Ukrainian Woman Hums Her Country’s National Anthem Through Her Tears…

YouTube player

Another Despot Raises His Ugly Head In Europe, The World Sees Deja Vu …

The nation of Ukraine finds itself in the unen­vi­able posi­tion of hav­ing a pow­er­ful ene­my almost encir­cling a large par­ty of its bor­der and anoth­er more pow­er­ful but friend­ly alliance to its flank of which it is not a member.
One expert argues that if you think of Ukraine as a clock, Russia encir­cles Ukraine from 10 through 7.

Clock-Drawing Test (CDT) - PsychDB

This leaves only a small por­tion of Ukraine’s bor­der between 7 & 10 that has friend­ly neigh­bors, tak­ing into account that Belarus is a hos­tile pow­er to Ukraine that has allowed Russia to launch aggres­sion against Ukraine from its borders.
Why Russia Needs "Professional Guerrilla Warriors"? - InformNapalm.org (English)

So here is Ukraine in a sort of no-mans-land, not a part of the old sovi­et empire any longer but not a mem­ber of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO).
Many peo­ple have asked, (a) why is America send­ing troops to east­ern Europe? The United States has com­mit­ments as a mem­ber of NATO and to arti­cle five of the NATO char­ter, known as the “com­mit­ment clause.” Within this clause, every mem­ber of NATO agrees that it will con­sid­er an armed attack against any mem­ber state, whether in Europe or North America, as an attack against all 30 mem­bers of the organization.
Additionally, the United States is the most pow­er­ful nation on the plan­et; despite its flaws, America has always stepped up to the plate in defense of weak­er nations in dis­tress and defense of Democracy.

Ukraine claimed to have shot down a Russian jet over the out­skirts of Kyiv overnight, with wreck­age falling on a house and leav­ing sev­er­al peo­ple injured.


America’s lead­er­ship after world war 11 cre­at­ed the United Nations, NATO, the International Criminal court in the Hague, which has large­ly kept the peace since the end of the last world war in 1945.
(b) Why does­n’t the United States insti­tute a no-fly zone over Ukraine? A no-fly zone requires sig­nif­i­cant resources and man­pow­er; how­ev­er, a no-fly over Ukraine would also mean American pilots fly­ing sor­ties con­tin­u­al­ly over a nation larg­er than Texas.
Where would the Russian air­force be? It would not allow anoth­er nation’s planes to be over its troops on the ground and so what we would have in quick time is a shoot­ing war between American and NATO forces with a pow­er­ful nuclear-armed nation that has a sociopath for its leader.

Ukrainian forces downed a Russian fight­er jet over Kyiv ear­ly on Friday (pic­tured, the wreck­age) and lat­er hit an air­field in Millerovo in Rostov, south­ern Russia, destroy­ing at least one Su-30SM around 10am local time (8am GMT)

Vladimir Putin wants a buffer between him­self and NATO forces; there is no deny­ing that. A look at the map above bears out Russia’s inse­cu­ri­ty at the prospect of Ukraine becom­ing a NATO mem­ber. (NATO) mem­ber states in blue would mean NATO on Russias’ bor­der should Ukraine become a mem­ber of the west­ern alliance.
Russia’s annex­a­tion of Crimea and its incur­sion into Georgia, as well as its sup­port for the break­away regions with­in Ukraine, demon­strates (a) Vladimir Putin’s desire to expand Russia’s bor­ders west­ward or to pre­vent NATO from out­flank­ing Russia.
In Fairness, Putin talks about the west­’s annu­al war games on his bor­ders, some­thing the United States would not tol­er­ate if Russia did the same.
It appears, how­ev­er, that Vladimir Putin’s larg­er ambi­tions are larg­er than mere­ly top­pling the elect­ed gov­ern­ment in Kyiv and installing his own pup­pet régime like the one he has in Belarus.
Step by step, Putin wants to redraw the old Soviet-era bor­ders in east­ern Europe. He con­stant­ly laments what he char­ac­ter­ized as the weak­ness that allowed for the fall of the Soviet Union in the 80s.

On March 18th, 2014, Vladimir Putin annexed the Republic of Crimea and the fed­er­al city of Sevastopol. Following the annex­a­tion, Putin imme­di­ate­ly esca­lat­ed his mil­i­tary pres­ence on the penin­su­la and lever­aged nuclear threats to solid­i­fy the new sta­tus quo on the ground.
Before send­ing his forces into Ukraine, Putin for­mal­ly rec­og­nized the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics and direct­ed the Russian Defense Ministry to deploy troops in those regions to car­ry out “peace­keep­ing functions.”Putin claimed in a ram­bling speech that the Nation of Ukraine was a Russian cre­ation. On February 24th, Vladimir Putin fol­lowed up by order­ing a bru­tal assault on the demo­c­ra­t­ic nation of Ukraine. He also warned that any­one who tried to stop him would be swift­ly dealt with in ways nev­er before seen in his­to­ry. -(Basically, again lever­ag­ing the use of nuclear weapons).
Notice the hyper­bole in the lat­ter state­ment- where have we heard that ver­nac­u­lar before?

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Guilty Of Violating George Floyd’s Civil Rights…

From left to right J Alexander Kueng, Thomas Lane & you Thao

Former Minneapolis police offi­cers Tou Thao, J. Alexander Kueng, and Thomas Lane were found guilty of vio­lat­ing George Floyd’s civ­il rights by a fed­er­al jury in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Thursday. The 12 jurors — four men and eight women — found Lane, Kueng, and Thao guilty of depriv­ing Floyd of his civ­il rights by show­ing delib­er­ate indif­fer­ence to his med­ical needs as for­mer Minneapolis police offi­cer Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd for more than 9 min­utes on May 25, 2020 — ulti­mate­ly killing him. The jurors also found Thao and Kueng guilty of an addi­tion­al charge for fail­ing to inter­vene to stop Chauvin. Lane, who did not face the extra charge, tes­ti­fied that he asked Chauvin twice to repo­si­tion Floyd while restrain­ing him but was denied both times.

Hopefully, this ver­dict will send a strong mes­sage to police across the coun­try that they are law enforce­ment offi­cers, not judges, jury, and exe­cu­tion­ers. Also that whether a per­son com­mits a crime or a vio­la­tion, that act is com­mit­ted against a per­son or the state and not against them.
It is not out of the ordi­nary to hear cops telling motorists who may have com­mit­ted the most insignif­i­cant traf­fic vio­la­tion that they are in their town or on their high­way. No town or high­way is the prop­er­ty of any cop or police depart­ment, and even if they were, they would equal­ly be the prop­er­ty of every law­ful dri­ver on the roads as well.
It is now up to depart­ment super­vi­sors to reori­ent cops under their com­mand, not just to refrain from the war­rior train­ing they are unleash­ing on the pub­lic but also to remem­ber that if they do not stop their col­leagues bru­tal­iz­ing charges in their care„, they will go to prison.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

A New War Breaks Out In Europe, Here Are Some Images From The Front.

Images from Ukraine as the Russian Federation begins an unpro­voked war against its neighbor.

Firefighters work on a fire on a build­ing after bomb­ings on the east­ern Ukraine town of Chuguiv. Photograph: Aris Messinis/​AFP/​Getty Images.

A view shows the Ukrainian State Border Guard Service site dam­aged by shelling in Kyiv region
Photograph: State Border Guard Service/​Reuters.

A woman reacts as she waits for a train try­ing to leave Kyiv, Ukraine. Photograph: Emilio Morenatti/​AP.

Smoke and flame rise near a mil­i­tary build­ing after an appar­ent Russian strike in Kyiv, Ukraine. Big explo­sions were heard before dawn in Kyiv, Kharkiv and Odesa Photograph: Efrem Lukatsky/​AP.

Smoke ris­es from an air defense base in the after­math of an appar­ent Russian strike in Mariupol. Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/​AP.

In this image made from video pro­vid­ed by the Border Service of Ukraine, mil­i­tary vehi­cles pass a con­trol point at the Armyansk check­point at the Ukraine-Crimea bor­der. Photograph: AP.

People wait at a bus sta­tion to go to the west­ern parts of the coun­try in Kyiv, Ukraine. Photograph: Ümit Bektaş/​Reuters.

A cor­doned-off area around the remains of a shell in a street in Kyiv. Photograph: Sergei Supinsky/​AFP/​Getty.

Ukrainian fire­fight­ers try to extin­guish a fire after an airstrike hit an apart­ment com­plex in Chuhuiv, Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine
Photograph: Wolfgang Schwan/​Anadolu Agency/​Getty.

Fire is seen com­ing out of a mil­i­tary instal­la­tion near the air­port in Mariupol, east­ern Ukraine. Photograph: Carlos Barría/​Reuters.

