Once again new infor­ma­tion has crept to the fore of Criminal cops bru­tal­iz­ing and ter­ror­iz­ing citizens.
Floyd Dent a 57 year old Detroit native was pulled over because he was sup­pos­ed­ly in a known drug zone.
Cops pulled Dent over under the guise that he rolled through a stop sign ‚pulled him from his Cadillac at gun­point, threw him to the pave­ment and placed him in a choke-hold. Police in a shock­ing­ly famil­iar scene caught on dash­board cam­era video. An offi­cer put Floyd Dent, 57, in a choke-hold with one arm and began throw­ing right-hand­ed hay-mak­ers to the man’s head. Video shows the full, vicious assault: 16 blows to the head and a kick to the arm, and anoth­er offi­cer shock­ing Dent with a stun gun three times.
Cops lied that dent was try­ing to flee but it appeared they for­got about their own dash-cam video which proved no such thing hap­pened. des­per­ate­ly seek­ing to jus­ti­fy their unwar­rant­ed on the 57 year old man, they lied that he said “I will kill you as they dragged him from his car”. Of course there was no evi­dence of that as they had turned of their microphones.
They arrest­ed Dent on a slew of charges, includ­ing dri­ving with sus­pend­ed license and pos­ses­sion of crack cocaine they allege was found in the car, accord­ing to Click On Detroit. Dent has no crim­i­nal past and a blood test at the hos­pi­tal revealed no drugs or alco­hol in his sys­tem. State police told Dent’s attor­ney this week they were inves­ti­gat­ing the inci­dent. William Melendez, the Inkster, Mich., offi­cer who placed Dent in the choke­hold, was accused of mis­con­duct as a Detroit police offi­cer in 2004 as part of a group of cops acquit­ted in a fed­er­al tri­al for civ­il rights abus­es, the Detroit Free Press report­ed. A judge dis­missed all but the drug charge against Dent, who faces an April 1 court date. He refused a plea deal for pro­ba­tion, his attor­ney said.“
Mister Dent Dent has no crim­i­nal past and a blood test at the hos­pi­tal revealed no drugs or alco­hol in his system. 
See: https://mikebeckles.com/i‑was-on-my-last-breath-detroit-man-put-in-chokehold-pummeled-shocked-by-cops-in-traffic-stop/

THE OUTRAGE

There is no nation­al media atten­tion on this issue!
Once again we see the issue of brazen, unpro­voked police aggres­sion being unleashed against mem­bers of the black community.
Which begs the ques­tion, when are peo­ple going to fight back against these crim­i­nal cops?
On these pages we have repeat­ed­ly asked, why isn’t it a felony for cops to turn off micro­phones or oth­er­wise tam­per with devices which may be need­ed for evidence?
More impor­tant­ly why are cops not pros­e­cut­ed to the full extent of the law when they plant evi­dence, and fal­si­fy reports?
Why are cops allowed to keep their jobs when they com­mit crimes against cit­i­zens, or worse, case allowed to qui­et­ly move to dif­fer­ent depart­ments to car­ry out their sadis­tic pow­er trips on citizens?
Why would Prosecutors offer mis­ter Dent a plea deal on the drug charge know­ing their police wit­ness­es were clear­ly caught try­ing to frame mis­ter Dent? 
Why is it more impor­tant to snag mis­ter Dent into the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem with a fraud­u­lent guilty plea than to aggres­sive­ly pros­e­cute the cops who obvi­ous­ly plant­ed evi­dence, bru­tal­ly assault­ed him and fal­si­fied reports to jus­ti­fy their actions? 

How much longer is this coun­try going to pre­tend that the seri­ous issue of police abuse, par­tic­u­lar­ly black cit­i­zens are iso­lat­ed events, or worse, does not war­rant seri­ous action?
Every inci­dent of police mis­con­duct which goes unpun­ished tells cit­i­zens that is how soci­ety wants it to be.
The stark real­i­ty is that much of the abuse police dish out to black cit­i­zens is done based on their racist mis­con­cep­tions of Black Americans.
Lets not fool our­selves Racism is deeply insti­tu­tion­al­ized and endem­ic in American society. 
There are won­der­ful police offi­cers just as there are won­der­ful doc­tors nurs­es and fire­men, but there are also a dan­ger­ous cadre of racist igno­ra­mus­es who are wear­ing police uni­forms and are seri­ous­ly abus­ing cit­i­zens , fal­si­fy­ing evi­dence to gain con­vic­tions and killing peo­ple they hate.

These cow­ard­ly punks get away with it because of America’s love affair with cops and law-enforcement.
The prob­lem for black cit­i­zens is that the love affair with cops walks hand in hand with the hatred many har­bor for us.
Never mind that if any­one had the right to be hate­ful and mad it would cer­tain­ly be us for what has been done and what is still being done to our people.
How do you defend against those hid­ing behind a badge? 
The tragedy for good cops is that when the rage boils over their is no dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion, a cop is a cop.
We have seen it hap­pen before.
Those who sup­port cops regard­less of the atroc­i­ties they com­mit are not law abid­ing intel­li­gent citizens.
Intelligent cit­i­zens are aware that when cops com­mit crimes and gets away with it, it erodes the respect cit­i­zens have for the rule of law.
They are aware it places the lives of all cops in jeopardy. 
You do not sup­port crim­i­nal cops in their abuse of cit­i­zens because you care about the well being of cops.

You do so because they car­ry out a sick sadis­tic desire you har­bor to inflict pain and death on those you hate. 

Linden New Jersey cop Pedro Abad Jr. has had sev­er­al run-ins with the law which would have land­ed any ordi­nary per­son in seri­ous trou­ble includ­ing jail time, was behind the wheel dri­ving the wrong way on a Staten Island street after leav­ing a strip-club, obvi­ous­ly drunk.
As a result he crashed head-on into a trac­tor trail­er Killing one of his col­leagues crit­i­cal­ly injur­ing two oth­ers and him­self and also injur­ing the trac­tor trail­er driver.
Here’s whats shocking.

Pedro Abad Jr., Linden police offi­cer, swerved off the road in a black 2010 Audi A5 and hit a bus stop sign, a street sign and a stop sign before slam­ming through the side of New Way Supermarket in Roselle, N.J., at 3:46 a.m. on Jan. 22, 2011, accord­ing to a police report.

It took three months for all the dam­age to be fixed and the dam­age was so exten­sive the store was closed for the first three weeks of repairs. “Everything was messed up,” Patel said. “The reg­is­ter was on the ground, every­thing. The door doesn’t even shut still because of the crash.” Reeking of alco­hol, Abad, 27, was rushed from the scene to University Hospital in Newark, where he was charged with dri­ving while intox­i­cat­ed and care­less dri­ving. Inside the ambu­lance he admit­ted to hav­ing two mixed drinks at a local club, accord­ing to the police report.

