ser­vice to the leader of the white Supremacist movement.
Samuel Alito, one of the right-wing reac­tionar­ies on the high­est court, was in a con­ver­sa­tion with a doc­u­men­tary film­mak­er pos­ing as a right-wing activist. He was not shy about speak­ing his mind about where he stood in retain­ing white control.
“I don’t know that we can nego­ti­ate with the left in the way that needs to hap­pen for the polar­iza­tion to end,” Lauren Windsor said at one point in the con­ver­sa­tion. “I think it’s a mat­ter of, like, winning.”
“I think you’re prob­a­bly right,” Alito replied. “One side or the oth­er is going to win. I don’t know. There can be a way of work­ing and liv­ing togeth­er peace­ful­ly. Still, it isn’t easy, you know, because there are dif­fer­ences in fun­da­men­tal things that real­ly can’t be com­pro­mised. They real­ly can’t be com­pro­mised. So it’s not like you are going to split the difference.”

In short, the Right-wing white nation­al­ists who pop­u­late the Heritage Foundation that pop­u­lat­ed the Supreme Court and oth­er fed­er­al courts did so to over­rule the will of the peo­ple even though the struc­tur­al builtin-ins such as the so-called Electoral College and the out­ra­geous two United States Senators per state have already drowned out the voic­es of tens of mil­lions of Americans and all but cement­ed minor­i­ty rule in the nation.
In 2000, George Bush lost the pop­u­lar vote but was anoint­ed pres­i­dent by the law­less right-wing Supreme Court that decid­ed to stop the vote count and anoint Bush President.
Bush would go on to win reelec­tion in 2004 and win the pop­u­lar vote as a con­se­quence of the ⁹⁄₁₁ attacks. George Bush will be remem­bered as one of the worst pres­i­dents ever. 
No Republican run­ning for the pres­i­den­cy has won the pop­u­lar vote since. The data has caused a par­a­digm shift in how the Republican peo­ple view their approach to nation­al elec­tions, Democracy, and much more.
No longer do they wrap them­selves in the American flag; they no longer care about democ­ra­cy. They now admire despots and dic­ta­tors like Vladimir Putin, Viktor Orban, and Kim Jong Un.

Get ready for an unbe­liev­able polit­i­cal dra­ma! In this video, we dive into the bizarre sce­nario of JD Vance stalk­ing Kamala Harris on the tar­mac. What’s real­ly going on? JD Vance, a U.S. Senator and Vice Presidential can­di­date, was caught shad­ow­ing Vice President Kamala Harris with Secret Service agents in tow. Why was he allowed to get so close, and what was he hop­ing to achieve? Is this an attempt to impress Donald Trump, or some­thing more sin­is­ter? Join us as we unrav­el this creepy and unprece­dent­ed sit­u­a­tion. Don’t miss out on this wild polit­i­cal showdown!

Terrific move my VP Harris…

Kamala Harris’ pres­i­den­tial cam­paign is bring­ing on a new ech­e­lon of senior advis­ers, most promi­nent­ly David Plouffe, the for­mer top polit­i­cal advis­er to Barack Obama. The per­son­nel move fol­lows weeks of spec­u­la­tion — and lob­by­ing from some Harris allies — to inject a fresh set of eyes into the cam­paign appa­ra­tus she inher­it­ed from President Joe Biden after he dropped his reelec­tion bid last month Plouffe was Obama’s 2008 cam­paign man­ag­er and in 2012 served a sim­i­lar role in Obama’s reelec­tion from his perch as a White House senior adviser.

Donald Trump, like any oth­er cheap con­fi­dence hus­tler, knows all too well the pow­er Religion has over vul­ner­a­ble and gullible peo­ple. It is no sur­prise that after a life­time of being a Democrat and sup­port­ing Democratic can­di­dates he switched par­ty and decid­ed to run as a Republican.
Before he ran he said if he ever decid­ed to run he would run as a Republican because they are stu­pid. He also knew that many of them claimed to be Christians while being fun­da­men­tal­ly racist and xeno­pho­bic, in oth­er words they were exact­ly like him.
Former President Barack Obama in a pri­vate set­ting before he was elect­ed, in a rae slip-up said, Republicans cling to guns and Bibles, a tes­ta­ment that he under­stood the cult like ded­i­ca­tion those vot­ers had to reli­gion and whiteness.