A flame is seen from an area near the Dnieper River in Kyiv. Photograph: Mary Ostrovska/​AP.

Russian mil­i­tary tanks and armored vehi­cles advance in Donetsk. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/​Getty Images.

Young women hold their mobile phones as they take refuge in a metro sta­tion in Kyiv. Photograph: Daniel Leal/​AFP/​Getty

Kyiv inhab­i­tants leave the city after pre-offen­sive mis­sile strikes by the Russian and Belarus armed forces. Photograph: Pierre Crom/​Getty.

A wound­ed woman is seen as airstrikes dam­age an apart­ment com­plex out­side of Kharkiv. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/​Getty.

Police offi­cers inspect the remains of a mis­sile that fell in a Kyiv street. Photograph: Valentyn Ogirenko/​Reuters.

Russians in Moscow watch a tele­vised address by Vladimir Putin about autho­riz­ing a mil­i­tary oper­a­tion in the Ukrainian Donbas region. He announced the aim is to ‘demil­i­tarise and denaz­i­fy Ukraine, as well as bring to jus­tice those who com­mit­ted numer­ous bloody crimes against civil­ians’ Photograph: Sergei Ilnitsky/​EPA.

People take shel­ter in a sub­way sta­tion in Kyiv Photograph: Valentyn Ogirenko/​Reuters.

The Ukrainian pres­i­dent, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, address­es the nation in Kyiv. He declared mar­tial law, say­ing Russia has tar­get­ed Ukraine’s mil­i­tary infra­struc­ture and urged Ukrainians to stay home and not pan­ic Photograph: Efrem Lukatsky/​AP.

People walk in a metro sta­tion in Kyiv as air-raid sirens ring out in down­town Kyiv, Photograph: Daniel Leal/​AFP/​Getty.

Black smoke ris­es from a mil­i­tary air­port in Chuguyev near Kharkiv. Photograph: Aris Messinis/​AFP/​Getty.

People in cars queue to leave the city of Mariupol in east­ern Ukraine. Photograph: Carlos Barría/​Reuters.

Tanks move into the city after Vladimir Putin autho­rized a mil­i­tary oper­a­tion in Mariupol, east­ern Ukraine. Photograph: Carlos Barría/​Reuters

A man sits outside his destroyed building after bombings on the eastern Ukraine town of Chuhuiv on 24 February 2022
A man sits out­side a destroyed build­ing in Chuhuiv, fol­low­ing bombings. 

A rocket embedded in a road after recent shelling on the northern outskirts of Kharkiv on 24 February 2022
People wait in a traf­fic jam as they attempt to leave the city of Kharkiv. 

People wait for buses at a bus station as they attempt to evacuate the city on February 24, 2022 in Kyiv, Ukraine

Russia Invades Ukraine In Europe’s ‘darkest Hours’ Since WWII

YouTube player

Judge Overturns Conviction Of Florida Cop Who Shot Autistic Man’s Caretaker

Many of you will remem­ber this shock­ing abuse of pow­er and the wan­ton impuni­ty with which this cop shot and seri­ous­ly wound­ed an African-American man for absolute­ly no reason.

YouTube player

Well, a judge has now over­turned the con­vic­tion of the cop who opened fire

In 2016, we saw footage of care­tak­er Charles Kinsey and Arnaldo Rios-Soto being approached by a group of police, result­ing in Kinsey being shot after lay­ing on the ground with his hands in the air. The offi­cer who shot Kinsey, Jonathan Aledda, just had one of his charges over­turned by the South Florida appeals court, report­ed CNN.

Aledda’s con­vic­tion for mis­dem­neaor cul­pa­ble neg­li­gence was over­turned by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal, report­ed CNN. His charge were con­sid­ered invalid because pros­e­cu­tors did not allow a SWAT com­man­der who trained Aledda to tes­ti­fy in the June 2019 trial.

Here is the moron­ic cop Jonathan Aledda who shot and seri­ous­ly wound­ed a man lay­ing on his back with his hand out­stretched toward the skies.

From CNN:

In a state­ment emailed to CNN, Florida State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said the deci­sion is “dis­ap­point­ing to all who believed that this shoot­ing inci­dent was unnec­es­sary and incor­rect.” The office may ask the appeals court for a re-hear­ing, the state­ment continued.

Eric Schwartzreich and Anthony Bruno, attor­neys for Aledda, told CNN, “We look for­ward to the State drop­ping the charges or in the alter­na­tive to Mr. Aledda being found not guilty.”
“He took the shots because he believed that a hostage was in dan­ger,” Schwartzreich and Bruno said in a statement.

Florida officer guilty of negligence for shooting caretaker - ABC News
Charles Kinsey now walks with a cane and can­not stand for long as a result of being shot by police.

Aledda was one out of 13 offi­cers who respond­ed to the July 2016 inci­dent. Rios-Soto, who has devel­op­men­tal dis­abil­i­ties, was in the mid­dle of an inter­sec­tion play­ing with a toy while Kinsey tried to bring him back inside. CNN report­ed the toy was a sil­ver truck but offi­cers respond­ed after a bystander report­ed it may have been a gun.

When offi­cers arrived, Kinsey laid on the ground with his hands raised to sig­nal he was non­threat­en­ing and announc­ing he was a care­tak­er. Aledda shot at Rios-Soto three times and hit Kinsey in the hip. In 2017, Aledda was charged with attempt­ed manslaugh­ter, one mis­de­meanor of cul­pa­ble neg­li­gence for shoot­ing Kinsey and one for endan­ger­ing Rios-Soto, per CNN’s report.

Aledda was acquit­ted of his oth­er cul­pa­ble neg­li­gence charges and manslaugh­ter charges in 2019, report­ed CNN.

Texas Police Chief Who Allegedly Used N‑word During Investigation Placed On Leave

The chief of police in Castroville, Texas, has been placed on leave after a law enforce­ment offi­cer said he heard the depart­ment head use the N‑word at least three times dur­ing a mur­der inves­ti­ga­tion. The offi­cer who made the accu­sa­tion said a body cam­era record­ed the incident.

The Castroville City Council, after hold­ing an exec­u­tive ses­sion, placed Chief Brian Jackson on leave dur­ing a meet­ing Tuesday night that was streamed to Facebook. According to KSAT, Jackson report­ed­ly used the offen­sive lan­guage after a body was found on February 5 near Houston Street and Hwy. 90. Multiple police agen­cies respond­ed to the scene includ­ing the Medina County Sheriff’s Office and Castroville Police Department

According to the report, Jackson was record­ed say­ing the N‑word three times when refer­ring to where the vic­tim was from. 

Castroville Mayor Darrin Schroeder released a statement:

Brian Jackson

The City of Castroville does not tol­er­ate dis­crim­i­na­tion of any kind. Our crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem can­not be shaped by biased polic­ing and unfair judi­cial prece­dents, includ­ing atti­tudes and actions that are root­ed in racism and oth­er forms of dis­crim­i­na­tion. The emo­tion­al, men­tal, phys­i­cal, and finan­cial impact on our com­mu­ni­ties is a tan­gi­ble expe­ri­ence for too many and must be tak­en seri­ous­ly. The threat of racial vio­lence is real, so we must take seri­ous­ly all words and actions that can be pre­cur­sors to that. Schroeder added, “Everyone deserves due process. We have been noti­fied of alle­ga­tions against Police Chief Jackson and are inves­ti­gat­ing them accord­ing to our poli­cies and with all dili­gence. We believe in all human rights, so we will not dis­ci­pline sim­ply on rumors or hearsay, but we will act deci­sive­ly if we deter­mine guilt of dis­crim­i­na­tion.” Castroville is locat­ed 20 miles west of down­town San Antonio. The city has a pop­u­la­tion of less than 4,000. 