Abad also received vio­la­tions for drunk­en dri­ving and refus­ing a Breathalyzer test on Feb. 26, 2013, after he crashed in Rahway, N.J., New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission records show. During that inci­dent, Abad was caught on cam­era stum­bling and slur­ring his words while ask­ing for an offi­cer he said he knew from the acad­e­my, NJ​.com report­ed. His license was sus­pend­ed for sev­en months in the wake of the Rahway crash, records show. In addi­tion to the two drink­ing-relat­ed crash­es, Abad was involved in six oth­er acci­dents going back to 2005, state records show.

Yet Pedro Abad Jr. the police offi­cer was still allowed to be dri­ving an automobile.
Why was this young man allowed to be driving ?
Why is he even still a cop after all those infractions?
Why is it such a hush , hush about whether he was drunk on the morn­ing of his lat­est crash?
Would it have tak­en this long to arrest the dri­ver of the trac­tor trail­er if he was dri­ving drunk the wrong way, seri­ous­ly injur­ing and killing cops?
I believe we all know the answer to these questions.
Condolences would be pour­ing in from all across the coun­try, the Media would have looped the sto­ry end­less­ly and there would have been a pro­ces­sion of cops parad­ing by to show sup­port for their fall­en com­rades killed by the drunk driver.
Of course the Media would have found all kinds of experts will­ing to offer up all kinds of advice on what the penal­ty should be for the driver.
Why is this case different?
Where is the outrage?
What hypocrisy?

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz no shrink­ing Violet when it comes to tack­ling tough sub­jects, once again braved the heat by ask­ing his com­pa­ny’s baris­tas to broach the sub­ject of race with customers.
The ini­tial part of the cam­paign was that baris­tas write the words “race togeth­er” on cof­fee cups as they serve customers.
That part of the cam­paign end­ed March 22^nd . Shultz insists that neg­a­tive back­lash is not behind the ter­mi­na­tion of that effort. The cup writ­ing part “was always just the cat­a­lyst for a much broad­er and longer term con­ver­sa­tion” about racial inequal­i­ty and diver­si­ty, he said.

The response to race togeth­er has been mixed includ­ing some harsh back­lash on social media, includ­ing threats against some exec­u­tives of Starbucks.
Hold that thought though.….
I am not sure whether surly half-awake peo­ple head­ing to work with­out their first bit of morn­ing pick-you-upper are ready to broach the tedious and thorny sub­ject of race.
Notwithstanding, I com­mend Howard Schultz for dar­ing to want to fix the can­cer­ous prob­lem of race in America.
Speaking to CNN Schultz said “If we all con­tin­ue to be bystanders on some­thing that’s divid­ing the nation, then where is this head­ed? We are bet­ter than this as a coun­try,”.
I agree that if we con­tin­ue to be bystanders on some­thing that’s divid­ing the nation we are head­ing , well, nowhere..
Not sure I agree America is bet­ter than this !
In fact America has shown it is not bet­ter than this.
How could America claim to be bet­ter than this in the year 2015 when there are racial divi­sions so deep and divi­sive that peo­ple are threat­ened with death for dar­ing to speak out and want­i­ng change?

How is America bet­ter than this when peo­ple are being killed by police because of the col­or of their skin?
I hear a lot of talk about the need for a nation­al con­ver­sa­tion on race.
This argu­ment has been at the fore-front of ever instance where race is present in an issue.
We hear it from the President down to every talk­ing-head on Television.
I’m not quite sure how that would occur? How is a nation­al con­ver­sa­tion on race ini­ti­at­ed? How is it executed?.
For the most part African Americans are par­tic­u­lar­ly enthused about such a conversation.
Black lead­ers have nev­er seen a con­fer­ence they did not like.
Give our peo­ple the oppor­tu­ni­ty to dress up and attend a con­fer­ence and they are in” hogs-heav­en”.
The only prob­lem is that after they attend these dress-up talk fests noth­ing ever change.
They go back to their deprived com­mu­ni­ties where things remain just the way they have always been.

Me ? I was nev­er one for all of that non­sen­si­cal talk, I guess it’s my Jeans T‑shirt and boots men­tal­i­ty , just do it like Nike says.
So lets quick­ly exam­ine some sim­ple facts sur­round­ing racism in America.
There is no rea­son to beat around the bush and pre­tend. You can­not fix what you do not iden­ti­fy, so lets iden­ti­fy the problem.
(1) WHITES STARTED RACISM IN AMERICA.
Whites start­ed racist dis­crim­i­na­to­ry prac­tices in America, they can end it when they chose.
This prac­tice pre-dates slav­ery. The prac­tice of white supe­ri­or­i­ty was what caused European set­tlers (most­ly prison inmates) to almost dec­i­mate the native American population.
It was that men­tal­i­ty which cre­at­ed the slave trade and the pogrom unleashed on African peo­ple both on the moth­er­land and those uproot­ed and trans­plant­ed here in the west­ern hemisphere.
It was white igno­rance, and grandiose ideas of racial supe­ri­or­i­ty which cost untold mil­lions of lives in the mid­dle pas­sage and here in the land of bondage.
It was whites who ini­ti­at­ed this car­nage on not only blacks, but all of the native peo­ple they found, not just here in the Americas but as far away as Australia, New Zealand and India.

(2) WHITES CAN END IT.
Whites can end the igno­ble prac­tice which teach­es and places one race above anoth­er, yet in far too many house­hold chil­dren are taught that they are supe­ri­or to others.
It is not acci­den­tal that many com­mu­ni­ties, towns, coun­ties and states are still rabid­ly dis­crim­i­na­to­ry to some peo­ple based on race.
Where do the chil­dren learn these behav­ior patterns?
They learn them from their par­ents, they learn them from their friends whose par­ents teach their kids to hate.

(3) MANY WHITES DO NOT WANT TO CHANGE.
Many whites under­stand the ben­e­fits of “white priv­i­lege” and they are not about to give it up.
Even those who claim not to be racist do ben­e­fit from white priv­i­lege even though they don’t know it, or may not even ask for it.
Getting a pass on a ticket,or not get­ting pulled over harassed or worse, is white privilege.
Having access to loans because of con­nec­tions is white privilege.
Being spo­ken to with respect by police is white privilege.

