School Yard Bullies:

Once there was boy called Israel he attend­ed mid­dle east high school in a volatile area. Most of the oth­er kids teased and threat­ened him, he was forced to defend him­self against the oth­er kids in his school , he once took on a whole group of them and beat them square­ly. This act of brav­ery forced some of his ene­mies to make friends with him, yet there were some who were vehe­ment­ly opposed to Israel. Some argued that he had no right to exist, oth­ers argued he had a right to exist , just not in their school.

Because Israel went to a school where he was not liked, a school where many argued he was placed because of his pow­er­ful friends, he was allowed to take weapons to school. Now the rules are that there should be no weapons in that school, but lit­tle Israel had big pow­er­ful friends who insist­ed they want­ed him in that school, and they swore that no mat­ter what they would defend him to the death.

One boy named Iran was par­tic­u­lar­ly pissed at the idea that Israel was not only allowed to take weapons to school, he was giv­en some of the most dev­as­tat­ing weapons by his pow­er­ful friends, and school admin­is­tra­tors nev­er ques­tioned it. So Iran decid­ed to fash­ion his own weapons and take them to school. Now grant­ed that Iran nev­er fought with Israel or was even a part of that group of oth­er guys that Israel had sound­ly beat­en there was still pal­pa­ble ani­mus that sim­mered between both boys.

As a result they con­tin­u­al­ly fought through prox­ies , in oth­er words they both had friends who fought mini skir­mish­es with each oth­er , in many cas­es their fin­ger­prints were all over the skirmishes.

(ronit​baras​.com image.)

Now Iran also has pow­er­ful friends, the dif­fer­ence with his friends was that they were not ide­o­log­i­cal friends ‚they were the type who looked out for their own inter­ests. In oth­er words they were not the type who would defend Iran in a fight, they would cut and run. Iran rec­og­nized that if he want­ed to regain respect for him­self and the respect of those boys who were sound­ly whipped by Israel he must get com­pa­ra­ble weapons to those Israel has. So Iran start­ed devel­op­ing his own arse­nal of weapons and in an effort to get respect he kept brag­ging that he was a bet­ter fight­er than many believe to be true. Now Israel’s pow­er­ful friends made claims that Iran was mak­ing weapons that are dan­ger­ous, with the inten­tion of tak­ing them to school. They argued that Iran not only want­ed to take the weapons to school he want­ed to destroy their friend Israel with them.

Now in all fair­ness, Iran in an effort to seem impor­tant had said that he want­ed to remove Israel from the map. This caused much con­ster­na­tion with Israel’s friends, who argued that based on those pompous boast­ful pro­nounce­ments alone Iran should be emas­cu­lat­ed and not allowed to have any weapons at all. Iran attempt­ed to walk those com­ments back, he argued I do not want to destroy him I just want to remove him from my school. As such the pow­er­ful friends lob­bied school admin­is­tra­tors to strip search Iran every­day he arrives at school because he can­not be trust­ed not to try to destroy Israel with the weapons he does­n’t have.

Israel for his part , know­ing that his friends wield­ed immense pow­er over the school admin­is­tra­tors and are also finan­cial pow­er­hous­es with­in the alum­ni, demand­ed that Iran not only be strip-searched but demol­ished and made bare for his inso­lence. Now America Israel’s largest and most pow­er­ful backer , was con­flict­ed he sup­port­ed Israel and said so, but he had been in sev­er­al fights, and even though he is extreme­ly pow­er­ful he had come out of a cou­ple of fights scarred, because he unad­vis­ed­ly entered into fights with­out clear­ly defined ene­mies and what win­ning looks like. America did not want to be dragged into anoth­er fight sim­ply put.

This did not sit well with Israel who by now had become accus­tomed to being treat­ed dif­fer­ent­ly, giv­en a feel­ing of enti­tle­ment if you will. After all he had always done what he want­ed with­out con­se­quence. His pow­er­ful friends gave him carte blanch, they gave him weapons and as much mon­ey as he want­ed. Even when he clear­ly broke school rules his pow­er­ful friends pre­vent­ed admin­is­tra­tors from pun­ish­ing him. To many even some who once sup­port­ed his right to be in that school he was now an out of con­trol bul­ly who want­ed to throw his weight,.….… oh .. well the weight of his friends around.

Despite being allowed to abro­gate all the rules many oth­er kids have been sus­pend­ed and even expelled for, Israel demand­ed that school admin­is­tra­tors stop hav­ing dis­cus­sions with Iran , he vehe­ment­ly demand­ed that Iran should be stripped searched using force. When he did not get school admin­is­tra­tors to do his bid­ding, Israel called them all kinds of deroga­to­ry names, and cas­ti­gat­ed them for being inef­fec­tu­al. Mark you this is the same admin­is­tra­tion which allowed him to defy rules and turns a blind eye to his malfeasance.

Many oth­er chil­dren have felt the over­whelm­ing arro­gance of Israel because of the weapons he had at his dis­pos­al and the pow­er­ful friends who stood by men­ac­ing­ly, ready to defend him with even more pow­er­ful weapons. Many won­dered how his friends could even be peace mak­ers between Israel and the oth­er kids when they state cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly they sup­port him, and pro­vide him with weapons even they com­bined can­not match.

Ok this is no sto­ry of a school with bul­ly­ing boys. This is actu­al­ly a grown up sit­u­a­tion between sov­er­eign nations run by men who will tell you they are intel­li­gent lead­ers who know best what’s good for their respec­tive country.

What would Israel do if it had no nuclear weapons, and did not have a pow­er­ful friend like the United States as an uncon­di­tion­al backer?

My gut tells me Israel would do every­thing in its pow­er to pur­sue and secure peace.

Barack Obama was elect­ed to office on a peace plat­form, he cam­paigned against the Iraq war and promised if elect­ed he would end it. He has , his base on the left are not par­tic­u­lar­ly thrilled with him for lit­er­al­ly esca­lat­ing the Afghan con­flict by throw­ing more troops into what many argue is an unwinnable war. Not a war unwinnable because America is weak , but unwinnable because not even the com­man­der-in- chief can artic­u­late what win­ning actu­al­ly is.

Not want­i­ng to seem weak, a charge repub­li­cans use to tar and feath­er demo­c­ra­t­ic pres­i­dents, Obama acqui­esced to demands by pen­ta­gon gen­er­als and oth­ers behold­en to the mil­i­tary indus­tri­al com­plex in the repub­li­can par­ty by send­ing more troops to the Afghanistan the­atre. The American peo­ple are still not told why blood and trea­sure is still being squan­dered in that coun­try when the rea­son they were told our mil­i­tary was sent there was to top­ple the Taliban and kill Osama Bin Laden. Both were accom­plished yet the United States mil­i­tary is still in Afghanistan.

But back to pres­i­dent Obama. This pres­i­dent is prob­a­bly the least pow­er­ful American pres­i­dent ever. Simply put, he is not allowed to use pres­i­den­tial pow­er in ways oth­er pres­i­dents has.Being the first black pres­i­dent his hands are all but tied, his every move is ques­tioned, his most rou­tine order parsed and ridiculed.

On the issue of Israel the pres­i­dent has giv­en more than he was com­fort­able giv­ing to Netanyahu. Forced to the right by hawks in the repub­li­can par­ty wish­ing to scare off Jewish vot­ers a valu­able part of Obama’s coali­tion. Of course repub­li­can or demo­c­ra­t­ic every can­di­date has to swear their com­mit­ment to the state of Israel, vow­ing to defend her with every ounce of their being if elect­ed pres­i­dent. Don’t believe me ask pres­i­dent Ron Paul.

Former pres­i­dent Jimmy Carter has been vil­i­fied mer­ci­less­ly because of all American pres­i­dents past to the present he has shown the great­est sense of fair­ness. As a result President Carter is vil­i­fied because he rec­og­nizes the right of the Palestinian peo­ple to live as free peo­ple, free from the grind­ing boots of Israeli occu­pa­tion and domination.

Why does Netanyahu not want peace to work ? Many in Israel want peace , even some who head­ed secu­ri­ty agen­cies in that coun­try have stat­ed their oppo­si­tion to war with Iran. Former Mossad head Meir Dagan said he does not think Israel should strike Iran’s nuclear indus­try any­time soon, an attack that would have to include “a large num­ber of tar­gets.” In keep­ing with Mossad’s rep­u­ta­tion, he sug­gest­ed going for “régime change” instead. (pressen­za International press agency)

I am not sure on what basis a coun­try or its oper­a­tives can call for régime change in anoth­er sov­er­eign nation. A nation I might add which has a rich his­to­ry and cul­ture. Who autho­ris­es one coun­try to demand change of lead­er­ship in anoth­er soverign nation sim­ply because they diosagree with them polit­i­cal­ly? My naiveté’ is exposed here but what would the reac­tion be if the two per­spec­tive Iran has for Israel would be bomb them into obliv­ion or change their lead­er­ship by what­ev­er means. This is the kind of dog­mat­ic rhetoric we saw com­ing out of for­mer pres­i­dent George Bush’s white house, spear­head­ed by Dick Chaney, which seem to be the posi­tion of Israel.

While we are on the sub­ject of Cheney , it has become clear to me that evil does not emanate from the heart but rather from the mind. Despite his rather unde­served good for­tunes in receiv­ing a new heart, Cheney has shown that his hatred for pres­i­dent Obama is just as intense when he addressed repub­li­cans in Wyoming stat­ing quote:”“I can’t think of a time when I felt it was more impor­tant for us to defeat an incum­bent pres­i­dent today with respect to Barack Obama. I think he has been an unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter to the coun­try,”cnn​.com

As a chris­t­ian I ques­tion myself when I hear this guy make these state­ments, I gen­er­al­ly won­der why decent peo­ple die dai­ly and this man despite the good­ness of God still will not stop lying and sow­ing hatred. Cheney is the author and archi­tect of the débâ­cle we refer to as the Iraq war, he man­u­fac­tured lies and prop­a­gat­ed them accus­ing Iraq of hav­ing weapons of mass destruc­tion, he sought to link Iraq to 911 when pro­fes­sion­als in the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty debunked those lies. This war­mon­ger who need­ed to get Black water into Iraq still con­tin­ued his drum­beat of lies and dis­tor­tions for war, which the coun­try was even­tu­al­ly plunged into.

The con­se­quences of this war will live with America for hun­dreds of years to come thanks to Dick Cheney. This guy has the nerve to talk about unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter? His very temer­i­ty is an unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter. Osama Bin Laden is dead . He could­n’t get him, General Motors is alive , they ran the coun­try into a hole Obama restored it. The Iraq débâ­cle is at an end and no Dick Cheney there were no weapons of mass destruc­tions there , you have been exposed, you are the unmit­i­gat­ed dis­as­ter, and a pathet­ic liar.

It is beyond my com­pre­hen­sion, maybe some of you good folks may enlight­en me here, what gives one coun­try the right to tell anoth­er sov­er­eign nation what they can­not have? Does the United States, Russia, France, England, Israel, China, India, Pakistan own the world? Does the nations that are not nuclear armed pow­ers have the right to demand that those coun­tries named above forth­with get rid of their weapons? Who decides in the world who gets to have arse­nals of weapon­ry that can poten­tial­ly destroy this plan­et a thou­sand times over? And while we are at it how can we argue that one nation can be trust­ed with nuclear weapons over oth­ers , when the United States is the only coun­try ever to have used atom­ic weapons ?

No one wants to ask these ques­tions, because of fear for the United States sen­sors or because of fear of being labeled anti-Semitic by sup­port­ers of Israel. As human beings the only thing we real­ly have is our char­ac­ter, we must stand for some­thing, we live in a world where if one says the wrong thing he could end up in prison just for telling the truth, but we must not be det­tered by what man may do to us, rather we must stand on the prin­ci­ples of our con­vic­tions. Like so many who were demo­nized, mar­gin­al­ized, and vic­tim­ized before us, we must ask the ques­tions that Dr. king, Gandhi. Garvey. Marley and oth­ers have asked , because if we have no jus­tice on this plan­et we call home, all of our efforts at peace are mere futile whis­tles in the wind.

PNP SHOCKING DESECRATION AND TOTAL DISMANTLING OF OUR COUNTRY:

There are not enough words to describe the pic­ture below. Your eyes are not deceiv­ing you. This was the swear­ing-in of Glendon Harris PNP coun­cil­lor ‚as Mayor of the sec­ond city of Montego Bay. This event is per­fect­ly rou­tine, one par­ty los­es the elec­tion the sit­ting Mayor makes way for the new may­or. Well that’s the way intel­li­gent peo­ple do things, unfor­tu­nate­ly not the low life thugs in the PNP, instead what they did is almost tan­ta­mount to trea­son.

Secretary Pamella Marsh enrobes incom­ing Mayor of Montego Bay Glendon Harris in front of the black and gold back­drop designed to depict the Jamaican flag. Outgoing Mayor Charles Sinclair looks on​.Read more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​N​O​T​-​T​RUE — Decorator-denies-MoBay-mayor-s-claims-in-flag-controversy#ixzz1s23uZ7jl

They told the dec­o­ra­tor for the event to leave the col­or green from the Jamaican flag. For no oth­er rea­son than that the col­or green is the col­or the oppo­si­tion par­ty JLP uses. The new­ly installed Mayor then lied, stat­ing that the rea­son green was left out was that there was a short­age of mate­r­i­al to do the job prop­er­ly , he went on to fur­ther lie that the dec­o­ra­tor promised to return the $30,000 fee he was paid for the project.
The dec­o­ra­tor has since debunked those lies, and named the PNP oper­a­tive who told him to leave out the col­or green from our flag.
Anyone famil­iar with my blogs knows with­out a shad­ow of a doubt that I have scant regard for the polit­i­cal par­ties in Jamaica, and even less with those who are involved in those parties.
I have long argued that the PNP is the worst thing to ever have hap­pened to Jamaica, and in my view if not checked will be the ruina­tion of that Caribbean Island.
The degen­er­ate who autho­rized this kind of deface­ment of the Jamaican flag is not the excep­tion. The unfor­tu­nate truth is that is the rule in the PNP, a par­ty asso­ci­at­ed with thug­gery, vio­lence and the most base and unciv­i­lized behav­ior imag­in­able. There is thug­gery and unciv­i­lized behav­ior in both par­ties , but the bar was set by the peo­ple’s nation­al par­ty from as far back as inde­pen­dence. No one inci­dent or set of occur­rences tells the whole story.However one medi­um recent­ly relat­ed the sto­ry Pernell Charles told of the strate­gies employed, by Michael Manley and his min­ions in the fight to keep the National Workers Union a monop­oly union in so far as rep­re­sen­ta­tion­al rights goes in the baux­ite industry.
Jamaica’s Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller:
The esca­lat­ing crime num­bers in the coun­try are a result of an unwrit­ten “wink wink nod nod” that has char­ac­ter­ized the rela­tion­ship between the PNP and their sup­port­ers. You elect us we will hands off so you may hus­tle do what you want! It is a strat­e­gy that has had dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for our coun­try and the mind­set going for­ward. It has kept the PNP in pow­er for most of the 50 years since inde­pen­dence, made some peo­ple who sup­port that par­ty extreme­ly rich and has cost the lives of thou­sands of others.
The PNP has always been about par­ty , with lit­tle thought of coun­try, their mis­sion is to stay in pow­er at all cost . This mind­set runs the gamut from the very pin­na­cle to those in the gut­ters. Thuggery and class­less behav­ior is and has always been the hall­mark of the PNP. Defacing the most rec­og­niz­able sym­bol of our nation is not and nev­er was beneath them !!!!
What a class­less uncouth dis­gust­ing lot of moron­ic punks.
The Gleaner not to be out­done, car­ried this car­toon in response to out­cry from civic groups and oth­er Jamaicans to include the polit­i­cal opposition.
Clearly this once pres­ti­gious paper, once the best in the Caribbean under the lead­er­ship of Oliver Clarke, is not con­tent to have cam­paigned for the thug­gery. They have now estab­lished that they are will­ing to help gov­ern the thug­gery . Gutter behav­ior that has no place in our coun­try is now sanc­tioned behav­ior by this paper.
Those in gov­ern­ment deface our flag as they destroy our coun­try, then we won­der why ath­letes drag our most cher­ished and rec­og­niz­able sym­bol in the dirt. They know no bet­ter, or at worse they are just drag­ging our flag in the dirt with a view to get­ting as low in the gut­ter as the gov­ern­ment of Jamaica.
Nothing is sacred in our coun­try any­more, one can hard­ly get any low­er than the gut­ter now, can they?

WHEN WE CALL OUT THE RACISTS THEY SAY WE ARE RACIST.

George Zimmerman is in cus­tody. Not because law enforce­ment in Sanford Florida thought that his killing of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin war­rant­ed an arrest. He is in cus­tody because of the right­eous indig­na­tion of mil­lions of peo­ple who decid­ed we are not going to take being ignored anymore.

Through the trou­bles and tra­vails of the civ­il rights strug­gle , broth­ers and sis­ters, black and white, jews and gen­tiles, yel­low and brown man has marched with us , in our quest for respect and recog­ni­tion. So too today peo­ple of all col­or came togeth­er to say this is unac­cept­able , we want answers why Trayvon Martin was killed and just ignored..

Decent peo­ple were out­raged when a hum­ble seam­stress was arrest­ed on a bus just because she chose to sit down. Decent peo­ple were out­raged about Trayvon today as they did back then. This came to light because a young white man knew about the case and felt out­rage, not because Trayvon was black and he is white but because a human being was killed under ques­tion­able cir­cum­stances and no one was being held accountable.

This was nev­er about black and white, it still isn’t, it’s about wrong and right, . Blacks and whites , Latinos and Asians , Jews and oth­ers marched , blogged , signed peti­tions and did what they could, and as Sabrina and Tracey said all they want­ed was an arrest. An arrest that would see the sys­tem play out, they want­ed their day in court.

The par­ents of Trayvon Martin nev­er sought vengeance, they nev­er sought a lynch­ing , all they asked for is that the fun­da­men­tal decen­cy afford­ed oth­ers be afford­ed their mur­dered son. That is not racism, that is not racial hatred that is called justice.

I don’t know whether George Zimmerman is a racist or not , see­ing him in court today , I could­n’t help feel­ing sym­pa­thy for him. Trayvon Martin is gone nev­er to return , but here is this young man going through life chang­ing , life alter­ing cir­cum­stances that will leave him scarred for life, what­ev­er that life has in store for him.

Yet one can­not ignore the lan­guage of sup­port­ers of George Zimmerman, the lan­guage and the strat­e­gy they chose has left a bit­ter taste in the mouths of well-mean­ing peo­ple the world over. The Race bait­ing, hate mon­gers at FOX mis­in­for­ma­tion nev­er grasped the con­cept that despite all of the noise, what real­ly hap­pened is that some­one died.

How much hate do these peo­ple have for African-Americans that they would unan­i­mous­ly back some­one blind­ly even though we are the aggriev­ed par­ty. From that twirp Sean Hannity , to the bul­ly Bill O’reilly to the loud mouth wind­bag Rush Limbaugh these mis­cre­ants jumped on the case blast­ing every­one from the pres­i­dent of the United States to the vic­tim with­out the com­mon human decen­cy to show empa­thy to the fam­i­ly of the deceased.

What kind of hate pos­sess­es these freaks of nature that they would devote their time in defense of some­one who chased down and mur­dered some­one in cold blood? As we strug­gle with try­ing to under­stand with­out pars­ing and ratio­nal­iz­ing , bot­tom feed­ing crus­taceans like Hannity , Limbaugh, O’Reilly and the oth­er gifts to human­i­ty at FOX make a racial spec­ta­cle out of this tragedy.

Bill O’reilly and Sean Hannity

Polls con­duced after this tragedy became pub­lic revealed a wide chasm between the way blacks and whites viewed what hap­pened , over­whelm­ing­ly African-Americans thought that Zimmerman killed Trayvon Martin with­out jus­ti­fi­ca­tion, con­verse­ly white Americans over­whelm­ing­ly stat­ed that they did not know enough to form an opin­ion. To some this may seem like a rea­soned and sober way to look at things , but when you are a part of the pop­u­la­tion that has been the vic­tim for cen­turies you don’t need any­more infor­ma­tion to con­clude that once again wrong has been done to us.

Like Ostriches many chose to bury their heads in the sand pre­tend­ing that there is no prob­lem of race in America. Some even ask “what more could you want we gave you your black pres­i­dent”? What nerve? Even some that share the same skin col­or as Trayvon, yet pur­port to share the same human­i­ty with the rest of us fail to get the pic­ture. One New England law pro­fes­sor assailed Reverend Sharpton and Jackson for the work they did bring­ing Trayvon’s case to the fore.