Abbott Floats Clemency For Indicted Austin Police Officers

So as you read this sto­ry, you will see exact­ly what is hap­pen­ing in the United States, using the log­ic of crim­i­nal Donald Trump, who did not see crim­i­nals he did not like or want to par­don regard­less of their crimes, except, of course, if they were Black.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott has decid­ed to fur­ther politi­cize the vio­lence that crim­i­nal cops per­pet­u­ate on cit­i­zens dai­ly. Violence that result in seri­ous injuries and 1055 dead cit­i­zens in 2021 at the hands of police officers.
Just take a wild guess at the race of the peo­ple abused by the igno­rant, brutish thugs that Gregg Abbott wants to grant clemen­cy to? (Publisher)

Greg Abbott

Greg Abbott lashed out Wednesday at the local pros­e­cu­tor in his state’s cap­i­tal, float­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty of clemen­cy to 19 Austin police offi­cers indict­ed for tac­tics used dur­ing 2020 demon­stra­tions against racial injustice.
Abbott, a Republican, allud­ed to the local police union’s asser­tion that charg­ing the offi­cers was a “polit­i­cal sham” in his first pub­lic state­ment on the indict­ments, includ­ing against two offi­cers involved in injury cas­es that the city has offered to pay mil­lions of dol­lars to set­tle. “In Austin, law enforce­ment offi­cers defend­ed the state Capitol from crim­i­nal assault, pro­tect­ed the Austin Police Department head­quar­ters from being over­run, cleared the inter­state from being shut down, and dis­rupt­ed crim­i­nal activ­i­ty in areas across the city,” Abbott said. “Many offi­cers were phys­i­cal­ly attacked while pro­tect­ing Austin. Those offi­cers should be praised for their efforts, not prosecuted.”
The gov­er­nor’s state­ment did not men­tion demon­stra­tors who were hurt, includ­ing some critically.

Nelson Linder, pres­i­dent of the Austin NAACP, said the governor’s announce­ment seemed pre­ma­ture and sent the wrong mes­sage on police bru­tal­i­ty. “I think it shows an imbal­ance in the city when it comes to pub­lic safe­ty,” Linder said.
“As a Black per­son and Brown per­son and for every­one else as well, we ought to be very con­cerned about the politi­ciza­tion of police mis­con­duct,” Linder said.
Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza’s cam­paign promised to take a tougher stance on police account­abil­i­ty, but he has denied that the charges are dri­ven by politics.
In a state­ment Wednesday, Garza’s office said: “no one is above the law” and that the inves­ti­ga­tion into the mat­ter con­tin­ues. Read the remain­der of the sto­ry here. https://​news​.yahoo​.com/​a​b​b​o​t​t​-​f​l​o​a​t​s​-​c​l​e​m​e​n​c​y​-​i​n​d​i​c​t​e​d​-​a​u​s​t​i​n​-​1​9​2​8​0​5​3​5​6​.​h​tml

Ex-NYPD Union President Ed Mullins Surrendering To Criminal Charges

Ed Mullins, cen­ter, speaks dur­ing a news con­fer­ence in the Bronx bor­ough of New York, on May 31, 2017. VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS

How hath the mighty fall­en. The real trav­es­ty in all of this is that this SOB was allowed to sur­ren­der rather than being led out in cuffs like oth­er accused criminals.

Former New York City police union pres­i­dent who’s clashed with city offi­cials over his bom­bas­tic tweets and hard­line tac­tics is expect­ed to sur­ren­der Wednesday to face crim­i­nal charges con­nect­ed to a raid last year on his home and union office, two law enforce­ment offi­cials said.
Ed Mullins resigned in October as head of the Sergeants Benevolent Association after the FBI searched the union’s Manhattan office and his Long Island home. He retired from the NYPD in November.
Information on charges against Mullins was not imme­di­ate­ly avail­able. He is expect­ed to be in fed­er­al court lat­er on Wednesday. The offi­cials con­firm­ing his arrest were not autho­rized to speak pub­licly about an inves­ti­ga­tion and did so on con­di­tion of anonymity.
Messages seek­ing com­ment were left with the NYPD, the union, and a lawyer who’s rep­re­sent­ed Mullins in the past. The FBI declined to comment.
The Sergeants Benevolent Association rep­re­sents about 13,000 active and retired NYPD sergeants and con­trols a $264 mil­lion retire­ment fund.
Mullins, a police sergeant detached to full-time union work, was sub­ject to depart­ment dis­ci­pli­nary pro­ceed­ings last year for tweet­ing NYPD paper­work in 2020 regard­ing the arrest of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s daugh­ter dur­ing protests over the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd.

Mullins, a police offi­cer since 1982, rose to sergeant, a rank above detec­tive but below cap­tain and lieu­tenant, in 1993 and was elect­ed pres­i­dent of the sergeants union in 2002. Under Mullins’ lead­er­ship, the union has fought for bet­ter pay — with con­tracts result­ing in pay increas­es of 40% — and staked a promi­nent posi­tion in the anti-reform movement.
Though he was a full-time union chief, city law allowed Mullins to retain his sergeant’s posi­tion and col­lect salaries from both the union and the police depart­ment. In 2020, Mullins made more than $220,000 between the two, accord­ing to pub­lic records: $88,757 from the union and $133,195 from the NYPD. Along with Mullins’ peri­od­ic appear­ances on cable net­works like Fox News and Newsmax — includ­ing one in which he was pic­tured in front of a QAnon mug — per­haps the union’s most pow­er­ful mega­phone is its 45,000-follower Twitter account, which Mullins runs him­self, often to fiery effect
In 2018, amid a rash of inci­dents in which police offi­cers were doused with water, Mullins sug­gest­ed it was time for then-Commissioner James O’Neill and Chief of Department Terence Monahan to “con­sid­er anoth­er pro­fes­sion” and tweet­ed that “O’KNEEL must go!”

O’Neill retort­ed that Mullins was “a bit of a key­board gang­ster” who sel­dom showed up to depart­ment functions.
Last year, Mullins came under fire for tweets calling the city’s for­mer Health Commissioner, Dr. Oxiris Barbot, a “b — — ” and U.S. Rep. Ritchie Torres a “first-class whore.”
Mullins was upset over reports Barbot refused to give face masks to police in the ear­ly days of the pan­dem­ic and angry with Torres’ calls for an inves­ti­ga­tion into a poten­tial police work slow­down in September 2020.
Torres, who is gay, denounced Mullins’ tweet as homophobic.

In 2021 Chicago Paid Out More Than M$67 For Police Wrong Doing

I know some peo­ple are not exact­ly the bright­est bulb in the ceil­ing, but what this Chicago alder­man said in oppos­ing a set­tle­ment in a vio­lent police mis­con­duct case takes the cake in stupidity.
On Thursday, Feb. 17, the Chicago City Council Committee on Finance vot­ed 13 – 7 to set­tle for $1.675 mil­lion with Mia Wright and four oth­er peo­ple with her when she was pulled from a car by at least sev­en offi­cers in a mall park­ing lot on May 31, 2020. That encounter left Ms. Wright par­tial­ly blind in one eye.

YouTube player

The cops had been stak­ing out the mall on that day of loot­ing across Chicago, and the five were tar­get­ed as sus­pects. Of course, under no cir­cum­stances could the mon­sters in uni­form have dealt with the sit­u­a­tion with­out vio­lence, so they vio­lent­ly ripped the occu­pants from the car, and the result is that Ms. Wright almost lost an eye.
The com­mit­tee vote fell along col­or lines, with only the 13 Black com­mit­tee mem­bers par­tic­i­pat­ing in the meet­ing vot­ing for the set­tle­ment to the group of five African-Americans. The next step is a vote on the set­tle­ment by the full coun­cil this week.

Alderman Raymond Lopez reminds me of Marco Rubio,& Raphael Cruz. What does all three have in com­mon oth­er than rank stupidity?

In object­ing to the set­tle­ment, one idi­ot­ic Latino alder­man Raymond Lopez said that the city would be open­ing a “Pandora’s box” by set­tling the law­suit and would give “every­one an excuse to start suing.”
Here is the kick­er by ear­ly last December, the city of Chicago had already paid out more than $67 mil­lion in 2021 alone to resolve police mis­con­duct claims.
Instead of rec­og­niz­ing the mount­ing cost of police mis­con­duct, both in the loss of life and lib­er­ty to cit­i­zens & the loss of tax­pay­er’s trea­sure used to com­pen­sate peo­ple wronged by police; this idi­ot­ic alder­man pro­pos­es an end to the just settlements.
This moron would have done well to keep his trap closed and not con­firm that he is an idiot, but he could not.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

How The So-called ‘master Race’ Continue To Destabilize The World

One would have thought that the “Master Race” (sarcasm, don’t bite my head off) would have been appro­pri­ate­ly enlight­ened by now not to invade oth­er coun­tries. I mean, by gol­ly, we are in the year 2022, and anoth­er poten­tial mil­i­tary con­fla­gra­tion is brew­ing in .…..you guessed it, on the con­ti­nent of the ‘Master Race’…
Remember, this is the con­ti­nent of the ‘Master Race” they told us they are the most intel­li­gent, haha­ha, have been the most enlight­ened. However, the Africans may dis­agree since they cre­at­ed gov­ern­ing coun­cils, cre­at­ed Universities, stud­ied Astronomy, Mathematics, Medicine, and had trav­eled around the world. At the same time, Europe thought the world was flat, or before the mas­ter race invad­ed their spaces plun­dered, raped, mur­dered, stole, and dis­tort­ed the truth then claimed, they cre­at­ed those things, and the peo­ple they stole from were the sav­ages. The damn nerve.….
The Chinese may also dis­agree, you know, since they invent­ed gun­pow­der but nev­er used it to harm any­one until the mas­ter race got their hands on it and changed the world for the worst forever.