Racism per­sist because peo­ple ben­e­fit from it, they are not about to give up the perks because it’s right or moral.
Some say you can’t leg­is­late that peo­ple do away with dis­crim­i­na­to­ry racial atti­tudes and practices.
I dis­agree.
There is leg­is­la­tion for every­thing else, you may not be able to change peo­ple’s heart with leg­is­la­tion but you damn sure can make it expen­sive if they dis­play racist atti­tudes toward others.
Eventually they will get the mes­sage right?
Yeah .…
You see, the rea­son we are still deal­ing with this crap, is that too many who are sup­posed to draft and pass the appro­pri­ate leg­is­la­tion into law are the most vile racist creatures.

I write about the coun­try we know as Israel from time to time in crit­i­cal terms.
The main rea­son I have been crit­i­cal of this 68-year-old state, is that it’s lead­ers, spon­sors, and some of it’s peo­ple claim divine author­i­ty for the estab­lish­ment and exis­tence of that enti­ty, not just in being but it’s geo­graph­i­cal placement.
Having read and seen a tiny bit of the atro­cious heavy-hand­ed­ness and cal­lous dis­re­gard Israel dis­plays for human life, while pur­port­ing to be God’s cho­sen peo­ple, I can­not remain silent.

If the God of Israel is that venge­ful and uncar­ing I do not want any part of that unjust dis­crim­i­na­to­ry God.
Because I know that the God of my chris­t­ian faith , the God of for­give­ness is a just God> I must speak out, not just against the bill of Goods which has been sold the world about this ille­git­i­mate state, but against Ministers of the Christian Gospel here in the west­ern world who con­tin­ue to mis­lead the faith­ful with false teach­ings about God’s demands, as it relates to sup­port for Israel.

“Israeli’s”, The name they call them­selves, are a sig­nif­i­cant­ly dif­fer­ent peo­ple than Jews of the Bible and yes, the Torah.
Scholars and oth­er thinkers won­der how a peo­ple who claim to have their Genesis in the mid­dle East could be exiled to Europe and return as Caucasians?
Did they under­go a change in their skin tone due to the pas­sage of time or, are they just peo­ple who adopt­ed a faith as their own and now claim to be God’s cho­sen people?
Many also won­der whether being a Jew is mere­ly accept­ing the faith which then auto­mat­i­cal­ly makes one God’s cho­sen people,entitled to a prophet­ic home­land, on land occu­pied by oth­ers for thou­sands of years?
If you find your­self ask­ing these ques­tions, you must be pre­pared for a blow-back of epic pro­por­tion which may result in you los­ing your abil­i­ty to work or worse.
No one is sup­posed to ques­tion the authen­tic­i­ty of the bill of goods. Do and you are brand­ed an anti-semite.
The very idea of a Jewish home­land, that which mate­ri­al­ized in the actu­al cre­ation of the so-called Jewish state in 1947, is based sole­ly on reli­gious inter­pre­ta­tion of peo­ple prac­tic­ing the faith.
If I decide to accept Islam as my reli­gion of choice does that give me the right to claim Saudi Arabia as my homeland?
You get my point!
So how does Caucasians prac­tic­ing the Jewish faith claim Palestine as their home­land then force the real indige­nous Jewish peo­ple into con­cen­tra­tion camps? 
I digress though.
You see, most peo­ple here in the west­ern world are unaware that the Zionist state of Israel round up and place African Jews(real jews)into con­cen­tra­tion camps.
The very foun­da­tion on which the state was for­mu­lat­ed is flawed and at best fraudulent.
Christian min­is­ters of the Gospel con­tin­ue to mis­lead con­gre­ga­tions on this sub­ject because they lack intel­lec­tu­al inquisitiveness. 
Others sim­ply do not know so the lead their flock in blind sub­mis­sion to a lie.
You don’t have to take my word for it take a look at what (Neturei Karta) Jews against Zionism has to say.

JUDAISM AND ZIONISM ARE NOT THE SAME THING

We would like to take a few min­utes of your time to pre­vent you from mak­ing a ter­ri­ble mis­take that may have dis­as­trous results for many.

You have always with­out a doubt heard and read much about the polit­i­cal crises in the Middle East in which the State of Israel plays a cen­tral role. This is, in fact, an ongo­ing series of crises with poten­tial to bring the great­est mis­for­tune on the entire world. Tragically many believe that Zionism and Judaism are iden­ti­cal. Thus they con­clude that the entire Jewish peo­ple is respon­si­ble for the actions of the Zionist gov­ern­ment and the world crises which emanates from it. This is a Grave Error!

The truth is that the Jewish faith and Zionism are two very dif­fer­ent philoso­phies. They are as oppo­site as day and night. The Jewish peo­ple have exist­ed for thou­sands of years. In their two thou­sand years of Divinely decreed exile no Jew ever sought to end this exile and estab­lish inde­pen­dent polit­i­cal sov­er­eign­ty any­where. The peo­ple’s sole pur­pose was the study and ful­fill­ment of the Divine com­mand­ments of the Torah.

The Zionist move­ment cre­at­ed the Israeli state. The lat­ter is a per­sua­sion less than one hun­dred years old. Its essen­tial goal was and is to change the nature of the Jewish peo­ple from that of a reli­gious enti­ty to a polit­i­cal move­ment. From Zionism’s incep­tion the spir­i­tu­al lead­ers of the Jewish peo­ple stood in staunch oppo­si­tion to it.

To this day Torah Jewry remains for­ev­er loy­al to its faith. Zionists want the world to believe that they are the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the entire Jewish peo­ple. This is false! The Jewish peo­ple nev­er chose them as their leaders.

The Zionists have deceived many well mean­ing Jewish peo­ple via ter­ror, trick­ery and false pro­pa­gan­da. They have at their dis­pos­al the use of a near­ly uni­ver­sal­ly sub­servient media. Whoever attempts to crit­i­cize them puts his liveli­hood and, at times, his very life in danger.

However, despite the media black­out and easy resort to ter­ror the sim­ple truth remains unre­fut­ed and irrefutable: ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH FAITH AND TORAH LAW THE JEWISH PEOPLE ARE FORBIDDEN TO HAVE THEIR OWN STATE WHILE AWAITING THE MESSIANIC ERA!

The Creator gave us the Holy Land thou­sands of years ago. Yet, when we sinned, He took it away and sent us into exile. Since that time our task is to wait for Him to send the Messiah. At that time, the Creator alone, with­out any human being lift­ing a hand or say­ing a word, will bring us togeth­er and take us out of exile. He will like­wise estab­lish uni­ver­sal peace among all mankind and all will serve Him in good will.

Some reli­gious Jews, con­fused by Zionist pro­pa­gan­da quote Biblical vers­es that state that G‑d gave the chil­dren of Israel the Holy Land. They over­look, unfor­tu­nate­ly, those vers­es which say that He took it away due to our sins. They fur­ther ignore those prophe­cies which explic­it­ly describe the last exile’s con­clu­sion as a Divine, not a human process.

