Breaking Ranks, Former Shin Bet Head Praises Iran Nuke Deal

Ami Ayalon calls accord ‘best option’ in keeping Tehran from getting the bomb, but faults Obama for appearing weak.

Ami Ayalon (Olivier Fitoussi /Flash90)
Ami Ayalon (Olivier Fitoussi /​Flash90)
July 21, 2015, 10:07 pm 13.
A for­mer head of Israel’s Shin Bet secu­ri­ty ser­vice called the Iranian nuclear accord, signed by the Islamic Republic and world pow­ers last week, “the best option” when it comes to curb­ing Tehran’s nuclear weapons capabilities.

The com­ment from Ami Ayalon, who served as head of the inter­nal intel­li­gence agency in the 1990s, runs counter to near unan­i­mous crit­i­cism of the deal among main­stream Israeli offi­cials, who fear it will fail to pre­vent Iran from devel­op­ing a nuclear weapon. Ayalon was lat­er a Labor MK. Labor’s cur­rent leader Isaac Herzog oppos­es the accord. Defending the deal, Ayalon said it push­es Iran’s break­out time for a bomb to a year, as opposed to the two months it had to com­plete the bomb pri­or to sign­ing the agree­ment. He spoke in an inter­view pub­lished Tuesday by US news web­site the Daily Beast. Under the terms of the deal struck last week in Vienna after almost two years of nego­ti­a­tions, Iran has agreed to give the UN nuclear watch­dog access to sus­pect sites, includ­ing mil­i­tary bases, as the world seeks to stop the Islamic Republic devel­op­ing atom­ic arms.
“When it comes to Iran’s nuclear capa­bil­i­ty, this [deal] is the best option,” Ayalon said. “When nego­ti­a­tions began, Iran was two months away from acquir­ing enough mate­r­i­al for a [nuclear] bomb. Now it will be 12 months… Israelis are fail­ing to dis­tin­guish between reduc­ing Iran’s nuclear capa­bil­i­ty and Iran being the biggest dev­il in the Middle East,” he explained.When the deal is imple­ment­ed, inspec­tors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will noti­fy Iran of a site they want to vis­it and Tehran has 14 days to com­ply. If it refus­es then there is a fur­ther 10-day delay to allow a joint com­mis­sion to exam­ine the case and order Iran to sat­is­fy the IAEA’s con­cerns. The 24-day peri­od has come under fire from crit­ics of the deal who say it will give Iran time to hide any incrim­i­nat­ing evi­dence that it is covert­ly seek­ing nuclear weapons. “I can assure you our intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty is com­plete­ly com­fort­able that 24 days is not enough time for them to be able to evade our tech­ni­cal means, our capac­i­ty to observe,” US Secretary of State John Kerry said. 
“This deal actu­al­ly push­es Iran fur­ther away from a bomb. And there’s a per­ma­nent pro­hi­bi­tion on Iran ever hav­ing a nuclear weapon,” US President Barack Obama added in his week­ly address on Saturday. “We will have unprece­dent­ed, 247 mon­i­tor­ing of Iran’s key nuclear facil­i­ties,” Obama said. But in the inter­view, Ayalon fault­ed Obama for appear­ing too gen­tle in his rhetoric. Obama “doesn’t have the right com­bi­na­tion of the lan­guage of peace and the lan­guage of war. He has to make it very clear that while he believes in diplo­ma­cy, he also knows how to use force,” Ayalon said.
Times of Israel staff con­tributed to this report.