World War I, also known as the Great War, began in 1914 after the assas­si­na­tion of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria. His mur­der result­ed in a war across Europe that last­ed until 1918. During the con­flict, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire (the Central Powers) fought against Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Japan, and the United States (the Allied Powers). By the time the war was over and the Allied Powers claimed vic­to­ry, more than 16 mil­lion peo­ple — sol­diers and civil­ians alike — died. (source, his​to​ry​.com).
The enlight­ened mas­ter race devour­ing itself and oth­ers with it. But let’s move on.
World War II was the biggest and dead­liest war in his­to­ry, involv­ing more than 30 coun­tries. Sparked by the 1939 Nazi inva­sion of Poland (again the mas­ter race not adher­ing to the rules of moder­ni­ty), the war dragged on for six bloody years until the Allies defeat­ed Nazi Germany and Japan in 1945. (source his​to​ry​.com).
The war began in 1939 and end­ed in 1945. By the time it was over, an esti­mat­ed 45 – 60 mil­lion peo­ple were killed; among them were 6 mil­lion Jews mur­dered in Nazi con­cen­tra­tion camps as part of Hitler’s dia­bol­i­cal “Final Solution,” now known as the Holocaust.

More con­flicts erupt­ed on the mas­ter con­ti­nent after the two great wars, includ­ing but not con­fined to the Kosovo con­flict (1998 – 99) con­flict in which eth­nic Albanians opposed eth­nic Serbs and the gov­ern­ment of Yugoslavia (the rump of the for­mer fed­er­al state, com­pris­ing the republics of Serbia and Montenegro) in Kosovo. The con­flict gained wide­spread inter­na­tion­al atten­tion and was resolved with the inter­ven­tion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
This con­flict result­ed in the death of tens of thou­sands and the dis­place­ment of over 1.5 mil­lion eth­nic Albanians from then Yugoslavia. (source bri​tini​ca​.com)
Among the oth­er trans­gres­sions of the mas­ter race was the British wag­ing war against Argentina for the Falkland Islands, the United States invad­ing Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan, and Iraq. That seems to me to be the mas­ter race export­ing the vio­lence it is so com­fort­able with.
Since then, Russia has annexed Crimea, and here we are again with anoth­er immi­nent attack on a sov­er­eign nation by anoth­er European nation.
This, how­ev­er, is not new; this has always been the modus operan­di of the so-called ‘mas­ter race, or should I say the last race to be civ­i­lized return­ing to its roots. You know the say­ing last hired first fired?
Well, we all know that their lies about being the mas­ter race were root­ed in cow manure, a prod­uct of an infe­ri­or­i­ty com­plex and a desire to project onto the oth­er races the infe­ri­or­i­ty it feels about itself.
Wandering and tak­ing what’s not theirs has been a main­stay ever since they were released from the caves and got up from all fours… See some of that his­to­ry in the link below.
https://​www​.bri​tan​ni​ca​.com/​t​o​p​i​c​/​h​i​s​t​o​r​y​-​o​f​-​E​u​r​o​p​e​/​B​a​r​b​a​r​i​a​n​-​m​i​g​r​a​t​i​o​n​s​-​a​n​d​-​i​n​v​a​s​i​ons

.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Another Black History Month Drawing To A Close, What Exactly Has Changed?

Another Black History month is near its end, and the ques­tion from me is, what have we accom­plished as melanat­ed peo­ple, par­tic­u­lar­ly here in America?
Police the domes­tic army of white nation­al­ists con­tin­ue to injure and kill Black peo­ple with [increas­ing] feroc­i­ty, and the sys­tem is unwill­ing to hold them accountable. 
More impor­tant­ly, how­ev­er, is the sense of dor­man­cy that still engulfs the major­i­ty of Black America, a com­mu­ni­ty that seems to have not a care in the world out­side of fake wigs, fake hair and nails drink­ing, and las­civ­i­ous endeav­ors- a death spi­ral that is cen­tered on the desire to enter­tain and be entertained.
Whenever atroc­i­ties are com­mit­ted against our peo­ple, it is the minor­i­ty that takes to the streets while the major­i­ty sit and home and hope that the efforts of a few will bring change to the many; some don’t even hope at all.
Even with our best efforts, stay­ing informed, stay­ing alert, vot­ing, chal­leng­ing the sta­tus quo, elect­ing peo­ple we can bet­ter lob­by, there are no guar­an­tees that there will be pos­i­tive outcomes.

The fact is that even among those who say they are the least hos­tile, the least anti-black, lurks wolves in sheep­’s clothing.
Hello Joe Manchin & Kyrsten Senema, anti-black Democrats who were elect­ed on a pro­gres­sive agen­da but turned their backs on the agen­da to uphold white minor­i­ty rule.

Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act - The New York Times
Although the 1965 Voting Rights Act was set­tled law, the five Republicans pic­tured at the top of this image destroyed the Act, open­ing the door for wide­spread vot­er ‑sup­pres­sion laws across the country. 

Many African-Americans still sub­scribe to the irra­tional the­o­ry that race rela­tions will change for the bet­ter… Data do not sup­port that belief, nor is it sup­port­ed by events across America 54 Years after degen­er­ate ele­ments assas­si­nat­ed Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr him­self warned against what he char­ac­ter­ized before his death as ‘the tran­quil drug of grad­u­al­ism’ as he elo­quent­ly spoke about ‘the fierce urgency of now. The idea of not suc­cumb­ing to the lies of those who say times have changed, things are bet­ter-the idea that giv­en time America will shed its igno­rant racist past and embrace moder­ni­ty. All lies, the fathers sucked the sour grapes of hatred and big­otry the teeth of the chil­dren are inex­orably set on edge.
The chil­dren of mur­der­ers, rapists, brutish col­o­niz­ers are not about to become good God-fear­ing cit­i­zens who believe in equal­i­ty for human­i­ty. It is insan­i­ty to expect the sons and daugh­ters of your oppres­sors to change and become your sud­den savior.
If it starts dirty, it ends dirty. On every issue ger­mane to the well­be­ing of peo­ple of col­or, ele­ments of the United States gov­ern­ment have been con­sis­tent­ly hos­tile. From the White House to the Supreme Court and mil­lions of homes all across the expanse of the fifty states, it is gov­ern­ment pol­i­cy to dis­crim­i­nate against peo­ple of col­or. The brutish indif­fer­ent dis­play of police act­ing with impuni­ty is the most vis­i­ble exam­ple of those dis­crim­i­na­tor poli­cies man­i­fest­ing themselves.

Redlining is no longer being writ­ten in the law, but Blacks are still exclud­ed from cer­tain neigh­bor­hoods. Blacks who have beat­en the odds and pur­chased homes have their homes under­val­ued by racist apprais­ers. Even when the old redlin­ing laws of the post-recon­struc­tion era are sup­pos­ed­ly not used any­more, the mind­set of the sons and daugh­ters of those who draft­ed those laws are the same and, in many cas­es, worse than their forebearers.
Laws are being passed all across the coun­try to make it expo­nen­tial­ly more dif­fi­cult to vote; how could this hap­pen, you ask?
The short answer is that the United States Supreme Court in 2013, for no valid rea­son oth­er than to make it easy to roll back vot­ing rights, evis­cer­at­ed the 1965 Voting Rights Act leav­ing it an emp­ty shell.
John Roberts, the Chief Justice and a for­mer Reagan Administration lawyer, is vehe­ment­ly hos­tile to the idea of one man one vote. Under Chief Justice John Roberts, a Bush Appointee, the 1965 Voting Rights Act was destroyed under the guise that it is no longer need­ed because times have changed.
Sure, times have changed, but peo­ple’s hatred has not. The John Roberts Supreme court with Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, the now-deceased Antonin Scalia, & Anthony Kennedy ensured that it destroyed set­tled law open­ing the gate for the present assault on vot­ing rights by those who would see Black peo­ple returned to the cot­ton plan­ta­tion
 and a place of abject servitude.