All across the world, cheap hus­tlers use reli­gion as a tool to threat­en hell fire to gullible peo­ple who open up their wal­lets to them, leav­ing them­selves with­out. In the mean­time they fly in style in elober­ate gulf­stream jets, live in lav­ish man­sions and pay no taxes.
It is no sur­prise that every con­fi­dence hus­tler wants to wear a col­lar so they may blud­geon the gullible with threats of hell fire and clean out their wal­lets and pocketbooks.
Though not reli­gious Donald Trump is at least smart enough as anoth­er kind of con artiste how to exploit the gulli­bil­i­ty of the wet mind­ed. Right after order­ing General Mark Milley to shoot down peace­ful pro­test­ers in DC and was rebuffed by the General, he had his police goon-squad beat and tear­gas those pro­tes­tors so they could clear space to could stand in front of a church with a Bible held upside down as a prop.

Despite this most Anti-Christ-like action from this most despi­ca­ble con ‑artiste, tens of mil­lions of racist so-called Christians flock to this imbe­cel­lic clown as if he is the sec­ond com­ing of the Messiah.
There was nev­er any rea­son to doubt that those peo­ple would flock to a char­la­tan like Donald John Trump, their par­ents and grand­par­ents would lit­er­al­ly leave church ser­vices and attend­ing the lynch­ing of Black Americans.

The dis­s­a­point­ment today comes from some of the Black religous hus­tlers who are too dumb to rec­og­nize that reli­gion is noth­ing more than a tool of phy­cho­log­i­cal and men­tal con­trol. The fear of God and hell­fire keeps purs­es and pock­et­books open and adher­ents con­trolled and sup­pli­cant. I expect­ed white Christians to fol­low the pied ‑piper but the black ones does alarm me,- then I recall that there were Black cool-aid drinkers with Jim Jones in the South American Jungles too. So it should come as no sur­prise that the great con artiste on Friday told a bunch of ador­ing racist reli­gious zealots dur­ing an event in Florida, “You won’t have to vote in future, we’ll have it fixed.” 
He encour­aged them to vote but assured them that if he is elect­ed they won’t have to vote anymore.
And they cheered!!!”
Christians get out and vote. Just this time,” he urged. “You won’t have to do it any­more. Four more years. You know what? It’ll be fixed. It’ll be fine. You won’t have to vote any­more my beau­ti­ful Christians.”
And the Sheep cheered some more!!!

In this riv­et­ing polit­i­cal analy­sis, explore the per­plex­ing real­i­ty that felons can’t vote but can run for President of the United States. The sad irony is glar­ing, reflect­ing deep-root­ed sys­temic issues with­in the American legal and polit­i­cal frame­work. This video delves into the nuances of the U.S. Constitution, its sparse cri­te­ria for pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates, and the con­trast­ing dis­en­fran­chise­ment of ordi­nary cit­i­zens con­vict­ed of felonies. The war being waged here isn’t just legal but moral and social, ques­tion­ing the very fab­ric of jus­tice and equal­i­ty in America. Through his­tor­i­cal ref­er­ences and present-day par­al­lels, this dis­cus­sion seeks to uncov­er how these laws are solid­i­fy­ing white suprema­cy and mar­gin­al­iz­ing the African-American com­mu­ni­ty. The notion of inte­gra­tion into a burn­ing house, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once feared, is exam­ined, high­light­ing the ongo­ing strug­gles for civ­il rights and true jus­tice. The video empha­sizes the impor­tance of self-reliance and eco­nom­ic future for the African-American com­mu­ni­ty, urg­ing view­ers to con­sid­er the broad­er impli­ca­tions of these legal dis­crep­an­cies. Share your thoughts in the com­ments, sub­scribe for more inci­sive analy­sis, and like the video to sup­port these crit­i­cal dis­cus­sions. Join us in scru­ti­niz­ing the inter­sec­tion of law, race, and pol­i­tics in America today.

In this com­pelling polit­i­cal analy­sis, the video delves into the recent com­ments made by Donald Trump, exam­in­ing the impact on the African-American com­mu­ni­ty. The dis­cus­sion high­lights Trump’s attempts to solid­i­fy white suprema­cy and the sad irony behind his state­ments. The war being waged against black Americans is dis­sect­ed through the lens of his­tor­i­cal and cur­rent events, reveal­ing a cold war of ide­olo­gies and inte­gra­tion into a burn­ing house. With a focus on self-reliance and the eco­nom­ic future of black Americans, the video under­scores the role of black women in hold­ing Trump accountable.

