Doctors Patching Up Gangsters For Large Sums Of Money, Thwarting Law Enforcement Efforts.…

Horace Chang

What’s going on in Montego Bay can­not be dealt with using nor­mal Policing mea­sures”.
“We need enhanced secu­ri­ty mea­sures.”
(Horace Chang, Minister of National Security)

Panicking much!
Let me just say that this guy should be nowhere close to National secu­ri­ty, but since we are talk­ing about Jamaica where its stan­dard pro­ce­dure for the Fox to guard the hen-house, it is also okay for the inmates to run the asy­lum.
Of course, what is hap­pen­ing in Montego Bay does not require nor­mal polic­ing mea­sures.
It has­n’t been that way for many years, but isn’t just Montego Bay, it is all across the Island.
.….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….….……
Imagine tes­ti­mo­ny com­ing to light in the Uchence Wilson Gang tri­al, that gang­sters went to rob a home in sleepy and serene Guys Hill where I attend­ed High school.
And that one gang­ster was shot by the police in the process, yet a Medical Doctor prac­tic­ing med­i­cine in the parish of Manchester asked for a quar­ter of a mil­lion dol­lars to remove the bul­let with­out alert­ing the Police.
According to the report­ing, the doc­tor received $90.000 to remove the bul­let and the police was none the wis­er.
When the major pon­tif­i­ca­tors in Jamaica get on their high hors­es to talk about cor­rup­tion, as if its a police only prob­lem, we try to shine a light on these well-respect­ed crim­i­nals in the soci­ety who are doing far worse than col­lect­ing lunch mon­ey because they are hun­gry.
These doc­tors know that the rea­son that gang mem­bers come to them instead of going to a hos­pi­tal is that for all intents and pur­pos­es they have been involved in crim­i­nal activ­i­ties.
They know full well that they like­ly killed one or more inno­cent per­sons in the process of com­mit­ting oth­er crim­i­nal acts.
Yet they patch them up and turn them loose on the soci­ety once again.
We can talk about the fear they have for their own lives if they do not com­ply with these gang­sters demands.
I’m pre­pared to counter with the fact that (a) how do the gang­sters know which doc­tor to go to across sev­er­al parish­es, unless they know these doc­tors are dirty and (b) if the gang­sters wished to, they could sim­ply force the doc­tor to per­form the pro­ce­dure with­out pay­ing one dime, then kill him. They don’t have to pay if they chose not to.
It fol­lows there­fore that these doc­tors are wlling par­tic­i­pants in the cul­ture of crime which has been plagu­ing the coun­try for decades.
They have been on the fore­front.
As police offi­cers, we knew that cer­tain doc­tors were there ready and wait­ing unscrupu­lous­ly, to patch up any mur­der­er for a price.

Despite these unscrupu­lous acts, these sick bas­tards will tell you they have tak­en a Hippocratic oath to do no harm.
That they have tak­en an oath to adhere to med­ical con­fi­den­tial­i­ty. What they won’t say is that those very same Hippocratic oaths bind them to also com­mit to non-malef­i­cence.
This across the board cor­rup­tion has been at the heart of the nations crime cul­ture. It enables those who pull the trig­ger off-ramps when they would have been oth­er­wise stuck on the free­way wait­ing for law enforce­ment to find them.
When Criminals are able to source under­ground hos­pi­tal and life-sav­ing med­ical ser­vice, after they them­selves have just robbed and mur­dered inno­cent cit­i­zens, it makes the job of the police dou­bly dif­fi­cult.
It is this lucra­tive under­ground econ­o­my which caus­es those in the high­est offices to be vehe­ment­ly opposed to the police.
It is this vehe­mence which makes police offi­cers say “to hell with it why am I both­er­ing myself”?

The pro­lif­er­a­tion and expan­sion of the cul­ture of vio­lence in our coun­try will not be reme­died with more laws. Certainly not the watered down types they have man­aged to pass to blow smoke up the col­lec­tive ass of the nation to make it seem they are doing some­thing about crime.
The two polit­i­cal par­ties have huge com­mu­ni­ties which are ben­e­fit­ing from crime. INDECOM and the pro­lif­er­a­tion of so-called human rights lob­by is proof that nei­ther polit­i­cal par­ty wants an end to the sta­tus quo, it works just fine for their inter­est.
Change in Jamaica requires that there is [a come to Jesus recog­ni­tion]. Jamaica is the only coun­try which spends its ener­gy wor­ry­ing about the rights of mur­der­ers and Rapists over the plight of law-abid­ing cit­i­zens.
It requires that the Prime Minister and his par­ty and Peter Phillips and his par­ty, decide to stop shield­ing crim­i­nals and com­mit to the full sup­port of the police as the depart­ments is allowed to go after the gangs and pull them up from the root.
The com­ments of Chang are cor­rect. Normal polic­ing can­not apply, these thugs are blood­thirsty mur­der­ers who play by no one’s rules.
ZOSO and SOE’s are not the way to erad­i­cate this scourge, more laws will do noth­ing as long as police going after these killers are crim­i­nal­ized for doing their jobs.
As long as the empha­sis is on the rights of crim­i­nals and not on that of inno­cent cit­i­zens, expect this dis­as­ter to con­tin­ue.
Andrew Holness’ attempt at social engi­neer­ing fol­lowed the PNP’s attempt at social engi­neer­ing.
Both have failed. We need to get back to allow­ing police to do their jobs with­out the specter of prison hang­ing over their heads, it is what suc­cess­ful coun­tries do.

Two Killed On Barnett Street Tonight…(Graphic Imagery)

These two men were report­ed­ly killed on Barnett Street in Montego Bay Saint James tonight.
The infor­ma­tion is still sketchy, we will update this post as more infor­ma­tion becomes available.

The lat­est update we have on this dou­ble mur­der is that the two men were walk­ing along Barnett Street at about 5:00 pm when they were pounced upon by assailants who shot them and dis­s­a­peared.
Neither men have been iden­ti­fied so far.

Not Focused On Children Or Abused Women, JFJ A Support Group For Murderers…

The cen­tral argu­ment prof­fered by Jamaicans for Justice in its suit against the pro­mo­tion of for­mer SSP Delroy Hewitt„ is that the (PCS) Police Service Commission, did not do a com­pre­hen­sive enough inves­ti­ga­tion, before green­light­ing Hewitt’s pro­mo­tion.
The argu­ment of the lob­by was not with­out mer­it for pro­mo­tions going for­ward. The coun­try should be seek­ing to find ways to engage in best prac­tices.
Nevertheless, the way the lob­by went about the case was prej­u­di­cial and biased against SSP Hewitt, a senior police offi­cer of impec­ca­ble char­ac­ter.
Instead of engag­ing the Government and the PSC in dia­logue on the issue Jamaicans For Justice chose to go after a sin­gle police offi­cer it did not like, and in that, it’s biased vendet­ta was laid bare.

Delroy Hewitt

The recent rul­ing of the British-based Privy Council, but­tressed the claim made by JFJ, that had the PCS con­duct­ed a lengthy Investigation it would poten­tial­ly have arrived at a dif­fer­ent con­clu­sion.
The deci­sion is con­sid­ered aca­d­e­m­ic, because Hewitt is long retired.
Personally, I would not add the word [academic]to any­thing around that rul­ing, as the PSC was not legal­ly bound to con­duct Investigations of can­di­dates before it for pro­mo­tion.
In the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure, this writer is not a lawyer but it seems to me that the deci­sion of the Privy Council is pure­ly sug­ges­tive, as the PSC did not fail as there was no legal­ly bind­ing duty to adhere to con­duct­ing inves­ti­ga­tions before green­light­ing pro­mo­tions.
The tragedy in this whole débâ­cle is that the Government did not mount a chal­lenge against the case on the basis that JFJ had no legal stand­ing to mount the chal­lenge to Hewitt’s pro­mo­tion.
Neither did it chal­lenge JFJ’s case on the friv­o­li­ty of it, since the PSC had no legal bind­ing duty to con­duct pre-pro­mo­tions inves­ti­ga­tions.
The fact is that the Government did not care because the mat­ter was about the police department.

Bruce Golding gave the nation INDECOM and all its side effects 

The real vic­tims of the litany of anti-polic­ing lob­bies, (JFJ includ­ed) which have sprung up over the last three decades or so, are law-abid­ing Jamaicans who are not invest­ed in crime.
Make no mis­take about it, the sup­posed good they are doing is cer­tain­ly not reflect­ed in the data as it relates to the low stan­dard of liv­ing Jamaicans are forced to endure as a result of the Islands expo­nen­tial­ly high crime rate.
For one, abuse of women are on the increase, there is no sys­tem­at­ic effort to get Jamaican men to respect women and not see them as prop­er­ty and or objects to be used and abused.
The plight of chil­dren is still an incred­i­bly sore sub­ject which requires imme­di­ate atten­tion, but sup­port­ing chil­dren’s rights is not as sexy for JFJ and oth­ers, as attack­ing the police.
Murders, Rapes and oth­er sex­u­al assaults are wide­spread, includ­ing sex­u­al assaults per­pe­trat­ed on chil­dren and even babies.
Violent crimes of oth­er nature are also wide­spread through­out the Island, mak­ing vic­tims of lit­er­al­ly every law-abid­ing Jamaican.
Yet the focus of the sup­posed human rights lob­bies is sole­ly focused on how many mur­der­ers are killed by the secu­ri­ty forces.

Carolyn Gomes

Jamaicans For Justice has cer­tain­ly not been Jamaica’s first anti-police [rodeo].
Long before they came on the scene, Flo O’Connor was there, and there were oth­ers whom I can­not recall at the moment.
The truth is, dur­ing the ’80s when those bleed­ing ‑hearts were cry­ing about police tak­ing out mur­der­ous gang­sters, homi­cides were just over 500 annu­al­ly.
Criminals were run­ning away from Jamaica and Investments and Jamaicans in the Diaspora were pour­ing in.
Jamaicans in the ’80s were not stu­pid, they real­ized that in order for their stan­dard of liv­ing to improve they could not have mur­der­ous thugs in their midst, so no one real­ly paid much atten­tion to Flo O’Connor, Horace Levy or the others.

Flo O’Connor

Neither O’Connor nor Levy received much trac­tion but some­one saw an open­ing to step into that space and make a name for her­self.
In stepped the White Jamaican baby doc­tor and before long she was an icon, a leg­end, she received a nation­al hon­or, and the entire nation­al secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus was answer­able to her.
The long-held glue which bound our police depart­ment pro­fes­sion­als togeth­er, [Esprit de ‑Corps], was maligned as a blue wall of silence it was out the door.
It was­n’t a blue wall of silence, it was a bond which meant cops would give their own lives in sup­port of each oth­er when they are active­ly fight­ing for their lives.
Owen Ellington, the then Commissioner of Police, was too busy pro­mot­ing his friends and fam­i­ly to care that the depart­ment was in deep dis­tress.
Carolyn Gomez’s tox­ic influ­ence had seeped into the Police Academic cur­ricu­lum, and the coun­try was not train­ing cops any­more, it was now in the busi­ness of turn­ing out agents for JFJ.
The sad real­i­ty is that it took rough­ly two decades and thou­sands of inno­cent lives for kar­ma to catch up with Gomez and she was exposed as a fraud­u­lent pur­vey­or of gay porno­graph­ic smut to chil­dren.
Not only did they not take back the nation­al hon­or, but she was also not pros­e­cut­ed. Yes, white skin has the same pow­er in Jamaica as it does in America, it is privileged. 