She cas­ti­gat­ed both gen­tle­men for dar­ing to sug­gest that oth­er black peo­ple wear hood­ies, argu­ing that the hood­ie feeds the stereo­type of black men as hood­lums. She went on to say that she lives in a pre­dom­i­nant­ly white neigh­bour­hood and her two sons have been tar­get­ed and trailed by the police who want­ed to know what they were doing in the neigh­bor­hood. The pro­fes­sor told how she raised her sons not to dress or act in cer­tain ways that would feed the stereo­type oth­ers have of them.

Bob Marley famous­ly said he was glad he was not edu­cat­ed or he would have been a total idiot. This pro­fes­sor is the per­son­i­fi­ca­tion of that quote from Marley. On that sub­ject I rest my case. My wife believes that slav­ery has done such a ter­ri­ble job on us , to the point that we believe we have to com­port our­selves in a man­ner con­sis­tent with the fear dri­ven norms oth­ers have imposed on us.

Irrespective of the out­come of this case Trayvon Martin will nev­er return to his par­ents, nei­ther will George Zimmerman be the same again. George Zimmerman a 28-year-old guy who seem to hate crime, so much so he want­ed to be a cop, when that did not work out he opt­ed to be a self-appoint­ed neigh­bor­hood watch cap­tain. He chose to pro­file and appre­hend Trayvon Martin even though he was warned to back off. We are left to won­der what drove this young man who hat­ed crime and want­ed to be a cop, to him­self run afoul of the laws when he com­mit­ted a case of domes­tic vio­lence, what caused him to com­mit two sep­a­rate cas­es of assault on police offi­cers , one with violence?

Are we to beleive that because he was not made to account in these cas­es we know about that he felt above the laws? Did he feel untouch­able because he was the son of a for­mer judge ? We don’t know the answers to these ques­tions, what­ev­er the truths. George Zimmerman felt enti­tled , he felt autho­rised, some­one made him feel that way.

What drove him to ignore the 911 oper­a­tor who told him we don’t need you to fol­low him?These are the ques­tions we must ask our­selves if we are to begin to under­stand what hap­pened that night which destroyed two lives one way or the oth­er and caused rip­ple effects through this coun­try and the world the likes of which we haven’t seen in a long time.

The reac­tion of mis­ter Zimmerman’s peo­ple was dis­re­spect­ful and wor­thy of a hard push­back. Sending a let­ter to the NAACP telling them that if any­thing hap­pened to Zimmerman blood would be on their hands and demand­ing they call off the dogs. The caus­tic nature of this let­ter as well as state­ments made by his father and broth­er does noth­ing to help heal the wounds of the Martin fam­i­ly, or the sim­mer­ing caul­dron of racial ani­mus bub­bling just beneath the sur­face in the country.

Act #1 FOR TRAYVON MARTIN:

SPECIAL PROSECUTOR ANNOUNCES CHARGE OF MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE. GEORGE ZIMMERMAN IN CUSTODY.

There is evi­dence here that heat does pro­vide light, do not be fooled giv­en enough heat we are remind­ed that light does appear. In the inter­est of jus­tice we have lent our voic­es to the cho­rus demand­ing jus­tice for Trayvon Martin. We do not demand jus­tice on the basis of race we demand jus­tice on the basis of fairness.

As we have stat­ed black-on-black crime has been the sin­gle largest killer of young black male in this coun­try. As such we will not be like those on the right who argue this case from the per­spec­tive of race. We under­stand that some are pre­dis­posed to sup­port­ing every­thing that is wrong as long as it fits their narrative.

We salute Angela Corey for her thus far pro­fes­sion­al stance in the way she con­duct­ed this inves­ti­ga­tions and the way she han­dled her press conference.

We will com­ment fur­ther at a lat­er time this is the first step in the right direction.

As one of the nameless/​faceless sig­na­to­ry to the peti­tion demand­ing that law enforce­ment take a sec­ond look. A more respect­ful look at what tran­spired that fate­ful night. We are hum­bled at the thought that when the voic­es of the many are raised in right­eous indig­na­tion the very foun­da­tions of the halls of pow­er tremble.

This is all Tracey and Sabrina asked for, that their son receive the dig­ni­ty and respect fit­ting of a human being no more no less. This fam­i­ly as shown that no mat­ter what the crit­ics say class and dig­ni­ty can­not be bought with mon­ey , it is not affil­i­at­ed with social stand­ing, it is not gen­e­sised in edu­ca­tion. It comes from an entrenched god­ly incul­ca­tion from youth, instilled by par­ents endued with decen­cy and purpose.

We want to reg­is­ter our admi­ra­tion for Tracey and Sabrina, for the stead­fast and dig­ni­fied fight they have waged for jus­tice for their son Trayvon Martin.

WE SALUTE YOU SABRINA AND TRACEY:

The Hate, Now And To Come:

On January 20th 2009 Barack Hussien Obama was sworn in as the 44th President of the United States of America. Administering the oath of office to the new pres­i­dent was chief jus­tice John Roberts an appointee of George W Bush the 43rd pres­i­dent whom Obama suc­ceed­ed. Roberts opt­ed to admin­is­ter the oath from mem­o­ry and botched it, every­one laughed off the man­gling of the oath,no one was pre­pared to allow any­thing to cloud that fate­ful day many peo­ple thought they would nev­er live to see.

America appeared jad­ed, the coun­try want­ed some­thing inspi­ra­tional to cheer about, we were engaged in two wars that were still drag­ging on with no end in sight and no under­stand­ing of what vic­to­ry would look like .Many were already invok­ing the word Vietnam into the war dis­course. America’s image abroad was in tat­ters , the coun­try and it’s pres­i­dent were lit­er­al­ly seen as a cow­boy with a bad atti­tude. The econ­o­my was in a reces­sion, the mag­ni­tude and scope of which experts gross­ly underestimated.

Despite the bad econ­o­my, two wars, the ter­ror attacks of September 11th 2011, there was a gen­uine feel­ing of antic­i­pa­tion in the coun­try. America seemed to have crossed that divide, it had final­ly come of age , it had elect­ed a black man president!

It was awe­some to see the new first cou­ple as they held hands and basked in the glow of what must have been a sur­re­al feel­ing of “this is not real­ly not hap­pen­ing to us”.

Many of the over 3 hun­dred mil­lion Americans basked in the glow of the moment, blacks and whites, Jews and gen­tiles, for a moment we were all Americans. If the feel­ing in America was pal­pa­ble, the images on tele­vi­sion depict­ing the absolute joy on the faces of hun­dreds of mil­lions the world over, on every con­ti­nent, told an elec­tri­fy­ing tale. They were cheer­ing for Barack and Michelle, but one got the feel­ing they were cheer­ing for America, that they were cheer­ing for the good­ness and decen­cy deep with­in human­i­ty. A good­ness and decen­cy that had final­ly worked its way to the sur­face. It had tak­en hun­dreds of years, many tears but final­ly our human­i­ty had final­ly worked its way to the sur­face . Somehow we had final­ly come to the real­iza­tion that the super­fi­cial dif­fer­ence of skin col­or was all that sep­a­rat­ed us. That the blood that flowed with­in our veins was all the same blood irre­spec­tive of the col­or of our skin.

We were for that moment in time, all God’s children.

But as we are well aware, there are oth­er forces with­in the uni­verse. We were brought crash­ing down to the ran­cid real­i­ties of the oth­er side of what we had all wit­nessed . The oth­er side of what we all felt. We were brought back to the pre­em­i­nent feel­ing that we should not have indulged in that moment, because there would be pay­ment exact­ed by the uni­verse. The oth­er shoe would drop. We became painful­ly aware that those euphor­ic feel­ings we expe­ri­enced have sim­i­lar con­se­quences to the tem­po­rary high derived from a drug abuse indulgence.

All of us ‚as we allowed our­selves the lux­u­ry of that euphor­ic indul­gence, were painful­ly aware that not every­one shared in our joy. We were con­ver­sant based on the his­to­ry of this great coun­try, that there was a dark shame­ful side, that did not dis­ap­pear the day Obama was elected.

What I cer­tain­ly was not pre­pared for is the scorched earth return to Jim Crowe in the year 2012 in America. A scorched earth that not only scooped up African-Americans but threat­en to engulf oth­er groups who felt they had over­come in America.The avalanche of hate swept up women , immi­grants, Gays and lesbians,Labor unions, work­ing poor, the mid­dle class, and pret­ty much any­one who was­n’t a mem­ber of the white male club.

Even though we expect­ed that there would be a back­lash against blacks for Obama’s breach­ing of the last bas­tion of white suprema­cy, we were large­ly unpre­pared for the Tsunami of hate that was to follow. 

We nev­er antic­i­pat­ed the return of Jim Crowe. We did not antic­i­pate the Senate Minority leader say­ing his pri­ma­ry focus was to make Barack Obama a one term pres­i­dent. No one fore­saw Jan Brewer Arizona Governor stick­ing her fin­ger in the face of the pres­i­dent of the United States, Or rook­ie Supreme court asso­ciate jus­tice Samuel Alito shak­ing his head and mouthing “not true” to his oppo­si­tion to their recent cit­i­zens unit­ed deci­sion. A colos­sal bad deci­sion, the effects of which are already being felt in the fight for America’s Democracy. Maybe we should have seen the likes of South Carolina’s con­gress­man Joe Wilson shout­ing “you lie” at the pres­i­dent, as he deliv­ered his state of the union address.

In fact those of us mes­mer­ized by the ascen­sion of Barack Obama, were naïve in our euphor­ic trance. How could we not see the pos­si­ble attempts at dele­git­imiza­tion of the lunatic right in the form of the birther non­sense. How could we not rec­og­nize that some mis­guid­ed ele­ments in the mil­i­tary would refuse to take orders from the pres­i­dent, argu­ing that if the order is unlaw­ful they have a right to dis­obey? How could we not see that Obama’s ascen­den­cy would not cre­ate a con­fla­gra­tion of hate groups? In fact how could we not see a total and uni­fied com­ing togeth­er of repub­li­cans , house and sen­ate in oppo­si­tion of Obama that would vir­tu­al­ly clog up the works, mak­ing it impos­si­ble to get any leg­is­la­tion of mean­ing passed .

There is noth­ing beneath the lunatic igno­ra­mus fringe of the right that they deem too offen­sive to hurl at the pres­i­dent. Even those who were once con­sid­ered reasonable(sic) have now fall­en vic­tim to the genealog­i­cal defi­cien­cy called racism. So it is now accept­able for Iowa US Senator Charles Grassley to refer to pres­i­dent Obama as stu­pid. Race aside, I would read­i­ly throw my hat into ring for Obama when it comes to intel­lect, over Chuck Grassley. No group is above the gut­ter behav­ior. We have seen that the pow­er struc­ture of the dom­i­nant white male is feel­ing uncer­tain of itself. High court judges, and top actors with­in the catholic church have not seen fit to main­tain the thin veneer of faux respectabil­i­ty that once obtained in their enclaves. A veneer that masks a sore that refus­es to heal, a sore called racism.

President Barack Obama won the pres­i­den­cy with­out win­ning the white vote. This is scary for white men who have seen the last bas­tion of their lies torn down and laid bare for all to see for what it was for cen­turies, a damn lie. All men are cre­at­ed equal under God, by god. The infe­ri­or­i­ty com­plex inher­ent in some, that caus­es them to vis­it all types of unimag­in­able evil on oth­ers dif­fer­ent from them­selves in order to show them­selves supe­ri­or has been exposed and they are scared to death. The very lies which gave them legit­i­ma­cy has been stripped away, and they have been exposed to be just like every­one else, ordi­nary peo­ple , not supe­ri­or, not from a mas­ter race, just a pile of mat­ter like every­one else.

This aspect of white suprema­cy has served white men for cen­turies they are not about to roll over and die. As a mor­tal­ly wound­ed ani­mals can be par­tic­u­lar­ly dan­ger­ous, so too is the van­quished lie of white suprema­cy. Obama rep­re­sents all that they hat­ed in oth­ers, he rep­re­sents what they feared for cen­turies, the results of remov­ing the glass ceil­ing and the sticky floor. Despite the vile putrid attacks lev­eled at him this pres­i­dent and his wife con­tin­ue to smile and be grace­ful , exud­ing the grace and charm that many could only hope to emu­late. This White house thus far, despite snares from their ene­mies has been scan­dal free. There is no talk of infi­deli­ty, no talk of impro­pri­ety, as such the hate mon­gers are left dis­parag­ing the Obama’s for being the prod­ucts of ivy League edu­ca­tion. You know you are doing good when your ene­mies can only con­jure up lies and dis­tor­tions in order to attack you.

President Obama has stead­fast­ly sought to advance the equal­i­ty of all ‚just as he promised as can­di­date Obama,he signed

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 is an Act of Congress enact­ed by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by on January 29, 2009. The bill amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stat­ing that the 180-day statute of lim­i­ta­tions for fil­ing an equal-pay law­suit regard­ing pay dis­crim­i­na­tion resets with each new dis­crim­i­na­to­ry pay­check. The law was a direct answer to the Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007), a U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion hold­ing that the statute of lim­i­ta­tions for pre­sent­ing an equal-pay law­suit begins on the date that the employ­er makes the ini­tial dis­crim­i­na­to­ry wage deci­sion, not at the date of the most recent pay­check, as a low­er court had ruled.(source wikipedia​.com)

He has appoint­ed two women to the United States Supreme Court. Associate Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor the first Hispanic to be appoint­ed to the high­est court in the land. His Administration has sided with wom­en’s groups in their fight against Republican assault on their repro­duc­tive rights , one which start­ed out in repub­li­can cir­cles as an Obama’s assault on reli­gious free­doms. That shell game did not sur­vive the smell test and was rather quick­ly revealed to be an attack on the repro­duc­tive rights of women.

His cab­i­net is remark­ably rep­re­sen­ta­tive of women.

Hillary Clinton Secretary of State:

Hilda Solis Secretary of labor:

Kathleen Sebelius Secretary of Health and human services:

Janet Napolitano Department of home­land security:

The fol­low­ing equiv­a­lent to cab­i­net positions

Lisa P Jackson envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion agency:

Susan Rice Ambassador to the United Nations:

Karen Mills Small busi­ness administration:

By all accounts this is an impres­sive array of pow­er­ful women,the pres­i­dent has demon­stra­bly shown his com­mit­ment to women and what’s impor­tant to them. Republicans may bury their heads in the sand , but this is exact­ly the rea­son Mitt Romney’s 4 point lead over Obama with women was wiped out and the pres­i­dent up in some polls by 12 – 15 points. Women are pay­ing attention.

Republican can­di­dates did not do them­selves any favors when they remained silent or at best mouthed mealy-mouthed ratio­nal­iza­tion of loud mouth Rush Limbaugh’s attack on a George Town University law stu­dent Sandra Fluke. Limbaugh in tra­di­tion­al style ref­ered to miss Fluke as a whore and a pros­ti­tute. Her crimes? tes­ti­fy­ing to a demo­c­ra­t­ic Congressional com­mit­tee on the prob­lems fac­ing young women in get­ting con­tra­cep­tive cov­er­age in their health insur­ance. Limbaugh’s boor­ish attack saw dozens of adver­tis­ers on his radio show run­ning for cover. 

Republicans in state after state have draft­ed leg­is­la­tion that seeks to strip away rights once believed to be set­tled laws. Many women are now won­der­ing whether in light of recent devel­op­ments, Roe:vs Wade is set­tled law.

Republican hate and hypocrisy has no lim­its, for the dura­tion of Bush 43rd Presidency we were del­uged with the term “judi­cial activism” from the pres­i­dent, nei­ther the supreme court, the gods on the fed­er­al 5th cir­cuit nor their polit­i­cal coun­ter­parts had a prob­lem with the pres­i­dent blast­ing the high court.

Of course all of the afore­men­tioned have a prob­lem with President Obama stat­ing that the supreme court has no busi­ness strik­ing down a law passed by a con­gres­sion­al major­i­ty. In fact what the pres­i­dent meant was that the supreme court should, if there are con­sti­tu­tion­al issues with a piece of leg­is­la­tion, send it back to the con­gress for fine tun­ing. But that aside, is the supreme court above crit­i­cism? Where is it writ­ten that no one may crit­i­cize the supreme court, least of all the President of the United States of America.

What the last three years plus has shown is the entrenched racism in this coun­try, cement­ed large­ly around white male. This elec­tion will be like noth­ing the world has ever seen before, it seemed they did not believe that Obama could win in 2008 , now they are not about to have him serve anoth­er four years. They will pull­out all the stops, the results will be like none we have seen before . That is how hate­ful repub­li­cans fight, by using lies innu­en­dos dis­tor­tions and cater­ing to peo­ple’s fears .

It is time that decent peo­ple stand up and repu­di­ate the hate mon­gers and the wares they are ped­dling. America is stronger because of its diver­si­ty, not despite it. America was not built by white men alone, it was built on the blood sweat and tears of blacks , native Americans, and all of the oth­ers who toiled to make this coun­try what it is. No one has a monop­oly on her, it belongs to all that have come and gone. Those who believe they own America will have a hard time defend­ing that posi­tion as this coun­try gets more and more diverse. Their fear is palpable.

Ex Marine Killed In His Own Home By Police.

Below is an email from Kenneth Chamberlain Jr., whose father, a 68-year-old vet­er­an of the U.S. Marines, was killed in his home by the police in White Plains, NY, on November 19, 2011. Kenneth cre­at­ed his peti­tion on SignOn​.org, a new site that allows any­one to start their own online petitions.

On November 19, 2011, my father, 68-year-old Kenneth Chamberlain Sr., was shot and killed in his home in White Plains, New York.

My father was a 20-year vet­er­an of the Westchester County Department of Corrections and proud­ly served the United States of America as a Marine. He stood about 5 feet, 9 inch­es tall, and he suf­fered from a heart condition.

The events that led to his killing began around 5 a.m., when his med­ical alert device was acci­den­tal­ly set off, send­ing a call to the City of White Plains Department of Public Safety. Everything that hap­pened after that was record­ed by an audio device installed in my father’s home as part of his med­ical alert system.

When the police arrived at my father’s home, he and the staff for his med­ical alert ser­vice told them that there was no med­ical emer­gency and asked them to leave. And yet they insist­ed that my father let them into his home, bang­ing loud­ly on my father’s door for over an hour. On the record­ing, the police can be heard call­ing my father a “nig­ger.”

Ultimately they broke through his apart­ment door and first shot him with a Taser. He was wear­ing noth­ing but box­er shorts when the police began their assault against him. Shortly after that, he was shot with two 40-cal­iber rounds and killed.

My fam­i­ly is ask­ing the Westchester County District Attorney to bring a crim­i­nal indict­ment, and we call on the United States Department of Justice or the New York State Attorney General to pros­e­cute this as a hate crime.

STILL NO ARREST IN TRAYVON MARTIN’S MURDER CASE.

It has been well over a month and still there has been no arrest in the killing of Florida teen Trayvon Martin, pic­tured above in hoodie.

Despite what appear to the aver­age onlook­er as enough to arrest, nei­ther the Sanford Police now out of the inves­ti­ga­tions, nor the spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor assigned to the case, has seen fit to do what the fam­i­ly and peo­ple all over this coun­try and the world are say­ing , arrest George Zimmerman !!

Instead we learn that there seem to be a colos­sal coverup and gross acts of impro­pri­ety by Sanford Police and oth­ers, to make the killing of Trayvon mar­tin go away.

We now know that George Zimmerman is the son of a retired Judge./ Interesting

We have learned that the lead Investigator want­ed to arrest Zimmerman but was over ruled by the pros­e­cu­tor who drove over 50 miles to over rule the lead investigator.

We are now told that the lead Investigator wrote an affi­davit detail­ing exact­ly what his find­ings were. In essence a cov­er your ass move.

We are told that the lead Investigator told some­one close to the fam­i­ly of Trayvon Martin that there are some stereo­typ­ing going on here. He obvi­ous­ly was dis­gust­ed with the way things were being handled.

We are told that Zimmerman claimed that he suf­fered a bro­ken nose and a bust­ed head, he alleged­ly told police that Trayvon Martin attacked him, knock­ing him to the ground, broke his nose pum­meled his head into the side­walk. He also claimed Trayvon attempt­ed to dis­arm him of his firearm and as such he was forced to kill Trayvon Martin.

Did Trayvon Martin know that Zimmerman have a firearm? If the answer is yes , did that not give Trayvon Martin even more right to fight like hell to defend his life?

We were for­mer­ly told that the Police stat­ed that Zimmerman had grass stains on the back of his jack­et and a bloody nose when they arrived. Yet a video record­ing released by the police shows George Zimmerman in the same jack­et 30 min­utes lat­er , there appeared to be no blood, and Zimmerman showed no signs that he was involved in a fight.

We are left won­der­ing who told who to say what?

Zimmerman’s father , broth­er, lawyer, and friend have all stat­ed that Zimmerman told them he was beat­en by Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman alleges he was forced to shoot Trayvon Martin. Despite Judge Zimmerman’s tes­ti­mo­ny on behalf of his son, he nev­er once men­tioned an apol­o­gy or empa­thy to the fam­i­ly of Trayvon Martin for the loss of their son.