So what are we doing as a peo­ple to ensure that our chil­dren and grand­chil­dren do not become serfs to the chil­dren and grand­chil­dren of those who hate and oppress us? Is it just about com­mem­o­rat­ing the strug­gles of the past, or is it about embrac­ing a new kind of mil­i­tan­cy that demands equal space to breathe on God’s green earth?
How do we devel­op that mil­i­tan­cy if we refuse to edu­cate our­selves about who we real­ly are and not who they say we are?
How do we demand change if we con­tin­ue to believe the lie taught us by our birthright-appro­pri­a­tors that we are a gen­tile peo­ple instead of God’s Hebrew peo­ple cre­at­ed in his image? When will we rise to rec­og­nize the curse of the four hun­dred years is over, and it is a time of Black progress?
Are we going to get up off our rear ends and take what’s right­ful­ly ours, or are we going to con­tin­ue to be behold­en to the teach­ings of the slave Bible?
The idea that things are get­ting bet­ter or will be bet­ter giv­en time has been turned on its head over and over again. The scorched earth assault on crit­i­cal race the­o­ry by the fas­cist right is an attempt to white­wash his­to­ry. They want to super­im­pose a kind and gen­tle face onto the mon­ster of four hun­dred years of white geno­cide against our people.
If you are opposed to the truth of his­to­ry being told to chil­dren, your or ours, it is because you are on the wrong side of history.

There is no they, just us-no, they are not going to give me this or that. You’re damn right about that their fathers and four fathers stole from us. They will con­tin­ue to steal from us unless we rec­og­nize who we are, not infe­ri­or but supe­ri­or, not slaves but enslaved, not sav­ages but the ones who brought sav­ages into the light. We taught them his­to­ry, math­e­mat­ics, astron­o­my. We taught them that the earth was not flat, but round.
We are a peo­ple who cooked our meat when oth­ers were eat­ing their raw blood drip­ping from it. We are the peo­ple who cre­at­ed demo­c­ra­t­ic coun­cils (the sys­tem of gov­ern­ment we now claim to have) and cre­at­ed uni­ver­si­ties; yeah, we cre­at­ed those.
None of that his­to­ry has been taught to African-Americans chil­dren, nor has it been taught to Caucasian children.
For those rea­sons, Ron Desantis in Florida, Ron Johnson in Wisconsin, the imbe­cil­ic Cuban Ted Cruz, and oth­ers do not want that his­to­ry taught to young American children.
As I said ear­li­er, if you are afraid of the things you did in the past, it is because of what you did wrong. Now, of course, this does not apply to Ted Cruz or Clarence Thomas; they are still enslaved peo­ple who are quite com­fort­able on the plantation…

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Police Launch Internal Affairs Investigation Into Baby Injured In Pensacola Police Custody

I talk about the cor­rup­tion and down­right dis­hon­esty of police offi­cers, their depart­ments, pros­e­cu­tors, and even judges in this forum, and on the rare occa­sion they get it right, I men­tion that too.
However, as you have seen in the case of Amir Locke, who was mur­dered as he emerged from sleep in Minneapolis, courts allow police to break into the homes of inno­cent cit­i­zens and mur­der them with­out consequence.
They did it to Breonna Taylor, who had noth­ing to do with their war­rant, and then arrest­ed and pinned attempt­ed mur­der of a police offi­cer charges on her boyfriend because he dared to defend his home as is his God-giv­en and con­sti­tu­tion­al right to do.
If a fly buzzes past them, that fly is swat­ted down, and charges are pinned against it, but when they wan­ton­ly mur­der inno­cent cit­i­zens, it takes mov­ing moun­tains to have charges prof­fered against them, even when they com­mit the most bla­tant and egre­gious acts of criminality.

Here again, in the case below is anoth­er instance of police going to a home, and when the occu­pant opens fire at them (not know­ing they are state actors) the inno­cent is charged with attempt­ed mur­der of a law enforce­ment offi­cer, and the cor­rupt pros­e­cu­tors are will­ing to pros­e­cute the case against an inno­cent person.
This is lit­er­al­ly one of the most cor­rupt sys­tems of jus­tice any­place on plan­et earth. 
When cit­i­zens have no right to defend even the sanc­ti­ty of their own homes, you know, we are liv­ing in a full-fledged police state. (MB)

The Pensacola Police Department says it has launched an inter­nal affairs inves­ti­ga­tion after par­ents say a child was hurt while in police cus­tody fol­low­ing last week’s police-involved shoot­ing. It hap­pened after Pensacola Police SWAT offi­cers exe­cut­ed a search war­rant last Thursday morn­ing at a home on N 7th Ave. Channel 3 has report­ed exten­sive­ly how 24-year-old Corey Marioneaux Jr. has been charged for shoot­ing at one of the SWAT offi­cers after they rammed his door.

Marioneaux Jr.‘s two young chil­dren — ages 1 and 3 — were inside the home at the time. The fam­i­ly argues Marioneaux Jr. shot at the offi­cers because he feared they were intrud­ers. Channel 3 sat down with the kids’ moth­er, Moiya Dixon, on Wednesday. “I was wok­en up by a phone call,” said Dixon, who co-par­ents with Marioneaux Jr. At 5 a.m. last Thursday, the chil­dren — Caion and Cylen — were asleep with their dad at the N 7th Ave. home. Dixon says she was asleep at her own home. Receiving the alarm­ing phone call, fam­i­ly told her what they knew. Among the info relayed was that her 1‑year-old was injured. “I get out my car like, ‘Where’s my baby? Where’s my baby?’ ” Dixon said. “And I get my baby and I see his face — and it’s almost unrec­og­niz­able com­pared to how he looked when I left him last.” A pic­ture shows the 1‑year-old’s nose and lip swollen, a scrape on his lip, scratch­es on his nose and sev­er­al bumps on his fore­head. Dixon’s first thought — “Who did this?” On Monday, the Pensacola Police Department sent Channel 3 a state­ment on the child’s injuries. The depart­ment claims both kids were in the back­seat of a car with an inves­ti­ga­tor. The inves­ti­ga­tor got out of the car. Upon return­ing, Pensacola Police says the inves­ti­ga­tor did­n’t notice the child lean­ing on the door. When the inves­ti­ga­tor opened it, police say the child fell out of the car.

Tweet…
Olivia Iverson
Meanwhile, the father still faces a charge for attempt­ed mur­der of a law enforce­ment offi­cer and lost his job over it. None of them know why police want infor­ma­tion from them for an inves­ti­ga­tion they say Corey Marioneaux isn’t a sus­pect for.

The child was checked by EMS for injuries. Both chil­dren were lat­er released to fam­i­ly mem­bers,” Pensacola Police goes on to say in its state­ment. Escambia County tells Channel 3 that EMS was called out at 6:40 a.m. for a hem­or­rhage and lac­er­a­tion on a tod­dler. They arrived six min­utes lat­er. The coun­ty could­n’t spec­i­fy what EMS saw and said. But it claims the call was can­celed 20 min­utes lat­er. The tod­dler was not tak­en to the hos­pi­tal by EMS — so Dixon took him her­self. Dozens of pages of paper­work from the hos­pi­tal doc­u­ment the child’s injuries after CAT scans and x‑rays. Dixon claims the Florida Department of Children and Families is inves­ti­gat­ing. DCF has not yet con­firmed this with Channel 3.

Channel 3 asked Dixon on Wednesday what she would say to the Pensacola Police Department. “How could you?” she respond­ed. Channel 3 brought Dixon’s ques­tions to Pensacola Police on Wednesday after the inter­view. The depart­ment said they could­n’t answer them because it has launched an inter­nal affairs inves­ti­ga­tion. Additionally, Pensacola Police called off Channel 3’s sched­uled inter­view with Chief Eric Randall that was set for Friday. Chief Randall met with Dixon in-per­son right after Channel 3’s inter­view and “had a con­ver­sa­tion with her,” accord­ing to police. Dixon says he apol­o­gized and promised to inves­ti­gate what hap­pened. “It’s been very dis­turb­ing and over­whelm­ing not know­ing the truth of what hap­pened to my 1‑year-old,” Dixon said. “My 3‑year-old is trau­ma­tized,” she added. “He keeps hav­ing to tell the sto­ry of what his 3‑year-old brain can com­pre­hend of what hap­pened to his baby broth­er. That is hor­ri­fy­ing.” Channel 3 asked Wednesday to speak with Marioneaux Jr. on cam­era, but he declined. He faces a charge of attempt­ed mur­der of a law enforce­ment offi­cer — which he lost his job over. “On top of all of his charges, he has to also think, ‘Now some­body hurt my baby,’ ” Dixon said.

Marioneaux Jr. does­n’t have a crim­i­nal record. Pensacola Police says he is not a sus­pect in the January shoot­ing inves­ti­ga­tion that led police to his home last Thursday morn­ing. Dixon says she has no idea why police would want infor­ma­tion in his home. The fam­i­ly now sim­ply wants answers — what led police to the house and how did their baby boy end up injured in police cus­tody? Channel 3 asked Dixon Wednesday whether they plan to take any legal action. Dixon says they are cur­rent­ly busy try­ing to fig­ure out sim­ple things, like where to sleep. She added they don’t live at the N 7th Ave. home any­more because they don’t feel safe.