Horace Levy

The dam­age was already done.
Police offi­cers who placed their bod­ies between blood­thirsty killers and inno­cent cit­i­zens were them­selves por­trayed as extra­ju­di­cial killers.
The term “extra­ju­di­cial” was attached to every police-involved shoot­ing, nev­er mind that the guns recov­ered, the inno­cent dead and wound­ed.
The focus became that police were shoot­ing too many crim­i­nals.
Attention was suc­cess­ful­ly deflect­ed away from the homi­cide num­bers to the cops doing the heavy lift­ing.
(a) Perfectly legit­i­mate police fatal shoot­ings were por­trayed as [extra­ju­di­cial killings].
(b) Because plain­clothes cops were the offi­cers fac­ing down the crim­i­nals, and because plain­clothes cops made up only a small por­tion of the force at the time, rough­ly about (6 – 8%), those offi­cers were nec­es­sar­i­ly and ratio­nal­ly fea­tured in vio­lent con­fronta­tions with crim­i­nals.
© The Aura cre­at­ed as a result of the brav­ery and ded­i­ca­tion of those offi­cers (name-brand-cops) served as a use­ful deter­rent to those who would take life as well as those who would engage in gang activ­i­ties.
(d) Those offi­cers were nation­al heroes, not vil­lains. They nev­er received a nation­al hon­or.
Sure there were instances where cops stepped over the line, those actions can­not be denied and should nev­er be con­doned or cov­ered over.
But planes fall from the skies because of pilot error, peo­ple die on oper­at­ing tables, because sur­geons make mis­takes, cars, trucks and bus­es crash because dri­vers make mis­takes, patients die because nurs­es give incor­rect med­i­cine.
I’m not sure why police offi­cers who risk their lives unlike any of the afore­men­tioned, are held to a high­er stan­dard of scrutiny?

Neither the Governing polit­i­cal par­ty nor the polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion, will come clean and tell the Jamaican peo­ple that their strat­e­gy has been a colos­sal dis­as­ter.
Neither will the crim­i­nal rights lob­by.
What is left of the police force has esti­mat­ed that there are well over two thou­sand gangs oper­at­ing in the small space of 4411 square miles.
Before it was only the poor and the busi­ness-peo­ple who were being mur­dered but of late a few politi­cians are hav­ing their domes pushed back as well.
Today the police are not engag­ing crim­i­nals as much, this writer is sup­port­ive of that posi­tion.
Why should offi­cers risk being dragged through a shit­ty sys­tem which favors crim­i­nals over them and inno­cent cit­i­zens?
The non-police, com­mis­sion­er of police, recent­ly said he is con­fi­dent that giv­en time every police offi­cer in Jamaica will be a human rights activists.
Every per­son who ever donned the uni­form of a police offi­cer with the right intent is a human rights activist.
It is the com­mit­ment to the rule of law, the pro­tec­tion of the weak which pro­pels them to run toward the dan­ger when every­one runs away from it.
What police offi­cers do not need is a rede­f­i­n­i­tion of polic­ing by some­one who was giv­en the top polic­ing role with­out a sin­gle idea of what polic­ing is.
Jamaicans cer­tain­ly need to rise up against these char­la­tans and frauds who talk about human rights but does not speak to the right their dead rel­a­tives had to the most impor­tant human right.
The right to life!

Appellate Court Shamefully Fails To Recognize Inherent Violence In Rape.…

The Court of Appeal came into being at the time of inde­pen­dence. The judges of this court exer­cise great care in review­ing the deci­sions of the low­er courts and tri­bunals, against which com­plaints are made. We give rea­sons for all of our deci­sions and invite the pub­lic at large to inform them­selves of these rea­sons by access­ing them on the web­site of the court. An informed pub­lic helps in the build­ing of a strong nation.
The court said. [http://​courto​fap​peal​.gov​.jm/]
The Jamaican Judiciary takes spe­cial pride in argu­ing for its inde­pen­dence, and right­ly so. An inde­pen­dent judi­cia­ry is one of the last bul­warks the aver­age cit­i­zen has against tyran­ny from the Government and injus­tice across the board.
Just in case a low­er court gets it wrong, the founders, in their wis­dom, cre­at­ed the Appellate court as a sec­ond chance for anoth­er look, this time gen­er­al­ly com­pris­ing of a three-mem­ber pan­el or more in some coun­tries.
And in case they get it wrong in the opin­ion of the peti­tion­er, there is a final court of adju­di­ca­tion, in Jamaica’s case, the Privy coun­sel In England.
Even as we cel­e­brate the ven­ti­la­tion the tiered sys­tem of jus­tice pro­vides the peti­tion­er, more and more nowa­days, we are left to won­der whether the idea of a Judiciary that real­ly does not answer to the vot­ers is the cor­rect way to go?
Sure the court says it fol­lows a strict code of con­duct.
But does it?
Let’s face it, peo­ple run afoul of the law, and yes, when we fall, we deserve a chance at redemption.

Over the years, we have had just cause to won­der at the actions of the Jamaican court sys­tem, as it relates, not just to its atti­tude to the peo­ple’s cas­es before it, but as it relates to con­vict­ed felons who must pay their debt to soci­ety.
More and more, the courts have usurped the peo­ple’s will by hand­ing down ridicu­lous­ly low sen­tences for vio­lent crimes or have low­ered the sen­tence imposed by low­er courts or worse.
Rather than adju­di­cate, the courts seemed to have tak­en on the role of Defense coun­sel to some defen­dants.
Defendants who com­mit vio­lent assaults on oth­er human beings or even on ani­mals deserve to feel the full brunt of the nation’s laws.
It goes with­out say­ing then that defen­dants who rape and mur­der have will­ful­ly and pre­med­i­tat­ed­ly decid­ed to vio­late their vic­tims in the most egre­gious ways imag­in­able.
It is incred­i­bly dif­fi­cult for police to iden­ti­fy and arrest per­pe­tra­tors of vio­lent crim­i­nals due to a litany of fac­tors.
On the rare occa­sions that they do man­age to iden­ti­fy sus­pects and amass enough evi­dence to go to tri­al, there are oth­er issues that mil­i­tate against a con­vic­tion, not the least of which is a court sys­tem that grants inor­di­nate amounts of adjourn­ments to defense lawyers, which helps inex­orably to clog up the sys­tem and delay jus­tice.
When cas­es slow­ly weave their way through the sys­tem to a con­clu­sion that ends in a guilty ver­dict, it helps to give a morale boost to police and pros­e­cu­tors who work to bring these cas­es.
More impor­tant­ly, it gives some mea­sure of clo­sure to vic­tims and their fam­i­lies who defen­dants have vio­lat­ed.
Those ver­dicts and the accom­pa­ny­ing fair sen­tences are pil­lars of the demo­c­ra­t­ic, and safer soci­eties all of us crave.
We hope that stiff sen­tences act as a deter­rent to future crim­i­nals and gives those sen­tenced time to think about the pain they have caused oth­ers and the harm they have brought onto society.

THESE ARE THE ACTIONS OF THE COURTS THAT ARE UNHELPFUL TO JAMAICA’S CRIME PROBLEM.

A man who raped a woman three times while hold­ing her hostage inside her home for three ter­ri­fy­ing hours has had his 40-year sen­tence slashed by 16 years.
In a rul­ing hand­ed down last Friday, the Court of Appeal ordered that Neville Barnes, 44, should instead serve 23 years and 10 months in prison for the June 2005 attack.
The court also ordered that October 2, 2012 – the day the 40-year sen­tence was imposed – should be regard­ed as the date Barnes began serv­ing his reduced prison term.
The rul­ing pro­vid­ed dis­turb­ing details about the attack, dur­ing which the vic­tim said Barnes told her: “I know what I am doing is wrong, but is just suh it guh in Jamaica.”
According to court doc­u­ments, the woman tes­ti­fied that she was awak­ened by a man enter­ing her bed­room dur­ing Barnes’ tri­al. She said that because her bed­side lamp was turned on, she observed that the shirt­less man was wear­ing a pair of navy-blue casu­al shorts and a pair of briefs drawn “half across his face.”
She gave evi­dence that her ordeal last­ed for three hours and that the man, who she lat­er point­ed out to police inves­ti­ga­tors as Barnes, had sex­u­al inter­course with her three times in dif­fer­ent posi­tions with­out her con­sent. He assault­ed her and stole $3,000 before leav­ing, she said. 
The court doc­u­ments, which cit­ed tran­scripts of the closed-door tri­al, revealed that the woman asked Barnes why he was rap­ing her at one point dur­ing her ordeal. “Because I choose you,” she said he responded.“The appli­cant (Barnes) com­mand­ed her to give him good lov­ing like she gives her boyfriend.
He also com­mand­ed her to say words to him in effect request­ing him to have rough inter­course with her,” the rul­ing by the appeal court detailed.


