Republicans Only Have Love For One Amendment In The Bill Of Rights…

YouTube player

The First Amendment pro­vides sev­er­al rights pro­tec­tions: to express ideas through speech and the press, to assem­ble or gath­er with a group to protest or for oth­er rea­sons, and to ask the gov­ern­ment to fix prob­lems. It also pro­tects the right to reli­gious beliefs and prac­tices. It pre­vents the gov­ern­ment from cre­at­ing or favor­ing a religion.

Republicans hate every­thing in the Bill of Rights except for the 2nd Amendment, the right to bear Arms.
They hate that ordi­nary American cit­i­zens are free to express their ideas through free speech and the rights guar­an­teed the Press. Except if the press report­ing is def­er­en­tial and slant­ed, like FUAX news and the wide net­work of right-wing dis­in­for­ma­tion organs through­out the country.
They oppose the teach­ing of American his­to­ry. Desantis is remov­ing the teach­ing of African-American his­to­ry in Florida’s high schools and col­leges. They are burn­ing books that they dis­agree with and much more.

The Second Amendment pro­tects the right to keep and bear arms.

This they agree with. They believe in unbri­dled access to guns of all types, includ­ing assault-style weapons that have been used in the almost dai­ly mas­sacres of American citizens.

  • US has 120.5 firearms per 100 res­i­dents, report finds
  • The only coun­try with more civil­ian-owned firearms than people(Bloomberg)
    There are a report­ed 400-plus mil­lion guns in the hands of Americans. However, those weapons are con­cen­trat­ed in the hands of only about 32% of the peo­ple, large­ly white Republicans.

The Third Amendment pre­vents the gov­ern­ment from forc­ing home­own­ers to allow sol­diers to use their homes. Before the Revolutionary War, laws gave British sol­diers the right to take over pri­vate homes.

Republicans are for the rich and pow­er­ful, so it is not a stretch to under­stand their sup­port for laws like immi­nent domain that allows the Government to appro­pri­ate the prop­er­ty of cit­i­zens under the guise that it is for the com­mon good. They have sup­port­ed even large cor­po­ra­tions forcibly acquir­ing the prop­er­ty of cit­i­zens using immi­nent domain as justification.

The Fourth Amendment bars the gov­ern­ment from unrea­son­able search and seizure of an indi­vid­ual or their pri­vate property.

House Republicans subpoena former prosecutor in Trump case – The Denver Post
Gym Jordon(sic) a new iter­a­tion of Joe McCarthy

Republicans are for the police state as long as it does not apply to them. They are com­fort­able with Police abus­ing the rights of poor Black Americans by forcibly enter­ing their homes and motor­cars with­out legal jus­ti­fi­ca­tion. They have no prob­lem with gov­ern­men­tal pow­er as long as it does not affect them.

The Fifth Amendment pro­vides sev­er­al pro­tec­tions for peo­ple accused of crimes. It states that seri­ous crim­i­nal charges must be start­ed by a grand jury. A per­son can­not be tried twice for the same offense (dou­ble jeop­ardy) or have prop­er­ty tak­en away with­out just com­pen­sa­tion. People have the right against self-incrim­i­na­tion and can­not be impris­oned with­out due process of law (fair pro­ce­dures and trials.

The Fifth Amendment is one of the rights most Americans have come to depend on against Government over­reach and abuse. Notwithstanding, Republicans like Donald Trump do not believe these rights should extend to peo­ple of color.
He want­ed the Central Park five exe­cut­ed, even though it turned out they were all inno­cent of the charges against them.
Republicans like Sarah Huckabee Sanders have just signed into law sweep­ing changes to parole laws in the state of Arkansas. 

The Sixth Amendment pro­vides addi­tion­al pro­tec­tions to peo­ple accused of crimes, such as the right to a speedy and pub­lic tri­al, tri­al by an impar­tial jury in crim­i­nal cas­es, and to be informed of crim­i­nal charges. Witnesses must face the accused, and the accused is allowed his or her own wit­ness­es and to be rep­re­sent­ed by a lawyer.

Their Fascist mes­si­ah Donald Trump fac­ing a 34-count felony indict­ment filed by the New York City District Attorney’s office is ask­ing a court for a cool­ing off peri­od as anoth­er case, this time a civ­il rape case, is get­ting ready for trial.
His accuser is enti­tled to a speedy res­o­lu­tion in this mat­ter as the alleged aggriev­ed and injured par­ty. In this case, Trump is ask­ing to slow things down, arguably he believes, as he has always telegraphed, that he can drag court cas­es out to frus­trate his oppo­nents. His cal­cu­lus is his hope that he will once again become pres­i­dent, where­upon the lat­ter case will nev­er see the light of day.