Instead he sought to blame the President of the United States, the con­gres­sion­al black causus, the NAACP, and every­one whom have spo­ken out in defense of the rule of law, fair­ness equi­ty and the right of Trayvon Martin to the fun­da­men­tal right to life .

One won­ders what kind of Justice was dis­pensed to black peo­ple in Orange coun­ty Florida by Judge Zimmerman?

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCECircumstantial evi­dence is direct evi­dence of a fact from which a per­son may rea­son­ably infer the exis­tence or nonex­is­tence of anoth­er fact. A per­son­’s guilt of a charged crime may be proven by cir­cum­stan­tial evi­dence, if that evi­dence, while not direct­ly estab­lish­ing guilt, gives rise to an infer­ence of guilt beyond a rea­son­able doubt.

As such, you draw your own con­clu­sion of a coverup either way you chose. The insult­ing thing to peo­ple’s intel­li­gence are the trans­par­ent attempts by the Zimmerman camp to impugn the integri­ty of the vic­tim Trayvon Martin. Clearly this is an effort to dis­tract peo­ple from the fact that a mur­der was com­mit­ted . This is a time-hon­ored ruse that have been used on African Americans for­ev­er and they have got­ten away with it, demo­niz­ing the vic­tim. Whenever a black man is mur­dered they trot out his crim­i­nal record , or make one up and in com­plic­it acqui­es­cence with the media we are made to believe that he had it com­ing to him because 30 years ago he was arrest­ed for fight­ing whilst in mid­dle school.

We see a sup­posed 53-year-old black man trot­ted out as a friend of Zimmerman . We see a black man giv­en the inter­im job of police chief . We see black peo­ple attest­ing to the fideli­ty and cred­i­bil­i­ty of the new state pros­e­cu­tor. These are smoke screen appease­ment meth­ods designed to quite dis­sent and noth­ing more. How many 53-year-old men have 28-year-old friends? How stu­pid and moron­ic do these peo­ple think we in the black com­muin­i­ty are?

STAND YOUR GROUND: Stand your ground is premised on the notion that a per­son being attacked has no duty to retreat and may use force to defend him/​herself. Hold that thought for a while.

George Zimmerman is a 28-year-old wannabe cop who has a record of three arrests one for resist­ing a police offi­cer with­out vio­lence. One for domes­tic vio­lence, and one arrest for resist­ing an offi­cer with vio­lence, in any oth­er place that is a felony yet all three arrests are mys­te­ri­ous­ly closed and we are told as we pon­der how this could hap­pen, that he is the legal owner/​car­ri­er of a semi auto­mat­ic weapon.

George Zimmerman had called 911 a total of 46 times over a peri­od of 56 days . That is a call placed to a 911 oper­a­tor every 1.217 days. Essentially George Zimmerman called 911 almost every day on aver­age. This pat­tern shows a man ter­ri­bly dis­turbed or ter­ri­bly obsessed with being a cop.

Zimmerman was told not to fol­low Trayvon Martin.

Zimmerman was not appoint­ed as watch cap­tain , he appoint­ed himself.

Zimmerman ought not to have a gun even if he was a legit­i­mate watch captain.

Zimmerman had no legal author­i­ty to approach Trayvon Martin.

Zimmerman had no legal author­i­ty to ask Trayvon Martin quote: “what are you doing around here“as explained by Trayvon Martin’s girl­friend who was on the phone with him as he told her he was being fol­lowed by a man.

I asked you to hold the “stand your ground thought”.

In light of the afore­men­tioned , who had an absolute right to stand his ground? Trayvon Martin did !

If Trayvon Martin had the right to stand his ground but end­ed up mur­dered , yet to date no one has been arrest­ed or charged for his killing.

We must ask our­selves does laws in America apply equi­tably to the pro­tec­tion of black people?

This is a legit­i­mate ques­tion, when­ev­er the rights of African-Americans are vio­lat­ed the strat­e­gy is to argue some­how that the aggriev­ed par­ty had no expec­ta­tion of pro­tec­tion of the very law that ought to be a shel­ter to pro­tect every­one. As we see in the Trayvon Martin case the vic­tim is once again the culprit.

This is noth­ing new, a Long Island New York Black man has been impris­oned for defend­ing his home. The inci­dent occured when a group of white thugs invad­ed his prop­er­ty in an attempt to kill his son. The law which gives every white home own­er the right to defend his home­st­ed , by shoot­ing first and ask­ing ques­tions lat­er, when that home stead is breached did not apply to that African American home own­er. All over America we see cas­es where the laws do not pro­tect all Americans, just cer­tain peo­ple. We must ask our­selves what kind of soci­ety dis­crim­i­nates against its own cit­i­zens? What kind of soci­ety allows law enforce­ment offi­cers and aver­age cit­i­zens the lat­i­tude to treat the life of cer­tain seg­ments of the soci­ety with impuni­ty and scant regard? What goes through the mind of a police offi­cer when he kills a 19-year-old col­lege stu­dent , despite the fact that they did not point their weapons on any of the white stu­dents involved in a so-called mele?

What caus­es a police offi­cer who pulls over a black man then ask what’s up guy? Not “how are you sir”? 

Many includ­ing the black intel­li­gentsia nuance and parse, refus­ing to call a spade a spade. The fact is, it is “entrenched and sys­tem­at­ic racism”, and it is learned behav­ior. We can­not fix what we fail to con­front, when the President of the United States says if I had a son he would look like Trayvon Martin, he was say­ing I am the President of the United States and if my son was walk­ing through that com­mu­ni­ty he would have been gunned down just like Trayvon Martin was.

How many black pres­i­dents are we killing? How many black attor­ney gen­er­als are we killing? This has got to stop. As we speak there are protests spring­ing up all over the coun­try. The world is watch­ing and wait­ing for jus­tice American style. America must show the world that when it says it stands for jus­tice and human rights it is not just for a cho­sen few . America pur­ports to sow democ­ra­cy around the world but it must begin at home. America’s cred­i­bil­i­ty is on the line. The world is watch­ing while minori­ties are killed dai­ly in America because of the col­or of their skin, it can­not con­tin­ue to be just anoth­er day at the office.

There must be jus­tice for Trayvon Martin now. We are count­ing the days to see how long it will take, before George Zimmerman is arrest­ed and charged for the cap­i­tal mur­der of Trayvon Martin.

JFJ’s DEMONSTRATION FIZZLES:

Amnesty International has released its 2011 death penal­ty report. In its report Amnesty crows that the Caribbean is what it calls an Execution free zone. At the same time Amnesty International is cel­e­brat­ing the fact that not one mur­der­er has been exe­cut­ed in the entire car­ribean which is becom­ing a mur­der zone, it’s sur­ro­gate Jamaicans for Justice (JFJ) held a ral­ly denounc­ing the Jamaican Police for killing heav­i­ly armed crim­i­nals who con­front them in vio­lent encoun­ters from day-to-day.

Death penal­ty 2011: Alarming lev­els of exe­cu­tions in the few coun­tries that kill 

Countries that car­ried out exe­cu­tions in 2011 did so at an alarm­ing rate but those employ­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment have decreased by more than a third com­pared to a decade ago, Amnesty International found in its annu­al review of death sen­tences and executions.
Only 10 per­cent of coun­tries in the world, 20 out of 198, car­ried out exe­cu­tions last year.
People were exe­cut­ed or sen­tenced to death for a range of offences includ­ing adul­tery and sodomy in Iran, blas­phe­my in Pakistan, sor­cery in Saudi Arabia, the traf­fick­ing of human bones in the Republic of Congo, and drug offences in more than 10 countries. 
Methods of exe­cu­tion in 2011 includ­ed behead­ing, hang­ing, lethal injec­tion and shooting. 
Some 18,750 peo­ple remained under sen­tence of death at the end of 2011 and at least 676 peo­ple were exe­cut­ed worldwide.
But these fig­ures do not include the thou­sands of exe­cu­tions that Amnesty International believes were car­ried out in China, where the num­bers are suppressed.
Nor do they account for the prob­a­ble extent of Iran’s use of the death penal­ty – Amnesty International has had cred­i­ble reports of sub­stan­tial num­bers of exe­cu­tions not offi­cial­ly acknowledged. 
 “The vast major­i­ty of coun­tries have moved away from using the death penal­ty,” said Salil Shetty Secretary General of Amnesty International. 
“Our mes­sage to the lead­ers of the iso­lat­ed minor­i­ty of coun­tries that con­tin­ue to exe­cute is clear: you are out of step with the rest of the world on this issue and it is time you took steps to end this most cru­el, inhu­man and degrad­ing punishment.”
In the Middle East there has been a steep rise in record­ed exe­cu­tions – up almost 50 per cent on the pre­vi­ous year. 
This was due to four coun­tries – Iraq (at least 68 exe­cu­tions), Iran (at least 360), Saudi Arabia (at least 82) and Yemen (at least 41) – which account­ed for 99 per cent of all record­ed exe­cu­tions in the Middle East and North Africa. The rise in Iran and Saudi Arabia alone account­ed for the net increase in record­ed exe­cu­tions across the world of 149, com­pared to 2010. 
Thousands of peo­ple were exe­cut­ed in China in 2011, more than the rest of the world put togeth­er. Figures on the death penal­ty are a state secret. Amnesty International has stopped pub­lish­ing fig­ures it col­lects from pub­lic sources in China as these are like­ly to gross­ly under­es­ti­mate the true num­ber. The orga­ni­za­tion renewed its chal­lenge to the Chinese author­i­ties to pub­lish data on those exe­cut­ed and sen­tenced to death, in order to con­firm their claims that var­i­ous changes in law and prac­tice have led to a sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tion in the use of the death penal­ty in the coun­try over the last four years. In Iran, Amnesty International received cred­i­ble reports of a large num­ber of uncon­firmed or even secret exe­cu­tions which would almost dou­ble the lev­els offi­cial­ly acknowl­edged. At least three peo­ple were exe­cut­ed in Iran for crimes that were com­mit­ted when they were under 18 years of age, in vio­la­tion of inter­na­tion­al law. A fur­ther four uncon­firmed exe­cu­tions of juve­nile offend­ers were report­ed there, and one in Saudi Arabia. The United States was again the only coun­try in the Americas and the only mem­ber of the G8 group of lead­ing economies to exe­cute pris­on­ers – 43 in 2011. Europe and for­mer Soviet Union coun­tries were cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment-free, apart from Belarus where two peo­ple were exe­cut­ed. The Pacific was death penal­ty-free except for five death sen­tences in Papua New Guinea. In Belarus and Vietnam, pris­on­ers were not informed of their forth­com­ing exe­cu­tion, nor were their fam­i­lies or lawyers. Public judi­cial exe­cu­tions were known to have been car­ried out in North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Somalia, as well as in Iran. In the major­i­ty of coun­tries where peo­ple were sen­tenced to death or exe­cut­ed, the tri­als did not meet inter­na­tion­al fair tri­al stan­dards. In some, this involved the extrac­tion of ‘con­fes­sions’ through tor­ture or oth­er duress includ­ing in China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia. Foreign nation­als were dis­pro­por­tion­ate­ly affect­ed by the use of the death penal­ty, par­tic­u­lar­ly in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand. 
But even in those coun­tries that con­tin­ue to exe­cute on a high lev­el some progress was made in 2011. 
 In China, the gov­ern­ment elim­i­nat­ed the death penal­ty for 13 main­ly ‘white col­lar’ crimes, and mea­sures were also put for­ward to the National People’s Congress to reduce the num­ber of cas­es of tor­ture in deten­tion, strength­en the role of defence lawyers and ensure sus­pects in cap­i­tal cas­es are rep­re­sent­ed by a lawyer. In the USA, the num­ber of exe­cu­tions and new death sen­tences dropped dra­mat­i­cal­ly from a decade ago. Illinois became the 16th state to abol­ish the death penal­ty. A mora­to­ri­um was announced in the state of Oregon. And vic­tims of vio­lent crimes spoke out against the death penal­ty “Even among the small group of coun­tries that exe­cut­ed in 2011, we can see grad­ual progress. These are small steps but such incre­men­tal mea­sures have been shown ulti­mate­ly to lead to the end of the death penal­ty,” said Salil Shetty. “It is not going to hap­pen overnight but we are deter­mined that we will see the day when the death penal­ty is con­signed to his­to­ry.” Amnesty International oppos­es the death penal­ty in all cas­es with­out excep­tion regard­less of the nature of the crime, the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the offend­er or the method used by the state to car­ry out the exe­cu­tion. The death penal­ty vio­lates the right to life and is the ulti­mate cru­el, inhu­man and degrad­ing punishment. 
 Regional sum­maries The Americas The US was once again the only exe­cu­tion­er in the Americas. A total of 43 exe­cu­tions were record­ed in 13 of the 34 states that retain the death penal­ty, a drop by a third since 2001, and 78 new death sen­tences were record­ed in 2011, a decrease by half since 2001.
The Caribbean An exe­cu­tion-free area, with the num­ber of coun­tries impos­ing new death sen­tences appear­ing to be in decline. Only three coun­tries are known to have hand­ed down a total of six death sen­tences: Guyana, Saint Lucia and Trinidad and Tobago. Asia-Pacific Positive signs ques­tion­ing the legit­i­ma­cy of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment were evi­dent through­out the region in 2011. Not count­ing the thou­sands of exe­cu­tions that were believed to have tak­en place in China, at least 51 exe­cu­tions were report­ed to have been car­ried out in sev­en coun­tries in the Asia-Pacific region. At least 833 new death sen­tences were known to have been imposed in 18 coun­tries in the region. The Pacific sub-region was death penal­ty-free with the excep­tion of five death sen­tences hand­ed down in Papua New Guinea. No exe­cu­tions were record­ed in Singapore and, for the first time in 19 years, Japan. The author­i­ties in both coun­tries have pre­vi­ous­ly shown strong sup­port for cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Sub-Saharan Africa Significant progress in 2011 — Benin adopt­ed leg­is­la­tion to rat­i­fy the key UN treaty aimed at abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty. Sierra Leone declared, and Nigeria con­firmed, offi­cial mora­to­ri­um on exe­cu­tions. And the Constitutional Review Commission in Ghana rec­om­mend­ed the abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty. There were at least 22 exe­cu­tions in three coun­tries in sub-Saharan Africa: Somalia, Sudan and South Sudan. Only 14 of the 49 coun­tries in the region are clas­si­fied as retain­ing the death penal­ty. Middle East and North Africa At least 558 exe­cu­tions could be con­firmed in eight coun­tries. At least 750 death sen­tences imposed in 2011 could be con­firmed in 15 coun­tries. The con­tin­u­ing vio­lence in coun­tries such as Libya, Syria and Yemen made it par­tic­u­lar­ly dif­fi­cult to gath­er ade­quate infor­ma­tion on the use of the death penal­ty in the region in 2011. No infor­ma­tion was avail­able about judi­cial exe­cu­tions in Libya, and no death sen­tences are known to have been imposed. Extrajudicial exe­cu­tions, tor­ture and arbi­trary deten­tion were often resort­ed to instead. Four coun­tries – Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Yemen – account­ed for 99 per cent of all record­ed exe­cu­tions in the Middle East and North Africa. 
 The author­i­ties of Algeria, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco/​Western Sahara and Qatar imposed death sen­tences but con­tin­ued to refrain from car­ry­ing out exe­cu­tions. Europe and Central Asia Belarus was the only coun­try in Europe and the for­mer Soviet Union, and apart from the USA the only one in the Organization for Security and Co-oper­a­tion in Europe (OSCE), to have car­ried out exe­cu­tions in 2011, exe­cut­ing two men.[Amnesty International]

You will ask , and cor­rect­ly so, why are you post­ing Amnesty International’s data on your blogs don’t they have their own web­site? Well yes they do and you are quite right in ask­ing, but there is a rea­son that I do . I hope that you have read the entire report and as you do I ask that you look at crime sta­tis­tics in coun­tries like Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana. Then ask your­self what com­po­nent is miss­ing from this equation?

The com­po­nent miss­ing from the equa­tion is any men­tion of the vic­tims of crime!!!

Every year rough­ly 1600 peo­ple are con­firmed mur­dered by crim­i­nals in the Island of Jamaica , in a coun­ty 4,411 square miles and a pop­u­la­tion of approx­i­mate­ly 2.7 mil­lion these mur­der sta­tis­tics are alarm­ing. Even though Amnesty International’s num­bers do ref­er­ence the United States , of note is the fact that a large num­ber of American States do uti­lize the death penal­ty. Most states of the unit­ed states are com­pa­ra­ble and in many instances exceed the size , econ­o­my , and pop­u­la­tion of most nations in oth­er parts of the world , and many of the 34 states that do retain the death penal­ty actu­al­ly do exe­cute mur­der­ers for their crimes.

The United states based on the afore­men­tioned can­not be glossed over as a sin­gle nation , but has to be seen as 50 sep­a­rate states with dif­fer­ent sov­er­eign gov­ern­ments, even so the Federal gov­ern­ment do exe­cute crim­i­nals whom are con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death in fed­er­al courts. Despite argu­ments to the con­trary States like Virginia, Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida that has the death penal­ty do have few­er crimes than states like New york ‚New Jersey, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia that defies the will of the major­i­ty and does not car­ry out the death penalty.

The United States has thou­sands of law enforce­ment agen­cies, police depart­ments from Compton California to the south side of Chicago, from Little Rock Arkansas to New york city engage crim­i­nals every day. Police depart­ments do not con­sult human rights agen­cies and lob­by groups about how to do their jobs, many peo­ple are killed in vio­lent con­fronta­tion with law enforce­ment each day in the United States.

Yet there are no dic­tates from Amnesty International to law enforce­ment. Why do I use the United States as ref­er­ence? The United States is the nation most look to as the bas­tion of human rights and jus­tice, the barom­e­ter by which oth­ers are judged. Yet despite mon­ey and oth­er resources law enforce­ment agen­cies are forced to kill vio­lent crim­i­nals every day. Are there instances where Jamaican cops are care­less or have engaged in instances of extra-judi­cial killings we sus­pect that there may be evi­dence of that. We have no evi­dence of it, nei­ther does JFJ and nei­ther does Amnesty International.We do know that offi­cers must do a bet­ter job with ensur­ing that no inno­cent per­son is injured at their hands.

As I write this blog there is yet to be an arrest made in the killing of 17 years old Trayvon Martin of Sanford Florida. Young Trayvon was gunned down over a month ago by a vig­i­lante for no oth­er rea­son oth­er than the col­or of his skin. There was the case of Sean Bell killed by NYC police offi­cers , Bell was out cel­e­brat­ing his bach­e­lor par­ty the night before he was to get mar­ried. The cas­es of police abuse and oth­er atroc­i­ties com­mit­ted against blacks in the United States is mind-blow­ing, yet Amnesty has nev­er made one sin­gle soli­tary state­ment about the rights of those victims.

What we are say­ing to the peo­ple at Amnesty International is this poor dis­ad­van­taged peo­ple are the same irre­spec­tive of where they live. If you don’t find abuse of the inno­cent objec­tion­able in America , Canada, and Britain , then you have no cred­i­bil­i­ty to point out any per­ceived injus­tice in Jamaica or any oth­er devel­op­ing coun­try. Thanks but no thanks .

We refuse to let the argu­ment of extra-judi­cial killings be dom­i­nat­ed by those whose motives are demon­stra­bly in the inter­est of criminals.

As we have artic­u­lat­ed those who talk about extra-judi­cial killings have zero evi­dence of what they speak, their only met­ric is num­bers , which is absolute­ly not a means of mak­ing those deter­mi­na­tions. One has to be eye-wit­ness to a killing to make that deter­mi­na­tion and just being a wit­ness does not qual­i­fy one unless he/​she puts him­self in the shoe of a police offi­cer tasked with mak­ing those deci­sions of using lethal force.

There is a rea­son crime weary Jamaicans have sim­ply tuned out Carolyn Gomes and the oth­er far left bleed­ing hearts. That is the rea­son almost no one turned out for their car­ni­val act, it was a sick cir­cus and the Jamaican peo­ple treat­ed it as such , this side=show was timed to coin­cide with Amnesty’s report and it end­ed up being a colos­sal flop.

ADDING INSULT TO INJURY

Jamaicans for jus­tice issued a state­ment to the press claim­ing that they were intim­i­dat­ed because of the pres­ence of the police at the event armed with rifles»»»» Not all of the atten­tion seek­ers aligned to that groups was as out­ra­geous with their claims. The offi­cers were there for their pro­tec­tion of the same peo­ple who are per­se­cut­ing them, such is the job of police officers.

This ludi­crous state­ment bared the soul of the lead­er­ship of JFJ as a psy­chot­ic des­per­a­do group that the major­i­ty of fair and bal­anced Jamaicans final­ly and cor­rect­ly already tuned out.