He demand­ed that she say the words loud­er when she did not do so loud­ly enough for him. He also asked her if she want­ed him to impreg­nate her (using less foren­sic lan­guage),” it con­tin­ued.
Further, the doc­u­ment revealed that Barnes asked the woman if any­one had ever per­formed oral sex on her and whether she want­ed him to do it. “At some point, he also forced, or tried to force, his tongue into her mouth,” the doc­u­ment said.
He was charged with bur­glary, rape, and inde­cent assault aris­ing from the attack and, by unan­i­mous ver­dict, was found guilty of all three offens­es fol­low­ing a tri­al in September 2012.
The High Court judge Marjorie Cole-Smith sen­tenced Barnes to 10 years in prison for bur­glary, 40 years for rape, and three years at hard labor for inde­cent assault.
However, through his attor­neys, Barnes chal­lenged the con­vic­tions and sen­tences on the grounds that the pre­sid­ing judge erred in her direc­tion to the jury on the pro­ce­dur­al fair­ness of the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion parade and that the 40-year term for rape was “man­i­fest­ly exces­sive.”
In explain­ing its deci­sion, the Court of Appeal not­ed that the length of the victim’s ordeal and the fact that she was raped three times made the low­est start­ing point of 15 years in prison “inap­plic­a­ble.” “We find a start­ing point of 18 years to be appro­pri­ate,” the court found.
The three-mem­ber pan­el added a fur­ther 15 years, cit­ing the aggra­vat­ing fea­tures of the case, includ­ing the trau­ma endured by the vic­tim and the fact that Barnes had a pre­vi­ous conviction.“It is not unrea­son­able to infer that the whole expe­ri­ence must have caused the vir­tu­al com­plainant severe psy­cho­log­i­cal trau­ma, although not much phys­i­cal vio­lence was used in this case,” the judges wrote, explain­ing the pro­posed sen­tence of 33 years in prison.
Barnes was cred­it­ed with the sev­en years and two months he spent in cus­tody await­ing tri­al and two years for the fact that there was no phys­i­cal vio­lence dur­ing the attack.[http://​jamaica​-glean​er​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​l​e​a​d​-​s​t​o​r​i​e​s​/​2​0​1​9​0​3​2​5​/​r​a​p​i​s​t​-​h​a​s​-​4​0​-​y​e​a​r​-​s​e​n​t​e​n​c​e​-​s​l​a​s​hed]

This writer has sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly called for manda­to­ry min­i­mum sen­tences for vio­lent offens­es against the per­son.
Mandatory min­i­mum sen­tences for cer­tain vio­lent crimes remove from wob­bly judges the dis­cre­tion to sup­plant the laws with their own feel­ings.
The Appellate court is sup­posed to hear the cas­es before it but is not oblig­at­ed or required to change ver­dicts, par­tic­u­lar­ly if police and pros­e­cu­tors have no breach­es of con­duct.
The sen­tence of the low­er courts is sup­posed to stand if there are no impro­pri­eties or new evi­dence from the accused.
(1)
Barnes, through his attor­neys, chal­lenged the con­vic­tions and sen­tences on the grounds that the pre­sid­ing judge erred in her direc­tion to the jury on the pro­ce­dur­al fair­ness of the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion parade and that the 40-year term for rape was “man­i­fest­ly exces­sive.”
That was a sub­jec­tive argu­ment that the defense had every right to make, but it does not mean that the tri­al judge was wrong in her sen­tence.
(2)
Barnes was cred­it­ed with the sev­en years and two months he spent in cus­tody await­ing tri­al and two years for the fact that there was no phys­i­cal vio­lence dur­ing the attack.
The three-judge pan­el demon­strat­ed some com­mon sense when they cred­it­ed the defen­dant with time served. They also demon­strat­ed com­mon sense when they con­clud­ed that the length of the victim’s ordeal and the fact that she was raped three times made the low­est start­ing point of 15 years in prison “inap­plic­a­ble.” “We find a start­ing point of 18 years to be appro­pri­ate,” they argued.

Then their ratio­nale fell apart.
Barnes was cred­it­ed with two years for the fact that there was no phys­i­cal vio­lence dur­ing the attack.
I won­der how either of or all three of those judges would like to have their homes invad­ed by assailants who rape them not once, not twice, but three times before leav­ing?
The idea that a judge, much less three judges, could all be so intense­ly dunce to the fact that the absence of oth­er forms of vio­lence on a rape vic­tim does not negate the egre­gious vio­lence rape does to the body and soul of vic­tims.
It is incom­pre­hen­si­ble to under­stand how any judge could utter those words, much less make that argu­ment at the appel­late lev­el for reduc­ing the sen­tence of a con­vict­ed ser­i­al rapist.
The phys­i­cal harm rape does to its vic­tims is only a small part of the oth­er issues vic­tims are left with psy­cho­log­i­cal­ly, men­tal­ly, emo­tion­al­ly, and yes, the idea that they may be impreg­nat­ed by their assailant or worse, giv­en an incur­able vene­re­al dis­ease.
The Appellate court could sim­ply have left well enough alone. Instead, it chose to inter­fere with the learned tri­al judge’s ver­dict on a deserv­ing ser­i­al rapist.
But that was noth­ing com­pared to the fact that the Appellate court does not believe rape in and of itself is an intrin­si­cal­ly vio­lent act..

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com. 

Government Must Find Out Where (JFJ) Gets Its Funding From And Why…

Former SSP Delroy Hewitt

At the risk of wad­ing too deep into the his­tor­i­cal­ly thorny and pre­cip­i­tous issue of police pro­mo­tions, I want to observe a few points regard­ing the rul­ing of the United Kingdom’s Privy Council in the case involv­ing now retired Senior Superintendent Delroy Hewitt. 

Before I delve into the case argued by the anti-police JFJ, I will talk a lit­tle about the Delroy Hewitt I knew, and with whom I worked.
My com­ments are a result of hav­ing the priv­i­lege of work­ing for years with a man whom many offi­cers young and old­er, weren’t par­tic­u­lar­ly keen on, because of his fideli­ty to dis­ci­pline, hon­esty, and adher­ence to the let­ter of the JCF’s code of ethics.
It is sad that a bunch of anti-police trolls can gar­ner such pow­er in a coun­try inun­dat­ed with mur­ders and oth­er vio­lent crimes, as to besmirch the char­ac­ter of a good man who does not have the same plat­form to clear his good name from the stain and stench cre­at­ed by these peo­ple with agen­das.
The shock­ing real­i­ty in all of this is that Delroy Hewitt has not even been charged with a sin­gle crime or breach of oper­a­tional protocol. 

It was in the year 1983 that I was trans­ferred to the Mobile Reserve from the then Beat-And-Foot patrol Division which was locat­ed at the bot­tom of West Street in Kingston.
Delroy Hewitt was a cor­po­ral of Police who had already tak­en it upon him­self that he would work full time and pur­sue high­er aca­d­e­m­ic stud­ies.
This was before the unavail­abil­i­ty of jobs in the econ­o­my forced col­lege grad­u­ates to decide that they want­ed to become police offi­cers.
It was also before peo­ple with degrees were giv­en police Uniforms and com­mand, with­out street polic­ing creds.
And it was cer­tain­ly before raw civil­ians were giv­en the Uniform of Assistant Superintendents. 

Corporal Hewitt was pro­mot­ed to Sergeant while I was still attached to the Mobile Reserve.
As I said pre­vi­ous­ly many offi­cers weren’t too keen on work­ing with Hewitt because he was seen as too strict.
I loved doing patrols with Hewitt exact­ly because of the fact that he was a strict no-non­sense cop who oper­at­ed by the let­ter of the law. His qui­et author­i­ty was exem­plary and was a buffer to some of the things which befalls less focused police offi­cers.
I felt a kin­ship with him because I was that same cop.
Hewitt was a cop of impec­ca­ble cre­den­tials who no one could point a fin­ger to.
It is because of my knowl­edge of that Delroy Hewitt, which caused me to decide to write this Article.
Long after I left the Force, Delroy Hewitt con­tin­ued to serve our coun­try as an upstand­ing police offi­cer of impec­ca­ble char­ac­ter and deter­mi­na­tion to the cause of law enforce­ment and jus­tice.
The idea that a pub­lic ser­vant can have is name besmirched and dragged through the mud even though he has not been charged with any wrong­do­ing is dis­grace­ful and rep­re­hen­si­ble.
Police offi­cers in Jamaica who do not hide and wait until crim­i­nals are gone before attend­ing to cit­i­zens calls are always going to fea­ture in vio­lent con­fronta­tions with the Island’s blood­thirsty thugs.
The fact that offi­cers names fea­ture into these inci­dents is cause for com­men­da­tion, not con­dem­na­tion.
And it cer­tain­ly is not cause for the self-serv­ing char­la­tans at JFJ to impugn their char­ac­ter for per­son­al agendas.

NOW TO THE RULING


Both low­er courts reject­ed the asser­tion that the Police Services Commission has legal a duty to con­duct, or to instruct anoth­er enti­ty to con­duct, inde­pen­dent, impar­tial and effec­tive inves­ti­ga­tions into an officer’s mis­con­duct when they are being con­sid­ered for a pro­mo­tion. 

The main issue aris­ing in the appeal was in rela­tion to what steps the PSC, as the enti­ty tasked with decid­ing on the pro­mo­tion and dis­ci­pline of police offi­cers, should take to inform itself about offi­cers rec­om­mend­ed for pro­mo­tion. JFJ raised this chal­lenge in response to a sys­temic prob­lem of pro­mot­ing police offi­cers against whom there were/​are alle­ga­tions of mis­con­duct to senior ranks with­in the Jamaica Constabulary Force, which under­mines attempts at police reform and taints the pro­mo­tion process with­in the police force. The legal chal­lenge sought to estab­lish in jurispru­dence that the Police Services Commission is legal­ly required to seek and con­sid­er reports of human rights vio­la­tions against offi­cers when con­sid­er­ing an officer’s pro­mo­tion – some­thing the Police Service Commission argued it was not legal­ly required to do. 

The argu­ments prof­fered by JFJ is that [if the PSC had done more Investigations it would like­ly have come up with a dif­fer­ent result].
On that score, it is like­ly that it may not have, and on that alone, since JFJ can­not prove a neg­a­tive the con­tention is moot.
Needless to say that Former SSP Delroy Hewitt is now retired and so as it is char­ac­ter­ized this res­o­lu­tion is pure­ly aca­d­e­m­ic as far as he is con­cerned.
Surely, as it relates to pro­mo­tions there is much work to be done. The high attri­tion rate from the Agency is one of the signs that peo­ple do not have con­fi­dence that their mer­i­to­ri­ous ser­vice will result in upward mobil­i­ty.
What we can­not have is an out­side lob­by with its own anti-police agen­da dic­tat­ing who gets pro­mot­ed in the police depart­ment and who does­n’t.
If that is allowed the coun­try may as well hand over the run­ning of the force to this par­tial­ly for­eign-fund­ed group which has no con­cern about the mur­der­ous ram­page crim­i­nals have been on over the last sev­er­al decades.
Neither does it have any con­cerns about the tens of thou­sands of Jamaicans(police offi­cers includ­ed) who have been mur­dered by the ram­pag­ing thugs.
That is of no con­cern for Jamaicans For Justice.
What con­cerns JFJ is the pro­tec­tion and enhance­ment of crim­i­nals and their con­duct in Jamaica.
And so we are call­ing on the Government once again, to tell the coun­try where JFJ is get­ting fund­ing to mount these legal chal­lenges from, and for what purpose?

DEMOCRACY

I am the King of the world’s most pow­er­ful coun­try, I find myself under inves­ti­ga­tions for var­i­ous and sundry breach­es of the laws.
Nevertheless, I lam­bast the pros­e­cu­tors dai­ly.
As if that is not enough, I replace the head of the Agency tasked with doing the Investigations of me, but I was cer­tain­ly not done.
I smeared and tar­nished the char­ac­ter of career pros­e­cu­tors and Investigators as well.
I had my min­ions drag them before the Congress and berat­ed and humil­i­at­ed them and then I fired them.
So they appoint­ed a spe­cial coun­sel which for all intents and pur­pos­es should be friend­ly to me because we are from the very same polit­i­cal party.