From Maryland Governor Wes Moore’s poignant remarks to the deter­mined efforts of New York State Attorney General Tish James and District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the video paints a vivid pic­ture of how black women in sig­nif­i­cant roles are poised to make Trump pay. This analy­sis also explores the broad­er impli­ca­tions of civ­il rights and the ongo­ing strug­gle for equality.

Viewers are encour­aged to share their thoughts in the com­ments, sub­scribe for more in-depth analy­sis, and like the video to sup­port these cru­cial dis­cus­sions. Join the con­ver­sa­tion and stay informed on the ever-evolv­ing polit­i­cal landscape.

#TrumpControversy #BlackJobs #TrumpCommentsOnJobs #BlackWorkerChallenges #TrumpRacism

CHAPTERS:
00:00 — Donald Trump’s “Black Jobs

So much has hap­pened over the last few weeks that it keeps one’s head swivel­ing on the neck like a bob­ble-head­ed doll. Biden was at Camp David prep­ping for a debate against the for­mer pres­i­dent Donald Trump, who served as the 45^th pres­i­dent of the United States. Biden then stunk up the dis­cus­sion, prompt­ing calls to drop out of the race and give some­one else a chance to con­front Donald Trump. Then Trump just con­ve­nient­ly sur­vived what they are call­ing an assas­si­na­tion attempt, emerg­ing with fist-pump­ing, blood streak­ing across his face, whol­ly exposed while held up by secret ser­vice agents.
Donald Trump would raise his head to pump his fist before enter­ing an SUV. I would have thought that the Secret Service would not have allowed him to expose him­self to an exis­ten­tial threat looming.
The media is now in full Trump-wor­ship mode, includ­ing left-wing media, as if it was­n’t Donald J Trump who called for vio­lence against peo­ple who even dared to crit­i­cize him.
Added to the mix is the white nation­al­ist con­ven­tion in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that will crown Trump King, Trump choos­ing Ohio junior US Senator JD Vance as his ‘Hand,’ hav­ing the likes of Marco Rubio cry­ing in his milk. 

Donald Trump was impeached twice even though the Republican Senate con­trolled by Mitch McConnell refused to con­vict and toss him from the psy­che of America and back to real­i­ty Television.
Trump refused to leave office after he lost and, in the process, con­coct­ed an elab­o­rate scheme that includ­ed plans to have the mil­i­tary con­fis­cate bal­lot box­es com­ing from pre­dom­i­nant­ly Black neigh­bor­hoods, pre­sent­ing false slates of elec­tors to cer­ti­fy the vote for him­self, have Mike Pence refuse to approve the elec­tions, (a pure­ly cer­e­mo­ni­al process, as the Vice President has no Constitutional author­i­ty to decer­ti­fy a pres­i­den­tial election.
Trump also filed motions across the nation alleg­ing fraud, which judges debunked, even those he appoint­ed. When all failed, Donald Trump riled up a mob of cave dwellers, point­ed them at the Capitol on January 6^th, 2021, and told them to fight, or else they would not have a coun­try any­more. We all know the result; it is a day that will live in infamy.

Donald Trump has paid no price for his crimes. As I am writ­ing this arti­cle, Democratic US Senator from New Jersey Robert Menendez was con­vict­ed by the sys­tem on cor­rup­tion charges. Despite hav­ing been adjudged a rapist in New York State Court and hav­ing been con­vict­ed on 34 felony counts of elec­tion inter­fer­ence as well, no ver­dict has been issued against him.
He is like a Duck with water sim­ply run­ning off his back. In any oth­er coun­try, a polit­i­cal leader who insti­gat­ed a vio­lent insur­rec­tion against his own coun­try would have already faced the jus­tice sys­tem for his crimes and would be cool­ing his heels in prison or worse. In America, hav­ing com­mit­ted those crimes, Donald Trump has yet to stand up in a court of law to answer for those crimes.
Why has Trump not faced jus­tice? In less than three years as pres­i­dent, Donald Trump was able to poi­son the judi­cia­ry at every lev­el, result­ing in an inex­pe­ri­enced syco­phant, Aileen Cannon, act­ing as a fed­er­al judge, throw­ing out the fed­er­al doc­u­ments cas­es against Trump. This was a shock­ing dis­play by the neo­phyte judge, who has been twice reversed on rul­ings by the appel­late cir­cuit in the same case.
But it’s not just the Colombian- Carmalita who has sold out to the con­vict­ed felon, now par­ty leader; the Supreme Court all but changed the rules to try and ensure that Donald Trump nev­er faces jus­tice. According to the right-wing rad­i­cals on the court, a pres­i­dent can now com­mit any crime he wants with­out even being ques­tioned about it.
The sad irony is that the judi­cial branch of gov­ern­ment, the insti­tu­tion charged with pro­tect­ing the demo­c­ra­t­ic exper­i­ment, has attacked the very foun­da­tion of that democ­ra­cy with a sledgehammer.
The war being waged in America between the Democrats is not a war for polit­i­cal pow­er. The par­ty that was once the Republican Party is now a white pow­er par­ty that is unable to win at the bal­lot box and has tak­en the deci­sion to end the American sys­tem as we know it to gain and keep white con­trol. The ado­ra­tion for Donald Trump through white America is based total­ly on this and noth­ing else.
Their refusal to accept Joe Biden as the legit­i­mate­ly elect­ed pres­i­dent of the United States harkens back to a time in American History that cul­mi­nat­ed in a Civil War.