The Seventh Amendment extends the right to a jury tri­al in Federal civ­il cases.
This amend­ment is par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant for poor defen­dants, par­tic­u­lar­ly peo­ple who are in the minority.
Imagine get­ting a fed­er­al judge appoint­ed by Donald Trump in a bench tri­al. This is an impor­tant amendment.

The Eighth Amendment bars exces­sive bail and fines and cru­el and unusu­al punishment.

This amend­ment gives some cov­er to minori­ties accused of crimes. In most cas­es, they are unable to afford the exor­bi­tant bail that uneth­i­cal racist judges would impose. Republicans have long railed against the amendment.

The Ninth Amendment states that list­ing spe­cif­ic rights in the Constitution does not mean that peo­ple do not have oth­er rights that have not been spelled out.

This is one of the rights in the Bill of Rights that Police depart­ments and their offi­cers, and their Republican sup­port­ers need to be remind­ed of on a reg­u­lar basis.

The Tenth Amendment says that the Federal Government only has those pow­ers del­e­gat­ed in the Constitution. If it isn’t list­ed, it belongs to the states or to the people.

This may be one amend­ment they are not too opposed to. They have con­sis­tent­ly railed against the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment begin­ning with Nixon, more so with Ronald Reagan and oth­er states’ rights pro­po­nents like Newt Gingrich and the entire mod­ern Republican party.
Understand, of course, that when they advo­cate for more rights for the states and less fed­er­al inter­ven­tion, they are advo­cat­ing for the right to bru­tal­ize and do as they please to Black cit­i­zens as they have done for hun­dreds of years.

The Bill of Rights: How Did it Happen?

Writing the Bill of Rights

The amend­ments James Madison pro­posed were designed to win sup­port in both hous­es of Congress and the states. He focused on rights-relat­ed amend­ments, ignor­ing sug­ges­tions that would have struc­tural­ly changed the government. 

Opposition to the Constitution

Many Americans, per­suad­ed by a pam­phlet writ­ten by George Mason, opposed the new gov­ern­ment. Mason was one of three del­e­gates present on the final day of the con­ven­tion who refused to sign the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights.

James Madison and oth­er sup­port­ers of the Constitution argued that a bill of rights was­n’t nec­es­sary because — “the gov­ern­ment can only exert the pow­ers spec­i­fied by the Constitution.” But they agreed to con­sid­er adding amend­ments when rat­i­fi­ca­tion was in dan­ger in the key state of Massachusetts.

Introducing the Bill of Rights in the First Congress

Few mem­bers of the First Congress want­ed to make amend­ing the new Constitution a pri­or­i­ty. But James Madison, once the most vocal oppo­nent of the Bill of Rights, intro­duced a list of amend­ments to the Constitution on June 8, 1789, and “hound­ed his col­leagues relent­less­ly” to secure its pas­sage. Madison had come to appre­ci­ate the impor­tance vot­ers attached to these pro­tec­tions, the role that enshrin­ing them in the Constitution could have in edu­cat­ing peo­ple about their rights, and the chance that adding them might pre­vent its oppo­nents from mak­ing more dras­tic changes to it.

Ratifying the Bill of Rights

The House passed a joint res­o­lu­tion con­tain­ing 17 amend­ments based on Madison’s pro­pos­al. The Senate changed the joint res­o­lu­tion to con­sist of 12 amend­ments. A joint House and Senate Conference Committee set­tled the remain­ing dis­agree­ments in September. On October 2, 1789, President Washington sent copies of the 12 amend­ments adopt­ed by Congress to the states. By December 15, 1791, three-fourths of the states had rat­i­fied 10 of these, now known as the “Bill of Rights.”

The Bill of Rights: How Was it Made?

Delaware’s Ratification of the Bill of Rights, January 28, 1790

National Archives, General Records of the U.S. Government

Creating the Parchment Bill of Rights

William Lambert and Benjamin Bankson, engross­ing clerks for the House and Senate, made 14 hand­writ­ten copies of the pro­posed amend­ments, which were signed by Speaker of the House Frederick Muhlenberg, Vice President John Adams, Clerk of the House of Representatives John Beckley, and Secretary of the Senate Samuel A. Otis. President George Washington sent a let­ter enclos­ing one to each of the 11 exist­ing states and to Rhode Island and North Carolina, which had not yet adopt­ed the Constitution.

In addi­tion to the file copy, the National Archives has Delaware’s copy of the Bill of Rights in its hold­ings. While most states noti­fied the Federal Government of their rat­i­fi­ca­tion of the amend­ments on a sep­a­rate doc­u­ment, Delaware chose to apply its cer­tifi­cate of rat­i­fi­ca­tion and state seal direct­ly on the parch­ment they had received.