When my Attorney General recused him­self and failed to inter­fere in the inves­ti­ga­tions with a view to pro­tect­ing me from the Special Counsel, I fired him too.
I then replaced him with an unqual­i­fied lack­ey who bad-mouthed the Investigations on tele­vi­sion and talked about ways in which he would starve the Special Counsel’s Investigations of resources, even­tu­al­ly shut­ting it down.
There was a wide­spread out­cry and so I imme­di­ate­ly looked for a replace­ment of him who could pass muster with the old guard.
Never mind that I still want­ed an Attorney General who could get con­firmed but I need­ed one who had writ­ten a long mem­o­ran­dum detail­ing his dis­dain for the Special Counsel process and express­ing his sup­port for wider pow­ers for me.
Ah yes, I got my man.
He’s been there before and it seems like he can be trust­ed to do exact­ly what I want him to do.
con­firm him now.

Witch hunt, witch hunt, no col­lu­sion, no col­li­sion is my dai­ly tirade as I won­der about find­ing new ways to inter­fere in these inves­ti­ga­tions which are keep­ing me up at night.
Daily I call for the Investigations to end.
What?
I don’t care if oth­er peo­ple don’t get to demand that an inves­ti­ga­tion into their activ­i­ties gets stopped.
I don’t care that they don’t get to com­plain about the length of time inves­ti­ga­tions are tak­ing, I’m spe­cial.
Now my man is in place and he gets to decide whether that mul­ti-mil­lion Dollar inves­ti­ga­tion gets revealed to the Congress, much less the poor peas­antry.
Oh wait, ha-ha-ha, I just real­ized that even though the Investigations are about my con­duct, I’m allowed to decide on whether its find­ings gets revealed.
Oh s**t, what was I wor­ried about, I head the Justice Department b*****s?
Touché mother‑f*****s, ha, ha, ha.……!

So my boy did his thing after the Republican Special Counsel passed the report he wrote up to him.
He writes the Congress led by the Dumb-crats[sic] a lit­tle cov­er let­ter say­ing that the Special Counsel found no con­spir­a­cy between myself and the Russians.
He left them a lit­tle some­thing to yap about on the issue of inter­fer­ence.
As if it’s not my Justice Department, My FBI, my Country, I can damn well do as I please.

In sum­ming up.
You pay for inves­ti­gat­ing me.
I inter­fere, I get my boy to say no con­spir­a­cy was found.
I get my boy to say he decid­ed not to act on me inter­fer­ing in the inves­ti­ga­tions.
And no you can­not see the report, who do you think you are?
I decide what Democracy is. It is what I say it is.
All of you who sat there and watched and wait­ed these two years as talk­ing heads opined about what the Special Counsel’s inves­ti­ga­tions would find about my actions are real­ly dumb­er than me.
Do you real­ly think that this coun­try would allow the world to know that a hos­tile for­eign pow­er put me in office?
And many of you Libs call me dumb.
Who is dumb now?
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.…..

Long Before Columbus: How Africans Brought Civilization To America


Blacks have been in America long, long, long before America was a nation.
African American schol­ars like Dr. Ivan van Sertima were laughed at for decades until now.
There is now undis­put­ed sci­en­tif­ic proof that the first Americans were descend­ed from Africans or Australian abo­rig­ines, accord­ing to evi­dence in a new BBC doc­u­men­tary. Dozens of their skulls and cave writ­ings have been found dat­ing back to 50,000 years. The skulls, one named ‘Lucia’ by Scientists, have def­i­nite and dis­tinct Negroid facial fea­tures like those of Africans, New Guineas or Australian Aborigines. [www​.naira​land​.com]


Contrary to pop­u­lar belief, African American his­to­ry did not start with slav­ery in the New World. An over­whelm­ing body of new evi­dence is emerg­ing which proves that Africans had fre­quent­ly sailed across the Atlantic to the Americas, thou­sands of years before Columbus and indeed before Christ. The great ancient civ­i­liza­tions of Egypt and West Africa trav­eled to the Americas, con­tribut­ing immense­ly to ear­ly American civ­i­liza­tion by import­ing the art of pyra­mid build­ing, polit­i­cal sys­tems and reli­gious prac­tices as well as math­e­mat­ics, writ­ing and a sophis­ti­cat­ed cal­en­dar.
The strongest evi­dence of African pres­ence in America before Columbus comes from the pen of Columbus him­self. In 1920, a renowned American his­to­ri­an and lin­guist, Leo Weiner of Harvard University, in his book, Africa and the dis­cov­ery of America, explained how Columbus not­ed in his jour­nal that Native Americans had con­firmed that “black skinned peo­ple had come from the south-east in boats, trad­ing in gold-tipped spears.”[globalresearch.ca]
These impor­tant details sur­rep­ti­tious­ly haven’t made it into( his-sto­ry) books[sic]

One of the first doc­u­ment­ed instances of Africans sail­ing and set­tling in the Americas were black Egyptians led by King Ramses III, dur­ing the 19th dynasty in 1292 BC. In fact, in 445 BC, the Greek his­to­ri­an Herodotus wrote of the Ancient Egyptian pharaohs’ great sea­far­ing and nav­i­ga­tion­al skills. Further con­crete evi­dence, not­ed by Dr. Imhotep and large­ly ignored by Euro-cen­tric archae­ol­o­gists, includes “Egyptian arti­facts found across North America from the Algonquin writ­ings on the East Coast to the arti­facts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon.”
In 1311 AD, anoth­er major wave of African explo­ration to the New World was led by King Abubakari II, the ruler of the four­teenth cen­tu­ry Mali Empire, which was larg­er than the Holy Roman Empire. The king sent out 200 ships of men, and 200 ships of trade mate­r­i­al, crops, ani­mals, cloth and cru­cial­ly African knowl­edge of astron­o­my, reli­gion and the arts.

African explor­ers cross­ing the vast Atlantic waters in prim­i­tive boats may seem unlike­ly, or per­haps, far fetched to some. Such incred­i­ble nau­ti­cal achieve­ments are not as daunt­ing as they seem, giv­en that
numer­ous suc­cess­ful mod­ern attempts have illus­trat­ed that with­out an oar, rud­der or sail ancient African boats, includ­ing the “dug-out,” would cer­tain­ly have been able to cross the vast ocean in a mat­ter of weeks.History: How African Muslims “Civilized Spain”
As time allows us to drift fur­ther and fur­ther away from the “European age of explo­ration” and we move beyond an age of racial intel­lec­tu­al prej­u­dice, his­to­ri­ans are begin­ning to rec­og­nize that Africans were skilled nav­i­ga­tors long before Europeans, con­trary to pop­u­lar belief.
Of course, some Western his­to­ri­ans con­tin­ue to refute this fact because, con­scious­ly or uncon­scious­ly, they are still hang­ing on to the 19th-cen­tu­ry notion that sea­far­ing was a European monopoly.

After all, his­to­ry will tell you that sea­far­ing is the quin­tes­sen­tial European achieve­ment, the sin­gle endeav­or of which Europeans are awful­ly proud. Seafaring allowed Europe to con­quer the world. The notion that black Africans braved the roar­ing waters of the Atlantic Ocean and beat Europeans to the New World threat­ens a his­tor­i­cal­ly white sense of own­er­ship over the seas.
When most peo­ple think about ancient Mexico, the first civ­i­liza­tions that come to mind are the Incas, Aztecs and the Maya. However, dur­ing the ear­ly 1940’s arche­ol­o­gists uncov­ered a civ­i­liza­tion known as the Olmecs of 1200 BC, which pre-dat­ed any oth­er advanced civ­i­liza­tion in the Americas.

The Olmec civ­i­liza­tion, which was of African ori­gin and dom­i­nat­ed by Africans, was the first sig­nif­i­cant civ­i­liza­tion in Mesoamerica and the Mother Culture of Mexico.
Olmecs are per­haps best known for the carved colos­sal heads found in Central Mexico, that exhib­it an unmis­tak­ably African Negroid appear­ance. Ancient African his­to­ri­an Professor Van Sertima has illus­trat­ed how Olmecs were the first Mesoamerican civ­i­liza­tion to use a writ­ten lan­guage, sophis­ti­cat­ed astron­o­my, arts and math­e­mat­ics and they built the first cities in Mexico, all of which great­ly influ­enced the Mayans and sub­se­quent civ­i­liza­tions in the Americas. “There is not the slight­est doubt that all lat­er civ­i­liza­tions in [Mexico and Central America], rest ulti­mate­ly on an Olmec base,” once remarked Michael Coe, a lead­ing his­to­ri­an on Mexico. 

Africans clear­ly played an intri­cate role in the Olmec Empire’s rise and that African influ­ence peaked dur­ing the same peri­od that ancient Black Egyptian cul­ture ascend­ed in Africa.
A clear indi­ca­tor of pre-Columbus African trans-Atlantic trav­el is the recent arche­o­log­i­cal find­ings of nar­cotics native to America in Ancient Egyptian mum­mies, which have astound­ed con­tem­po­rary his­to­ri­ans. German tox­i­col­o­gist, Svetla Balabanova, report­ed find­ings of cocaine and nico­tine in ancient Egyptian mum­mies. These sub­stances are known to only be derived from American plants. South American cocaine from Erythroxylon coca and nico­tine from Nicotiana tabacum. Such com­pounds could only have been intro­duced to Ancient Egyptian cul­ture through trade with Americans.

Similarities across ear­ly American and African reli­gions also indi­cate sig­nif­i­cant cross-cul­tur­al con­tact. The Mayans, Aztecs and Incas all wor­shipped black gods and the sur­viv­ing por­traits of the black deities are reveal­ing. For instance, ancient por­traits of the Quetzalcoatl, a mes­si­ah ser­pent god, and Ek-ahua, the god of war, are unques­tion­ably Negro with dark skin and wooly hair. Why would native Americans ven­er­ate images so unmis­tak­ably African if they had nev­er seen them before? Numerous wall paint­ings in caves in Juxtlahuaca depict the famous ancient Egyptian “open­ing of the mouth” and cross liba­tion rit­u­als. All these reli­gious sim­i­lar­i­ties are too large and occur far too often to be mere coincidences.

Professor Everett Borders notes anoth­er very impor­tant indi­ca­tion of African pres­ence, which is the nature of ear­ly American pyra­mids. Pyramid con­struc­tion is high­ly spe­cial­ized. Ancient Egypt pro­gressed from the orig­i­nal stepped pyra­mid of Djosser, to the more sophis­ti­cat­ed fin­ished prod­uct at Giza. However, at La Venta in Mexico, the Olmecs made a ful­ly fin­ished pyra­mid, with no signs of pro­gres­sive learn­ing. Olmecian and Egyptian pyra­mids were both placed on the same north-south axis and had strik­ing­ly sim­i­lar con­struc­tion meth­ods. Tellingly, all of these pyra­mids also served the same dual pur­pose, tomb and temple.

Ancient trans-Atlantic sim­i­lar­i­ties in botany, reli­gion and pyra­mid build­ing con­sti­tute but a frac­tion of the signs of African influ­ence in ancient America. Other indi­ca­tors include, astron­o­my, art, writ­ing sys­tems, flo­ra and fau­na.
Historically, the African peo­ple have been excep­tion­al explor­ers and pur­vey­ors of cul­ture across the world. Throughout all of these trav­els, African explor­ers have not had a his­to­ry of start­ing dev­as­tat­ing wars on the peo­ple they met. The great­est threat towards Africa hav­ing a glo­ri­ous future is her people’s igno­rance of Africa’s glo­ri­ous past.