The Creator has com­mand­ed every Jew to fol­low the ways of peace and to be loy­al to the coun­try where he lives.

Torah true Jewry waits patient­ly for the Messianic redemp­tion. They have noth­ing to do with any kind of pseu­do “Jewish State” and its aggres­sions against oth­er peo­ples. They have a deep sym­pa­thy for the plight of the Palestinians who have suf­fered the most from Zionism’s false teach­ings and bar­bar­ic actions. The Zionist state is not a Jewish state. The Zionists alone are the only ones respon­si­ble for their actions. Authentic Jewry has and will con­tin­ue to oppose the very exis­tence of this blas­phe­mous state.

May all mankind wit­ness the true redemp­tion. http://​www​.nkusa​.org/​A​b​o​u​t​U​s​/​Z​i​o​n​i​s​m​/​j​u​d​a​i​s​m​_​i​s​n​o​t​_​z​i​o​n​i​s​m​.​cfm

More to come....»»

On the eve of Israeli Elections Benjamin Netanyahu the Likud Prime Minister of the Zionist State of Israel was asked by an inter­view­er with the Israeli news site, NRG, if it was true that a Palestinian nation would nev­er be formed while he’s prime min­is­ter, Netanyahu replied, “Indeed.”

“Anyone who is going to estab­lish a Palestinian state, any­one who is going to evac­u­ate ter­ri­to­ries today, is sim­ply giv­ing a base for attacks to the rad­i­cal Islam against Israel,” he said. “This is the true real­i­ty that was cre­at­ed here in the last few years.”

Netanyahu went on to say that any oppo­nents on the left who might argue oth­er­wise are “stick­ing their head in the sand, time and time again.”
From all indi­ca­tions Benjamin Netanyahu will also be the new Prime Minister of Israel for anoth­er term.

Thursday March 19^th Benjamin Netanyahu told NBC News.
“I don’t want a one-state solution”.
“I don’t want a one-state solu­tion,” Netanyahu told NBC News in his first inter­view with U.S. news orga­ni­za­tions since Tuesday’s hard fought elec­tions, adding that “cir­cum­stances would have to change” first, for there to be a “nego­ti­at­ed peace.”

There are a few issues at play here. Either Netanyahu believes peo­ple have for­got­ten his ear­li­er state­ments giv­en just a cou­ple of days ear­li­er , or he does­n’t care that we know he is a racist liar who respects no one but Israeli’s.
I’m going to go with the lat­ter , hav­ing seen this guy’s Modus-operandi.

That’s not all how­ev­er, Netanyahu’s arro­gance knows no bounds, in answer to his one state pro­nounce­ments on the eve of the elec­tions he lied point blank in anoth­er inter­view giv­en to a dif­fer­ent network.
Quote: “We have to get the Palestinians to go back to the nego­ti­at­ing table, break their pact with Hamas, and accept the idea of a Jewish state. And I think that’s what the inter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty should be focused on,”.
Well there is the cheeky arro­gance. He sets the para­me­ters for what the Palestinians must do before he con­sid­ers, (in his Godly might) their demands for a home of their own in their homeland.

Consider that even if the Palestinians were to allow them­selves to be humil­i­at­ed fur­ther, by acqui­esc­ing to every demand Netanyahu makes , they would not be any clos­er to a home­land than they are today.
A Palestinian home­land can­not be con­tin­gent on the dic­tates of Israel or Palestine for that mat­ter, there has to be a hon­est impar­tial bro­ker both par­ties respect. Israel respects no one.
A true Palestinian state may not be doable in light of all of the bad blood which has foment­ed since 1947.
It is cer­tain­ly not pos­si­ble with Israel telling a sov­er­eign peo­ple who they may asso­ciate with.
It is not pos­si­ble with Israel lay­ing para­me­ters for talks, while con­fis­cat­ing, and annex­ing more and more Palestinian ter­ri­to­ry each day, using them to build more and more set­tle­ments for Israeli Jews.
A Palestinian state is cer­tain­ly not pos­si­ble with the United States of America act­ing as bro­ker while simul­ta­ne­ous­ly being a spon­sor, enabler, and sup­port­er of Israeli dom­i­na­tion and occu­pa­tion of the Palestinian people.

So even if Palestinian lead­ers were to some­how capit­u­late to every demand Israel makes, what guar­an­tee do they have of a homeland?
The sim­ple answer is “none”.
The Palestinians would be stu­pid to sit at the same table with Israel, as long as Israel has at it’s helm, the patho­log­i­cal liar Benjamin Netanyahu.
There is no diplo­mat­ic speak to make this any more palat­able. Netanyahu is a vile despi­ca­ble liar.

Asked by NBC’s Andrea Mitchell whether he was racist in light of com­ments he made just pri­or to the elec­tions, he replied, “I am not” , On the day of the elec­tion, Netanyahu claimed that his gov­ern­ment was being threat­ened by Israeli Arab vot­ers who were turn­ing out for the elec­tion in “huge quan­ti­ties.”
When was vot­er turnout a bad thing?
Do you see the con­nec­tion here between Netanyahu the Senator from Israel and Republicans here in America who fun­da­men­tal­ly believe black and Latino vot­er turnout should be con­trolled and impeded?
Judge for your­self , this is Benjamin Netanyahu speak­ing about African migrant work­ers enter­ing the Jewish state. “They are Infiltrators,“If we don’t stop their entry, the prob­lem that cur­rent­ly stands at 60,000 could grow to 600,000, and that threat­ens our exis­tence as a Jewish and demo­c­ra­t­ic state,”
Not only is Netanyahu a racist he is a xenophobe.
Netanyahu is adamant­ly opposed to African migrant work­ers enter­ing Israel, some of his com­ments were cen­tered around alle­ga­tions that a Jewish woman was raped in a migrant com­mu­ni­ty. Israeli Police said the over­all crime rate in Israel had fall­en. There had been one alleged rape of a teenage girl con­nect­ed to the migrant com­mu­ni­ty, for which three sus­pects were in custody.

Yohanan Danino, the Israeli police chief, said migrants should be per­mit­ted to work to dis­cour­age pet­ty crime. the​guardian​.com reports.

This was not enough to tamp down the vile racism of some of Israel’s leaders.
Interior min­is­ter, Eli Yishai, reject­ed such a move, say­ing: “Why should we pro­vide them with jobs? I’m sick of the bleed­ing hearts, includ­ing politi­cians. Jobs would set­tle them here, they’ll make babies, and that offer will only result in hun­dreds of thou­sands more com­ing over here.” Yishai repeat­ed an ear­li­er call for all migrants to be jailed pend­ing depor­ta­tion. “I want every­one to be able to walk the streets with­out fear or trep­i­da­tion” … The migrants are giv­ing birth to hun­dreds of thou­sands, and the Zionist dream is dying,”.