Courtesy of the Jamaica dai­ly Gleaner:

As I have stat­ed cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly, Jamaicans do not hate police offi­cers. Our peo­ple are warm recep­tive and engag­ing , even those peo­ple with­out the ben­e­fit of for­mal edu­ca­tion are decep­tive­ly intel­lec­tu­al with incred­i­ble rea­son­ing pow­er. They demand fideli­ty and hon­esty from their pub­lic offi­cials, pub­lic offi­cials includ­ing politi­cians and police. We have a pop­u­la­tion of 2.7 mil­lion peo­ple most offi­cers are chil­dren of decent rur­al work­ing peo­ple. The atti­tudes of peo­ple out­side the cor­po­rate area of Kingston and Saint Andrew are vast­ly dif­fer­ent from those who reside in those areas.

My point in all of this is that our peo­ple want to sup­port their law enforce­ment offi­cers, I have been away from law enforce­ment for 20 years but I still mar­vel at the lev­el of sup­port I received when I served. Support which result­ed in the removal of many weapons and crim­i­nals from the streets and in oth­er cas­es may have pro­tect­ed my life from those who wished me harm for no oth­er rea­son oth­er than the fact that I was a law enforce­ment officer.

What the Jamaican peo­ple are not going to tol­er­ate is any group destroy­ing one of their insti­tu­tions which is pop­u­lat­ed by their chil­dren. They know that like their chil­dren who go astray and require guid­ance, some­times they have to hold their police feet to the fire. What they will not have, are for­eign fund­ed groups telling them their chil­dren are no good and should be dis­card­ed. Jamaicans are trau­ma­tized by crime, they need results, they will not have any­one destroy those who stand between them and those who sow death and destruction.

Officers have a duty to uphold the fideli­ty of their office,they have a duty to the oath they took, they have a duty to them­selves , their coun­try and their col­leagues to bring back respectabil­i­ty to the JCF. As we charge them to respect the rights of each and every indi­vid­ual, I chal­lenge them to refrain from brute force but to use their pow­ers of arrest to make the state­ment they chose to make. You do not need to beat some­one sense­less if he com­mits an offense, briskly apply hand­cuffs inform them of their rights and cart them off to jail. No one wants to be in jail. Use your pow­ers of arrest on all who break the laws, with­out fear or favor, but before you do that offi­cers , please know what the laws are!!!!! I urge my fel­low Jamaicans to respect the rule of law, sup­port your law enforce­ment offi­cers, if you see some­thing say some­thing, the life you save may be your own.With that said send a strong mes­sage to the for­eign inter­lop­ers that Jamaicans are quite capa­ble of gov­ern­ing them­selves, we will enact the laws we see fit and we will treat crim­i­nals the way we see fit.

Trayvon Martin Was Our Son:

The killing of Trayvon Martin by self-appoint­ed neigh­bour­hood watch Captain George Zimmerman has sparked out­rage across America, and has brought to the fore, the ran­cid prob­lem of race rela­tions in this coun­try. Racial ani­mus are like sores that refus­es to heal, every time that the scab is removed it lays bare the ugly sore that pre­cludes the limb from doing all it could poten­tial­ly do. America great as it is, still has not seen the heights of its poten­tial great­ness because of its stead­fast reluc­tance to dis­card racism.

Sandford Police Chief Bill Lee
George Zimmerman

What makes a per­son sus­pi­cious ? George Zimmerman’s 911 call described 17-year-old Trayvon Martin as sus­pi­cious look­ing. Mister Zimmerman’s lawyer has since stat­ed over and over again that race had noth­ing to do with his clients actions that night. Understandably Zimmerman’s attor­ney under­stands the Federal ram­i­fi­ca­tions for his client, in the event inves­ti­ga­tors deter­mines that race was a fac­tor in young Trayvon Martin’s death.

ABOUT GEORGE ZIMMERMAN

So lets look at a few key fac­tors in this case, at least as far as the infor­ma­tion that has been made public.

(1) We know that Zimmerman sat in his truck and called 911 about what he char­ac­ter­ized as a sus­pi­cious person.

(2) We know that he com­menced to fol­low Trayvon while he spoke to the 911 dispatcher.

(3) We know that the 911 dis­patch­er asked Zimmerman if he was fol­low­ing Trayvon, to which he answered in the affirmative.

(4) We know that the 911 dis­patch­er told Zimmerman quote“we don’t need you to do that“end quote.

(5) We know that Trayvon’s 16-year-old girl­friend affirmed that she was on the phone with Trayvon as he described that he was being stalked by a man, and that she told him to just run on home.

(6) We know that Zimmerman mut­tered quote “fuck­ing coons always get away” after he was told by the dis­patch­er not to fol­low Trayvon Martin.

(7) We know that Zimmerman pur­sued Trayvon Martin after he was told not to by the 911 dis­patch­er and that a scuf­fle of sorts ensued , and that some­one was yelling for help.

(8) We know that Trayvon Martin’ moth­er has said that she rec­og­nizes the voice on the 911 tapes as that of her 17-year-old son yelling for help.

(9) We know that George Zimmerman fired a shot killing Trayvon Martin on the spot, Trayvon Martin had a pack­age of skit­tles and a bot­tle of iced tea . Snacks he went out to get before the start of the all-star game.

(10) We know that George Zimmerman has not been arrested.

ABOUT THE SANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT

(1) Why was drug and alco­hol test done on the corpse of Trayvon Martin and none done on George Zimmerman, despite the argu­ments of Sanford police that none was done because Zimmerman was not arrested.?

(2) Why did police not hand over the 911 tapes to the fam­i­ly as requested?

(3) Why despite claims of self-defense by Zimmerman did police not cor­don the scene and treat it like any oth­er scene of crime , includ­ing gath­er­ing foren­sics, tak­ing pho­tographs, con­fis­cat­ing the mur­der weapon , look­ing for spent cas­ings if it was a semi auto­mat­ic weapon which would have dis­card­ed spent casing/​s?

(4) Why did police not ques­tion wit­ness­es and secure affi­davits from wit­ness­es and the shooter?

(5) Why did the police not try to reach the last person/​s Trayvon spoke to on his cell phone to deter­mine who he was and who were his parents?

(6) Why did police not com­plete a file with all evi­dence and sub­mit it to the prosecutor ?

(7) Why did police sim­ply take Zimmerman’s word for it that it was self-defense ?

(8) Is the Sanford police empow­ered to act as judge and jury in deter­min­ing guilt or inno­cence or is that the duty of a court of law?

I am par­tic­u­lar­ly moved by the smile on this kid’s face, I have four boys and a nephew who is like my own son. I see the shirt he is wear­ing and I see my own 18-year-old son who worked part-time at that retail­er , proud­ly wear­ing his Hollister shirt. That kid could have been my kid , it could have been your kid. As President Obama said if he had a son he would look like Trayvon, I think what the President was say­ing was that if it was his kid walk­ing there that night he would have suf­fered the same fate.

This leads us to the ques­tion of why are black men so reviled and feared, so much so that any black man is auto­mat­i­cal­ly deemed sus­pi­cious ‚based sole­ly on the col­or of his skin? Why do police all over this coun­try refuse to inves­ti­gate crimes against black peo­ple. Why don’t they treat black peo­ple with the same respect they give to oth­ers. Why do pre­dom­i­nant­ly white police depart­ments con­tin­ue to abuse and treat peo­ple of col­or in this coun­try with impunity,without attract­ing any con­se­quence for their actions?

Mister Zimmerman’s lawyer claims that his client is not a racist, mis­ter Zimmerman’s father we are told has stat­ed that he is Hispanic, as if racism is sim­ply a white against black thing. One is judged by the words that emanate from one’s mouth, it is by our words we decide on who some­one his, the spo­ken word tells a great deal, it opens the soul to scruti­ny from the out­side. If some of us would just speak less we would find our­selves in way less trou­ble. I am inclined to believe that George Zimmerman will rue the day he uttered the two words “fuck­ing coon” 

As we have heard since the killing of Young Trayvon Martin came to the fore, many young black men have spo­ken artic­u­late­ly about sur­vival skills they are forced to devel­op in order to sur­vive. Critics will argue that young black men are the great­est threat to the sur­vival of oth­er black men,those argu­ments can­not be seri­ous­ly dis­card­ed with­out seri­ous­ly look­ing at the sta­tis­tics of the wan­ton slaugh­ter of young black men by their peers, oth­er young black men.

In cities all over America LA, Kansas City, Newark , Jersey City, Philadelphia,Little Rock, Chicago the sit­u­a­tion is the same young black men con­tin­ue to mur­der each oth­er at an alarm­ing rate, Even in small­er cities like Newburgh and Poughkeepsie New York it is the same every year the killings continue.

As we are appaled at the killing of Trayvon Martin and the lack of an arrest, experts from University pro­fes­sors to par­sons lament the cau­sa­tion behind the fear oth­ers have of us. How can we seri­ous­ly and cred­i­bly won­der why oth­ers fear us when we are so prone to killing each oth­er? As we seek to address the prob­lem of sys­tem­at­ic racism in America, blacks must also embrace the real­i­ties that we are a part of the problem.

As we tell our sons:

Do not run from the police.

Stop if you are pulled over.

Don’t do this , don’t do that we are left won­der­ing when will black peo­ple ever be afford­ed full cit­i­zen­ship in their own coun­try? I have four sons and sev­er­al nephews, I too tell my sons and nephews what oth­er black fathers and moth­ers tell their sons, but even if they do all we tell them, does it pro­tect them from the sus­pi­cions oth­ers have of them? Trayvon Martin from all indi­ca­tions did not do any­thing that would have caused a rea­son­able per­son to be sus­pi­cious of him. Trayvon Martin’s prob­lem was his black skin. That black skin made him an auto­mat­ic sus­pect in the mind of George Zimmerman.

President Obama rec­og­nized this when he artic­u­lat­ed “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon” Blacks are ask­ing for a con­ver­sa­tion on race. A con­ver­sa­tion? Really? Prominent black peo­ple are ask­ing for a con­ver­sa­tion? How many con­ver­sa­tions are we going to have regard­ing this issue, every time there is a killing which sparks nation­al out­rage, black élite ask for a nation­al dia­logue. A nation­al con­ver­sa­tion, I believe the time for a con­ver­sa­tion is over. It is time for solu­tions, words mat­ter very little.

Black America must under­stand as Jews have, that it’s sur­vival rests in its own hands, How can a nation of approx­i­mate­ly 40 mil­lion allow oth­ers to treat it this way? The time has come for the Black nation to rise up and take its right­ful place in a nation that was built on the backs of its fore-par­ents. It is time that Black America take to heart the creed that all men are cre­at­ed equal by their cre­ator. It is time that black America stop ask­ing oth­ers to respect it , it is time to demand respect.

Supporters of George Zimmerman argue that Trayvon Martin attacked him from behind, knock­ing him to the ground, alleged­ly break­ing his nose, and leav­ing him blood­ied. This new piece of infor­ma­tion does noth­ing to advance the case in favor of Zimmerman, at least to my mind. The ques­tion here is this, does a per­son have a right to defend him­self from an armed assailant who unau­tho­rized stalks him for no reason?

You bet. !!!

Even if this cam­paign by Zimmerman is accept­ed by those who seek every pos­si­ble excuse oth­er than to see this case for what it is, we believe that Trayvon Martin had a fun­da­men­tal right under Florida’s law to stand his ground in the face of being attacked by an armed assailant.

It does not serve Zimmerman’s friends and sup­port­ers to try to attack this child’s cred­i­bil­i­ty, this will not sit well with black peo­ple in this coun­try, we are aware that there are now plans under­way to besmirch Trayvon’s char­ac­ter, they would be well advised not to try this tact.

JAMAICAN POLICE UNDER FIRE.

new rough terrain vehicles
new rough ter­rain vehicles

In the age of tech­nol­o­gy, Youtube is a gold mine where police excess­es, as well as cit­i­zens mis­be­hav­ior is evi­dent. My col­league was shot in Olympic Gardens as an old woman grabbed him so that her grand son could shoot him. Legitimate though con­cerns of ques­tion­able shoot­ings are, the ques­tion of (sup­posed cit­i­zens) inject­ing them­selves into the scene when­ev­er police arrive are real. They cre­ate shields for their crim­i­nal men, warn­ing them with loud nois­es, and yes putting them­selves and their chil­dren in front of police guns as a means of pro­tect­ing the men who oper­ate in these com­mu­ni­ties, even when the shoot­ing starts. There are those who sit around gath­er­ing num­bers and sta­tis­tic about crim­i­nals whom are killed, with a motive of indict­ing the nar­ra­tive or expla­na­tions of police. The Police has no such luxury,they have respon­si­bil­i­ties, that of pro­tect­ing life and prop­er­ty. Sad though instances of acci­den­tal shoot­ings are Jamaica, will have to stop the pre­tence , it is a coun­try at war and in war there are casu­al­ties, and yes col­lat­er­al dam­age is a part of the equa­tion. Their sto­ries nev­er get told, Cops whom are shot and injured and killed, or who end up with life alter­ing injuries are forced onto the side­lines to live in pover­ty and squalor who tells their sto­ry? Who grieve for them and their fam­i­lies? As blood con­tin­ue to run in Jamaica polit­i­cal lead­ers are clue­less as to how to stop it, our coun­try needs lead­er­ship, and solu­tions. The crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem must change , leg­is­la­tors must enact laws that looks out for the coun­try , not for par­ty sup­port­ers, laws that puts crim­i­nals in prison and lets them stay there. There must be truth in sen­tenc­ing. There must be con­se­quence for hin­der­ing gov­ern­men­tal admin­is­tra­tion, real penal­ty. There must be com­plete and unequiv­o­cal removal of pol­i­tics from the oper­a­tions of police. There must be a com­plete and com­pre­hen­sive re-ori­en­ta­tion of the pub­lic to respect the rule of law and those who enforce them. There must be social inter­ven­tion and jobs cre­at­ed that will dis­in­cen­tivise peo­ple from engag­ing in crim­i­nal behav­ior. I am will­ing to sub­mit to Government , irre­spec­tive of who forms that gov­ern­ment , a blue print on how to pro­ceed to a bet­ter Jamaica, one that is not a panacea , but one that will lay the foun­da­tion toward a more man­age­able, liv­able country.

Gleaner pho­to: Taken March 5th 2012

Today March 23rd Jamaicans are going back to the polls to elect those they want to rep­re­sent them at the local Government lev­el. While they do so ‚the Prime Minister still walks around in orange cloth­ing, com­plete­ly obliv­i­ous that the General elec­tions are over and now it’s time to gov­ern. As crime esca­late var­i­ous groups have come out against the amount of peo­ple who have been killed by police bul­lets since the start of the year. This is a legit­i­mate con­cern for any­one who is rea­son­able and fair. I can­not imag­ine los­ing a child , moth­er or any mem­ber of my fam­i­ly ‚or even a friend to bul­lets fired by police officers.

Why is this though?

We hold our police offi­cers to a dif­fer­ent stan­dard they are the ones who are sup­posed to pro­tect us , as such when we become vic­tims of police abuse or error it is par­tic­u­lar­ly hard­er to under­stand or process. As such it is total­ly under­stand­able that peo­ple are up in arms when police bul­lets kill their loved ones whom the police are unable to say are threat­en­ing their lives or the lives of oth­ers. As such I hope the police will learn from protests planned by civic groups, and do not nec­es­sar­i­ly see this as oppo­si­tion to them , but as an oppor­tu­ni­ty for each indi­vid­ual offi­cer to take as much care as pos­si­ble in pre­serv­ing the life of the inno­cent as is placed in offi­cer safety.

DPP TRIUMPHS OVER RM PUSEY:

Director of pub­lic Prosecutions Paula Llewelyn has pre­vailed against Resident Magistrate Judith Pusey in the Judicial Review Court.

THE Judicial Review Court today ruled that Director of Public Prosecutions Paula Llewellyn, should not give evi­dence in the stalled Cuban Light Bulb tri­al. The court ordered that a sub­poe­na for DPP to be wit­ness be quashed and also ordered that the Llewellyn must not be barred from court dur­ing evi­dence. Two jus­tices Raymond King and Evon Brown were in favour of the DPP and Justice Almarie Sinclair-Hayles was the dis­sent­ing judge. Lord Anthony Gifford QC was the attor­ney rep­re­sent­ing Llewellyn.Read more: http://​jamaicaob​serv​er​.com

Kudos to the DPP for stand­ing up for the peo­ple of Jamaica, we wish to cel­e­brate this vic­to­ry with her, as we stood with the Director against what we saw as an over-reach by this Magistrate Judith Pusey. We feel she is an activist Magistrate who has time and time again leg­is­lat­ed from the bench, and in this instance has vast­ly prej­u­diced the case of the Jamaican peo­ple. As a no lawyer observ­er I was appaled to see the lev­el of lat­i­tude giv­en the defense in the Kern Spencer Light bulb tri­al, we feel that now that the high court has ruled it is time that this case pro­ceed with­out any more arti­fi­cial hur­dles. It is time that Kern Spencer and oth­er accused have their day in court, it is full time that the inter­est of the Jamaican peo­ple be served.

Greg Christie And Other Comments:

A quick com­ment com­mend­ing Contractor General Greg Christie on his res­olute stance regard­ing the PNP’s much tout­ed Jamaica Emergency Employment Program(JEEP) . Contractor General Christie expressed con­cerns about the integri­ty of that pro­gram a day after a team from his office raid­ed the offices of the Transport and Works Ministry where JEEP is based :Link here .jamaicaob​serv​er​.com

Greg Christie

I will once again state, as I have always done for his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive, that Greg Christie is a phe­nom­e­nal pub­lic ser­vant . Many have argued that Christie is a pub­lic­i­ty hound, they have called him par­ti­san, they have called him over zeal­ous. The truth is Greg Christie oper­at­ing in a coun­try where the rule of law is sacro­sanct, in a coun­try where peo­ple want­ed what’s best for their coun­try ‚would have accom­plished won­der­ful things for that coun­try. I am par­tic­u­lar­ly impressed by Christie’s call for all the agen­cies tasked with root­ing out cor­rup­tion to be merged as one unit. I say Greg Christie for Prime Minister and Jamaica would be a total­ly dif­fer­ent coun­try, a bet­ter country.

Greg Christie faces a pop­u­la­tion resis­tant to the rule of a law, unwill­ing to do the things that would lead to bet­ter life for them­selves and their chil­dren. The Police are encoun­ter­ing the same push-back, a lot of which they cre­at­ed for them­selves. Our coun­try will great­ly miss Greg Christie. Mister Christie has indi­cat­ed to the Governor General that he will be leav­ing office toward the end of this year. I strug­gle to see how mis­ter Christie will be replaced with some­one com­pa­ra­ble to his integri­ty, and enthusiasm.

PNP RIGHTS COMMISSION WANTS END TO MILITARY STYLE POLICING:

Every time the peo­ple’s nation­al par­ty take over the reins of Government we see dra­mat­ic upsurge in crim­i­nal activ­i­ties. Their takeover after the December 29th 2011 win has been no dif­fer­ent. Spin doc­tors aligned to that cult gov­ern­ment unashamed sug­gest crime upsurge are the works of the oth­er par­ty. Trouble with that assess­ment is that even as they strug­gle to tell that lie, they cringe under the glare of the truth, the fact being that crimes in Jamaica no longer has polit­i­cal stripes.

The PNP on its return to pow­er estab­lished an unusu­al­ly large exec­u­tive gov­ern­ment , despite crit­i­ciz­ing the for­mer gov­ern­ment stri­dent­ly for hav­ing what they said then was a too large cabinet,Miller went ahead with an even big­ger one. Portia Simpson Miller bold-faced argued that the large cab­i­net stacked with her rel­a­tives and friends was com­men­su­rate with the amount of seats her par­ty won in the elec­tions . Her Party won 41 of the 63 seats in the House of Representatives.

Miller by her rea­son­ing revealed that she takes us for fools, or as some sug­gest she sim­ply do not know any bet­ter. I will leave you to decide.

The issue I want to address here is the PNP affil­i­at­ed groups get­ting involved in law enforce­ment . Jamaica can­not be allowed to go back to the days when PNP gun­men did as they pleased, because their par­ty is in pow­er. I sug­gest the lit­tle mon­grels in the PNP affil­i­at­ed groups and JLP affil­i­at­ed groups stick to their pol­i­tics and leave polic­ing to the pro­fes­sion­als. (Rest in peace Motty Perkins).

Jamaica’s police are far from per­fect. On too many occa­sions some cops shoot when they do not need to, this can­not be allowed, it can­not be stan­dard pro­ce­dure and the com­mis­sion­er of police will have to look to remov­ing cops whom are involved in fre­quent shoot­ings from the streets. I will not as some would sug­gest, say remove some­one if they are involved in a shoot­ing, Jamaica is far too vio­lent for that.