Pre-Columbus civ­i­liza­tion in the Americas had its foun­da­tion built by Africans and devel­oped by the inge­nu­ity of Native Americans. Sadly, America, in post-Columbus times, was found­ed on the geno­cide of the indige­nous Americans, built on the backs of African slaves and con­tin­ues to run on the exploita­tion of work­ers at home and abroad.
Clearly, Africans helped civ­i­lize America well before Europeans “dis­cov­ered” America, and well before Europeans claim to have civ­i­lized Africa. The grow­ing body of evi­dence is now becom­ing sim­ply too loud to ignore. It’s about time edu­ca­tion pol­i­cy mak­ers reex­am­ine their school cur­ricu­lums to adjust for America’s long pre-Columbus history.


In fact when Christopher come-rob-us arrived (by acci­dent no less), the Moors from Africa were already liv­ing in America, hav­ing arrived from around the 11th Century.
Blacks have been under white boot-heels since then.
The chang­ing face of America is the best thing for all Blacks includ­ing peo­ple from the Caribbean who live in America. It is the com­bined numer­i­cal strength of a major­i­ty-minor­i­ty Democratic vot­ing block which is, and will con­tin­ue to put to rest once and for all the vex­ing issue of tox­ic racism in America.
Those who believe that blacks will get bet­ter jobs, bet­ter edu­ca­tion, bet­ter oppor­tu­ni­ties by fight­ing against more minori­ties in America, absolute­ly needs an edu­ca­tion on America’s his­to­ry to present .[www​.glob​al​re​search​.ca]

MESSAGE: FROM THE JAMAICA POLICE FEDERATION

Cpl. Jason Bennett attached to the St. Catherine North OST was shot and injured a short while ago and is present­ly under­go­ing emer­gency surgery.
Information received was that a team from the St. Catherine North OST to include Cpl. Jason Bennett was on patrol along Old Harbour Road, Spanish Town, St. Catherine when they came under gun­fire.
Cpl. Jason Bennett was shot in the chest and was rushed to hos­pi­tal where he is present­ly under­go­ing an emer­gency surgery. 

Myself along with Sgt. Patrae Rowe and Sgt. Lloyd Duncan are at the facil­i­ty ensur­ing that the mem­ber’s wel­fare is tak­en care of. Retired Commissioner George Quallo, DCP Clifford Blake, SP Clunis, DSP Andrew Edwards, Insp. Linroy Edwards, Insp. D. Linton, Insp. Hepburn and a host of rank and file mem­bers from St. Catherine North, DWTT and oth­er Divisions are also on loca­tion.
Please pray earnest­ly for Cpl. Jason Bennett, his injuries are con­sid­ered seri­ous. Pray also for the oth­er mem­bers who were on the oper­a­tion.
Regards, Tameca Thomas Det/​Cons.
Executive Member
Director of Welfare, Projects & Healthy Lifestyle
Jamaica Police Federation

High-powered Weapons Recovered In St. James.

These weapons were report­ed­ly recov­ered by the police in the Salt Spring area in the trou­bled Parish of Saint James.



We are yet to learn if there are any arrests in con­nec­tion with these finds. As more infor­ma­tion becomes avail­able we will update this post.

Revisiting PM Andrew Holness’ Inaugural Speech…

When you think of some of the things hap­pen­ing in our coun­try it is dif­fi­cult to come away with­out think­ing that they are avoid­ing tried and proven fix­es inten­tion­al­ly.
Solutions to the coun­try’s cor­rup­tion prob­lem are absolute­ly not insur­mount­able. The Island’s lead­ers are not clue­less about this.
Why then would they con­tin­ue to allow Ministers of Government ?Members of Parliament and peo­ple in pub­lic bod­ies to get away with such high lev­els of crim­i­nal corruption?

It is incred­i­bly hard to make a case against those who talk about police cor­rup­tion.
Nevertheless, when we look at the cor­rupt acts com­mit­ted in the open by politi­cians it is breath­tak­ing­ly shock­ing.
From the Iran sug­ar deal. to Outameni, Petrojam, The Dutch
Trafigura scan­dal, the Cuban Light bulb scan­dal to the present day scan­dal involv­ing Ruel Reid nei­ther sides have clean hands.
Ask your­selves how Kern Spencer could walk away with­out being con­vict­ed in the Cuban light bulb scan­dal?
Then look at the so-called Judiciary and ask your­selves how a sit­ting Resident Magistrate could throw a mon­key wrench in the pros­e­cu­tion’s case and be pro­mot­ed instead of removed and imprisoned?

Want to talk about cor­rup­tion?
Lets look at the cor­rup­tion involved in the Firearm’s Licencing Authority today.
Law abid­ing Jamaicans who ful­fill every cri­te­ria and tick every box can hard­ly receive approval to pur­chase a firearm for their pro­tec­tion.
But a well con­nect­ed crim­i­nal with some mon­ey to toss around can eas­i­ly secure such approval.
This was a func­tion under the Police , much like the issuance of Passports.
The politi­cians promised that they would strip out the cor­rup­tion from the process when they removed both func­tions from the police.
Today both the Passports and the firearm process­es are two of the most cor­rupt organs of government.

My com­ments are in no way one of sup­port for those func­tions to be returned to the police, far from it.
I mere­ly intend to point to the across the board cor­rup­tion drain­ing the eco­nom­ic lifeblood from the coun­try.
The Customs depart­ment has always been a cesspool of cor­rup­tion, today more than ever it is a rot­ten morass of cor­rup­tion graft and bribes.
The Registrar General’s Department, you don’t pay you are not about to receive a birth cer­tifi­cate.
The Motor Vehicles Department is infa­mous for its cor­rupt exam­in­ers, no mat­ter how good a dri­ver you are you will not receive a pass­ing grade to secure a dri­vers license unless you pay up.
Inside the post office, they opened peo­ple’s mail and steal what­ev­er they want.
It is as a result of this across the board thiev­ery that Transparency International arrived at its rather gen­er­ous 84% cor­rupt rat­ing for Jamaica.
I fun­da­men­tal­ly believe that across all agen­cies of the over-bloat­ed gov­ern­ment bureau­cra­cy, it is some­where clos­er to 95% corrupt. 

It is against this back­ground that I con­tin­ue to call for greater train­ing, remu­ner­a­tions, and leg­isla­tive sup­port for the police.
It is against this back­ground that I call for the repeal of the INDECOM act, and greater invest­ments into the jus­tice deliv­ery process.
I believe that when there is pro­fes­sion­al­ism, trans­paren­cy, account­abil­i­ty, com­pe­ten­cy, hon­esty, and clar­i­ty in the jus­tice deliv­ery sys­tem those who work in the sys­tem has no choice but to uphold best prac­tices or leave.

On this score, nei­ther polit­i­cal par­ty has clean hands. In some cas­es, the argu­ments that those in oppo­si­tion are sim­ply mad because they are on the out­side look­ing in are not with­out mer­it.
I shall post the speech giv­en by Andrew Michael Holness when he ascend­ed to the top exec­u­tive posi­tion in our country.

Your Excellencies, the Governor General, the Most Honourable Sir Patrick Allen and Lady Allen.
Leader of the Opposition the Most Honorable Portia Simpson Miller Former Prime Ministers:
The Most Honorable Edward Seaga and Mrs Seaga
The Most Honorable PJ Patterson
The Honorable Bruce Golding and Mrs Golding.
My fel­low Jamaicans
Good after­noon.

I rec­og­nize that I stand here today only by the Grace of God. It has not been an easy jour­ney to this podi­um, but earnest labor and fer­vent prayers con­quer all. To God be the glo­ry.It is with a deep sense of grat­i­tude, hon­or and humil­i­ty that I took the Oath of Office moments ago, ful­ly con­scious of the mag­ni­tude of expec­ta­tions and respon­si­bil­i­ty I have assumed, but equal­ly ener­gized and opti­mistic about a pros­per­ous future for Jamaica. I pledge to serve the peo­ple of Jamaica faith­ful­ly, with all of my ener­gies, all of my heart, mind and soul.
I stand here today hap­py to be rep­re­sent­ing the voice, vision, vote and vic­to­ry of Jamaica.
We may have dif­fer­ent voic­es and dif­fer­ent votes on a sim­i­lar vision, regard­less of our dif­fer­ences, Jamaica was vic­to­ri­ous at the General Elections. It is not per­fect, but we can all be proud of the peo­ple, sys­tems, and insti­tu­tions that make up our democracy.

Meaning of the Mandate

On the day of Election, I wit­nessed a young man car­ry­ing, cra­dled in his arm, an obvi­ous­ly bed-rid­den elder­ly man from a polling sta­tion. I was touched by the sight. In the bus­tle of the busy school yard, as they passed, the elder­ly man point­ed his ink stained fin­ger at me and said, “Andrew, do the right thing!”I stand here hum­bled by the awe­some pow­er of you, the peo­ple, and I com­mit to doing right by you. The peo­ple are sov­er­eign and their views and votes must nev­er be tak­en for grant­ed.
The peo­ple of Jamaica did not vote in vain. They expect a gov­ern­ment that works for them and by the same expec­ta­tion, an Opposition that is con­struc­tive. This his­toric elec­tion deliv­ered the small­est major­i­ty but also the clear­est man­date: Fix Government! With this man­date: There is no major­i­ty for arro­gance
There is no space for self­ish­ness. There is no place for pet­ti­ness. There is no room for com­pla­cen­cy and There is no mar­gin for error. I am under no illu­sion as to the mean­ing of this man­date. We have not won a prize. Instead, the peo­ple are giv­ing us a test. There is no absolute agency of pow­er. This means that the win­ner can­not take all, or believe we can do it alone.

Leading Partnerships for Prosperity

To achieve the vision of shared pros­per­i­ty through inclu­sive eco­nom­ic growth and mean­ing­ful job cre­ation, now more than ever, Government must lead, acti­vate, empow­er and build real part­ner­ships. I intend to lead a Government of part­ner­ship. The solu­tions to our prob­lems do not rest with Government alone. The sum total of our poten­tial exceeds our prob­lems; our col­lec­tive capa­bil­i­ties are greater than our chal­lenges, but it is only through part­ner­ship that these capa­bil­i­ties and this poten­tial can be seized, har­nessed and real­ized for the good of Jamaica. Partnerships require trust, clear assign­ment of respon­si­bil­i­ty and an ele­vat­ed sense of duty.
There is only so much trust that pledges and state­ments of com­mit­ment can buy. I under­stand that the Jamaican peo­ple now want to see action in build­ing trust. This is part of fix­ing gov­ern­ment. Everyone who will form the next gov­ern­ment must be seized of this expec­ta­tion. From the politi­cian mak­ing pol­i­cy to the civ­il ser­vant pro­cess­ing an appli­ca­tion, we must act duti­ful­ly to ful­fill our respon­si­bil­i­ties. Trust requires the actu­al­iza­tion of our com­mit­ments. We will ful­fill our commitments.