Israel forcibly removed migrant African work­ers, some of whom were deport­ed to Eritria and Sudan. Others are incar­cer­at­ed in a mam­moth prison in the Negev desert. The facil­i­ty is report­ed to hold rough­ly 11,000 peo­ple and was built at a cost of £58m.
In response to fears of human rights groups and NGO’s about the dan­gers they could face in their home coun­tries once returned Netanyahu said, “I’m not respon­si­ble for what hap­pens in Eritrea and Sudan, the UN is.”
Completely obliv­i­ous and uncon­cerned for the safe­ty of refugees, Netanyahu cold­ly dis­miss­es that concern.
Nevertheless Netanyahu and oth­er Jews nev­er miss an oppor­tu­ni­ty to berate the rest of the world with sto­ries of what Hitler did to them.
Some Israeli’s do have a heart how­ev­er, they argue in the light of Jewish his­to­ry, their state should be sym­pa­thet­ic and wel­com­ing to those flee­ing persecution.

Over the last three decades American Administrations have sup­pos­ed­ly worked to achieve peace in the Middle east. From Carter to Obama.
We can agree that the United States was nev­er a hon­est bro­ker toward that end, as it was the United States and Britain which cre­at­ed the prob­lem in 1947 with the cre­ation of what we have come to know as the state of Israel.
Yesterday , under pres­sure to pre­serve his polit­i­cal via­bil­i­ty on the eve of nation­al elec­tions, Benjamin Netanyahu declared there will be no Palestinian state on his watch.
This bold, yet unequiv­o­cal state­ment flies in the face of what Israel and it’s sup­port­ers claim has been their goal all along. To have a two state solu­tion with the Palestinians.
Netanyahu made liars of all apol­o­gists, who swore over the decades that Israel was com­mit­ted to peace and a two state solu­tion to the decades long conflict.
American Administrations dat­ing back 3 decades have sup­pos­ed­ly worked fever­ish­ly toward what they char­ac­ter­ize as peace between Palestine and the state they created.
Peace was nev­er attain­able under the con­di­tions on the ground, in fact the Americans have main­tained they sup­port­ed Israel unequivocally.
That means regard­less of the atroc­i­ties Israel com­mits, America has pledged it’s unwa­ver­ing sup­port to defend it.
The Palestinians argue they want a state of their own as the land now occu­pied by Israeli’s are Arab lands, their lands.
Since 1947 Palestinians have lived under sub­ju­ga­tion and rigid Israeli dom­i­na­tion. Some observers argue Israel prac­tices a form of apartheid worse than that which exist­ed in South Africa.

I am not sure about the anal­o­gy, hav­ing seen some of the suf­fer­ing of the South African black peo­ple under the bru­tal oppres­sion of the White Apartheid régime which exist­ed there,
On the oth­er hand Palestinians liv­ing in the West Bank and Gaza live and die under incred­i­ble con­di­tions caused by Israeli blockade,occupation and humiliation.

Notwithstanding, Netanyahu’s last ditch des­per­ate con­fes­sion is sur­pris­ing only to dyed in the wool Israeli apologists.
Sure Netanyahu want to hold onto pow­er in Israel’s twist­ed maze of a polit­i­cal sys­tem. In fact even as as I write this Media Houses are report­ing that he has already claimed vic­to­ry , even though the race is sup­pos­ed­ly too close to call.
Now that Netanyahu revealed him­self to be a decep­tive liar to his sup­port­ers the rest of the world which nev­er drank the Israeli kool-aid are vindicated.
Israelis do not want peace with their neigh­bors. If Israel strikes a deal with the Palestinians they will have no more pre­text to keep annex­ing their lands.

We were nev­er fooled by Netanyahu or Israel and it’s sup­port­ers. All it takes is a lit­tle research and an open mind to rec­og­nize that the State of Israel is a land grab­bing cen­ter of trou­ble in the mid­dle east.
No one both­ers to talk about the fact that Israel has scores of Nuclear weapons while sup­port­ers of the Zionist state wants Iran emasculated.
It is not enough that Saddam Hussien is out of the way, Netanyahu wants America to dec­i­mate Iran under the guise that Iran is seek­ing nuclear weapons.
If Israelis are seri­ous about peace why don’t they give up their stock­piles of weapons of mass destruction?
Why don’t they give back the lands they annexed to their right­ful owners ?

These are the ques­tions which intel­li­gent observers must ask , any­thing else is accept­ing with­out chal­lenge man­u­fac­tured Zionist propaganda.
Somehow Israel has made it some kind of crime to crit­i­cize them, or to ques­tion their lies. It is time that the world see this coun­try for what it is, a land-grab­bing war­mon­ger which can­not coex­ist with it’s neighbors.
Netanyahu has to know say­ing there will be no Palestinian state on his watch will be attrac­tive to Jews anx­ious to get their hands on Palestinian lands on the eve of a vote.
That is the rea­son he said it, Obama be damned.
American mon­ey will nev­er dry up, too many pow­er­ful Jews with mon­ey con­trol the politics.

Well just as we have said on so many occa­sions before, Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu fac­ing defeat and des­per­ate to hold onto pow­er in electeions sched­uled for Tuesday March 17 said, as long as he is Prime Minister there will be no State of Palestine.
Well wow , take a moment to digest that statement.
For years Israel has gob­bled up Palestinian ter­ri­to­ry with unprece­dent­ed rapaciousness.
Many peo­ple have seen it for what it is, a craven land grab, end of story.

American Presidents from Carter to Clinton, to Bush and now Obama has demand­ed that as part of any peace­ful end to the pro­tract­ed Israeli /​Palestinian con­flict, Israel must stop build­ing set­tle­ments on Palestinian lands. Nevertheless none of them did any­thing to stop the Billions of tax-pay­ers dol­lars which pour into Israel annu­al­ly ‚even as Israel thumbs its nose in contempt.
Ariel Sharone once said it was real easy to move America to do its bidding.
Israel argues they need to con­fis­cate more ter­ri­to­ry to place a buffer between them and their enemies.
That entire argu­ment is flawed and unwor­thy of seri­ous dis­cus­sion. Based on that argu­ment Israel would per­pet­u­al­ly need to c take ter­ri­to­ry until Palestinians are forced out of the region all together.