What we don’t need are incon­se­quen­tials like the PNP lit­tle mutts in wait­ing , mak­ing state­ments when most of them are them­selves involved in crim­i­nal activ­i­ty. I call on Simpson Miller to rein in her lit­tle rabid chi­huahuas, no one elect­ed them to any­thing.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com

Too often the police in the exe­cu­tion of their duties do not appear to be care­ful enough to ensure the preser­va­tion of lives; and too often engage in shoot­ings when it may have been more strate­gic to with­draw or change tac­tic,” Commission Chairman, Clyde Williams said. “The pur­suit of crim­i­nals must not pro­vide the con­text for the death of the innocent.”
Read more: http://​www​.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​P​N​P​-​r​i​g​h​t​s​-​c​o​m​m​i​s​s​i​o​n​-​w​a​n​t​s​-​e​n​d​-​t​o​-​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​-​s​t​y​l​e​-​p​o​l​i​c​i​n​g​#​i​x​z​z​1​p​u​H​Z​l​J46

(Clyde Williams PNP human rights com­mis­sion chairman.)

What is this fool smok­ing ? Portia needs to muz­zle this lit­tle mon­grel and let him crawl real quite­ly back under the cel­lar where he belongs. No one elect­ed this moron to anything.

These state­ments are blood boil­ing, where is this clown when these shoot­ings are hap­pen­ing? And if he is not there, how can he make the state­ment he did? Suits many of the licky licky police who run behind this cult and helped to put the PNP in office. Many of these cops are noth­ing more than ser­vant boys for them anyway.

I wish all Jamaicans liv­ing abroad and well think­ing ones at home see what the PNP is advo­cat­ing for our country.Withdrawing from crim­i­nals, allow­ing them to return them to the days of the last PNP gov­ern­ment. Where in the world does police with­draw from crim­i­nals? The PNP with its mul­ti­ple gar­ri­son com­mu­ni­ties must explain to the coun­try and the world why it is ask­ing police to with­draw from con­fronting crim­i­nals. The PNP is large­ly respon­si­ble for our coun­try being in the state it’s in, due large­ly to 1970’s poli­cies, 18 12 years of being at the helm , and an unmit­i­gat­ed desire to main­tain gar­ri­son pol­i­tics as the cor­ner­stone of Jamaica’s existence.

Is the answer because of the thou­sands of crim­i­nals they have in their zones of polit­i­cal exclusions?

Or is it because of the fact that with­in the par­ty itself there are crim­i­nals oper­at­ing in broad daylight.

JCF/​INDECOM/​AND JFJ.

Jamaica Constabulary Force emblem.svg

There is ample evi­dence in the pub­lic’s domain that tells both sides of the sto­ry which now bedev­ils Jamaica.I refer to alle­ga­tions of police per­ceived excess. Many do not use the word per­ceive because it does not fit the sto­ry they want to tell. Others who want change will like to get both sides out, so that the change we seek will be one all can live with. Anyone who have fish as pets, know that the water with­in the aquar­i­um has to be changed from time to time, how­ev­er one would be mind­ful nev­er to total­ly remove all of the orig­i­nal water putting his fish in an alien envi­ron­ment. This blog is not about fish despite my love of fish. It is about the con­ver­sa­tion I would like to have with you about some­thing that needs to be changed as we seek des­per­ate­ly to keep it because with­out it we are doomed.

Jamaica’s police force has a pub­lic rela­tions prob­lem, this is noth­ing new . For decades the force through inept man­age­ment has allowed itself to be car­i­ca­tured into a woe­ful­ly inept shoot-first ask ques­tions lat­er bunch of half-wits. The pow­ers which cre­at­ed and main­tained the Agency knew exact­ly how to con­trol the force as an enti­ty through divide and rule. As I have stat­ed before rich peo­ple from upper St. Andrew do not allow their chil­dren to join the JCF . For the most part chil­dren of inner city com­mu­ni­ties are also dis­al­lowed large­ly because of their zip code. This leaves the bulk of the force’s enlist­ment to chil­dren of work­ing poor peo­ple from rur­al parishes.

To the best of my knowl­edge these are not peo­ple who are exposed to killings and I’m darn sure are not trained to wan­ton­ly kill peo­ple at the Police acad­e­my. Which brings us to the facts: Jamaicans liv­ing in rur­al areas of the Island up to recent times , before the influx of crim­i­nals run­ning from Kingston, were peace-lov­ing peo­ple . These were peo­ple who cel­e­brat­ed some­one becom­ing a bus dri­ver from their District. So when a mem­ber of their com­mu­ni­ty become a nurse, teacher , or yes a police offi­cer they are very proud.

So what caus­es police offi­cers born and raised by rur­al chris­t­ian folks of mod­est means to become what some would have you believe to be cal­lous mean killing machines? I ran across this arti­cle in the Jamaica Observer I would like to link you to.jamaicaob​serv​er​.com The Article I thought revealed an inter­est­ing truth , a truth I have toiled to bring to the fore in these blogs. That truth is that police kill peo­ple wrong­ful­ly , when that hap­pen they should fess up , and the fam­i­ly of the deceased per­son must be treat­ed with the utmost care and empa­thy, where pos­si­ble max­i­mum com­pen­sa­tion must be made to the fam­i­ly with a view to try to ease the pain. This must be done tak­ing into con­sid­er­a­tion the lim­it­ed resources the coun­try has at its dis­pos­al , but tak­ing into account that no amount of mon­ey may ade­quate­ly com­pen­sate for the life of a loved one.

With that said a greater empha­sis must be placed on the con­di­tions under which our police offi­cers work, the dan­gers they face and the lev­el of sup­port they get in car­ry­ing out their duties. I have writ­ten at length in pre­vi­ous blogs as to the rea­son offi­cers are forced to use force, and in many cas­es dead­ly force. I left the police force from as far back as 1991. Back then we faced M‑16 assault rifles, shot guns, hand guns and on the rare occa­sion oth­er auto­mat­ic weaponry.

Despite the dan­gers we faced then , it pales in com­par­i­son to the pro­lif­er­a­tion and veloc­i­ty of weapon­ry that the coun­try is now awash in. Despite slight improve­ments made in pro­tec­tive gear avail­able to them, police offi­cers face vast­ly ampli­fied and more dan­ger­ous sit­u­a­tions because of the sheer num­ber of guns on the streets. The veloc­i­ty of weapons avail­able to mur­der­ers is ter­ri­fy­ing, and the crim­i­nals who own them have no com­punc­tion about using them on whomev­er they chose, to include police officers.

As I allud­ed to pre­vi­ous­ly, the pow­ers which put the force togeth­er did not intend to have a force that would one day be pop­u­lat­ed with intel­li­gent peo­ple who could talk back or demand prop­er work­ing con­di­tions. They nev­er fore­saw a force which would see itself on par with oth­er Jamaicans irre­spec­tive of their sta­tion. After all the police were night watch­men appoint­ed to serve Port Royal, Kingston, Saint Catherine, and Saint Andrew. After the Morant Bay rebel­lion of 1865 the need for an orga­nized police force became more urgent and 984 peo­ple were com­mis­sioned into a police force under an Inspector General appoint­ed by the British governor.

Many of Jamaica’s so-called upper class still can­not visu­al­ize mem­bers of the police force as their equals, and as such they fight any and every effort of the police to orga­nize or lob­by for bet­ter work­ing con­di­tions , or worse inves­ti­gate them when they are accused of impropriety.

One such group is the Editorial board of the Daily Gleaner:

THE EDITORIAL BOARD OF THE JAMAICA DAILY GLEANER HAS TAKENSTRIKINGLY COWARDLY STANCE AGAINST JAMAICA’S POLICE OFFICERS , DESPITE KNOWING THE INFORMATION THEY PRINT ARE WOEFULLY DISHONEST.

Two weeks in suc­ces­sion their edi­to­r­i­al page has car­ried bold head­lines in sup­port of INDECOM ‘s Terrence Williams with­out address­ing the heart of the dis­con­tent of the police groups. The Editorial board chose instead to make claims against the police not even Williams him­self has made, at least pub­licly. They have char­ac­ter­ized the grouse of the police regard­ing Williams’ atten­dance at the press con­fer­ence as quote” ludi­crous”. As I did the first time they wrote their head­line in sup­port of Williams ‚I again called them on their disin­gen­u­ous biased and lying stance in sup­port of Williams. See arti­cle here.jamaica​glean​er​.com The Editorial board of the Gleaner obvi­ous­ly have no greater con­tri­bu­tion to make to nation build­ing than lies innu­en­dos, and dis­in­for­ma­tion, and as such it has dou­bled down on the garbage it pub­lished days before . The idea it seem ‚at least in their view is ‚if they keep repeat­ing a lie it will some­how become truth.

Everyone now have an opin­ion from University pro­fes­sors to med­ical doc­tors to news­pa­per edi­tors , every­one is enti­tled to their opin­ion, maybe it’s good that the con­ver­sa­tion has picked up in earnest. Maybe Jamaicans will see that their sur­vival is tied to the rule of law and irre­spec­tive of who enforces the laws , the title is the same POLICE. Those with­in the soci­ety who have a prob­lem adher­ing to the rule of law, whether they are Editors , Politicians lawyers or whomev­er , know this, the police is going nowhere. Get used to it , obey the laws, that’s it. Former Illinois gov­er­nor Rod Blagojevich this week sur­ren­dered to fed­er­al author­i­ties, he com­menced serv­ing a 14 year term in fed­er­al prison.He was con­vict­ed of cor­rup­tion stem­ming from his attempts to sell the sen­ate seat once held by now President Barack Obama. Rod Blagojevich was a gov­er­nor , and a lawyer, he joined a long list of once pow­er­ful men who thought they were above the law . I would sug­gest the high and mighty in Jamaica take a long hard look at them­selves in the mir­ror and exam­ine what hap­pened to Christopher (Dudus) Coke, a man vast­ly more pow­er­ful than they ever will be . The way things used to be soon will be no more.

Many argue that the police vot­ed over­whelm­ing­ly for Portia and her par­ty, hence their request for her to inter­vene into the impasse between INDECOM and them­selves. I am unsure how the vil­lage lawyers know how peo­ple vot­ed. But with that said I hope for their sakes the police are not await­ing a response from either Bunting or Miller that will have any val­ue to them as a group. This gov­ern­ment has no clue and are sim­ply in it for what they can rip for them­selves. A bet­ter day is com­ing to Jamaica, and it means adher­ence to the rule of law, get used to it.

Jamaica Will Have To Decide If It Wants To Side With Criminals Over The Rule Of Law !

This old build­ing sit­u­at­ed at 103 Old Hope Rd. Kingston still hous­es the Offices of the Commissioner of police and the 911 call cen­ter that man­ages all emer­gency calls for the country.

Recently we spoke about the despi­ca­ble posi­tion tak­en by Earl Witter Jamaica’s pub­lic Defender regard­ing police officers.Witter shares the view as does Carolyn Gomes head of (JFJ) that police offi­cers do not get shot pro­por­tion­al­ly with the amount of crim­i­nals they shoot.

Many crit­i­cize me for stand­ing with police offi­cers, and as such I want to be real clear where I stand. As a lit­tle boy grow­ing up I recall police offi­cers killing a young Rastafarian man sim­ply because he ran. He was asleep on a counter in his father’s shop where oth­er men were play­ing cards, the police just hap­pened to make their bi-annu­al vis­it to the dis­trict that night, every­one shout­ed police, abrupt­ly awak­ened from a deep sleep he ran from his house and was shot dead. Nothing ever came of his killing!!!! 

The Jamaican his­tor­i­cal land­scape is replete with sim­i­lar sto­ries of instances of abuse by those who took an oath to pro­tect and serve. If we told a thou­sand sto­ries sim­i­lar to this one it would not be overem­pha­siz­ing that this is a prob­lem, and so those whom are tasked with inves­ti­gat­ing , and lob­by­ing for the use of less lethal force must be sup­port­ed where practicable.

With that said if we do not sup­port the rule of law where does it leave us? As a young nation it will not be easy to get to first world sta­tus by pre­tence, nei­ther will we get there with­out adher­ing to the rule of law. As we hold our police feet to the fire of account­abil­i­ty , we must stead­fast­ly demand adher­ence to the rule of law from all cit­i­zens. It is dan­ger­ous to believe we can have a sta­ble coun­try if we tear down the rule of law and those who enforce them . If we believe we can gain safe­ty by sid­ing with crim­i­nals we are woe­ful­ly mis­guid­ed, a scor­pi­on is a scor­pi­on and it will sting.

I served in the JCF and walked away years ago. I will for­ev­er be proud of the ser­vice I gave to my coun­try in that capac­i­ty, if any­thing I feel indebt­ed to my coun­try for hav­ing allowed me to serve. I have met many won­der­ful peo­ple who were exem­plary human beings, some not so much. Many have paid the ulti­mate price, many still serve. One thing is cer­tain I nev­er saw a rich per­son­’s child in the JCF, many feel their kids are too good to serve as police offi­cers. Because of that I per­son­al­ly refused to serve them ‚so I left. Until the men­tal­i­ty of the Jamaican peo­ple change to reflect the real­i­ties of the 21st cen­tu­ry, Police offi­cers will con­tin­ue to feel under siege and they will lash out. Policing is a covenant between offi­cers and the peo­ple, much like gov­er­nance, each par­ty has to hold up their end of the bar­gain. Earl Witter:Gomes:

Public Defender Earl Witter is sup­port­ing a direc­tive from Police Commissioner Owen Ellington for cops to exer­cise restraint and avoid using unnec­es­sary lethal force in con­fronta­tions with criminals.
But Witter says crim­i­nals should also refrain from attack­ing police per­son­nel, so the cops are not placed in a posi­tion to use lethal force.
According to Witter this could help stem the unend­ing flow of alle­ga­tions of police excess and abuse.
Witter says this would also reduce the com­plaints to the pub­lic defend­er, the Independent Commission of Investigations and oth­er organ­i­sa­tions as well as end the cost­ly and unnec­es­sary drain upon the nation’s mea­gre resources.
Witter made the appeal in a media release in which he con­demned the attack on a police­man in Bathsheba, St. Elizabeth on Tuesday.
Corporal Anthony Watson had report­ed­ly gone to arrest a want­ed man for ille­gal wound­ing, when he was chopped on the arm by the machete wield­ing man.
The pub­lic defend­er says the inci­dent high­lights the per­ils faced dai­ly by police per­son­nel in the exe­cu­tion of their duty.(Jamaicagleaner story)

I HAVE CONSISTENTLY ARGUED THAT ALLEGATIONS OF EXTRA-JUDICIAL KILLINGS BY JAMAICAN POLICE OFFICERS CONTRARY TO PERCEPTION, IS NOT LARGELY THE FAULT OF THE POLICE DESPITE GRAND PRONOUNCEMENTS FROM AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AND THEIR SURROGATES JAMAICANS FOR JUSTICE.

For years I have argued that the prob­lem of police killings are not total­ly the fault of the police. Crawling out of every wood­work are sup­posed wit­ness­es to these acts, I am not in a posi­tion these days to indict nor con­firm if these cas­es are true or not. What I do know is nei­ther are the detrac­tors of the police.

Local groups like Jamaicans for jus­tice which pro­fess­es to be legit­i­mate human rights groups, have com­pro­mised their legit­i­ma­cy based on their fix­a­tion on alle­ga­tions of police abuse. Stake hold­ers are now tak­ing a deep­er look at their oper­a­tions and are com­ing away with the con­clu­sion I came to years ago. Simply put JFJ is a group that looks out for the rights of crim­i­nals. There are many who cor­rect­ly argue that crim­i­nals have rights too. I total­ly agree that they do . I sim­ply refuse to pay atten­tion to their rights over the rights of their victims.

Make no mis­take, police offi­cers do kill peo­ple ille­git­i­mate­ly. Even though many would have you believe that police killings are con­fined to Jamaican cops, the facts do not bear out those asser­tions. Police Departments all over the world have to deal with offi­cers killing civil­ians under ques­tion­able circumstances.

This does not excuse the police from what crit­ics refer to as heavy-hand­ed tac­tics by police depart­ments the world over. The United States of America with its thou­sands of police depart­ments, is cer­tain­ly not immune to harsh crit­i­cism of heavy-hand­ed tac­tics by police offi­cers in areas where there are large pop­u­la­tion den­si­ty and racial diver­si­ty. What is an absolute fact is that groups like Amnesty International and oth­er human rights groups, do not influ­ence how inves­ti­ga­tions are done, and they cer­tain­ly do not get to influ­ence pros­e­cu­tion of police offi­cers when they take action in the line of duty, regard­less of pub­lic outcry. 

There are no rush to arrest, there are no rush to impugn the integri­ty or motive of offi­cers because any group says so, while there are yet inves­ti­ga­tions going on. Amnesty International which has tremen­dous influ­ence and lever­age in small devel­op­ing coun­tries like Jamaica, are large­ly silent , and are nowhere to be found when blacks and Latinos com­plain about police killings in the United States Canada and their base coun­try Britain.

From the sadom­iz­ing of Haitian immi­grant Abner Louima in a New York police sta­tion to 41 shots fired at unarmed African immi­grant Amadou Diallo snuff­ing out his life , to the scores and scores of oth­er ques­tion­able killings by police in New York city alone they are silent,impotent and nowhere to be found.

Yet these same peo­ple have gone to Jamaica and oth­er coun­tries in which they seek rel­e­vance and dis­tort­ed the truth to sup­port the angle they want to advance. No antag­o­nist group for­eign or local, has sought to get the per­spec­tive of the prin­ci­pal play­ers in the whole affair, the Jamaica con­stab­u­lary force. And I do not mean the gazetted ranks ‚who are gen­er­al­ly sec­ond-rate civ­il ser­vants , removed from the streets , heav­i­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed by pol­i­tics and the desire for their own sur­vival to be con­sid­ered objec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the police force.

Each coun­try has its own unique prob­lems , as such each nation’s prob­lems must be addressed in a unique man­ner. Jamaica’s crim­i­nals are extreme­ly savvy, they under­stand the val­ue of per­cep­tion, they under­stand the val­ue of good press and they play to those under­stand­ings. People in depressed neigh­bor­hoods are pres­sured to go out and demon­strate against police, they are forced through fear or cohe­sion to attest to see­ing things that lat­er demon­stra­ble turn out to be lies.

Garrison com­mu­ni­ties have pro­fes­sion­al mourn­ers who on que, delve into mourn­ing for the cam­eras, but revert to social­iz­ing as soon as cam­eras are turned off or removed, these are fac­tu­al hap­pen­ings with­in Jamaica’s inner cities, yet these very peo­ple become wit­ness­es for groups like Amnesty International and their sur­ro­gates. Their tes­ti­monies have formed the frame-work for exten­sive and expan­sive doc­u­ments on which Jamaica and it’s secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus is judged.

Not to be out­done for­eign tele­vi­sion net­works have joined the band­wag­on. Television net­works like al Jazeera and ITN have found it nec­es­sary to crit­i­cize police in Jamaica using the same sources oth­ers use. I ref­er­ence Al Jazeera because no one in their right mind take what they have to say seri­ous­ly . When one con­sid­ers what hap­pens in Arab nations as it relates to civ­il rights par­tic­u­lar­ly as it relates to women. It is astound­ing that Al-Jazeera would find time to crit­i­cize oth­ers. These are peo­ple who most­ly oper­ate in the 12th cen­tu­ry but have the gall to crit­i­cize our coun­try’s secu­ri­ty forces for sen­sa­tion­al and rat­ings pur­pos­es. They dare not ques­tion their own despot­ic regimes regard­ing their atro­cious human rights record. As such let us fall back and with­out deny­ing that we have a prob­lem, not over­re­act throw­ing out the baby with the prover­bial bath-water.

Those who under­stand the utmost impor­tance of the rule of law, also under­stand that they will not be able to con­vince every one of the need to be sup­port­ive of police and the rule of law. It is impor­tant that those who risk being called snitch­es, inform­ers, and what­ev­er oth­er names are out there, do so with the knowl­edge that some peo­ple will have to be dragged along, oth­ers nudged, and oth­ers coaxed along. After all, we all have dif­fer­ing opin­ions, and appro­pri­ate­ly so.

If our peo­ple are to be lift­ed out of igno­rance and despair . If they are to be freed from the shack­les of gen­er­a­tional pol­i­tics which con­demns them to vot­ing the same way ‚cycle after cycle for the same peo­ple, and then their chil­dren. If their lives are to be changed so they too have a shot at get­ting an edu­ca­tion the only real way out of pover­ty, then we have to low­er crime. Jamaicans if not for coun­try, must for them­selves, rec­og­nize that invest­ment that fuels growth shuns crime. Investors must feel rel­a­tive­ly safe, if they are not total­ly safe they must feel that polit­i­cal lead­er­ship is doing what it takes to reverse crime and root out cor­rup­tion. Jamaicans will have to rec­og­nize the gov­ern­ment will not be their sav­ior, there real­ly can nev­er be enough gov­ern­ment jobs to go around. Secondly gov­ern­ment jobs are fuelled by monies com­ing in from the pri­vate sec­tor. The absense of a vibrant pri­vate sec­tor because of crime, those gov­ern­ment jobs dis­s­a­pear real­ly fast. Simply put it is impos­si­ble to pay gov­ern­ment work­ers with­out a sus­tain­able stream of cash com­ing in.