Our actions can achieve so much more if they are coör­di­nat­ed. We will bring greater coör­di­na­tion, ratio­nal­i­ty and focus to the role of gov­ern­ment so that the objec­tives of part­ner­ship can be clear. There is no doubt that sig­nif­i­cant num­bers of Jamaicans have lost hope in our sys­tem, but I am encour­aged that a far larg­er num­ber main­tains faith, keeps hope and con­tin­ues to pray that Jamaica will grow and pros­per.
I am ener­gized by the expres­sions of will­ing­ness to work with our new Government in the inter­est of Jamaica. The sense of duty is alive and well. There is more hope than despair and this cre­ates a great oppor­tu­ni­ty to form part­ner­ships for prosperity.

Partnership with Families

You know, I am now joined in Parliament by my life part­ner Juliet.
Family is the ulti­mate part­ner­ship. And that is why my Government will focus resources on sup­port­ing fam­i­lies. By increas­ing the income tax thresh­old we will restore the eco­nom­ic pow­er of house­holds to par­tic­i­pate in not only grow­ing our GDP but more impor­tant­ly grow­ing the gen­er­al well­be­ing of the soci­ety.
Here’s how the part­ner­ship with fam­i­lies, and the work­ing heads of house­holds will work.
Our gov­ern­ment will ease your tax bur­den, but you must spend and invest wise­ly, use the addi­tion­al mon­ey to acquire a house for your fam­i­ly or improve the house you already have, or buy Jamaican-made goods. This how we will increase local effec­tive demand in hous­ing, man­u­fac­tur­ing, and agri­cul­ture. This is how you can play a part in cre­at­ing in jobs while sat­is­fy­ing your well­be­ing.
We will con­tin­ue our pol­i­cy of tuition-free edu­ca­tion and no user fee access to health care. However, will enable you to save in an edu­ca­tion bond for your children’s edu­ca­tion and in a nation­al health insur­ance scheme your health­care.
We will enhance our social safe­ty net for vul­ner­a­ble fam­i­lies, and will pro­vide sup­port for par­ents in cri­sis, but you must be respon­si­ble and send your chil­dren to school. Our men must take care of their chil­dren, and cou­ples must be respon­si­ble in hav­ing the chil­dren they can afford.

Our gov­ern­ment com­mits to cre­at­ing the envi­ron­ment in which fam­i­lies can flour­ish and form com­mu­ni­ties of social mobil­i­ty from which every ghet­to youth can be star. However, every fam­i­ly mem­ber must do his or her part by being per­son­al­ly, social­ly and eco­nom­i­cal­ly respon­si­ble.
I am sure Juliet will under­stand if I seek to build anoth­er part­ner­ship in Parliament. Leader of the Opposition, Portia Simpson Miller has giv­en long and ded­i­cat­ed ser­vice to the coun­try and I believe the man­date is say­ing, we may not be on the same side of the road, but as much as pos­si­ble we should hold hands in coöper­a­tion to over­come obsta­cles for the good of the coun­try. We have evolved with­out for­mal struc­ture a very good part­ner­ship in edu­ca­tion and we intend to con­tin­ue our infor­mal col­lab­o­ra­tions in this area and pur­sue oth­er such areas of coöper­a­tion between Government and Opposition mem­bers.
I still believe it is a use­ful sym­bol of nation­al uni­ty for the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition to appear togeth­er in zones of polit­i­cal exclu­sions. I again extend the invitation.

Partnership for Growth with Private Sector

The pri­or­i­ty of this Government is to grow the econ­o­my and cre­ate mean­ing­ful jobs. In so doing, we will more rapid­ly and sus­tain­ably reduce debt. I am sure we all agree that much of Jamaica’s devel­op­ment has been achieved with­out growth, which has left us with much debt. This is unsus­tain­able. Going for­ward, Jamaica’s devel­op­ment must rest on its abil­i­ty to cre­ate propo­si­tions of val­ue and attract invest­ments to con­vert the val­ue into wealth. In this mod­el, Government is not the main investor, it is the Private Sector whether they be large enter­pris­es or small busi­ness. In the eco­nom­ic part­ner­ship with the Private Sector, Government’s role, among oth­ers, is: 

To ensure the rule of law. Create a safe, secure, and fair envi­ron­ment for busi­ness. Make mar­kets where none exist. Ensure trans­paren­cy and access to infor­ma­tion ‑and cre­ate an effi­cient and sup­port­ive pub­lic sec­tor bureau­cra­cy.
In exchange, we want the Private Sector to unleash invest­ments in the local econ­o­my. We want to see the return of the pio­neer­ing dri­ve to cre­ate new indus­tries, the entre­pre­neur­ial will­ing­ness to take risk, and the inno­v­a­tive insight to do things bet­ter. I am heart­ened by the sig­nals com­ing from the Private Sector. I believe they have got the mes­sage about the part­ner­ship for growth and job cre­ation. Now is the time for growth.

Partnership with inter­na­tion­al partners

We are not naïve about the chal­lenges we face regard­ing our debt and the need to main­tain fis­cal dis­ci­pline. This is why we will con­tin­ue with the prin­ci­ple of joint over­sight of our Economic Programme and per­for­mance.We rec­og­nize the impor­tance of, and val­ue our rela­tion­ship with our bilat­er­al and mul­ti­lat­er­al friends. These rela­tion­ships have been crit­i­cal in secur­ing sta­bil­i­ty.
We believe in pre­serv­ing sta­bil­i­ty, but we must now build upon this, in a pro­duc­tive part­ner­ship with them to achieve inclu­sive growth and job cre­ation. There are many more areas of part­ner­ships that we must for­mal­ly pur­sue for nation­al devel­op­ment and as our gov­ern­ment is installed over the com­ing days these will become evident.

The Role of the Prime Minister

In all these part­ner­ships for pros­per­i­ty, there must be coör­di­nat­ed effort. That is my role. I will ensure that: Government is coör­di­nat­ed and strate­gi­cal­ly direct­ed Decisions are tak­en quick­ly. Targets are set. The nation is informed and that. Everyone under my appoint­ment is held to account for their action or lack there­of.
Institutional Reform
There is a sense of expec­ta­tion of change. It is not lost on me that I am the first of the Post-Independence gen­er­a­tion to lead Jamaica. More than any­thing else we want to see Jamaica take its true place as a devel­oped coun­try in the next 50 years. The strug­gle is not so much polit­i­cal inde­pen­dence as it is eco­nom­ic inde­pen­dence. It is through our eco­nom­ic inde­pen­dence that we secure real polit­i­cal inde­pen­dence.
However, after 53 years of inde­pen­dence, there is need for insti­tu­tion­al review of the Jamaican State both in terms of mod­ern­iza­tion of the insti­tu­tions of the State, and the struc­ture of the State. Government has to improve its busi­ness process­es and become more effi­cient as a reg­u­la­tor and a ser­vice provider.

There is need for us to have a say in the fun­da­men­tal insti­tu­tions that define Jamaica, the rights we secure for our cit­i­zens and how we want Jamaica to be. We will give form to that voice in a ref­er­en­dum to decide on the con­sti­tu­tion­al mat­ters and social mat­ters.
Independent Jamaica must remove the cul­ture of depen­den­cy from our midst. We must teach our chil­dren that there is no wealth with­out work, and no suc­cess with­out sac­ri­fice. We must remove the belief from the psy­che of our chil­dren that the only way they can step up in life is not by how hard they work, but by who they know.
As Prime Minister I have a duty to align our incen­tives and reward sys­tems for those who work and fol­low rules. We must cre­ate a Jamaica where the man who plays by the rules is reward­ed!
It is impor­tant that the cit­i­zens of Independent Jamaica have a sense of enti­tle­ment to good ser­vice from their coun­try. However, increas­ing­ly this is not being bal­anced with a duty of ‘giv­ing back’. Jamaica has ben­e­fit­ed sig­nif­i­cant­ly from the civic pride and sense of nation­hood that drove so many to give gen­er­ous­ly of their tal­ent and trea­sures to build our great nation.
The spir­it still exists, to a great extent, local­ly and in our Diaspora. However, we have to be more active in pro­mot­ing civic respon­si­bil­i­ty, vol­un­teerism and ‘giv­ing back’, par­tic­u­lar­ly among our youth. And we have to inte­grate the incred­i­ble tal­ents and assets of the Jamaican Diaspora in local devel­op­ment. Too often I hear com­plaints from the Diaspora that they expe­ri­ence dif­fi­cul­ty in giv­ing to Jamaica. Giving should be easy, as part of our Partnership for Prosperity which includes the Diaspora, we will make it eas­i­er for you to con­tribute to the devel­op­ment of your homeland.

Jamaica is too rich in peo­ple and tal­ent to be a poor coun­try. With good gov­er­nance and a prospec­tive out­look, Jamaica, with­in a decade or less, could emerge as a boom­ing econ­o­my and a pros­per­ous soci­ety.
Jamaica is geo­graph­i­cal­ly cen­tral in the Caribbean. My vision is to turn Jamaica into the cen­tre of the Caribbean. A cen­tre of finance, trade and com­merce, tech­nol­o­gy and inno­va­tion, and the cen­tre of arts, cul­ture, and lifestyle region­al­ly. This is all pos­si­ble with­in our life­time. Despite any neg­a­tives, Jamaica still has a pow­er­ful and allur­ing brand ampli­fy­ing our voice and influ­ence in the world.
We can­not be sat­is­fied with things as they are. My dream is to ful­fill your dream. We must cre­ate a Jamaica where there is hope and oppor­tu­ni­ty. Where we can encour­age our chil­dren to dream big and be opti­mistic about their life chances. We must cre­ate a Jamaica where our young peo­ple can find mean­ing­ful work. A Jamaica where you feel safe to live, work and raise your chil­dren. A Jamaica that is boom­ing and investors and entre­pre­neurs can have a con­fi­dent out­look on the econ­o­my. A place where we can retire and tru­ly enjoy as par­adise. All of this is pos­si­ble. We must start now. Time for a part­ner­ship. Time for action!

PNP YO Calls For Ruel Reid’s Firing From JC

PNPYO CALLS FOR RUEL REID TO BE FIRED AS PRINCIPAL OF JC

The PNP Youth Organisation wel­comes news that the Principal of Jamaica College, Ruel Reid has been fired as Minister and has also resigned from the Senate. This devel­op­ment has only come about because of a dili­gent Parliamentary Opposition led by Dr. Peter Phillips, who called atten­tion to Mr. Reid’s stew­ard­ship over cor­rupt prac­tices at the Ministry.
That the Prime Minister has seen it fit to fire Mr. Reid, tells the pub­lic that what is being uncov­ered in Ministry of Education could very well be worse than what was unearthed at Petrojam. 