Jefferson Davis was the first and only pres­i­dent of the Confederacy. He served in that capac­i­ty from 1861 to 1865. The rea­son Jefferson Davis was the Confederacy’s only pres­i­dent was that the Confederacy, a trea­so­nous insur­gency, did not sur­vive; it was defeat­ed when the South lost the Civil War. Davis was a cot­ton planter in Mississippi who owned as many as 113 Black peo­ple as slaves.
During the Civil War, Davis served as com­man­der in chief of the Confederate armies. The Confederacy was defeat­ed in 1865, and Davis was cap­tured, he was accused of trea­son, and imprisoned.
Jefferson Davis was released with­out tri­al after two years. Davis was often blamed for the Confederacy’s defeat, but after his release from prison, he became a hero of the Confederacy.
Jefferson Davis’ lega­cy as Confederate leader is still cel­e­brat­ed in the South, how­ev­er, he is fre­quent­ly crit­i­cized as a sup­port­er of slav­ery and racism, and many of the memo­ri­als ded­i­cat­ed to him through­out the United States have been removed.
The United States is at a crit­i­cal junc­ture today in many ways, as before the Civil War in 1861.

The South, heav­i­ly invest­ed in the con­tin­u­a­tion of slav­ery, threat­ened to secede from the Union if the new­ly formed Republican Party tried to end the prac­tice. The Republican Party at the time was less favor­able to the prac­tice of slav­ery. On November 6, 1860, vot­ers in the United States went to the polls in an elec­tion that end­ed with Abraham Lincoln as President. The elec­tion of Abraham Lincoln would even­tu­al­ly lead to the Civil War. Lincoln’s vic­to­ry didn’t hap­pen on that day, and his vic­to­ry wasn’t set­tled for months. It was expect­ed that at least sev­en states would take steps to leave the Union if and when Lincoln was elect­ed well before he was inau­gu­rat­ed as President in March 1861.
When Lincoln and his peo­ple final­ly received the news via tele­graph from New York that he had won the elec­tion, Lincoln report­ed­ly walked home and broke the news to his wife, then went to bed. Lincoln was bur­dened by the very present dan­ger of seces­sion that could hap­pen with the news of his acces­sion to the presidency.
Lincoln wor­ried that the Democrats may unite around a sin­gle can­di­date. He wor­ried that his par­ty, the Republican Party, may replace him with an alter­na­tive can­di­date, or worse, that the south­ern states boy­cotted the Electoral College.
Much of Abraham Lincoln’s fears were real­ized; nev­er­the­less, the south­ern states did take part in the Electoral College process, and Lincoln’s elec­tion was cer­ti­fied in Congress in February 1861. But there was a more fab­u­lous than reg­u­lar mil­i­tary pres­ence on Capitol Hill. 
By the time Lincoln became President in March 1861, replac­ing the feck­less James Buchanan, sev­en south­ern states had left the Union — all before Lincoln’s elec­tion was cer­ti­fied in Congress on February 15, 1861.