Frustrated with that argu­ment , for­mer President Bill Clinton stat­ed some time ago, Israel should state it does not want a two state solu­tion and live with the con­se­quences. President Carter who worked assid­u­ous­ly to bro­ker peace between the two par­ties, and bro­kered the his­toric 1978 peace treaty between Israel and Egypt have been fac­tu­al­ly forth­right in talk­ing about Israel’s atroc­i­ties against the Palestinian people.

President carter said that the state of Israel is worse than the Apartheid sys­tem which exist­ed in South Africa. Carter out­raged many Jews who are gen­er­al­ly above crit­i­cism with his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.
In the Book President Carter said quote:” “The bot­tom line is this: Peace will come to Israel and the Middle East only when the Israeli gov­ern­ment is will­ing to com­ply with inter­na­tion­al law, with the Road-map for Peace, with offi­cial American pol­i­cy, with the wish­es of a major­i­ty of its own cit­i­zens — and hon­or its own pre­vi­ous com­mit­ments — by accept­ing its legal bor­ders,” end quote.…
In response American Jewish Committee head David Harris respond­ed in a col­umn for The Jerusalem Post. “In accept­ing the Palestinian nar­ra­tive, Carter has con­ve­nient­ly revised his­to­ry, excused the Palestinians for their trag­ic fail­ure to come to terms with Israel each time the chance pre­sent­ed itself, and blithe­ly ignored Israel’s very legit­i­mate secu­ri­ty con­cerns,” Harris wrote in 2006. 

“Many Israelis, includ­ing those that once great­ly admired his role in fos­ter­ing peace with Egypt, may nev­er again trust Carter’s diplo­ma­cy, includ­ing his vaunt­ed role as an elec­tion mon­i­tor. He can no longer claim to be an hon­est broker.”

So there you have it they only have use for you when you agree with them.
After the expect­ed fire­wall of protest from Jews and their sup­port­ers, Carter offered up a mea cul­pa of sorts in March of 2010. By the sum­mer of that very year Carter was forced to slam Israel once again in an op-ed piece quote:
“There is no humane or legal jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for the way the Israeli Defense Forces are con­duct­ing this war,” the two for­mer pres­i­dents wrote. “Israeli bombs, mis­siles, and artillery have pul­ver­ized large parts of Gaza, includ­ing thou­sands of homes, schools, and hos­pi­tals. More than 250,000 peo­ple have been dis­placed from their homes in Gaza. Hundreds of Palestinian non­com­bat­ants have been killed. Much of Gaza has lost access to water and elec­tric­i­ty com­plete­ly. This is a human­i­tar­i­an catastrophe.”

Netanyahu’s state­ment came after polls in Israel showed him los­ing ground in elec­tions slat­ed for Tuesday. Some observers have opined that Netanyahu’s address to a joint ses­sion of con­gress in defi­ance of President Obama’s efforts to get a deal with Iran may have backfired.
Running in a tight race against Isaac Herzog, his com­peti­tor from the Zionist Union par­ty. Experts say the race is too close to call.
“I think any­one who is going to estab­lish a Palestinian state and to evac­u­ate ter­ri­to­ry is giv­ing rad­i­cal Islam a stag­ing ground against the State of Israel,” 

On these pages we have con­sis­tent­ly main­tained that the Zionist state is not inter­est­ed in a two state solution.
Peace is not in Israel’s plans, nev­er was. Ariel Sharone and now Benjamin Netanyahu has no inter­est in peace. 
Netanyahu like Sharone, under­stands the sim­plic­i­ty of mak­ing that a real­i­ty, as far as America is concerned.
Continue to set­tle more land, Palestinians respond to the injus­tice, Israel reacts with over­whelm­ing force, there is no consequence.
Of course Israel has no oblig­a­tion to respect International law. Bombing schools, hos­pi­tals and res­i­dences are quite nor­mal. It’s just Palestinian lives at stake.
Their argument?
We need more land to sep­a­rate us from the ter­ror­ist Palestinians ., so they take more and the cycle con­tin­ues . Never mind that it is Israel which has the nuclear weapons and the cut­ting edge weapon­ry, the best in the world, as against the down­trod­den Palestinians throw­ing rocks and blow­ing them­selves up in exasperation.

They do all this withAmerica’s back­ing of course.

I’m cer­tain­ly no fan of the Democratic Party, it is weak ‚It’s unfo­cused and a frac­tious throw-togeth­er of self-serv­ing inter­est groups.
With that said, faced with the unpalat­able prospect of the two polit­i­cal par­ties, right mind­ed peo­ple have to hold their noses and side with the Democrats.
It’s not as if the Democratic par­ty is better,(less bad). It’s just that the Republican Party has den­i­grat­ed to such depths of Racism and is so sold out to the 1% of the wealth­i­est Oligarchs, there is hard­ly any alter­na­tive but to cast one’s lot with the lousy Democrats.

Whether you are a fan of President Obama or not, one has to won­der whether Republicans are mind­ful that what they are doing to him is prece­dent setting?
Republicans want con­trol of the White House.
To them, the Executive branch is the crème-de-la-crème of the three branch­es of Government as long as a Republican is the occupant.
Not so much when Democrats occu­py the Executive Mansion.Then Republicans are hell-bent on using what­ev­er clout they hold between the Legislative and Judicial branch to stymie the effec­tive­ness of whichev­er Democrat is in the white house.

In recent times they did it to Presidents Carter and Clinton, but nei­ther of the two saw the ven­om and hatred which has been direct­ed at Barack Obama.
Of course what Obama faces is more than the idea that no demo­c­rat should occu­py the white house but also over four hun­dred years of raw white supremacy.
They do not believe a black man should ever enter much less occu­py the white house.
Incredibly they have ques­tioned Obama’s com­pe­tence, of course none of the elect­ed ones could cred­i­bly ques­tion his aca­d­e­m­ic qual­i­fi­ca­tions for the job. So they had a polit­i­cal wannabe, the buf­foon Donald Trump do it.
Obama is a Harvard edu­cat­ed con­sti­tu­tion­al lawyer so that did not work.
It did not stop them from ques­tion­ing the place of his birth, to this day they argue he was born in Kenya.
Ironically, dur­ing the 2008 elec­tions between Obama and John McCain, when the birther [sic] issue emerged, no one both­ered to men­tion that John McCain was born on a mil­i­tary base some­where in the Panama Canal zone.
There was no great out­cry dur­ing George Romney’s 1968 bid for the GOP nomination .
There is also silent acqui­es­cence sur­round­ing the divi­sive Ted Cruz’s Presidential ambi­tions, even though he was born in Calgary Canada.
So what is it that gives legit­i­ma­cy to the birther issue as it regards Obama if not race, you decide?