The PNPYO is there­fore demand­ing that Ruel Reid steps down as Principal of Jamaica College and not be allowed to serve on any State Boards in the near future. His pro­longed sec­ond­ment was already improp­er and to keep him in this posi­tion of lead­er­ship sends the wrong mes­sage to the stu­dents who would be under his influ­ence and guidance.The role of Principal must be held by one who is firm on prin­ci­ple, integri­ty and good judge­ment. Mr. Reid has proven that he does not meet such high stan­dards.
We fur­ther ask that the Custos of St. Andrew, HON. DR. PATRICIA DUNWELL review this mat­ter to deter­mine whether Mr. Reid could right­ly con­tin­ue to hold the office of Justice of the Peace (JP). The Ministry of Justice requires that a JP be a per­son of unques­tion­able integri­ty and who com­mands the respect and con­fi­dence of the local community. 

We believe that the Prime Minister’s loss of con­fi­dence in Ruel Reid to con­tin­ue his tenure as Minister and Senator is a clear indi­ca­tion that he is no longer suit­ed to bear the seal of such an office as Justice of the Peace. With infor­ma­tion yet unfold­ing, his actions may well war­rant a dis­missal on the grounds out­lined in Section 9, sub­sec­tion 4a(i and ii) of the Justices of the Peace Act, 2018.

END

Ruel Reid Fired

In an unprece­dent­ed and unex­pect­ed move, Jamaica’s Prime Minister, Andrew Holness has fired Education Minister Ruel Reid.
Reid has also resigned from the Senate.

In a state­ment to the Nation Holness said the fol­low­ing.
This morn­ing I met with Minister Ruel Reid regard­ing cer­tain alle­ga­tions in the pub­lic domain.
In keep­ing with the prin­ci­ples of good gov­er­nance, I request­ed and received Minister Reid’s res­ig­na­tion. Minister Reid has also resigned from the Senate.
The Minister’s res­ig­na­tion will ensure that any inves­ti­ga­tion into mat­ters of con­cern will not be in any way imped­ed by his pres­ence or over­sight of the Ministry.
The Ministry of Education Youth and Information will now fall under the tem­po­rary super­vi­sion of the Office of the Prime Minister which will start its own review of the min­istry and its agencies.

Andrew Holness PM (file photo)

According to local report­ing, the Auditor General’s Department is cur­rent­ly under­tak­ing a per­for­mance audit of the depart­ment.
It was, how­ev­er, the polit­i­cal oppo­si­tion which is cred­it­ed with rais­ing ques­tions amidst reports of mis­use of pub­lic funds and cor­rup­tion at the edu­ca­tion min­istry and sug­gest­ed that it was equiv­a­lent to the scan­dal uncov­ered at Petrojam, the state-owned oil refin­ery. Opposition Leader Dr Peter Phillips, speak­ing dur­ing a post-Budget press con­fer­ence, said the alle­ga­tions are relat­ed direct­ly to Caribbean Maritime University and the use of funds sent to the min­istry by the HEART Trust for the Career Advancement Programme as well as the Technical, Vocational, Educational and Training (T‑VET) Rationalisation Project.(Jamaica Geaner​.com)

Ruel Reid

It is that kind of over­sight which the coun­try must encour­age rather than the tit-for-tat, back and forth which has char­ac­ter­ized oppo­si­tion par­ties behav­ior pre­vi­ous­ly.
Although there is far from suf­fi­cient infor­ma­tion in the pub­lic domain for a rea­son­able con­clu­sion to be drawn, the actions of the Prime Minister in fir­ing Reid, tells us that the sto­ry is seri­ous enough despite the PM’s con­tention that the min­is­ter’s removal will ensure that any inves­ti­ga­tion into mat­ters of con­cern will not be in any way imped­ed by Reid’s presence.

I urge the Prime Minister to call in the Police to con­duct a free and fair inves­ti­ga­tion even as the Auditor General’s office is work­ing on a par­al­lel track.
One inves­ti­ga­tion will not impede the oth­er, and should not be seen as anti­thet­i­cal to each oth­er.
Regardless of the out­come, the law must take its course. If breach­es of the laws are found fir­ings are not enough.
The full force of the law must be brought to bear as it would for any oth­er Jamaican.
It is about time that those entrust­ed with pub­lic posi­tions of trust under­stand that pub­lic offices and pub­lic posi­tions of pow­er are not oppor­tu­ni­ties to get rich.
It would also demon­strate that the Prime Minister is com­mit­ted to the rule of law and does not believe that the laws are only there for some people.

In the mean­time the Opposition PNP issued the fol­low­ing state­ment under the sig­na­ture of the oppo­si­tion leader Peter Phillips.

Statement on the Matter of Corruption at the Ministry of Education and Related Agencies
Dr. Peter Phillips, PNP President and Leader of the Opposition
March 20, 2019.
The hasty removal of the Minister of Education is in response to our demand at the Press Conference on Monday, March 18, 2019, for a full inves­ti­ga­tion of activ­i­ties at Ministry of Education in light of cred­i­ble reports of cor­rup­tion, nepo­tism and mis­ap­pro­pri­a­tion of pub­lic funds involv­ing the Ministry of Education and its asso­ci­at­ed agen­cies. Our report indi­cates the depth of the can­cer of cor­rup­tion and dis­hon­esty engulf­ing the Holness Administration.
Reports received indi­cate that not only the cen­tral Ministry but agen­cies includ­ing the Caribbean Maritime University, the National Education Trust and the HEART Trust which was sub­se­quent­ly trans­ferred to OPM have all been impli­cat­ed in the web of cor­rup­tion.
This is the 2nd senior Minister of Government that has been forced to resign in less than a year under the shad­ow of cor­rup­tion affect­ing agen­cies for which they have been respon­si­ble and account­able. We should remem­ber also that inves­ti­ga­tions in the Petrojam scan­dal by the National Integrity Commission and MOCA are still not com­plet­ed. Furthermore, the Prime Minister who had car­riage of the Ministry of Energy has still not pro­vid­ed the rel­e­vant doc­u­men­ta­tion to the Parliamentary Committee.
I am again call­ing upon the Auditor General and the National Integrity Commission, as well as secu­ri­ty agen­cies includ­ing JCF, MOCA and the Financial Investigation Division (FID) to ful­ly inves­ti­gate the alle­ga­tions which have caused the Minister’s res­ig­na­tion. We expect them to act with integri­ty and urgency to hold those who broke the law account­able.
Indeed, we note that the Prime Minster has not yet said what was the basis on which he asked for the res­ig­na­tion of the MOE and we are call­ing up on him to do so imme­di­ate­ly.
Also, in light of dis­turb­ing reports, that the Security agen­cies are being ham­pered in the con­duct of their inves­ti­ga­tions, we are call­ing up on all the heads of the Security agen­cies to act with integri­ty and urgency, mind­ful that they rep­re­sent the line of defense against wan­ton cor­rup­tion and the abuse of tax­pay­ers mon­ey.
The People’s National Party stren­u­ous­ly objects to the Prime Minister’s deci­sion to take the Ministry of Education with­in the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) and sub­ject to the Prime Minister’s per­son­al con­trol.
First of all, the Ministry of Education is much too impor­tant to be giv­en par­tial over­sight in the con­duct of day-to-day activ­i­ties, which are absolute­ly essen­tial to the future of our nation’s chil­dren.
Secondly, the expe­ri­ence of the role of the Office of the Prime Minister in its man­age­ment of Petrojam does not give the coun­try con­fi­dence.
We can­not for­get the infa­mous Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) in Petrojam which was done under Prime Minister Holness’ watch. He is yet to table all the doc­u­ments linked to the res­ig­na­tion of the for­mer Human Resource Manager at Petrojam, nor has he pro­vid­ed the rel­e­vant advice that the lawyers gave to Petrojam on this mat­ter.
The coun­try can­not afford the Office of the Prime Minister to act once again to cov­er up the mis­deeds of Minsters. The peo­ple of Jamaica deserve much better!

This sto­ry is devel­op­ing and may be updat­ed as more infor­ma­tion becomes available.

Virginia Cop Identified As Part Of White Nationalist Group

Leaked chat logs reveal that Daniel Morley, a school resource offi­cer, recruits for Identity Evropa. 

By Andy Campbell

headshot

A police offi­cer has been con­nect­ed to white nation­al­ist group Identity Evropa, join­ing a grow­ing list of pub­lic employ­ees who have been iden­ti­fied in a gar­gan­tu­an leak of the group’s chat logs.
Daniel Morley, 31, a school resource offi­cer at L.C. Bird High School in Virginia, holds a side gig as an orga­niz­er for Identity Evropa, a group not­ed for its part in the orga­niz­ing of the dead­ly Unite the Right ral­ly in Charlottesville in 2017. The group (also known as the “American Identity Movement”) tasked Morley with help­ing new recruits through the appli­ca­tion process. 
He was first iden­ti­fied by anti-fas­cist activists scour­ing through hun­dreds of thou­sands of mes­sages leaked by Unicorn Riot, an inde­pen­dent media orga­ni­za­tion.
Morley been sus­pend­ed from his job at the high school, and Chesterfield County Police Chief Jeffrey Katz rec­om­mend­ed he be fired pend­ing a state-man­dat­ed dis­ci­pli­nary process, accord­ing to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

We are con­cerned and com­mit­ted to deter­min­ing if there is any truth to these alle­ga­tions,” Katz said Monday. “There is absolute­ly no place for intol­er­ance or prej­u­di­cial behav­ior in pub­lic ser­vice, and we will not tol­er­ate affil­i­a­tions which even remote­ly lend them­selves to pre­dis­po­si­tions of bias.”
Morley ― using the moniker “Danimal876” ― had been post­ing on the white nation­al­ist group’s pri­vate chat serv­er since at least 2017, accord­ing to The Daily Beast. He used that han­dle on mul­ti­ple plat­forms, includ­ing the white suprema­cist forum Stormfront, to espouse racist views and engage with like­mind­ed big­ots as far back as 2009.
On Identity Evropa’s serv­er, he active­ly worked on recruit­ment. “Good after­noon new­com­ers to IE! I’m the new pledge coör­di­na­tor,” he wrote in September, accord­ing to the Daily Beast. “My job is to help guide peo­ple through the process of apply­ing to IE and becom­ing full mem­bers of this great orga­ni­za­tion. If you have any ques­tions about what you need to do next, DM me and I’ll get back to you.”

In August of 2018, the Chesterfield County Police Department post­ed a video of Morley, in which he intro­duced him­self as the high school’s new resource officer.“I want to ensure that the chil­dren of this coun­ty get to have the same safe child­hood that I did grow­ing up,” he says in the short clip. 