The Jamaican peo­ple can­not expect to pre­tend to want secu­ri­ty if they are unpre­pared to share the respon­si­bil­i­ty of look­ing out for them­selves. The non­sen­si­cal notion of no snitch­ing, no inform­ing, made pop­u­lar by even more igno­rant dance hall artists must be shunned . The only ben­e­fi­cia­ries are the crim­i­nals who exert con­trol of their lives, through fear, intim­i­da­tion, fuelled by the peo­ple’s own silent acquiescence.

I lost three col­leagues whose mem­o­ries will for­ev­er remain with me.

Constable R Seivright:Motorized Patrol.

Detective con­sta­ble Cowan: Western Kingston.

Sergeant Leroy Steele:Eastern Kingston:

These were three of the best men, jovial ‚loved their job, the best our coun­try had to offer . Why do I men­tion these three? These were three of the offi­cers that were clos­est to me, we had attend­ed the Academy togeth­er , gone through the ups and downs of spend­ing a full year between Port Royal and Twickenham Park togeth­er. Our group was the last to have been at the for­mer Port Royal facil­i­ty, but was forced to move as the deci­sion was made to move police train­ing to the for­mer Jamaica school of Agriculture.

As recruits it was a tumul­tuous, but fun peri­od for us, we were involved in the lit­er­al move­ment of the school. because of the pro­tract­ed demands of the mov­ing process, we spent a full year in the train­ing facil­i­ty, an excep­tion not the rule. To this day we still take great pride in the fact that we were the last batch of recruits at Port Royal and the first batch to be trained at the Jamaica Police Academy. 

Constable Seivright was a young man always smil­ing, as soon as you came face to face with Seivright his face lit up in an ear to ear smile, he believed fun­da­men­tal­ly in his chris­t­ian faith, he was one of the only recruits to have tak­en his Bible with him to train­ing school. From the onset many of us thought that Seivright was too quite, too accom­mo­dat­ing to all to be effec­tive as a police offi­cer in the crim­i­nal jun­gle which is our coun­try. In the 80’s lit­tle did we know that our coun­try would be get­ting worse than what we saw then. Unfortunately we were right Seivright was far too good. One night as he walked up to a cab they pulled over on the Mandela Highway and leaned over to say hel­lo a pas­sen­ger opened up with a ster­ling sub-machine gun killing him on the spot. Constable Seivright nev­er had the priv­i­lege of being issued with a bul­let proof vest.

Steele and Cowan gave their lives much the same way . They died believ­ing that they could rea­son with peo­ple. They bought the lie that peo­ple will respect them enough not to attack them because they were cops. Both paid the ulti­mate price because they bought into the lies that Jamaican peo­ple will respect any­thing but hard-nosed policing.

Community polic­ing is the pref­ered form of polic­ing, I embrace it ful­ly, how­ev­er it is naïve’ and disin­ge­nous to sug­gest or infer that com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing can achieve any mea­sur­able result in Jamaica’s urban com­mu­ni­ties. First the ter­ror­ists hid­ing there must be removed then com­mu­ni­ty offi­cers are insert­ed to inter­act with the peo­ple. But it must be clear, those who har­bor crim­i­nals will be pros­e­cut­ed to the fullest extent of the law.

GLEANER PICKS SIDE:

The Following is the full edi­to­r­i­al com­men­tary from the Jamaica Daily Gleaner regard­ing the impasse involv­ing INDECOM’s Terrence Williams and the Police Federation

MR TERRENCE Williams must stand his ground and resist those in the con­stab­u­lary, and its aux­il­iaries, who want to see him go.

Until there are cred­i­ble rea­sons for us to do oth­er­wise, Mr Williams has the sup­port of this news­pa­per. We expect, too, that he will find sim­i­lar sup­port from Mr Owen Ellington, the reform-mind­ed police chief, whose efforts have, up to now, found favour with us.

More impor­tant­ly, the Government must reject any pres­sure to act against Terrence Williams.

Additionally, Constable Franz Morrison, the chair­man of the Police Federation — the union for the rank-and-file mem­bers of the con­stab­u­lary — if he har­bours notions of him­self as a pro­gres­siveleader, would wel­come aggres­sive over­sight from an agency like INDECOM, which Mr Williams heads. Apparently, we expect a high­er qual­i­ty of lead­er­ship than Mr Morrison demands of him­self, or which he seems to believe his con­stituents deserve.

INDECOM (Independent Commission of Investigations), it is recalled, was estab­lished by Parliament in 2010 to inves­ti­gate cas­es of shoot­ings, as well as oth­er com­plaints of abuse against cit­i­zens by the secu­ri­ty forces. It was the out­come of years of accu­sa­tionsof extra­ju­di­cial killings and oth­er mis­be­hav­iour, par­tic­u­lar­ly by the police, and loss of pub­lic con­fi­dence in the con­stab­u­lary’s abil­i­ty to impar­tial­ly inves­ti­gate itself.

Unsurprisingly, in its short life, INDECOM has had an uneasy rela­tion­ship with the con­stab­u­lary, and some in the judi­cial process, over its attempt to assert its inde­pen­dence in ful­fill­ing its mandate.

Mr Williams has, for instance, com­plained of attempts by police offi­cers to mus­cle his inves­ti­ga­tors out of crime scenes where there have been police shoot­ings and the death of civil­ians, and where INDECOM ought to have prime author­i­ty. Such actions are apart from the test­ing in the courts by the Police Federation, the Police Officers’ Association and the Special Constables’ Association of INDECOM’s pow­ers of arrest.

Judicial chal­lenges are one thing. What Mr Morrison’s crowd is now attempt­ing is quite anoth­er. They are attempt­ing to rile the pub­lic and mem­bers of par­lia­ment into a mood of no con­fi­dence in Mr Williams so as to have the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al rescind his appoint­ment. Or, prefer­ably, he resigns.

The ‘offence’

Mr Williams’ ‘offence’ is that he recent­ly appeared at a press con­fer­ence, host­ed by a human-rights group, to express his con­cern at the spate of police homi­cides — near­ly two dozen in less than a month.

According to the Police Federation’s Mr Morrison, such a con­cern ren­dered Mr Williams inca­pable of “impar­tial­ly inves­ti­gat­ing any inci­dent involv­ing police offi­cers”. So, accord­ing to Mr David White, the fed­er­a­tion’s gen­er­al sec­re­tary, they have writ­ten to the prime min­is­ter, the gov­er­nor-gen­er­al and the Parliament to have Mr Williams “removed”.

The real aim of the cam­paign is trans­par­ent­ly ludi­crous. It has lit­tle to do about Mr Williams’ atten­dance at the press con­fer­ence or the remarks he may have made, and every­thing to do with a wish to elim­i­nate any body that would hold the con­stab­u­lary account­able for its behaviour.

If it was­n’t these com­ments, it would be some oth­er, and who­ev­er replaces Mr Williams will face the same chal­lenges until there is a change of the cul­ture of impuni­ty that per­vades the police force.

Jamaica’s high crime rate and the dif­fi­cul­ties faced by the con­stab­u­lary notwith­stand­ing, 951 police homi­cides in four years is unac­cept­able. With that, Mr Morrison should agree.jamaica​glean​er​.com

Terrence Williams

Here’s my response:

The Editorial board from its recent utter­ances, includ­ing this one, and the nar­ra­tive it advances, fur­ther demon­strates that the cul­ture it sup­ports is an alien one far removed from real­i­ty. As such, no respon­si­ble par­ty need take any of the utter­ances made by this board seri­ous­ly. On every issue to include this one, you are wrong. Clearly it can­not escape any­one with a mod­icum of intel­lect, that the Commissioner of INDECOM in his capac­i­ty as inde­pen­dent inves­ti­ga­tor ‚must be judi­cious with whom he appears and/​or asso­ciates. Particularly on top­i­cal , sen­si­tive issues like the cas­es his office or he will have to inves­ti­gate. Taking into account the per­cep­tion around JFJ, as a crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group, whether one dis­agrees or not. Let me inform you and your friends who feel com­pelled to tell offi­cers what is right for them. Justice must not only be done it must appear to be done. Police offi­cers will no longer allow elit­ists to tell them how they should go about look­ing out for their inter­ests. Your argu­ments are disin­gen­u­ous, and are intend­ed to mis­lead . You should be ashamed to use this well-regard­ed medi­um to spout lies, innu­en­dos , and mis­in­for­ma­tion to fur­ther your indi­vid­ual agen­da. You are a disgrace.

ONE MORE THING:

Let me instruct you on what is con­sid­ered ludi­crous. As a stu­dent in detec­tive train­ing I was told that no greater task could any per­son be giv­en than be asked to bring to jus­tice the ille­git­i­mate killer of anoth­er human being. I took that charge seri­ous­ly as a detec­tive. Any per­son charged with inves­ti­ga­tions must not only be impar­tial they must also appear to be impar­tial. As such an inves­ti­ga­tor can­not stand with those on the out­side shout­ing extra-judi­cial killings when he is the one tasked with mak­ing an informed deter­mi­na­tion as it relates to the facts. By your utter­ances here you have zero under­stand­ing of how inves­ti­ga­tions are done, yet you have not felt restrained from tak­ing sides despite your demon­strat­ed igno­rance of such sub­ject. Investigators must approach each case with an open mind , and fol­low the evi­dence wher­ev­er it leads, a real inves­ti­ga­tor knows that if one is biased one way or anoth­er, one may find evi­dence to sub­stan­ti­ate any mind­set, as such it can­not be overem­pha­sized that inves­ti­ga­tors have an open mind, even when it seem that there is over­whelm­ing evi­dence to sub­stan­ti­ate the call for blood. As inju­di­cious and just plain wrong as Terrence Williams’ appear­ance with JFJ was, your attempt at obfus­ca­tion and dis­hon­esty is dan­ger­ous­ly decep­tive and unpatriotic.

This juve­nile attempt at opin­ion shap­ing fell flat,succeeding sole­ly in reveal­ing the writer to be an elit­ist who did not both­er to do any research before attempt­ing to shape pop­u­lar per­cep­tions. The prob­lem with the writer of this spiel is one that is now prov­ing to be one that many in Jamaica is hav­ing a hard time assim­i­lat­ing at this time.I speak of a more edu­cat­ed, force­ful police depart­ment even at the low­est rank who are deter­mined they will not be told to sit down.

Traditionalists like the writer of this piece of garbage, now find them­selves in a quandary deal­ing with the chil­dren of the poor­est of the poor, who are pre­pared to stand their ground and test every­thing in the courts. And by the way they have the pow­er of arrest. This was not in the game-plan, the cod­ed writ­ings of this per­son, whom one could rea­son­ably con­strue to be a fool , drips with ven­omous anger at the temer­i­ty of the police to chal­lenge them and their friends. The rigid caste sys­tem is unrav­el­ing in front of their very eyes, those aspir­ing to the upper lev­els , have a vest­ed inter­est in main­tain­ing that sys­tem, now that they have climbed to the top of the heap. And they do not want change in Jamaica. After all, if the poor is giv­en a chance to free them­selves from pover­ty, and illit­er­a­cy who will they lord over?

Ha ha I love it ‚.

INDECOM SHARES STAGE WITH CRIMINAL SUPPORTERS>

Last week there was an uproar over a rash of killings involv­ing Jamaican offi­cers and urban ter­ror­ists. According to reports 21 peo­ple lost their lives at the hands of the Jamaican police, the reports also stat­ed that a cou­ple of peo­ple got caught in the cross­fire. There is already a lot of con­clu­sion made on this mat­ter, even though the inves­ti­ga­tions has not yet deter­mined who fired the shots that killed the inno­cents. The men­tal­i­ty is that the bul­lets can only come from the guns of offi­cers. Of note is the fact that sev­er­al weapons have been removed from the streets by the police dur­ing those con­fronta­tions, includ­ing AK47 rifles.

I will now intro­duce to you some faces that you ought to know and remem­ber when you hear that crime is over-run­ning Jamaica. Do remem­ber these faces these are the faces of crim­i­nal sup­port in Jamaica, I will tell you who they are and quote for your their posi­tions on crime in our coun­try. You decide if this sit­u­a­tion is ten­able and tell us how long our coun­try should tol­er­ate this kind of behavior.

Public Defender Earl Witter JFJ’s Carolyn Gomes INDECOM comm. Terrence Williams

Witter is paid with tax dol­lars to inves­ti­gate instances of abuse on behalf of the pub­lic, frankly I do not under­stand the need for this failed crim­i­nal lawyer to be on the pub­lic pay­roll, but this is Jamaica, (every­one affi eat a food) every­one has to be fed, from the pub­lic purse no less. Carolyn Gomes a pedi­atric doc­tor who has been wag­ing a cam­paign of mis­in­for­ma­tion and per­son­al vendet­ta against the police force, her orga­ni­za­tion is fund­ed by for­eign human rights groups which has gen­uine inter­est in human rights. Gomes has used that mon­ey and influ­ence, par­lay­ing it into a per­son­al cam­paign of lies and innu­en­dos against defense­less Jamaican cops who do not have the soap box Gomes have to defend them­selves. Gomes was award­ed the order of Jamaica for her cam­paign against law enforce­ment . My per­son­al feel­ings regard­ing a National hon­or in Jamaica is, it’s not worth being spat on, in light of Gomes being award­ed one. Terrence Williams was hired to head the new agency, INDECOM that would inde­pen­dent­ly inves­ti­gate alle­ga­tions of police abuse. He has turned out to be a pow­er grab­bing nar­cis­sis­tic ego­ma­ni­a­cal turd. His inves­ti­ga­tions so far has not unearthed any­thing that the police through its own inves­ti­ga­tions have not unearthed when it inves­ti­gates its own.

INDECOM ASIDE GOMES AND WITTER HAS STRIDENTLY ARGUED THAT FOR THE KILLING OF CRIMINALS TO BE JUSTIFIED AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF POLICE OFFICERS MUST BE KILLED.

Yup! one can­not make that stuff up. Williams is the com­mis­sion­er of INDECOM, the agency charged with look­ing into alle­ga­tions of police shoot­ings in an inde­pen­dent and pro­fes­sion­al man­ner. Despite a lot of grand­stand­ing and pon­tif­i­cat­ing mis­ter Williams has not been able to inde­pen­dent­ly con­clude an inves­ti­ga­tion which shows a sin­gle case of unlaw­ful killing. This has not stopped Williams from being on tele­vi­sion and radio every chance he gets mak­ing state­ments and com­pro­mis­ing inves­ti­ga­tions in which his agency is active­ly engaged.

As if that was not bad enough INDECOM Terrence Williams joined the most vit­ri­olic anti police group in the country,(JFJ) Jamaicans for Justice, in a joint press con­fer­ence berat­ing the police for shoot­ing crim­i­nals and remov­ing sev­er­al guns from the streets, to include AK47 rifles. The Police Federation through its chair­per­son has cor­rect­ly hit back at Williams for being at that press con­fer­ence, and demand­ed he resign.The Federation has sent let­ters of com­plaint to the Governor General, the Prime Minister,and the Parliament to have Williams removed. In response INDECOM has fired back that it’s com­mis­sion­er has done noth­ing wrong and as such he should remain in his job.

We make no apolo­gies for shar­ing the con­cerns of organ­i­sa­tions such as Jamaicans for Justice or the Office of the Public Defender and air­ing our con­cerns in that regard,” the state­ment read. The state­ment indi­cat­ed that those con­cerns do not rep­re­sent an attack on the secu­ri­ty forces and should not be con­strued as such”.

This state­ment from the morons at INDECOM shows two things , (1) that they are com­plete­ly and unequiv­o­cal devoid of ratio­nal thought. If the agency sees noth­ing wrong with hav­ing a press con­fer­ence with JFJ it clear­ly is inca­pable of engag­ing in unbi­ased investigations.(2) That they are inca­pable of under­stand­ing their mandate.

That state­ment from INDECOM , what hubris? So here’s a new agency just formed recent­ly, stat­ing we make no apolo­gies , should­n’t hubris be left out of this par­tic­u­lar debate? How could this new agency not see some­thing wrong with its actions in shar­ing stage with Carolyn Gomes. Gomes advo­cates the killing of police offi­cers, she has stri­dent­ly argued that even if the killings of crim­i­nals are indeed jus­ti­fi­able , it is unac­cept­able for offi­cers to kill them. What that means is that offi­cers should be killed in equal num­bers as crim­i­nals, . That is the view of Carolyn Gomes and Earl Witter. Clearly this has got to be the tip­ping point. Decent Jamaican will have to take a stand and demand that the police do more to root out bad apples with even more alacrity, but they must col­lec­tive­ly also put their foot down on the neck of JFJ and make sure that kind of non­sense is stopped once and for all.

As if all of this is not enough the recent­ly embar­rassed Jamaica labour par­ty has decid­ed to fur­ther destroy that par­ty by sid­ing with the peo­ple who are fight­ing tooth and nail against the police. Already Andrew Holness, Delroy Chuck, and Derick Smith have thrown their sup­port behind Williams cement­ing the wide­ly held belief that INDECOM was a tool of the JLP. The JLP would be wise to watch its words very carefully,sour grapes?The Police just vot­ed with the Jamaican peo­ple to boot them from office, and I must say that even though I loathe the PNP I would be more inclined to sup­port the PNP if the Labour par­ty sides with those who sides against the police.

I stand with decent law-abid­ing cops , my sup­port is with the rule of law, that com­mit­ment is unwa­ver­ing and unequivocal.

LET’S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT:

It nev­er ceas­es to amaze me, the brazen dis­dain mem­bers of the peo­ple’s nation­al par­ty and their sleep­er affil­i­ates have for the intel­li­gence of the Jamaican peo­ple. The peo­ple’s nation­al par­ty here­to referred to as the PNP are mas­ters at strate­giz­ing and as a con­se­quence win­ning elec­tions. Their only prob­lem is that they are ter­ri­ble at gov­ern­ing. Their ground game is immac­u­late, leav­ing the Jamaica Labour Party JLP bewil­dered in the dust. Based on their orga­ni­za­tion­al skills the PNP have made the argu­ment that Jamaica is PNP coun­try, with some mer­it. They have plant­ed sleep­ers at every lev­el of nation­al life. Mark you there is noth­ing wrong with peo­ple hav­ing their polit­i­cal views. we all do, the prob­lem with these sleep­ers is that they pre­tend they are inde­pen­dent apo­lit­i­cal mem­bers of soci­ety with no axe to grind. Untill of course they are exposed grind­ing their PNP axes.

Garnet Roper Omar Davis

As a boy I grew up lis­ten­ing to Ronald Thwaites pon­tif­i­cate, prog­nos­ti­cate, and pro­mul­gate on the air­ways. Always try­ing to appear neu­tral, I always told friends Thwaites was a plant. No need to speak any fur­ther on Thwaites. Omar Davis spewed finan­cial gib­ber­ish on radio dai­ly as well, he pre­tend­ed he was a finan­cial guru who was from the intel­li­gentsia. We all know that Omar Davis was a polit­i­cal plant which had dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences for Jamaica.

Recently G2K the youth arm of the labour par­ty came out after com­plaints by oth­ers in civ­il soci­ety on the issue and spoke stri­dent­ly about the mass of peo­ple who were actu­al plants of the PNP who open­ly opined and pre­sent­ed them­selves as neuter­al mem­bers of the media and oth­er areas of soci­ety only to be revealed as plants of the PNP after the elec­tions. Most if not all of them are now hold­ers of lucra­tive pub­lic sec­tor jobs.

One such plant is Yvonne Mccalla Sobers This lady who looks like any­one’s sweet grand­moth­er, has argued vehe­ment­ly for jus­tice, most­ly against the police , and with lim­it­ed or/​fabricated evi­dence, while at the same time she presents her­self as a friend of the police. By the way Yvonne MCCalla Sobers was just appoint­ed to head the board of E‑learning Jamaica com­pa­ny lim­it­ed. ” Wow”. Garnet Roper President of the Jamaica the­o­log­i­cal sem­i­nary now on a gov­ern­ment board, appoint­ed by the PNP. The peri­od lead­ing up to the last nation­al elec­tions was prob­a­bly the most reveal­ing though, all the rodents start­ed crawl­ing out of the wood-work . Many have since been reward­ed with plum Government jobs,or appoint­ed to boards and giv­en oth­er lucra­tive assign­ments. This gov­ern­ment and it’s oper­a­tives are despi­ca­ble, and down­right shame­less. They are once again uti­liz­ing the pub­lic sec­tor purse as its pri­vate pig­gy-bank to reward loy­al foot sol­diers for putting in the work.