Shane Dalling Lays Bare Corruption Of FLA Board, Even As He Has Been Accused Of Lying…

YouTube player

The head of the Firearms Licencing Authority (FLA) should be called before a select com­mit­tee of the Parliament to tes­ti­fy open­ly as to the facts he out­lined in a speech he gave about over 200 crim­i­nals being giv­en gun licens­es over the objec­tions of the police.
In the list, Dalling out­lined that con­vict­ed crim­i­nals of all stripes, includ­ing mur­der­ers, have been giv­en licens­es to pos­sess firearms over the stri­dent objec­tions of the police who have sup­plied rea­sons for their objections.
At a press con­fer­ence, the chief exec­u­tive offi­cer of the FLA, Shane Dalling, assert­ed his right to speak, “my days of remain­ing silent are over Dalling assert­ed, I am going to speak on every mat­ter.”
Dalling said he want­ed to ven­er­ate the mat­ter of the grant­i­ng of firearm licens­es and what he called the con­stant attacks on his character.

He said he said he joined the FLA in June of 2017, and that was when he real­ized that peo­ple were get­ting gun licens­es under ques­tion­able circumstances.
He said he was first alert­ed when a Superintendent of police from Westmoreland sub­mit­ted a two-page let­ter to the FLA with what he char­ac­ter­ized as adverse find­ings on an indi­vid­ual involved in lot­to-scam­ming and gang activ­i­ties that had secured a firear­m’s license from the Board of the FLA
In 2017 the entire board of the FLA resigned after it came to light that the same board was giv­ing crim­i­nals gun licens­es. To date, there have been no inves­ti­ga­tions by the police.
If peo­ple with crim­i­nal back­grounds are walk­ing around with licensed firearms, there is a prob­lem; why have the police not inter­viewed those board mem­bers to get an expla­na­tion of the rea­sons and on the basis by which those licensees were qual­i­fied to be issued licenses?

After MOCA and the FLA had done a review, it was dis­cov­ered that over two hun­dred (200) crim­i­nals from Saint James, Manchester, Clarendon, Trewlany, and Westmoreland were grant­ed gun licens­es. Dalling said the police warned that they should not be giv­en the right to have a legal firearm. None of those licens­es have been withdrawn.
Dalling said licens­es were issued to con­vict­ed mur­der­ers, Lotto-scam­mers, ille­gal pos­ses­sion of firearms, rob­bery with aggra­va­tion, rape, and drug trafficking.
Dalling assert­ed that he want­ed to be cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly clear that all of that infor­ma­tion was a part of the files, yet the FLA board still grant­ed licens­es to those criminals.
The fLA boss detailed the case of a man from Mandeville who was want­ed for ille­gal pos­ses­sion of a firearm; the man was held and even­tu­al­ly sen­tenced for the crime. He alleges that the man applied for a firearm license, and the request was denied because he had a crim­i­nal record and had also lied on his application.
Mister Dalling said that although the appli­cant did not file a new appli­ca­tion nor did he file an appeal the FLA board went ahead and grant­ed a license to the same appli­cant three months later.

Mister Dalling said that the issues plagu­ing the FLA were brought to the atten­tion of the Ministry of National Security in 2015, but nobody did any­thing about it. Instead, he said the prob­lem mushroomed.
Dalling said peo­ple are try­ing to tar­nish his rep­u­ta­tion because every­one is mak­ing mon­ey from the cor­rup­tion at the agency and that many of them have open­ly lob­bied to have him removed from the agency.
Here again, we have a sit­u­a­tion made pos­si­ble by ad hoc craft­ed leg­is­la­tion inten­tion­al­ly done to allow loop­holes for crim­i­nal corruption.
If the laws gov­ern­ing the issuance of firearm licens­es were well writ­ten, clear, and con­cise, there would be no pos­si­bil­i­ty that a board could issue per­mits to any­one who did not tick all of the box­es in the law.
It is a murky mess designed to make it pos­si­ble for the kind of cor­rup­tion Dalling speaks to. Who has the finals say in who gets a license to pur­chase and car­ry a firearm? Is it clear­ly stip­u­lat­ed in the law, or is it as we imag­ine, a man does­n’t pay, so he does­n’t play.
In October 2020, the chair­man of the Police Federation, Sergeant Petra Rowe, accused Shane Dalling of fail­ing to grant licens­es to police offi­cers based on claims that they had com­mit­ted domes­tic violence.
At the time, Dalling denied the claim to the media, but Rowe coun­tered, “I think that he was try­ing to jus­ti­fy the com­plaint we had made to make it seem like they had prob­a­ble cause to deny police offi­cers firearm licens­es in large numbers.”
Rowe told the media there was no over­whelm­ing report with­in the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) to sug­gest that police are involved in high num­bers of domes­tic abuse and assert­ed that if that were the case, there would have been sev­er­al reports and inter­nal inter­ven­tions as there are poli­cies in the JCF that gov­ern such occurrences.

In his push back against Dalling, Sergeant Rowe said, “It is quite curi­ous to think that per­sons would com­plain to FLA over seek­ing to pur­sue crim­i­nal actions against our col­leagues for domes­tic vio­lence unless the FLA CEO is con­fus­ing police offi­cers with some oth­er group. We do not deny there may be cas­es in the JCF where police offi­cers, like any oth­er man from any oth­er group in this coun­try, would have offend­ed their spouse in that way. But the claim from the FLA CEO gives the coun­try an impres­sion that this action among police offi­cers is so promi­nent that it leads to mass denials. So we are not say­ing it is not hap­pen­ing or has nev­er hap­pened, but the impres­sion giv­en by the FLA CEO that it is a promi­nent rea­son for denial is absolute­ly false.
At the time, Sergeant Rowe point­ed out that he was dis­ap­point­ed in Dalling mak­ing a pub­lic dec­la­ra­tion that a mem­ber of the JCF’s firearm license was revoked because of men­tal issues when there has been no psy­cho­log­i­cal report on the state of the mem­ber’s health. Rowe said the mat­ter was before the court, and it is for the court to declare the mem­ber’s psy­cho­log­i­cal fit­ness to hold a firearm; thus, Dalling’s dec­la­ra­tion is irresponsible.

Was Shane Dalling lying then, or is he lying now? If he lied, then as was borne out, can he be believed now even if he is telling the truth?

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Prosecutors Reduce Requested Sentence For Ex-cop Kim Potter

Minnesota pros­e­cu­tors have appar­ent­ly backed away from their pur­suit of a longer-than-usu­al sen­tence for the sub­ur­ban Minneapolis police offi­cer who said she con­fused her hand­gun for her Taser when she killed Daunte Wright, a 20-year-old Black motorist.

Kim Potter, 49, is sched­uled to be sen­tenced Friday fol­low­ing her December con­vic­tion of first-degree manslaugh­ter. In a court fil­ing this week, pros­e­cu­tors said a sen­tence of slight­ly more than sev­en years — which is the pre­sumed penal­ty under the state’s guide­lines — would be proper.

The pre­sump­tive sen­tence takes into account the main ele­ments of the con­vic­tion: the death of Daunte Wright and Defendant’s reck­less­ness,” pros­e­cu­tor Matt Frank wrote.

Potter’s attor­neys are ask­ing for less than usu­al, includ­ing only pro­ba­tion. Frank wrote that pros­e­cu­tors dis­agree with the defense, but “the State rec­og­nizes that this is a unique case giv­en the con­text in which Defendant Potter reck­less­ly han­dled her firearm.”

Potter was con­vict­ed of first-degree and sec­ond-degree manslaugh­ter in the April 11 killing of Wright, who was pulled over by Brooklyn Center offi­cers for hav­ing expired license plate tags and an air fresh­en­er hang­ing from his rearview mir­ror. Officers learned he had an out­stand­ing war­rant for a weapons pos­ses­sion charge, and he pulled away as they tried to arrest him.

Video shows that Potter shout­ed sev­er­al times that she was going to tase Wright, but she had her gun in her hand and fired one shot into his chest.

Under Minnesota statutes, Potter, who is white, will be sen­tenced only on the most seri­ous con­vic­tion of first-degree manslaugh­ter. State sen­tenc­ing guide­lines call for a penal­ty rang­ing from slight­ly more than six years to about 8 12 years, with the pre­sump­tive sen­tence being just over sev­en years. The sen­tenc­ing guide­lines are advi­so­ry, but judges can’t go above or below them unless they find a com­pelling reason.