The poi­so­nous McCain has always pre­tend­ed to be a ratio­nal per­son. McCain has been care­ful to pick and chose instances when to appear rea­son­able. For exam­ple dur­ing the 2008 elec­tions when a big­ot­ed old woman told him at an event that she did not trust Obama because he was an Arab who did not belong here. The seem­ing­ly ratio­nal McCain told her then quote”. “No ma’am,[Obama’s] a decent fam­i­ly man, cit­i­zen, that I just hap­pen to have dis­agree­ments with on fun­da­men­tal issues.” Sounds rea­son­able enough right? The truth is, John McCain saw the polls and he knew he would lose that elec­tion. He was in dam­age con­trol mode then.
In fact no one ever accused John McCain of being bright, rather than defend Arab-Americans as decent peo­ple wor­thy of trust, McCain fed into the hatred in the crowd by telling that igno­rant old woman that Obama was not an Arab.
So what if he was Arabic?
Where in the con­sti­tu­tion of the United States does it pre­clude an Arab from run­ning for the Presidency of the United States? I will how­ev­er leave Arabs to defend themselves.
At the time McCain had Arabs like Daryl Issa sup­port­ing him and in some cas­es there were Arabs active­ly cam­paign­ing for him. There have also been Arab-Americans who have giv­en exem­plary ser­vice to this coun­try . Former US Senate major­i­ty leader George Mitchell and four stars General John Abizaid, for­mer Commander of the US Central Command, just two of the many.

To sug­gest that McCain was being mag­nan­i­mous then, would be to praise a man who sets fire to a build­ing then call the fire department.
It was McCain who chose the poi­so­nous hate-mon­ger Sarah Palin and released her onto the nation.
The raw big­otry which the world saw dur­ing the 2008 cam­paign was unprece­dent­ed and unwar­rant­ed. Yet John McCain stood by and did noth­ing as Palin poured the accel­er­ant of hate stok­ing the smol­der­ing embers of America’s big­otry and hate which lay just beneath the surface.
The resul­tant infer­no of racial ani­mus now engulf­ing America was reignit­ed on John McCain’s watch.
There is no rea­son­able­ness in McCain.
Every major pol­i­cy deci­sion McCain has tak­en, includ­ing choos­ing Sarah Palin has been dis­as­trous and wrong.
Unfortunately John McCain has been insu­lat­ed from crit­i­cism since his release from a Hanoi POW camp in March of 1973.
The brain-dead media is unwill­ing to con­front John McCain with the fol­ly of his posi­tions, wrong on every issue.
Never mind that McCain has con­sis­tent­ly got­ten every issue wrong, the media still puts him on nation­al tele­vi­sion as if he is some kind of for­eign pol­i­cy heavy-weight.

It should come as no sur­prise to any rea­son­able per­son that McCain still hold a grudge for the shel­lack­ing he took from the black guy.
It also should come as no sur­prise that McCain’s office has said that he will not sup­port Federal Prosecutor Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General and the first black woman to hold that post.
Every President is enti­tled under the con­sti­tu­tion to his nom­i­nees, that includes Obama.
There is noth­ing real­ly which they can point to in the past of Loretta Lynch which would dis­qual­i­fy her from being the next AG.
In fact Lynch who is supreme­ly qual­i­fied, has far bet­ter char­ac­ter than the Republican Senators who are hold­ing up her con­fir­ma­tion out of spite for the president.
McCain’s col­league Chuck Grassley — one of just four Republicans who have expressed sup­port for Lynch — said at her hear­ing: “If we can’t con­firm Loretta Lynch, then I don’t believe we can con­firm anyone”.

My ques­tion to Democrats is this, “are you tak­ing notes”?
One day they will have a pres­i­dent in the white house, what will you do then?
Are you going to rub­ber-stamp every­one and every­thing they bring to a vote as you have done over the decades?
Are you going to allow your­selves to be rail-road­ed into giv­ing them carte-blanche as you did with the Patriot Act?
This coun­try is becom­ing a shell of it’s own stat­ed ideals.
Why?
Because a bunch of racist reac­tionar­ies have tak­en con­trol of one par­ty and the oth­er par­ty is too cow­ard­ly to fight back.
On issue after issue they have been proven wrong, yet time and again, they have been allowed to drag America to the brink, because the Democratic par­ty is too weak to stand up for America.
Too weak and divid­ed to stand up for it’s own President.

What we do not hear in black church­es is a fac­tu­al rev­e­la­tion of the true his­to­ry of this coun­try we now come to know as America.
What we do not hear is a run­ning his­tor­i­cal com­men­tary which tells the true sto­ry of this country.
That the lying Christopher Columbus and the white suprema­cist nar­ra­tive which evolved from his exploita­tive for­ay into this sec­tion of the Globe was one of lies and deception.
What black pas­tors do not preach is that when this demon land­ed here he saw black man and brown man liv­ing here in peace., side by side.

You can­not preach it if you do not know it .
Farrakhan knows it , that’s why unabashed­ly and unafraid he tells it.
That is why they hate him.
We can allow our past to be told by our oppres­sors which in turn dic­tate our future , essen­tial­ly acqui­esc­ing to (his-sto­ry).
Or we may edu­cate our­selves about our his­to­ry, and decide our own future.
The American black is cow­ard­ly and feckless . 
His strength is used for bring­ing harm to his sis­ters and brothers.
When it’s time to stand with those who look out for his inter­est he is large­ly absent.
How can you be a racist if you talk about the pogrom, arguably the worst human atroc­i­ty ever to be vis­it­ed on a race of peo­ple by anoth­er race?
Why would you allow your­self to be cowed , or con­trolled by the sons and daugh­ters of those who raped and mur­dered your fore-parents?
People who stand by as their police slaugh­ter your children.
People who go into vot­ing booths and elect reac­tionar­ies who are ded­i­cat­ed to your demise.

If the life you live is for your­self it is a wast­ed life.
It is even worse if the life you live is one based on enter­tain­ment and las­civ­i­ous vices, a life which is out of touch with hap­pen­ings around you.
If you do not decide , oth­ers will decide for you.
There are no short­age of self hat­ing blacks who are quite con­tent to be sec­ond class cit­i­zens despite lofty perch­es in American society .
Their perch­es range from the Supreme Court, to the halls of Congress , from Hospital emer­gency rooms to police departments. 
Prized Negros have con­sumed the drug of grad­u­al­ism Dr King spoke about. The drug Malcolm had no patience for.
Go along to get along is a pre­scrip­tion for con­tin­ued sec­ond-class citizenship.
Black peo­ple must rise up and take respon­si­bil­i­ty for their coun­try, this coun­try they call America. 
This coun­try the European American claim as the coun­try their fore-par­ents built.
With no men­tion or appre­ci­a­tion for the blood, sweat and agony of our fore-par­ents, mil­lions of who died so this coun­try could take on life.