MCCalla Sobers attacked the police in the PNP’s mouth­piece, the Jamaica Daily Gleaner today, in an Article titled “Extrajudicial killings show no com­mit­ment to peace. Read more here”(jamaica​glean​er​.com)

I love Yvonne MCCalla sobers and as such I want­ed to give her Article respect. I want­ed to make sure I under­stood what she intend­ed to con­vey, so I read it twice, and unfor­tu­nate­ly the sec­ond read­ing left me just as baffled:

Quote: If the soci­ety wants peace and pros­per­i­ty, we need to ‘wheel and come again’. The secu­ri­ty tar­get would be win­ning pub­lic con­fi­dence rather than using brute force to cre­ate sit­u­a­tions where com­mu­ni­ties trust crim­i­nals more than police. The pub­lic might then be will­ing to part­ner with the police in solv­ing crime, so the police could rely more on brain than baton or bullet.

Ha ha ha, what utter non­sense, Jamaicans had that.

As a boy grow­ing up in the 70’s in NE. Saint Catherine our police did not car­ry guns, cops patrolled and every­one was on their best behav­ior. Truth mat­ters Yvonne, I refuse to allow you or any­one else to use revi­sion­ist his­to­ry to paint our police offi­cers. Many of Jamaica’s police offi­cers have giv­en detrac­tors more than enough to talk about. But I will keep your feet to the fire of truth in the inter­est of verac­i­ty, and his­tor­i­cal perspective.

The Jamaican peo­ple had offi­cers who some even argued were too nice, what did our peo­ple do? They made it an art, a part of the cul­ture to fight and assault offi­cers. To this day this cul­ture of assault­ing offi­cers is great con­ver­sa­tion piece with­in some quar­ters. Many Jamaicans delight in telling tales of unarmed police offi­cers beat­en by local (bad­men) sim­ply for doing their jobs. They nev­er tire of relat­ing those tales to the delight of their cap­tive audi­ences. Many police offi­cers were mur­dered , many crim­i­nals were shut­tled out of Jamaica through Cuba to Canada after killing police offi­cers, some have returned to Jamaica and to date are still immune from fac­ing charges for killing cops. Many cops who passed through the for­mer Beat-and-foot patrol at the bot­tom of West Street in Kingston will attest to the fact that when young cops come out of the Academy fresh and ide­al­is­tic they are not tough. They are not mean peo­ple who are com­mit­ting alleged acts of extra-judi­cial killings. They are your neigh­bours, your sons and daugh­ters, sis­ters and broth­ers, cousins, aunts and uncles and your friends, and yes they are your class mates too.

It is the vile dis­re­spect­ful igno­rance of peo­ple who refuse to con­form to the rule of law which trans­forms them into what many of you think are killing machines. The truth is our coun­try is an incred­i­bly vio­lent place where the kind of polic­ing you advo­cate is impossible.

Winning pub­lic con­fi­dence, are you nuts ? 85 % of the Jamaican peo­ple are deemed to be cor­rupt, who are you fool­ing. How could any­one with a mod­icum of under­stand­ing argue that police offi­cers would try to make peace with crim­i­nals. The police do not have a man­date to make peace, they have a man­date to enforce the laws. No coun­try may make peace with crim­i­nals for the sake of peace. That is called appease­ment, after doing that, no gov­ern­ment. No police depart­ment may do what you pro­pose and claim legitimacy!!!!.

Those who give up their rights in pur­suit of peace and secu­ri­ty end up with nei­ther. No peo­ple should be lulled into believ­ing that mak­ing peace, call­ing off the police will grant them last­ing peace or secu­ri­ty. Where has it ever worked, did it work in Tivoli Gardens, did it work in any gar­ri­son in our coun­try? The answer is no !! Despite the many view-points local­ly or abroad, one strat­e­gy works in Jamaica. People can­not be asked to obey laws, they must be made to obey laws.

We tried it your way.

WAR ON JAMAICAN POLICE FOR DOING THEIR JOBS:

After Bruce Golding was forced to con­front the real­i­ty that Tivoli Gardens the epic cen­ter of his West Kingston con­stituen­cy was unten­able he act­ed. Golding act­ed because he was forced to act. I wrote an open let­ter to Golding which was car­ried in the Daily Gleaner upon his ascen­den­cy. In that let­ter I asked the then Prime Minister to be dif­fer­ent, I implored him to take on the man­tle of Bustamante , Hugh Shearer in a renewed com­mit­ment to Jamaica, I told him if he was pre­pared to do the heavy lift­ing, the peo­ple would fol­low him and he would be remem­bered as the Prime Minister. Not just anoth­er, in a line of prime ministers.

Mister Golding either did not read that let­ter, or he bla­tant­ly ignored it. Either way Mister Golding end­ed up the worse for it. Despite his short-com­ings, and we could spend our life­time argu­ing those from a polit­i­cal per­spec­tive, Golding was forced to rec­og­nize that the gar­ri­son cul­ture as it exist­ed could not be main­tained in this new world. Golding gave our coun­try Portia Simpson Miller and the sad incom­pe­tent lot the coun­try has today. And reduced his lega­cy to a foot note in his­to­ry. Leaders are not made they are born, one can­not lead from behind, one must make tough unpop­u­lar deci­sions to be a leader,buck the trends, remove the sta­tus quo. Golding in the end was capa­ble of neither.

As such Mister Golding was forced to release the pow­er of the state to repel what was a well orches­trat­ed and defi­ant attack on the rule of law and the Jamaican state by exten­sion. In the end over 70 peo­ple were report­ed­ly killed and Tivoli Gardens was annexed to Jamaica. Whether the peo­ple of that com­mu­ni­ty uses this oppor­tu­ni­ty to ingra­ti­ate them­selves with the oth­er com­mu­ni­ties which make up our coun­try, is up to them to decide. They have been released from the ten­ta­cles of gar­ri­son pol­i­tics. What they do with that oppor­tu­ni­ty will deter­mine whether or not the secu­ri­ty forces will ever have to enter that com­mu­ni­ty with force of arms, or they will ben­e­fit from the ser­vices of com­mu­ni­ty polic­ing which all civ­i­lized peo­ple are enti­tled to.

Scene: Military APC nav­i­gat­ing streets in Hannah town after ter­ror­ists went on a rampage. 

Revisionist his­to­ri­ans and crim­i­nal sup­port­ing groups if allowed will rewrite the sto­ry of what hap­pened, they will lie to the world that 70 inno­cent peo­ple were mur­dered by agents of the state. Nowhere in those litany of lies and dis­tor­tions will you see the Police sta­tions which were razed, burned to the ground by Jamaica’s urban terrorists.

Pictures of the Hannah Town Police Station on fire, and the Cross Rds. Police Station after a ter­ror assault on them

Nowhere will you see them talk­ing about the offi­cers killed in that assault. Nowhere will you hear about the scores of armed thugs who pledged their alle­giance to Christopher (Duddus) Coke. And nowhere will you hear these char­la­tans speak about the thugs who picked up their weapons and moved to Tivoli Gardens to do bat­tle against the state. When their lies are writ­ten and the revi­sion­ist sto­ries told there will be no men­tion of Officers of this Cop.Police Sargeant Wayne (Max) Henriques, who was called away from cel­e­brat­ing his wed­ding anniver­sary with his beau­ti­ful wife. In the Jamaican police ser­vice it is called (exi­gen­cies of the ser­vice).Sargeant Henriques could have said no when he was called, upon which he would have faced dis­ci­pli­nary action. He chose to hon­or his oath, the next time his fam­i­ly saw him again was when they iden­ti­fied his body at the morgue. Sergeant Henriques and his col­leagues were cut down in a hail of bul­lets on moun­tain view avenue as they tried to help strand­ed motorist. Wayne and oth­er police offi­cers who lost their lives will not be remem­bered by nei­ther of the two polit­i­cal gangs which alter­nate in rip­ping off our coun­try. They will not be remem­bered by the Editorial board of the news papers. They will not be hon­ored by the lap-dogs at the top of the con­stab­u­lary. And they damn sure will not be remem­bered by the crim­i­nal sup­port­ers at the for­eign fund­ed Jamaicans for Justice. The con­sol­ers and enablers of crim­i­nal­i­ty in our coun­try. We how­ev­er will nev­er let their sac­ri­fice be for nought. We will nev­er stop men­tion­ing their names.

This mas­sive crowd most­ly clad in white , were not march­ing to be free from the ten­ta­cles of orga­nized crime. They were march­ing , show­ing their sup­port for a thug that came from a long line of thugs, who ruled their com­mu­ni­ty with iron fists, doled out largess, and took advan­tage of their depen­den­cy. They knew no bet­ter, it is with­in those con­text police offi­cers are forced to enforce Jamaican laws, with zero sup­port from their polit­i­cal boss­es. Political boss­es who them­selves have bloody hands.

Today Coke is gone but the prob­lem remains, these same peo­ple are unem­ployed and some are unem­ploy­able, every­one has to eat and sleep some­where. Unless gov­ern­ment can offer the peo­ple what ghet­to enforcers like Coke and oth­ers pro­vid­ed , the secu­ri­ty forces will for­ev­er be seen as the ene­my to be shot at and pil­lo­ried. Those with the ben­e­fit of hind­sight will argue with­out any real knowl­edge that offi­cers should take all pre­cau­tions when they are shot at not to hurt inno­cent bystanders, this is para­mount for all mem­bers of the secu­ri­ty forces. As a for­mer mem­ber who was on the front­lines, I am all too aware of the dif­fi­cult nature of fight­ing a bat­tle where the ene­my observes no rules yet I am restrained at the per­il of life in prison, if my split sec­ond deci­sion of life and death is the incor­rect one.

Policing inner city com­mu­ni­ties in Jamaica is com­pa­ra­ble to the slums of Rio de Jenero Brasil, Bogata Columbia, Johannesburg South Africa, and the drug car­tel con­trolled areas of Mexico. As such I must point out that in 10 years of ser­vice in the JCF and hav­ing been shot at count­less times and hav­ing been involved in hun­dreds of high risk oper­a­tions, and hav­ing being shot ‚I was nev­er issued with a bal­lis­tic vest. Officers are asked to police a peo­ple who demon­stra­bly refus­es to con­form to the rule of law. There is ample evi­dence of mem­bers of iner city com­mu­ni­ties run­ning toward offi­cers doing their jobs and open­ly defy­ing and jeer­ing offi­cers in an attempt to shield the men who shoot at offi­cers. People in these com­mu­ni­ties, par­tic­u­lar­ly women are active par­tic­i­pants in the com­mis­sion of seri­ous crimes to include assaults which results in death of police offi­cers. They remove weapons and spent shells from scenes of shoot­ings cre­at­ing the impres­sion there was no shoot out .

Well mean­ing peo­ple who want to live their lives free from the scourge of crime would cer­tain­ly like a coun­try where cops do not car­ry guns.

We were at that place and what did we do? We start­ed fight­ing our police offi­cers, yes assault­ing an offi­cer in Jamaica became a sport. The same peo­ple who claim police aggres­sion nev­er opened their pie-holes to denounce those so-called (rude boys)who assault­ed our offi­cers and in many cas­es killed our offi­cers. They were silent. The same frauds were silent then as they are now when the inno­cent are slaugh­tered. There are places where police can be less aggres­sive, Jamaica is not one of those places. Olof Palme of Sweden thought as Prime Minister he was immune from vio­lence, he nev­er knew what hit him.

Olof Palme

Criminal sup­port­ing groups like JFJ is walk­ing a fine line. They sup­port mur­der­ers as a secu­ri­ty mea­sure, one day soon of the degen­er­ates who did not receive the memo will bring real­i­ty painful­ly home to these frauds. 

A Young col­league who went by the alias (fudge) was almost killed in Olympic gar­dens when an elder­ly woman grabbed him allow­ing her son to shoot him point-blank range ear­ly one morn­ing. Fudge sur­vived that bul­let, the elder­ly woman was let go by Jamaican crim­i­nal lov­ing judges, no con­se­quence. The son was not that lucky, Officers did not allow a judge to let that would be cop-killer walk free. When the mon­day morn­ing quar­ter­backs are doing with their pon­tif­i­cat­ing, talk­ing as if they know some­thing about being police offi­cer in Jamaica, let them vol­un­teer to ride with cops for a week. guar­an­teed they would piss what­ev­er they are wear­ing, and that includes the grand­stand­ing Zealots in the pub­lic defend­ers office, INDECOM, JFJ, the vil­lage lawyers in the media and whichev­er rock they live under.

These are some of the peo­ple whose car­rers it is to sec­ond guess every action of the police, though they nev­er have any­thing to say about the killing of police offi­cers. Earl Witter Public defend­er . Carolyn Gomes Criminal rights advo­cate. And Terrence Williams INDECOM commsisioner.

Has any­one noticed that the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group JFJ nev­er make men­tion of the weapons that are recov­ered from hood­lums in the west Kingston shoot out, or any oth­er? Do you know why they make no men­tion of the weapons tak­en off the streets? Because it would dele­git­imize their argu­ments! Jamaica is a pre­ten­tious soci­ety that pre­tends we have a sta­ble democ­ra­cy. As we saw in 2010 with the killing of law enforce­ment offi­cers and the burn­ing of police station,there are ele­ments with­in the soci­ety who are quite will­ing to take on the Jamaican state. Make no mis­take they are not com­mon crim­i­nals. When some­one picks up a weapon against the state that act becomes trea­so­nous. Any coun­try seri­ous about the rule of law would pros­e­cute these offend­ers and those who sup­port them to the full extent of the law. The fact of the mat­ter is, Jamaica despite what the crim­i­nal sup­port­ers tell you, is not an ordi­nary place . Police doing their jobs there do not do so with­in the frame-work of nor­mal polic­ing, there are a series of sit­u­a­tions that makes the par­a­digm dif​fer​ent​.To include. Terrain ‚types of weapons,types of crim­i­nals, men­tal­i­ty of the peo­ple being policed.

In devel­oped coun­tries when a person/​persons decide to use the kind of force that is used by Jamaican crim­i­nals , and the weapons they use comes into play. Police use over­whelm­ing force, and the first shot they get that threat is neu­tral­ized. Those who pon­tif­i­cate as if the know some­thing , do not know what they are talk­ing about. It’s always easy to sit and Monday-morn­ing quar­ter back , some­thing Jamaicans are very good at doing. Everyone has an opin­ion, irre­spec­tive of their lack of knowl­edge, they are will­ing to offer an opin­ion notwithstanding.

Having left the JCF I won­dered, “why did I risk my life to serve”? Then I con­soled myself “I did not serve because I loved the ingrates, I served because I love my coun­try”. We will nev­er sur­ren­der to crim­i­nal thugs or their sup­port­ers. If the bat­tle needs to be ele­vat­ed to anoth­er lev­el , then that may be what peo­ple will have to do. The peo­ple of Columbia took back their coun­try, we will take back our country.

SUBMITTED HERE FOR YOUR INFORMATION IS THE MOST RECENT NARCOTICS CONTROL STRATEGY REPORT RELEASED TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS:

The 2012 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) has raised grave wor­ries about Jamaica’s progress in drug fighting.
The report was sub­mit­ted today to the United States Congress.
The report notes that the Commissioner of Police faces inter­nal, judi­cial, and polit­i­cal road­blocks that are hin­der­ing reforms man­dat­ed by Jamaica’s 2007 Police Strategic Review Implementation Plan.
But the doc­u­ment notes that the Commissioner has tak­en a strong pub­lic stance against cor­rup­tion, and is con­tin­u­ing to imple­ment and expand the plan.
It also claims that high-pro­file orga­nized crime gangs con­tin­ued to suc­cess­ful­ly oper­ate with­in Jamaica and gang lead­ers are often afford­ed com­mu­ni­ty and, in some cas­es, police protection.
The INCSR reviews con­di­tions in the major illic­it drug-pro­duc­ing coun­tries, the major drug-tran­sit coun­tries, and the major source coun­tries for pre­cur­sor chem­i­cals used in the pro­duc­tion of illic­it nar­cotics. In addi­tion, the INCSR dis­cuss­es con­di­tions in the major mon­ey-laun­der­ing countries.
This is the 29th edi­tion of the annu­al report to Congress and cov­ers the cal­en­dar year 2011.
See full report on Jamaica below.
A. Introduction
Jamaica con­tin­ues to be the largest Caribbean sup­pli­er of mar­i­jua­na to the United States. Although cocaine and syn­thet­ic drugs are not pro­duced local­ly, Jamaica is a tran­sit point for drugs traf­ficked from South America to North America. Drug pro­duc­tion and traf­fick­ing are both enabled and accom­pa­nied by orga­nized crime, domes­tic and inter­na­tion­al gang activ­i­ty, and police and gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion. The gun trade for illic­it drugs exac­er­bates the prob­lem as undoc­u­ment­ed hand­guns are moved into the coun­try in exchange for drugs.
Drugs flow into, through and from Jamaica in small boats and large ves­sels (both inside the ves­sel and in par­a­site con­tain­ers attached to the hull), as con­tra­band car­ried by ship and air­craft pas­sen­gers, with­in ship­ping con­tain­ers, and to a lim­it­ed degree by pri­vate air­craft. Most drugs leav­ing Jamaica are bound for North America. However, some amounts of mar­i­jua­na and cocaine are smug­gled from Jamaica into England, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, either using per­son­al couri­ers, car­go on com­mer­cial air­craft, or by insert­ing the drugs into ship­ping con­tain­ers that pass through Kingston’s busy con­tain­er ter­mi­nal and con­tin­ue onto Europe.
Factors that con­tribute to drug traf­fick­ing are the country’s con­ve­nient posi­tion as a point for nar­cotics being traf­ficked from Latin America; its lengthy, rugged and dif­fi­cult-to-patrol coast­line; a high vol­ume of tourist trav­el by indi­vid­u­als and pri­vate boats; its sta­tus as a major trans­ship­ment point for ship­ping con­tain­ers between Asia, Latin America, Europe and Africa; and, a strug­gling econ­o­my that encour­ages cul­ti­va­tion of mar­i­jua­na in remote swamps and moun­tain areas.
Law enforce­ment author­i­ties are mod­er­ate­ly effec­tive in com­bat­ing illic­it traf­fick­ing with com­pe­tent and ded­i­cat­ed lead­er­ship, but their efforts are under­cut by a slow and mar­gin­al­ly effec­tive crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem, a lack of suf­fi­cient resources, and cor­rup­tion. Jamaican law stip­u­lates that pos­ses­sion or use of cocaine; hero­in, mar­i­jua­na, and ecsta­sy are ille­gal and sub­ject to crim­i­nal and civ­il penal­ties. The ille­git­i­mate pos­ses­sion of pre­cur­sor chem­i­cals is also pro­hib­it­ed by law.
Jamaica is a sig­na­to­ry to the 1988 UN Drug Convention.
B. Drug Control Accomplishments, Policies, and Trends
1. Institutional Development