Joe Biden faces the same head­winds today that Abraham Lincoln faced in 1860 – 1861 and beyond. The Republican Party is not unmind­ful of the events of the ear­ly 1860s. Despite the Civil War’s resul­tant car­nage, the Republican par­ty is walk­ing America right back to the brink as the Democrats did in 1861.
Kevin Roberts, the pres­i­dent of the Heritage Foundation, the group that pop­u­lat­ed the Supreme Court with right-wing reac­tionar­ies and the leader of Trump’s 2025 Manifesto, recent­ly declared, ‘The coun­try is in the midst of a “sec­ond American Revolution” that will be blood­less “if the left allows it to be.”
The nation is in the throes of a cold war, and the Democrats are fast asleep. The align­ment of wealthy cor­po­ra­tions and poor whites who nev­er quite fig­ured out how to cash in their white priv­i­lege is all about one thing and one thing only; it is about solid­i­fy­ing white suprema­cy in the face of the brown­ing of America.

In this video, Mike takes a deep dive into the his­to­ry of black men sup­port­ing Trump, reveal­ing the com­plex­i­ties and ironies involved. He starts by recount­ing a piv­otal moment in recent his­to­ry: when Jim Comey announced an inves­ti­ga­tion into Secretary Hillary Clinton, lead­ing to a cas­cade of events that ulti­mate­ly result­ed in Donald Trump’s elec­tion. Mike points out that the Republicans’ choice to nom­i­nate a 34-count indict­ed felon for pres­i­dent sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent, espe­cial­ly con­sid­er­ing the pro­found impact of the Criminal Justice System on black men in the United States. 

The irony is stark: while many black men who have felonies are dis­en­fran­chised, the Republican nom­i­nee retains his right to vote. Mike responds to the action tak­en by black men who open­ly sup­port Trump, con­trast­ing it with the lack of sup­port from black women. He argues that edu­ca­tion in American his­to­ry is invalu­able, espe­cial­ly for those wear­ing MAGA caps with­out under­stand­ing the deep­er his­tor­i­cal and social impli­ca­tions. Join the dis­cus­sion on this crit­i­cal top­ic. Share your thoughts below, hit the sub­scribe but­ton for more analy­sis, and don’t for­get to like this video to sup­port our discussions. 

In this video titled “Trump’s Return: A Threat Worse Than You Think,” Mike points out the grave con­cerns sur­round­ing Donald Trump’s poten­tial return to pow­er. Analyzing President Joe Biden’s per­for­mance and the Democratic par­ty’s strate­gic dilem­mas, Mike dives deep into the press­ing issues fac­ing America today. He responds to the actions tak­en by the Supreme Court, high­light­ing how Trump’s influ­ence has set a dan­ger­ous prece­dent, risk­ing the nation’s demo­c­ra­t­ic fabric.

Mike’s polit­i­cal analy­sis delves into Biden’s achieve­ments and con­tro­ver­sies, includ­ing his stance on for­eign pol­i­cy and patri­o­tism. The dis­cus­sion under­scores the crit­i­cal need for uni­ty with­in the Democratic and inde­pen­dent vot­er bases to avoid a repeat of Trump’s pres­i­den­cy. With ref­er­ences to recent polit­i­cal shifts in Britain and France, Mike empha­sizes the impor­tance of col­lec­tive action in safe­guard­ing democracy.

Share your thoughts below, hit the sub­scribe but­ton for more analy­sis, and don’t for­get to like this video to sup­port our dis­cus­sions on cur­rent events and polit­i­cal issues.

#DemocraticParty #BidenVsTrump #VoterSuppression #VotingRightsAct #JudiciaryPower

#DemocraticParty #TrumpThreat #BidenVsTrump #RepublicanParty #ScotusDecisions

President Joe Biden’s flubs, inco­her­ence, and loss of his thoughts mid-sen­tence dur­ing the debates against Donald Trump are legit­i­mate things that the Democratic Party should be talk­ing about. The Democratic Party is not a cult like the Republican Party that bows in fear to the dic­tates of its dear leader. Many argue that talk­ing about Biden’s débâ­cle of a debate weak­ens their can­di­date; this is absolute hog­wash. Burying one’s head in the sand and pre­tend­ing that the issue before us will dis­ap­pear is not a good strategy.
They argue that talk­ing about Biden empow­ers Trump. Realistically, every­one talk­ing about Joe Biden wants to defeat Donald Trump in November. They say there is no room for error and want to ensure they put up the best can­di­date to defeat Trump. Those vot­ers will sup­port Joe Biden; they want the best shot at doing so.