Prosecutors ini­tial­ly argued that aggra­vat­ing fac­tors war­rant­ed a sen­tence above the guide­line range. Among them, pros­e­cu­tors said Potter abused her author­i­ty as an offi­cer and that her actions caused a greater-than-nor­mal dan­ger to others.

There is no indi­ca­tion in the court record that they have for­mal­ly with­drawn that argu­ment, but the doc­u­ment filed Tuesday indi­cates they now believe the pre­sump­tive sen­tence is appropriate.

Defense attor­neys, in seek­ing a lighter sen­tence, have argued that Wright was the aggres­sor and that he would be alive if he had obeyed commands.

In their request for pro­ba­tion only, Potter’s attor­neys said she has no pri­or record, is remorse­ful, has had an exem­plary career and has the sup­port of fam­i­ly and friends. They also said her risk of com­mit­ting the same crime again is low because she is no longer a police offi­cer, and they said she would do well on probation.

Prosecutors dis­agreed with the defense’s rea­son­ing. In Tuesday’s fil­ings, Frank wrote that to sen­tence Potter to only pro­ba­tion, the judge would have to find that pro­ba­tion would serve society’s inter­ests, not Potter’s, and that the defense must estab­lish that. But Frank also said there could be some ben­e­fits to pro­ba­tion. Among them, Potter could speak to law enforce­ment groups or law­mak­ers about the dan­gers of con­fus­ing a hand­gun for a Taser.

Frank said she could also speak to man­u­fac­tur­ers about mak­ing design changes to avoid con­fu­sion. And, he said, she could acknowl­edge her fail­ure and try to help the com­mu­ni­ty heal to “hon­or the mem­o­ry of Daunte Wright.”

No prison sen­tence can bring Daunte Wright back to life. A prison sen­tence is just a num­ber, and that num­ber can­not undo this tragedy or bring Daunte Wright back to his fam­i­ly,” Frank wrote. “Fostering heal­ing and com­mu­ni­ty restora­tion is valu­able too.”

He wrote that if the court finds that prison isn’t war­rant­ed, Potter should get 10 years of pro­ba­tion and be required to spend a year in jail, speak to law enforce­ment about the dan­gers of weapons con­fu­sion, and speak to Wright’s fam­i­ly about their loss if they want her to do so.

Frank also dis­agreed with defense argu­ments that Potter should be giv­en a sen­tence that goes below the guide­line range.

If the court finds that Potter’s case is less seri­ous than the typ­i­cal first-degree manslaugh­ter case, he wrote, the court should issue a sen­tence between four and slight­ly over sev­en years, the pre­sump­tive sen­tences for sec­ond-degree and first-degree manslaughter.

To impose any­thing less would fail to take into account Daunte Wright’s death and the jury’s find­ing that Defendant Potter com­mit­ted first-degree manslaugh­ter,” Frank wrote.

In Minnesota, it’s pre­sumed that con­victs who show good behav­ior will serve two-thirds of their sen­tence in prison and the rest on super­vised release, com­mon­ly known as parole. That means if Potter gets the rough­ly sev­en-year pre­sump­tive sen­tence, she would serve about four years and nine months behind bars, with the rest on parole.

Potter has been at the state’s women’s prison in Shakopee since the guilty verdict.

The Parallel Between Police And Predatory Animals Is Uncanny…

The images tell us a lot about our­selves; are we bet­ter than the oth­er animals?

As I think about the dai­ly killing of peo­ple of col­or by out-of-con­trol cops who are doped up on racism, big­otry, racial ani­mus, and God knows what else, a thought came to me that I would like to share with you.

Here we see three preda­tors sur­round and are about to kill a Wildebeest; more strik­ing­ly, a whole herd of Wildebeest stands pas­sive­ly and looks on as if their sheer advan­tage in size and num­bers mean nothing.
And so we ask the ques­tion, what is it that the Wildebeest believe about them­selves that keeps them from cap­i­tal­iz­ing on their advan­tages in size and numbers?

In the sec­ond image above, we see anoth­er group of preda­tors, albeit from a dif­fer­ent species, snuff­ing out anoth­er inno­cent life as the preda­to­ry cats killed the Wildebeest in the first image.
In the third image, we see a small crowd gath­ered; this crowd is syn­ony­mous with the Wildebeest herd that stood by while one of their own is being killed. These obser­va­tions are [not] a call to arms, but rather a call for reflection. 

Day by day, we see these images and videos of police com­mit­ting crimes against the pub­lic; unnec­es­sary assaults, griev­ous bod­i­ly harm, and death on the peo­ple, while oth­ers stand aside and look.
In this state of tyran­ny in which we as peo­ple of col­or exist, gov­ern­ment agents com­mit crimes that ordi­nary cit­i­zens are exe­cut­ed and impris­oned for, and they do it with impunity.
Some experts attribute this quote to Thomas Jefferson; oth­ers claim not so, I believe we have reached that tip­ping point.
When gov­ern­ment fears the peo­ple, there is lib­er­ty. When the peo­ple fear the gov­ern­ment, there is tyran­ny.“We, the peo­ple, now live in mor­bid fear of the Government, much the same way that the Wildebeest, though hav­ing the num­bers and supe­ri­or size, are pet­ri­fied of the much small­er preda­to­ry cats that prey on them.

Here a Texas cop tack­les a scant­i­ly-clad teenage girl and throws her to the ground at a pool party.
He then sits on top of her sub­dued semi-naked form, which was what he want­ed all along…
He then pulls his weapon and threat­ens to mur­der bystanders who dared to chal­lenge his inap­pro­pri­ate behavior…

The above image best sums up the car­nage of police vio­lence in America. We have the inno­cent Wildebeest being preyed on by the Lionesses, the Wildebeest, not know­ing their strength or wired to be vic­tims, runs away while the peo­ple who can effec­tu­ate real and mean­ing­ful change to the car­nage watch in delight.
It is what they designed all along. American Policing is [not] bro­ken; it works exact­ly as they designed it.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.

Purdue University Officer Captured Violently Arresting Black Student In Viral Video Is On Leave, But Only Because He Allegedly Received Death Threats

Before you process the lat­est iter­a­tion of police con­tin­ued bru­tal attacks on Black Americans, let us remem­ber that the FBI warned from as far back as 2006 that white suprema­cists and neo-nazis were infil­trat­ing police depart­ments; it is also kin­da remark­able that the FBI made those warn­ings even though America’s police depart­ments have been cesspools of white suprema­cy and anti-Black ani­mos­i­ty since the police were first cre­at­ed to keep Blacks in their place.
Ask your­selves what has been done by Federal, State & Local author­i­ties to rein in the blood­thirsty thugs that now roam the streets look­ing to see who they mur­der next?
Zero!!!

The white cam­pus police offi­cer in a recent viral video where he appears to be strug­gling with a Black Purdue University stu­dent has been placed on leave as his depart­ment claims he has been receiv­ing death threats since the encounter at the West Lafayette, Indiana, institution.

Purdue police offi­cer strug­gling with stu­dent (Video screengrab/​Action Injury Law Group)

A minute-long video that was post­ed on social media shows a strug­gle between Adonis Tuggle, 24, and the uniden­ti­fied offi­cer in the snow on the school’s cam­pus on Friday, Feb. 4. Cries of dis­tress can be heard from Tuggle and a woman believed to be Tuggle’s girl­friend, who appar­ent­ly is record­ing the encounter with her cell­phone. The woman screams, “You’re hurt­ing him. You’re hurt­ing him. Can you take your elbow off his f — — neck? Tuggle is also heard in footage say­ing over and over again to the cop, “You’re chok­ing me. You’re chok­ing me.” “Please help. This offi­cer won’t get off his neck,” the girl­friend shouts toward the end of the clip. “He’s tak­ing it too far. While the officer’s name has not been released by the Purdue University Police Department, the Lafayette Journal & Courier news­pa­per iden­ti­fies him as Jon Selke. Tuggle told The Associated Press that the alter­ca­tion start­ed with an argu­ment between him and his girl­friend that esca­lat­ed to the cam­pus cop punch­ing him in the face and using his elbow to hold him down on the ground by the neck. It end­ed with him being locked up for resist­ing arrest. The junior psy­chol­o­gy major stayed in the jail for an hour and was able to bail him­self out.