Coöperation remains strong between the Governments of Jamaica and the United States in an effort to curb nar­cotics and relat­ed transna­tion­al crime. The United States’ pri­ma­ry part­ners are the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF), the Jamaica Defence Force (JDF), Jamaica Customs, and the Ministry of Finance’s Financial Investigation Division.
The Jamaican gov­ern­ment and the United States have a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) that assists in evi­dence shar­ing. Both gov­ern­ments have a rec­i­p­ro­cal asset shar­ing agree­ment and a bilat­er­al law enforce­ment agree­ment gov­ern­ing coöper­a­tion to stop the mar­itime flow of ille­gal drugs. Jamaica is a par­ty to the Inter-American Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, the 1961 UN Single Convention as amend­ed by the 1972 Protocol, the 1971 UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances, the 1988 UN Drug Convention, the 1996 Inter-American Convention Against Corruption, the UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime and its three pro­to­cols, and the UN Convention Against Corruption. The Jamaican gov­ern­ment has signed, but has not rat­i­fied, the Caribbean Regional Maritime Counterdrug Agreement.
The 1991 extra­di­tion treaty between the United States and Jamaica is active­ly and suc­cess­ful­ly used by the United States to extra­dite sus­pect­ed crim­i­nals from Jamaica. Extradition requests are nor­mal­ly processed in a rou­tine and effi­cient man­ner by Jamaican polit­i­cal and judi­cial authorities.
Realizing that fight­ing gangs, drugs, and transna­tion­al crime begins at the com­mu­ni­ty lev­el, the JCF increased com­mu­ni­ty-based polic­ing (CBP) efforts with U.S. sup­port. CBP is now the offi­cial pol­i­cy of the JCF and is incor­po­rat­ed into pre-ser­vice train­ing for all police recruits. The CBP pro­gram spread from three pilot com­mu­ni­ties in 2008 to 360 com­mu­ni­ties in 2011. Of the JCF’s 8,444 front line offi­cers, 5,609 received train­ing in CBP prac­tices with the remain­der sched­uled for train­ing. Civilian accep­tance of CBP is facil­i­tat­ed through pro­grams such as a safe schools pro­gram and youth civic engagement.
The Commissioner of Police faces inter­nal, judi­cial, and polit­i­cal road­blocks that hin­der reforms man­dat­ed by Jamaica’s 2007 Police Strategic Review Implementation Plan. The Commissioner has tak­en a strong pub­lic stance against cor­rup­tion, is con­tin­u­ing to imple­ment and expand the plan, and has made steady progress toward insti­tu­tion­al reform. However, it is unclear whether the Commissioner will secure con­tin­ued leg­isla­tive and exec­u­tive sup­port, both in fund­ing and polit­i­cal back­ing, to make sig­nif­i­cant and endur­ing progress in com­bat­ing police cor­rup­tion and trans­form­ing the institution.
2. Supply Reduction
Marijuana is grown in all four­teen parish­es of Jamaica. An esti­mat­ed 15,000 hectares (37,000 acres) of mar­i­jua­na is gen­er­al­ly found in areas inac­ces­si­ble to vehic­u­lar traf­fic on small plots in moun­tain­ous areas and along the trib­u­taries of the Black River in Saint Elizabeth parish. The JCF and JDF employ teams of civil­ian cut­ters to cut grow­ing plants and who are escort­ed by the mil­i­tary or police. Teams seize seedlings and cured mar­i­jua­na and burn them in the field. Jamaican law pro­hibits the use of her­bi­cides, and only man­u­al erad­i­ca­tion is conducted.
Eradication of mar­i­jua­na (cannabis, seedlings, seeds, and nurs­eries) increased from 2010: 707 hectares of cannabis were erad­i­cat­ed; 1,900,630 seedlings destroyed and 480 kilos of seeds destroyed in 2011 when com­pared to 447 hectares, 956,300 seedlings and 255 kilos of seeds in 2010. Additional progress in erad­i­ca­tion efforts is hin­dered by the Jamaican government’s fis­cal con­straints and the unavail­abil­i­ty of JDF air­craft to locate mar­i­jua­na fields and trans­port per­son­nel to the remote areas where the crops are grown.
Jamaica pro­hibits the man­u­fac­ture, sale, trans­port, and pos­ses­sion of ecsta­sy, metham­phet­a­mine, and reg­u­lates the pre­cur­sor chem­i­cals used to pro­duce them. Jamaica does not pro­duce pre­cur­sor chem­i­cals or oth­er chem­i­cal sub­stances and, relies on coun­tries export­ing goods to con­form to inter­na­tion­al stan­dards gov­ern­ing export ver­i­fi­ca­tion. The impor­ta­tion and sale of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal prod­ucts and chem­i­cal sub­stances are reg­u­lat­ed and rein­forced with fines or impris­on­ment. Other con­trols exist to mon­i­tor the usage of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal prod­ucts and chem­i­cal sub­stances includ­ing reg­is­ter con­trols, inspec­tions, and audits.
Smugglers con­tin­ued to use mar­itime ship­ping con­tain­ers, ships, small boats, air­craft and couri­ers to move drugs from and through Jamaica to the United States. Seizures of mar­i­jua­na-relat­ed prod­ucts improved in 2011, with 47,691 kilos of cannabis and 170 kilos of hash oil in 2011, com­pared to 39,291 kilos and 121 kilos in 2010, respec­tive­ly, although hashish decreased to 9 kilos in 2011 from 13 in 2010. Seizures of cocaine increased to 552 kilos in 2011 from 176 kilos in 2010, though crack cocaine dropped to 1.3 kilos in 2011 from 5.98 in 2010.
High- pro­file orga­nized crime gangs con­tin­ued to suc­cess­ful­ly oper­ate with­in Jamaica. Gang lead­ers are often afford­ed com­mu­ni­ty and, in some cas­es, police pro­tec­tion. Nevertheless, drug-relat­ed arrests increased to 20,216 in 2011, com­pared to 10,255 in 2010.
3. Drug Abuse Awareness, Demand Reduction, and Treatment
The JCF reports that mar­i­jua­na is used by nine per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion, mak­ing it the most abused illic­it drug among Jamaicans, while cocaine abuse reached a plateau of less than 0.1 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion over the last 10 years. There is evi­dence that new drugs, such as hero­in and ecsta­sy, entered the Jamaican domes­tic mar­ket in small amounts.
To com­bat the use of illic­it drugs, the Ministry of Health’s National Council on Drug Abuse (NCDA) was estab­lished by statute in 1982. NCDA field offi­cers pro­vide sup­port to the pri­ma­ry care sys­tem through the assess­ment of sub­stance abusers in the men­tal health sys­tem. Also, the Jamaican government’s National Health Fund (NHF) estab­lished and fund­ed 18 com­mu­ni­ty med­ical clin­ics across the island, pri­mar­i­ly through faith- based insti­tu­tions, that pro­vide pri­ma­ry treat­ment ser­vices with refer­rals to hos­pi­tals, clin­ics, physi­cians, psy­chol­o­gists, and psy­chi­a­trists. The clin­ics pro­vide drug-relat­ed coun­sel­ing and trau­ma services.
The Jamaican gov­ern­ment oper­ates one detox­i­fi­ca­tion cen­ter locat­ed at the University Hospital of the West Indies in Kingston. In col­lab­o­ra­tion with the Organization of American States Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD), Jamaica offers a uni­ver­si­ty-lev­el cer­tifi­cate pro­gram in drug addic­tion and drug pre­ven­tion. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) works direct­ly with the Jamaican gov­ern­ment and NGOs on demand reduc­tion; how­ev­er, due to lim­it­ed resources, these pro­grams have lit­tle impact.
The Ministry of Health (MOH) reg­u­lates phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, includ­ing the impor­ta­tion of pseu­doephedrine, both in pow­der and final prod­uct forms. The NCDA, the Pharmacy Council, and the MOH work to expand aware­ness among health pro­fes­sion­als about the poten­tial dan­ger of pseu­doephedrine and ephedrine when they are divert­ed to pro­duce metham­phet­a­mine. The NCDA col­lab­o­rates with oth­er non-prof­it orga­ni­za­tions to pro­vide non-res­i­den­tial drug coun­sel­ing services.
4. Corruption
As a mat­ter of pol­i­cy, the Jamaican gov­ern­ment does not encour­age or facil­i­tate ille­gal activ­i­ty asso­ci­at­ed with drug traf­fick­ing; nor are any senior Jamaican offi­cials known to engage in such activ­i­ty. Nevertheless, cor­rup­tion of pub­lic offi­cials con­tin­ues to be a major con­cern to the Jamaican and U.S. gov­ern­ments as well as most Jamaicans. The law penal­izes offi­cial cor­rup­tion; how­ev­er, cor­rup­tion is entrenched, wide­spread, and com­pound­ed by a judi­cial sys­tem that is poor­ly equipped to han­dle com­plex crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tions in a time­ly manner.
Corruption under­mines efforts against drug and oth­er major crimes and is a major fac­tor in allow­ing the pas­sage of drugs and drug pro­ceeds through Jamaica. An improv­ing anti-cor­rup­tion stance with­in Jamaican cus­toms enforce­ment, the JCF, the Jamaica Tax Administration, and the Office of the Contractor General has shown encour­ag­ing signs. Additionally, the USAID-sup­port­ed National Integrity Action Forum helped focus increased pub­lic and gov­ern­ment atten­tion on anti-cor­rup­tion reforms.
The Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) of the JCF has shown suc­cess in iden­ti­fy­ing and remov­ing offi­cers engaged in cor­rup­tion. Since the ACB’s incep­tion in 2008, 319 JCF per­son­nel have been dis­missed for uneth­i­cal or cor­rupt behav­ior, with 69 of those dis­missed in 2011. Another 44 offi­cers faced crim­i­nal cor­rup­tion charges dur­ing the year. The JCF’s suc­cess is due part­ly to mech­a­nisms that allow it to dis­miss cor­rupt or uneth­i­cal offi­cers when evi­dence is insuf­fi­cient to jus­ti­fy crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion. For exam­ple, the JCF requires high lev­el police offi­cers to sign employ­ment con­tracts that improve account­abil­i­ty and facil­i­tate speedy dis­missal for cor­rupt or uneth­i­cal behav­ior. Vetting and a poly­graph exam­i­na­tion are also required for pro­mo­tions into key positions.
The JDF has been effec­tive in iden­ti­fy­ing and respond­ing to cor­rup­tion with­in its ranks. The JDF, while not immune from cor­rup­tion, takes swift dis­ci­pli­nary action when war­rant­ed in fur­ther­ance of its zero tol­er­ance policy.
A bill cre­at­ing an Anti-Corruption Special Prosecutor is being con­sid­ered by Parliament, but no action is expect­ed soon. Efforts by leg­is­la­tors from both polit­i­cal par­ties to dilute the effec­tive­ness of the mea­sure threat­en its prospec­tive impact on curb­ing gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion. There has not been leg­isla­tive action to cre­ate a National Anti-cor­rup­tion Agency, which is required by the Inter-American Convention against Corruption to which Jamaica is a signatory.
C. National Goals, Bilateral Coöperation, and U.S. Policy Initiatives Supporting Jamaica’s trans­for­ma­tion into a more secure, demo­c­ra­t­ic, and pros­per­ous part­ner rep­re­sents a major U.S. pol­i­cy goal. Narcotics traf­fick­ing, cor­rup­tion, and crime under­mine the rule of law, demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­er­nance, eco­nom­ic growth, and the qual­i­ty of life for all Jamaicans. In response, the United States is work­ing to enhance the effec­tive­ness and capac­i­ty of Jamaica’s law enforce­ment and crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. Within the fab­ric of all U.S. aid to Jamaica, beyond that relat­ing only to law enforce­ment and jus­tice, is the acknowl­edge­ment that suc­cess depends on a com­pre­hen­sive approach that rec­og­nizes the link between drugs, gangs, orga­nized crime, pover­ty, unem­ploy­ment, lack of edu­ca­tion­al oppor­tu­ni­ties and gov­ern­ment corruption.
The U.S. sup­port to com­bat nar­cotics pro­duc­tion and traf­fick­ing in Jamaica includes train­ing, equip­ment and logis­ti­cal assis­tance to the JCF and JDF. For exam­ple, fund­ing sup­ports con­tin­ued mar­i­jua­na erad­i­ca­tion oper­a­tions, logis­ti­cal sup­port to the JDF Coast Guard and JCF Marine Division for inter­dic­tion of nar­cotics traf­fick­ing in coastal waters, and enhance­ment of bor­der secu­ri­ty at air and sea ports for Jamaica Customs. Additional sup­port focus­es on spe­cial­ized JCF units that tar­get nar­cotics and gangs, on JCF crime scene inves­tiga­tive and foren­sic analy­sis capac­i­ty, and on train­ing for pros­e­cu­tors involved in pros­e­cut­ing nar­cotics, cor­rup­tion and finan­cial crimes. Indirect sup­port for coun­ternar­cotics efforts is fur­nished through the devel­op­ment of effec­tive com­mu­ni­ty-police rela­tions, improve­ment of JCF train­ing facil­i­ties, and anti-cor­rup­tion ini­tia­tives with­in the JCF, plus edu­ca­tion and work­force devel­op­ment pro­grams tar­get­ing at-risk youth who are sus­cep­ti­ble to nar­cotics and gang influence.
The pri­ma­ry source of U.S. fund­ing in sup­port of law enforce­ment and jus­tice reform is through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI), which con­tains both bilat­er­al and region­al fund­ing mech­a­nisms. The pro­gram­ming of region­al funds is guid­ed by tech­ni­cal work­ing groups com­prised of rep­re­sen­ta­tives from par­tic­i­pat­ing Caribbean coun­tries. The region­al com­po­nent of CBSI is instru­men­tal in achiev­ing U.S. goals in Jamaica because the chal­lenges it faces are large­ly shared by Caribbean neighbors.
D. Conclusion
Through essen­tial­ly sol­id demo­c­ra­t­ic insti­tu­tions and the efforts of strong lead­ers with­in the gov­ern­ment, Jamaica is mak­ing slow, but steady progress in com­bat­ing the crim­i­nal scourges that plague the country’s polit­i­cal, eco­nom­ic and social well-being, name­ly the illic­it traf­fick­ing of nar­cotics and firearms, vio­lent crime, cor­rup­tion, gangs and orga­nized crime. Carefully tar­get­ed U.S. sup­port, com­bined with efforts from oth­er inter­na­tion­al part­ners – in par­tic­u­lar Canada, the United Kingdom and the European Union – is help­ing to make a dif­fer­ence in that battle.
Success sto­ries can be found in JCF efforts to root out cor­rup­tion through its ACB, by its ini­tia­tive to inoc­u­late com­mu­ni­ties from crime and gang influ­ence using com­mu­ni­ty ‑based polic­ing, and with spe­cial­ized JCF vet­ted units attack­ing nar­cotics and gangs. Successes are also found with­in the offices of INDECOM, the Financial Investigation Division and the Contractor General, where com­pe­tent, ded­i­cat­ed and vet­ted per­son­nel are strug­gling with lim­it­ed resources to turn the tide against police killings, finan­cial crime and gov­ern­ment corruption.
Despite encour­ag­ing signs with­in Jamaica’s law enforce­ment agen­cies, progress is less evi­dent with­in Jamaica’s crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem as a whole. The judi­cial branch remains ill-equipped to han­dle a large num­ber of crim­i­nal cas­es and pros­e­cu­to­r­i­al effi­ca­cy is also lack­ing. As a result, there are a large num­ber of gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion cas­es for await­ing pros­e­cu­tion, and con­vic­tions are few as the cas­es may be put off for years with­out result.
Future U.S. efforts should con­tin­ue to sus­tain the momen­tum gained with­in Jamaica’s law enforce­ment agen­cies, par­tic­u­lar­ly in the areas of mar­itime secu­ri­ty, cor­rup­tion, gangs and orga­nized crime. The United States should focus enhanced sup­port and pres­sure for demon­stra­ble progress by pros­e­cu­tors and the courts in mov­ing crim­i­nal sus­pects through the crim­i­nal jus­tice system.

Jamaican Criminals Are Once Again In The Drivers Seat Supported By JFJ

Treasonous crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group Jamaicans for jus­tice, more com­mon­ly referred to as JFJ, has launched a broad­side against the Jamaican police for tak­ing out ter­ror­ists who engage them in shootouts with high-pow­ered weapons

(Jamaica Gleaner photo)

The lat­est ver­bal assault against the police in sup­port of Jamaica’s crim­i­nals was launched by Susan Goffe today. In her speech at a press con­fer­ence at their head­quar­ters Goffe said quote: This is the largest loss of life at the hands of the State since the end of slav­ery.” “This orgy of blood­let­ting by the police must end now.” 

Goffe called on Police Commissioner Owen Ellington to imme­di­ate­ly remove all police per­son­nel involved in the most recent inci­dents from front line duties.“They must remain off front line duty until the courts have deter­mined that they act­ed legal­ly,”(jamaica​glean​er​.com)

In what oth­er coun­try where the rule of law is para­mount ‚would this Charlatan even have the nerve to sug­gest that hero­ic law-enforce­ment offi­cers be removed for tak­ing out ter­ror­ists? These are some of the most dead­ly crim­i­nals armed with lethal high-pow­ered weapons. Anyone famil­iar with Jamaica knows they are not afraid to use them on anyone.

Crime has gone up sig­nif­i­cant­ly under this Government since it took office after the most recent elec­tions of December 29th 2011. There is a gen­er­al con­sen­sus on the streets that this gov­ern­ment is one that is soft on crime. Criminals open­ly state that this is the gov­ern­ment which allows them to “eat a food” (Eating a food is )col­lo­qui­al ver­nac­u­lar that trans­lates into being allowed to make mon­ey, irre­spec­tive of the ille­gal­i­ty of the methodology.

Carolyn Gomes.

Goffe and Gomes parade as defend­ers of the oppressed, but they are not defend­ers of rights they have end­ed up being the biggest sup­port­ers of the most ruth­less crim­i­nals run­ning around slaugh­ter­ing men, women and chil­dren all over the country.

Their cam­paign against law-enforce­ment has being bor­der­ing on aid­ing and abet­ting the most ruth­less crim­i­nals oper­at­ing in the coun­try today.

There is a war going on, The secu­ri­ty forces in Jamaica are not< let me re-empha­size NOT oper­at­ing under nor­mal polic­ing pro­ce­dures. There is an exis­ten­tial fight going on with some of the world’s most blood thirsty urban ter­ror­ist. As such, any causal­ly that accrues can­not be looked at with­in the con­text of nor­mal polic­ing. Of note, absent from the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing JFJ’s dia­tribe is any men­tion of the peo­ple being killed by their maraud­ing friends. There is no men­tion of the guns removed from the bat­tle field. Four in the west Kingston inci­dent alone. There is no men­tion of the lethal­i­ty of the weapons ‚to include the most feared weapon of all the AK47 rifle. This crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group must now be looked at for what it is . If the police was a com­pe­tent police force they would and should be inves­ti­gat­ing this group for sedi­tion and trea­son. Law abid­ing cit­i­zens will have to make a deci­sion ‚as to how long they will be will­ing to tol­er­ate this crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group to exist with­in our coun­try, fund­ed and direct­ed by over­seas interests.

While the police are busy tak­ing out crim­i­nal ele­ments. The call of the crim­i­nal sup­port­ing group JFJ is not falling on deaf ears. Not want­i­ng to be out­done the coun­try’s nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter Peter Bunting has ordered the com­mis­sion­er of police Owen Ellington to review police operations.

(Peter Bunting Jamaica’s nation­al secu­ri­ty min­is­ter)(jamaica​glean​er​.com)

As I point­ed out to you in a recent post this is exact­ly what crim­i­nals incar­cer­at­ed at the Horizon Remand cen­ter want­ed. Recent flare-ups are designed to have mem­bers of the mil­i­tary removed from con­trol over high risk inmates incar­cer­at­ed there. They have achieved the desired results, inso­far as the inmates and their sup­port­ers are con­cerned. As I told you those mem­bers of the mil­i­tary would be removed, well they have been removed. This is a mul­ti pronged approach launched by crim­i­nals in prison, on the streets and the forces that inter­cede on their behalf. They know this gov­ern­ment is a weak on enforc­ing the laws and they are not let­ting up. Recently Jamaican disc jock­ey Adijah Palmer aka Vybes Kartel who is also incar­cer­at­ed await­ing tri­al on mul­ti­ple mur­der charges had a promi­nent mem­ber of the University of the West Indies(UWI) Carolyn Cooper argu­ing in the Daily Gleaner that Palmer who is charged with mul­ti­ple cas­es of mur­der could not be so stu­pid to com­mit those mur­ders. This despite the misog­y­nis­tic garbage that Palmer puts out in the name of music, and her not hav­ing a shred of excul­pa­to­ry evi­dence that would prove Palmer’s inno­cence on nei­ther of the charges. Her entire the­o­ry is hinged on her premise that Palmer could not be that stu­pid. Carolyn Cooper lec­tures at the University!! See sto­ry here:(jamaica​glean​er​.com).

The great­est threat to the Jamaican state is the weak­ness of the present gov­ern­ment. This is a dan­ger­ous­ly feck­less gov­ern­ment that is still pop­u­lat­ed with the same peo­ple of the last PNP admin­is­tra­tion which last­ed 18 12 years and turned out to be a colos­sal fail­ure. During the afore­men­tioned peri­od the nation­al secu­ri­ty of our coun­try was left hang­ing, mort­gaged out to those who fight for the most bru­tal­ly mur­der­ous ele­ments amongst us. During this débâ­cle, crime went up and busi­ness­es fled as they did in the 70’s. Every year under the past PNP Administration over 1600 Jamaicans were slaughtered.A new Government came into being and they were forced to release the secu­ri­ty forces to do their jobs. As a result of the un shack­ling of the secu­ri­ty forces crime went down 40% after Tivoli Gardens rean­nex­a­tion to Jamaica. In the three months since the PNP has been returned to pow­er, crime has explod­ed to wit crim­i­nals feel ener­gised and con­fi­dent to once again take on the secu­ri­ty forces, now claim­ing “this is PNP time”, this is the infor­ma­tion com­ing from the streets.

As the prime min­is­ter attends galas thrown in her hon­or, and as she ingra­ti­ate her­self into mat­ters like crick­et that she was not elect­ed to fix, the coun­try is once again being over-run by the most heart­less crim­i­nals. Once again our coun­try has a deci­sion to make , the Jamaican peo­ple must, as oth­er coun­tries are doing, take their future into their own hands. Jamaicans must tell this gov­ern­ment that if they do not unshack­le the police they will take the laws into their own hands , and the gov­ern­ment must live with the consequence.