Why do you care what your ene­my think about you?
Any non-black opposed to your right to dig­ni­ty, respect and full cit­i­zen­ship is an enemy. 
Therefore he does not count , his opin­ion does not matter.
Why do you sit idly and uni­formed while he sends his chil­dren to good schools.
His chil­dren are not harassed and killed by police.
His is white privilege.
He has priv­i­lege because you don’t, that’s why it’s called privilege.
[Privilege] “a spe­cial right, advan­tage, or immu­ni­ty grant­ed or avail­able only to a par­tic­u­lar per­son or group of people”.
If your white friend do not want you to have it , con­sid­er your choice of friends or your under­stand­ing of friendship.
Throughout the sojourn of this exper­i­ment good peo­ple, black and white have strug­gled and died because of their desire to see all peo­ple live in peace and with dignity.
Not all white peo­ple are ene­mies of our race, of our people.
Let us embrace those who share in our struggle,those who stand with us, even as we con­front those who would do us harm.

President Obama said he is embar­rased for the 47 Republican Senators and oth­ers who sent a let­ter to Iran, indi­cat­ing to that Nation that what­ev­er deal the Administration and oth­er pow­ers arrive at would pre­sum­ably be an exec­u­tive deal sub­ject to change by the next President.
The pres­i­dent made the com­ments in a trail­er for a Vice News inter­view sched­uled to run in full on Monday, accord­ing to (Politico).

“I’m embar­rassed for them. For them to address a let­ter to the Ayatollah who they claim is our mor­tal ene­my, and their basic argu­ment to them is ‘don’t deal with our pres­i­dent ‘cause you can’t trust him to fol­low through on agree­ment,” Obama said in a trail­er for a Vice News inter­view sched­uled to run in full on Monday. “That’s close to unprecedented,”
Germany’s for­eign min­is­ter weighed in Thursday, say­ing that to call the let­ter unhelp­ful would be “an understatement.”
What’s even more nau­se­at­ing is that they can­not come up with a plau­si­ble expla­na­tion for their actions that would sway any­one to con­clude that their actions are any­thing but racial.
John McCain the elder state­ment of being per­pet­u­al­ly wrong and one of the sig­na­to­ry of the let­ter said.
“It was kind of a very rapid process. Everybody was look­ing for­ward to get­ting out of town because of the snow­storm, I think we prob­a­bly should have had more dis­cus­sion about it, giv­en the blow-back that there is.”

In oth­er words he is only con­cerned about the blow­back , and not (1)that he did not take time to con­sid­er the con­se­quences to his and his col­leagues actions, and (2) That his actions would be unprece­dent­ed and wrong but could be con­sid­ered to be bor­der­line trea­so­nous as the New York Daily News and peo­ple all across the Globe believe.
This is the same John McCain who burst into bomb, bomb bomb Iran song when he ran against Obama in 08 and the ques­tion of Iran came up.
Despite the hys­te­ria of McCain and the more rabid war­mon­gers on the right sur­round­ing Iran’s sup­posed march toward a nuclear bomb, there is no evi­dence Iran has a bomb or is active­ly seek­ing to devel­op nuclear weapons.

These were the same peo­ple who lied to the world using maps and sup­posed satel­lite imagery to con­vince many goats[sic] that Iraq pos­sessed dan­ger­ous weapons which were capa­ble of destroy­ing their Ally Israel and destroy­ing the world.
Israel is still where it was , the world is still here, and the Goats who fell for that malarkey now know that it was all a lie.
AS FOR CLAIMS OF TREASON

The Logan Act a law dat­ing to 1799 pro­hibit­ing unau­tho­rized cit­i­zens from nego­ti­at­ing with for­eign gov­ern­ments dur­ing a dis­pute with the United States. The law was a response to the actions of George Logan, a physi­cian and zeal­ous Republican from Pennsylvania, who under­took a lone voy­age to Paris in an effort to nego­ti­ate an end to the Quasi-War with France. Logan had no offi­cial stand­ing or stature, and his pri­vate diplo­ma­cy stoked Federalist fears of a wide­spread plot among Republicans (as mem­bers of the Jeffersonian par­ty, also known as the Democratic-Republican par­ty, called them­selves) to sub­vert the elect­ed gov­ern­ment in Philadelphia. Ironically, Logan was nev­er pros­e­cut­ed under his name­sake fed­er­al law — quite the con­trary: He was elect­ed to the Senate in 1800.
These Senators had no Authority to nego­ti­ate with Iran, yet they will not be pros­e­cut­ed for their actions. It is impor­tant to note that this is irony full circle.
Logan was not pros­e­cut­ed , nei­ther will these 47 Republicans.
Which caus­es me to won­der why is Edward Snowden in hid­ing when these 47 are not?

Despite my dis­gust at these Republicans , I still have a prob­lem with way the President sees this.
Quote: For them to address a let­ter to the Ayatollah who they claim is our mor­tal ene­my, and their basic argu­ment to them is ‘don’t deal with our pres­i­dent ‘cause you can’t trust him to fol­low through on agreement,”
Mister President I dis­agree with you, at least on the way you per­ceive this
They are not say­ing that you can­not be trust­ed to deliv­er on what­ev­er deal you make strike with the Iranians. They are telling the Iranians that you basi­cal­ly have no author­i­ty to deliv­er on any deal they can­not wipe away.
Yes it is unprecedented.
Some say it is Treasonous.
No one will be pros­e­cut­ed, if a poor per­son had done any­thing remote­ly sim­i­lar to what these Senators did all of these hyp­ocrites, not just the 47 Senators who signed the let­ter, but those poten­tial­ly run­ning for the Republican nom­i­na­tion would be on tele­vi­sion call­ing for that per­son­’s head as they did Snowden.

If Democrats had done that to a sit­ting Republican pres­i­dent, repub­li­cans would ham­mer them for it for decades. There would be hear­ings and more hearings.
They are a despi­ca­ble set of hyp­ocrites who are not averse to spend­ing tens of mil­lions of tax pay­ers dol­lars to unearth noth­ing as they did with Special Prosecutor Kenneth Star dur­ing the Clinton years.
Or the non­sen­si­cal pur­suit of noth­ing as a result of the unfor­tu­nate Benghazi incident.
What con­tin­ues to be clear, is the lev­el of idio­cy and racism inher­ent in vot­ers who con­tin­ue to elect the likes of Cotton, Cruz, Rubio, Pense, Lee, etal.
It does seem that when one exam­ines the views of those elect­ed to office in the Republican par­ty, it is clear that this coun­try has not made much stride, con­trary to what the President believes.