YouTube player

He told the AP that some­one had called the police on them as they were argu­ing in pub­lic. Tuggle said they were already cool­ing off when Selke arrived. Tuggle said, “I was already a cou­ple of feet away from my girl­friend,” when the encounter with the offi­cer start­ed. The girl­friend also tried to reas­sure the cop that they were OK, but instead of accept­ing their protes­ta­tions that there was no need for an inter­ven­tion, Selke cursed at them, Tuggle claims. “I told him he had no rea­son to be dis­re­spect­ful,” Tuggle said. “He was yelling at her and she was yelling at him. I told my girl­friend to calm down and I heard him scream, ‘OK, bud­dy, you’re going down,’ and he threw me against the car.” After this, the offi­cer wres­tled Tuggle to the ground and told him to “stop resist­ing.” “He had his hand press­ing my face in the snow. He was smoth­er­ing me, almost as if you were try­ing to drown some­body under­wa­ter,” Tuggle said. “Basically, what hap­pened to George Floyd almost hap­pened to me, except I had an elbow, not a knee, and for­tu­nate­ly, I’m still breath­ing instead of being in a cas­ket.” As the girl­friend start­ed to record the vio­lent inter­ac­tion, she tapped the offi­cer. Tuggle alleges that the cop threat­ened to use his taser on her if she did it again. Tuggle also said that when oth­er police offi­cers arrived, one of them held his leg down while anoth­er held his arm down.

The first state­ment from the uni­ver­si­ty spoke direct­ly to Chief John Cox’s deci­sion to put the offi­cer on leave in light of the atten­tion and what he said were death threats sur­round­ing the inci­dent. “Cox ini­ti­at­ed the leave of absence after the offi­cer and depart­ment received death threats. PUPD is inves­ti­gat­ing the threats,” it read. Cox also released his own remarks sep­a­rate­ly. First, he stat­ed that the encounter was pre­cip­i­tat­ed when a caller to police said “it appeared a woman was being held against her will near Horticulture Drive,” as described by the state­ment. “Any time a PUPD offi­cer uses force in con­nec­tion with an arrest, the depart­ment con­ducts an inter­nal review. PUPD com­menced that review, led by Deputy Chief Lesley Wiete imme­di­ate­ly upon receiv­ing the officer’s report on Friday night,” the state­ment read.
That inves­ti­ga­tion will, under PUPD General Orders, include input from all wit­ness­es to the arrest and take into account all avail­able evi­dence, includ­ing video from offi­cers’ body-worn cam­eras and state­ments from the stu­dents involved. No phys­i­cal injuries were suf­fered in the inci­dent.” Tuggle has secured an attor­ney, Andrew M. Stroth, to rep­re­sent his inter­est in the case. Stroth stat­ed, “We are demand­ing a full and trans­par­ent inves­ti­ga­tion into the exces­sive and unjus­ti­fied attack on Adonis by the Purdue University police officer.”

YouTube player

We are demand­ing the imme­di­ate release of all the video evi­dence,” he stat­ed. “There is body cam­era police video that police have, that has not been shared with the fam­i­ly or shared pub­licly.” He cul­mi­nat­ed his demands by say­ing, “It’s anoth­er young Black man attacked by a police offi­cer. This took place, trag­i­cal­ly, on a col­lege cam­pus. Thank God he’s OK because the offi­cer had his elbow in Adonis’ neck. Adonis couldn’t breathe.” The Purdue Black Student Union orga­nized a town hall meet­ing to plan what their next points of action are. The hope was to come up with a solu­tion to pre­vent instances like this from hap­pen­ing to oth­er stu­dents, accord­ing to local sta­tion WTHR. One stu­dent said During the meet­ing, “Why do Black peo­ple con­stant­ly have to jus­ti­fy their lives?” Another stu­dent chimed in, “How many more videos of police putting their knees and elbow on a Black person’s neck and throat do we need to see before we real­ize that’s not how arrests are made?”
Purdue University President Mitch Daniels released a state­ment on the inci­dent on Thursday, Feb. 10.
“There are no sub­jects Purdue takes more seri­ous­ly than cam­pus safe­ty, stu­dent well-being, and prop­er police con­duct. On Friday evening, Feb. 4, police received a bystander report of a sus­pect­ed assault on a woman, prompt­ing an officer’s urgent response,” the release start­ed. Daniels shared that the insti­tu­tion “imme­di­ate­ly” start­ed inves­ti­gat­ing the alleged exces­sive use of force by the offi­cer by review­ing his actions and assess­ing the footage, inter­view­ing the wit­ness, and look­ing at “all video evi­dence, includ­ing body-worn and in-car cam­era footage.”

Should there be a find­ing of mis­con­duct by the offi­cer, appro­pri­ate action will be tak­en prompt­ly,” Daniels promised. “In the spir­it of trans­paren­cy, once the Purdue Police and Indiana State Police reviews are com­plete, all find­ings and evi­dence … will be made avail­able.” The pres­i­dent asks the pub­lic to remain patient dur­ing the investigation.(ABS)

Viral Video Of A Black Teen Being Pinned Down And Arrested At A New Jersey Mall While White Teen Seen Fighting With Him Sits On Couch Sparks Investigation

A video of two police offi­cers break­ing up a fight has gone viral. The offi­cers appear to treat a Black teenag­er (on the ground in a white hood­ie) and a white teenag­er (on the couch in a black hood­ie) dif­fer­ent­ly. Karina Stevens
  • A viral video of a New Jersey mall fight between two teens has sparked outrage.
  • Police were filmed pin­ning down the Black teenag­er, while the white teen sat on a near­by couch.
  • An inves­ti­ga­tion has been launched into the police offi­cers’ actions.

A video of police offi­cers break­ing up a fight at a New Jersey mall has sparked anger over accu­sa­tions that law enforce­ment treat­ed the two teenagers involved in the scuf­fle — one Black and one white — differently.

In a video doc­u­ment­ing the fight at the Bridgewater Commons mall in Bridgewater Township, New Jersey, the teens can be seen get­ting into a ver­bal argument.

Get your hand out of my face,” the Black teen said.

They then begin shov­ing each oth­er, and a phys­i­cal fight breaks out. The Black teen is thrown on the floor by the white teen dur­ing the fight. Two police offi­cers — one male and one female — arrive.

YouTube player

The female offi­cer push­es the white teen onto a near­by couch and motions for him to stay there. At the same time, the male offi­cer tack­les the Black teen to the floor, sit­ting on him and hand­cuff­ing him, while the female offi­cer quick­ly kneels on his back to keep him down on the ground.

It’s cause he’s Black. Racially moti­vat­ed,” some­one can be heard say­ing in the video’s background

The white teen is then seen stand­ing over the Black teen while the offi­cers hand­cuff the Black teen. As the video ends, the Black teen is hauled to his feet while the white teen sits on the couch.

Local ABC affil­i­ate ABC 7 report­ed that the fight involved a Black eighth-grad­er, iden­ti­fied as Kye, and a white high school­er whose name has not been released.

They basi­cal­ly tack­led me to the ground, and then the male offi­cer put his knee in my back, and then he start­ed putting me in cuffs,” Kye told ABC 7. “Then the female offi­cer came over and put her knee on my upper back too, and start­ed help­ing him put cuffs on me while he was just sit­ting down on the couch watch­ing the whole thing.”

Kye’s moth­er, Eboné, told ABC 7 that she was grate­ful that her son was OK but want­ed the two police offi­cers fired.

I had to watch it on mute. I still haven’t watched it and lis­tened to the sound, I’m baby-step­ping my way into watch­ing it, but it’s just crazy,” she said.

It does­n’t take two cops to hold a 14-year-old boy down who is not resist­ing, while the oth­er boy is just going free and still going off on my son. It just does­n’t make sense,” Eboné told NBC in an inter­view on Tuesday.

On Wednesday, a let­ter from Bridgewater Township Mayor Matthew Moench said an inves­ti­ga­tion had been launched over the incident.

The Township Administration is aware of a video cir­cu­lat­ing on social media involv­ing some young peo­ple and offi­cers of the Bridgewater Police Department,” Moench wrote. He added that the local pros­e­cu­tor’s office would be con­duct­ing an “inde­pen­dent review” of the inci­dent with the police depart­men­t’s support.

Although an inves­ti­ga­tion is still gath­er­ing the facts about this inci­dent, I’m deeply dis­turbed by what appears to be racial­ly dis­parate treat­ment in this video,” New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy tweet­ed on Wednesday. “We’re com­mit­ted to increas­ing trust between law enforce­ment and the peo­ple they serve.”

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, the Bridgewater Township Police Department said it was aware of the incident.

We rec­og­nize that this video has made mem­bers of our com­mu­ni­ty upset and are call­ing for an inter­nal affairs inves­ti­ga­tion,” the police depart­men­t’s state­ment said.

The Bridgewater Township Police Department did not imme­di­ate­ly respond to a request for com­ment from Insider.

Read the orig­i­nal arti­cle on Insider