Having seen the whole debate, your hum­ble ser­vant has been among those who called for the President to step aside. Biden’s friends talk about his suc­cess­es; no ratio­nal per­son can deny them, but not every­one is hap­py with some oth­er things. For exam­ple, Biden’s full-throat­ed sup­port of the Zionist Criminal who leads the Apartheid state of Israel’s war crimes against the Palestinian people. 
They also dis­cuss Biden’s patri­o­tism for his coun­try. The most patri­ot­ic thing any­one can do is put their ego and self aside and put their coun­try before them­selves. Biden has been a suc­cess­ful pres­i­dent by every met­ric in this first term.
He could have walked away and been seen as a hero by allow­ing some­one younger and more dynam­ic to take the lead. Kamala Harris is up to the task. Having said the fore­gone, if the President decides to stay, the par­ty needs to coa­lesce around him in the face of the exis­ten­tial threat Donald Trump, the Republican Party, and the Supreme Court pos­es, not just to our freedoms but our very lives.
I sat in on a casu­al dis­cus­sion over the week­end with some peo­ple I con­sid­er pret­ty intel­li­gent: Black peo­ple. I was stunned at the lack of recog­ni­tion of the threat the nation faces if Donald Trump were ever to return to the pres­i­den­cy and the seri­ous threat he pos­es to Black peo­ple’s exis­tence in America.
Donald Trump would be a lot more pow­er­ful if he returned to pow­er. He has at his dis­pos­al a cor­rupt Supreme Court he fash­ioned in his image, hav­ing been allowed to place three mem­bers on the nine-mem­ber Court, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, in addi­tion to the cor­rupt Thomas Alito and the acqui­es­cent Roberts.
Trump’s acolytes have pre­pared a Fascist doc­u­ment, Project 2025, a blue­print for auto­crat­ic rule; the Supreme Court in Trump V US gave Donald Trump a free hand to exter­mi­nate his oppo­nents with­out consequence.
Please read the doc­u­ment; we are not being shrill or hyperbolic.

https://​www​.pro​jec​t2025​.org

Joe Biden is still the President of the United States, yet we have seen the pow­er of a court fash­ioned in the image of a Fascist dic­ta­tor. The Court has sin­gle-hand­ed­ly struck down set­tled laws. Every court mem­ber told the Senate they would respect (stare deci­sis, let­ting the prece­dent stand). The six right-wing reac­tionar­ies on the Court all lied as they engaged in dis­man­tling what Steve Bannon calls the Administrative State. John Roberts alone has shown him­self to be a patho­log­i­cal liar.
As Chief Justice, Roberts has presided over 21 prece­dent-over­turn­ing cas­es and vot­ed to over­turn prece­dent in 17 (81%).
The Court dis­man­tled the 1965 Voting Rights Act using the laugh­able log­ic that there was no longer a need to pro­tect Black vot­ers because there was no longer any­one stop­ping them from vot­ing. That ver­dict prompt­ed a bar­rage of vot­er sup­pres­sion laws across the South and oth­er parts of the country.
The Court struck down Roe V Wade in its Dobbs deci­sion. Roe has been the law of the land for forty-nine years. The Red States imme­di­ate­ly began pass­ing laws lim­it­ing and crim­i­nal­iz­ing abor­tions. They are com­ing for con­tra­cep­tion soon. Clarence Thomas all but told them to do it, and the high­est Court will decide in their favor.
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, she over­turned Chevron USA v. National Resources Defense Council² and the fed­er­al judi­cia­ry’s forty-year-old prac­tice of defer­ring to agen­cies’ rea­son­able inter­pre­ta­tions of ambigu­ous fed­er­al laws. In a 6 – 3 deci­sion, Chief Justice Roberts wrote that the judi­cia­ry has the sole pre­rog­a­tive to “say what the law is.
Roberts and his cronies on the Court arro­gat­ed to them­selves the pow­er to decide over qual­i­fied sci­en­tists and experts on crit­i­cal issues of life and death. Agencies like the FDA, CDC, OSHA, EPA, and oth­ers are far weak­er today because the lawyers in the high­est Court know more than the sci­en­tists in these agencies.
Even more fright­en­ing is the deci­sion of Trump ver­sus the US, the Roberts court hold­ing: Under our con­sti­tu­tion­al struc­ture of sep­a­rat­ed pow­ers, the nature of Presidential pow­er enti­tles a for­mer President to absolute immu­ni­ty from crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion for actions with­in his con­clu­sive and pre­clude — sive con­sti­tu­tion­al authority.
This means that Trump can now shoot any­one on 5^th Avenue, and he can­not be prosecuted.
Trump’s peo­ple say this is a sec­ond Revolution that will be blood­less if those who dis­agree with them bow down to the MAGA agenda.
It is fright­en­ing to the tenth degree that we could be dither­ing about what we do not like about Joe Biden and Kamala Harris at this time.
Voters in France under­stood what was at stake, and so they band­ed togeth­er, put their dif­fer­ences aside, and ensured that the Fascist right wing did not take pow­er in their country.
Voters in Britain turned their backs on the Conservative Right and returned Labor to pow­er for the first time in four­teen years.
In America, a sin­gle-term, twice-impeached, pussy-grab­bing, thir­ty-four-count con­vict­ed felon is lead­ing in the polls.
Democratic and Independent vot­ers do not have the lux­u­ry of cut­ting off their noses to spite their faces.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

In this video, Mike expos­es the Supreme Court’s dan­ger­ous pow­er grab and its poten­tial impli­ca­tions for democ­ra­cy. If the pres­i­den­t’s actions are deemed legal by an out-of-con­trol Supreme Court, what stops President Biden from declar­ing no more elec­tions? Mike points out that this sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent, turn­ing the pres­i­den­cy into a de fac­to monar­chy. He responds to the action tak­en by the Supreme Court, sug­gest­ing that President Biden could use this unchecked pow­er to declare him­self pres­i­dent for life. This sce­nario, while out­ra­geous, high­lights the Supreme Court’s alarm­ing stance on pres­i­den­tial immunity.

Join the dis­cus­sion as Mike delves into how these judi­cial deci­sions affect Jamaica, polit­i­cal analy­sis, and cur­rent events. Share your thoughts below, hit the sub­scribe but­ton for more analy­sis, and don’t for­get to like this video to sup­port our discussions.

#Monarchyusa #Powergrab #Bidenimmune #Legalcontrol #Bidenpresidency

In this crit­i­cal polit­i­cal analy­sis, Mike delves into the alarm­ing impli­ca­tions of the recent Supreme Court rul­ing under the Roberts Court, describ­ing it as a “five-alarm fire for democ­ra­cy.” This deci­sion on pres­i­den­tial immu­ni­ty, involv­ing for­mer pres­i­dent Donald Trump, sets a dan­ger­ous prece­dent that could fun­da­men­tal­ly alter the United States’ demo­c­ra­t­ic prin­ci­ples. Mike points out how the court’s decree poten­tial­ly grants sit­ting pres­i­dents unprece­dent­ed pow­er, effec­tive­ly cre­at­ing an impe­r­i­al pres­i­den­cy. Drawing on his­tor­i­cal con­text from the American Revolutionary War and ref­er­enc­ing the Federalist Papers, Mike responds to the action tak­en by the Supreme Court, high­light­ing the grav­i­ty of Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson’s dissents.

This rul­ing, accord­ing to Mike, erodes account­abil­i­ty and restraint, pos­ing a sig­nif­i­cant threat to the repub­lic’s integri­ty. Share your thoughts below, hit the sub­scribe but­ton for more analy­sis, and don’t for­get to like this video to sup­port our dis­cus­sions on cur­rent events and polit­i­cal analy­sis. Your engage­ment helps us con­tin­ue to bring insight­ful com­men­tary on crit­i­cal issues affect­ing our democracy.

The Dread Scott Decision: America’s Darkest Hour is an in-depth polit­i­cal analy­sis by Mike dis­cussing the most con­tro­ver­sial Supreme Court deci­sions in US his­to­ry. Mike points out how the Supreme Court, orig­i­nal­ly intend­ed as the final arbiter of jus­tice for all Americans, has some­times set a dan­ger­ous prece­dent with its rul­ings. Starting with the infa­mous Dread Scott v. 

Sanford deci­sion, which denied African-Americans cit­i­zen­ship, Mike delves into how this rul­ing and oth­ers like Plessy v. Ferguson and Korematsu v. United States have shaped America’s dark­est hours. He responds to the action tak­en by the Court over time, high­light­ing the impor­tance of the 13^th and 14^th Amendments in over­turn­ing such deci­sions. Through a seri­ous and ana­lyt­i­cal lens, Mike empha­sizes the need for a fair and just Supreme Court. Share your thoughts below, hit the sub­scribe but­ton for more analy­sis, and don’t for­get to like this video to sup­port our dis­cus­sions. #mike­beck­les