Unicorn Riot’s leak of more than 700,000 mes­sages has led to numer­ous ground­break­ing reports about white nation­al­ism, par­tic­u­lar­ly as it per­tains to pub­lic fig­ures and employ­ees in the United States.
HuffPost report­ed exclu­sive­ly this week that sev­en mem­bers of the U.S. mil­i­tary were work­ing direct­ly with Identity Evropa, help­ing the group recruit on cam­pus­es and in cities across the coun­try. There’s been report­ing on the group’s efforts to sup­port promi­nent white suprema­cists in office like Iowa Rep. Steve King; legit­imize itself and recruit through col­lege groups like Turning Point USA; and even infil­trate the GOP head-on.
Since Unicorn Riot’s drop, Identity Evropa attempt­ed to rebrand by renam­ing itself the “American Identity Movement.”

https://​www​.huff​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​v​i​r​g​i​n​i​a​-​c​o​p​-​d​a​n​i​e​l​-​m​o​r​l​e​y​-​i​d​e​n​t​i​f​i​e​d​-​a​s​-​p​a​r​t​-​o​f​-​w​h​i​t​e​-​n​a​t​i​o​n​a​l​i​s​t​-​g​r​o​u​p​_​n​_​5​c​9​0​e​b​2​6​e​4​b​0​d​5​0​5​4​5​0​0​2​d9e

How Can The JCF Legally Prevent Officers From Resigning The Force?

Those in pow­er tell the Jamaican peo­ple that they want a bet­ter Police Department because the Police are cor­rupt. So cor­rupt that they have to bring in the Army’s head to take over.
Remember now, this was not done once, not twice, we are on the third iter­a­tion of this freak show in which the head of the 3’000-man army is brought in to head the 10’000 man police force.
As far as things look noth­ing has changed for the bet­ter.
Those who hate Police and want their beliefs to be val­i­dat­ed will have their beliefs read­i­ly val­i­dat­ed by the deci­sion mak­ers.
To the rest of us who under­stand that when we go to the super­mar­ket we want gro­ceries for our mon­ey, much like we expect gas when we go to the gas sta­tion, when we pay police we want secu­ri­ty.
With that said when we look at the crime sit­u­a­tion those who are will­ing to think, read­i­ly under­stand that noth­ing is being done to put the boot heels on the neck of the crim­i­nals.
Some will make the argu­ment that crim­i­nals are being empow­ered more and more each day. I am among those people.

I do not care too much who leads the JCF as long as they do a good Job.
In fact, I believe we should have a civil­ian com­mis­sion­er of Police and a police chief in the JCF and I have said so in numer­ous arti­cles.
I also believe that the force has every right to source exper­tise wher­ev­er pos­si­ble or nec­es­sary but that does not mean stu­pid­ly giv­ing those civil­ian work­ers police rank. Doing so is coun­ter­pro­duc­tive.
Rank is earned not some­thing bestowed on some­one because they have a skill you would like to exploit.
In the great­est Military in the world, the US mil­i­tary, rank is award­ed on mer­it. Education and bat­tle-test­ed com­mand com­pe­tence.
In police Departments across America, con­sul­tants give invalu­able ser­vice to the thou­sands of depart­ments nation­wide, they are not giv­en rank.
My prob­lem with Antony Anderson, is that he paid lip ser­vice that he would eschew cor­rup­tion but as soon as he took office he brought his boy with him.
Make no mis­take about it that is cor­rup­tion and it is wrong.
As far as the senior ranks of the JCF are con­cerned, (with the excep­tion of a cou­ple of them) I don’t care whether they are over­looked or not, or they nev­er get anoth­er pro­mo­tion.
They have been abysmal with the pow­er they have had over the decades.
As a con­se­quence, there has been an astro­nom­i­cal­ly high attri­tion rate of tal­ent­ed peo­ple who would not tol­er­ate their BS.
Because of nepo­tism, polit­i­cal lean­ings, gross incom­pe­tence, envy, igno­rance, and a gen­er­al sense of not want­i­ng to see tal­ent­ed young peo­ple advance they brought the JCF to where it is today.

Both polit­i­cal par­ties have been all too will­ing to help push the wag­on over the ledge, all while talk­ing about crime as if they are doing some­thing about it.
Because the senior corps of the JCF aligned itself to the two polit­i­cal par­ties in ways that make them sub­servient yard-boys to the par­ty boss­es, they gam­bled away the pow­er of the JCF, ren­der­ing it inef­fec­tive and unable to impact crime pos­i­tive­ly.
Simply put, if the Commissioner of Police is a slav­ish tool to the rul­ing class, he is also a tool to their crim­i­nal hench­men, if they are tools to the hench­men they are tools to the shot­tas.
What author­i­ty then, does a con­sta­ble have to do his job against these peo­ple?
Whether we acknowl­edge it or not, the fact remains that the Jamaica Constabulary Force is com­plete­ly inca­pable of bring­ing charges against a politi­cian regard­less of his/​her crimes.
This is a direct result of the feck­less incom­pe­tence of the Gazetted Ranks from the com­mis­sion­er of police on down, through­out the years
By that Metric the JCF is inca­pable of bring­ing charges against any major crim­i­nal play­er, (a‑la Christopher dud­dus Coke), his father before him and that goes for the litany of PNP thugs who have been major pro­duc­ers of vio­lent crimes which have tak­en untold amounts of lives.

It is for that rea­son why crime has tak­en hold and flour­ished in our coun­try.
Pervasive igno­rance, arro­gance and the crim­i­nal pro­cliv­i­ty of far too many of our peo­ple are only accel­er­ants to that fire, not the cause of the fire.
In this medi­um, we have sought to shed some light on some of those short­com­ings, because we under­stand the crit­i­cal role police play in suc­cess­ful soci­eties.
And so, for a large sub-sec­tion of the Jamaican pop­u­la­tion, oth­ers will inex­orably have to advo­cate for a bet­ter Jamaica for them, despite them.

When the Commissioner of Police brings his dri­ver and head of his secu­ri­ty detail from the army with him, and that untrained per­son is made an Assistant Superintendent of Police under the guise that his pay in the JDF was com­men­su­rate with the pay he is now receiv­ing as an ASP , they made it about the indi­vid­ual and not about the coun­try and the JCF.
It is cor­rup­tion, but the rank and file are like dis­grun­tled chil­dren who once giv­en a lit­tle talk­ing to sulk away and con­tin­ue with life as chil­dren.
Antony Anderson did that talk­ing to recent­ly and Joel Hamilton was instruct­ed to write a let­ter of apol­o­gy and all is well now.
In the mean­time, the Federation which removed cor­po­ral McBeam as gen­er­al sec­re­tary in a pow­er­play recent­ly was seem­ing­ly rebuffed by the courts.
We were informed she will be rein­stat­ed, we have not been able to inde­pen­dent­ly ver­i­fy that report­ing.
The Gazetted offi­cers who should have object­ed to the promotion/​appointment of Joel Hamilton on prin­ci­ple have uttered not a sin­gle word and have sulked away like lit­tle pup­pies as well.

What they are strong on is cas­es like the above let­ter in which a mem­ber of the depart­ment, who no longer wish­es to be in the agency is being told that he can­not leave the force as he desires.
In the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure, I am not a lawyer, but these rules to which the JCF mem­ber­ship are sub­ject­ed seem eeri­ly uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. to me.
(1) Six months of advanced notice before resign­ing.
Rules were not in effect when most of the force joined.
(2) Must give state­ments to INDECOM imme­di­ate­ly after an inci­dent of force.
Rules were not in effect when prob­a­bly half of the depart­ment joined.
(3) How can you con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly stop any per­son from leav­ing a job they no longer wish to serve in?

Ladies and gen­tle­men what kind of police offi­cers do you expect to have come to your res­cue if they are slaves unable to leave the police depart­ment on their own voli­tion?
At the time the JCF decid­ed to insti­tute this 6‑month pre­clear­ance rule before res­ig­na­tions I said it was a bad idea. This admin­is­tra­tion in cohorts with the oppo­si­tion par­ty is destroy­ing the police depart­ment
Creating rules designed to stem attri­tion is not a solu­tion for stop­ping attri­tion.
There is a rea­son that 50 peo­ple leave the Jamaica Constabulary Force each month.
Truthfully, a large per­cent­age of the pop­u­la­tion does not deserve the sac­ri­fices those young peo­ple make on their behalf.
The job is an ungrate­ful, dan­ger­ous, thank­less and shit­ty one which pays peanuts.
Those leav­ing are mak­ing the deci­sion to take their chances else­where.
The JCF hier­ar­chy has done some real­ly dumb things, try­ing to pre­vent offi­cers wish­ing to leave from doing so , is right up there with the real­ly dumb things they are doing. 

First, They Came For Ilhan Omar

The congresswoman was smeared — nothing she said warranted the criticism she received. But progressives should not fall into the trap of denying that anti-Semitism exists on the left.

In this March 12, 2019, photo, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., listens as Office of Management and Budget Acting Director Russ Vought testifies before the House Budget Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. Debate in Congress over Israel and anti-Semitism is providing President Donald Trump an opening to appeal to Jewish American voters (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

What’s wrong with this picture?

Back in February, Representative Ilhan Omar tweet­ed that American polit­i­cal lead­ers’ sup­port for Israel was “all about the Benjamins baby” — a Puff Daddy quote that some were quick to con­demn as invok­ing the anti-Semitic theme of Jews buy­ing influ­ence. The fresh­man con­gress­woman, who came to the United States as a refugee from Somalia at the age of 12, quick­ly issued an unequiv­o­cal apol­o­gy, say­ing she was “grate­ful for Jewish allies and col­leagues who are edu­cat­ing me on the painful his­to­ry of anti-Semitic tropes.”

A cou­ple of weeks lat­er, after a town-hall meet­ing at Washington’s Busboys and Poets, where Omar remarked that she want­ed “to talk about the polit­i­cal influ­ence in this coun­try that says it is OK for peo­ple to push for alle­giance to a for­eign coun­try,” Omar’s oppo­nents accused her of claim­ing American Jews had a “dual loy­al­ty” — anoth­er vin­tage anti-Semitic trope. Even though she was clear­ly refer­ring to the pres­sure she her­self felt as a mem­ber of Congress and a sup­port­er of Palestinian rights, that didn’t stop the House Democratic lead­er­ship from mov­ing a res­o­lu­tion that, while it didn’t men­tion Omar by name, was clear­ly aimed at her. 

Yet, by the time that House res­o­lu­tion came to a vote, the text con­demned both anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim big­otry as “hate­ful expres­sions of intol­er­ance” — along with white-suprema­cist attacks “tar­get­ing tra­di­tion­al­ly per­se­cut­ed peo­ples, includ­ing African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and oth­er peo­ple of col­or, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, the LGBTQ com­mu­ni­ty, immi­grants, and oth­ers.” When the res­o­lu­tion passed by a mar­gin of 407 to 23, with almost the entire Democratic del­e­ga­tion, includ­ing Omar, vot­ing in favor, some of the same com­men­ta­tors who’d con­demned the Democratic lead­er­ship for “smear­ing” Omar now decid­ed the episode had end­ed hap­pi­ly after all. 

Read more here http://​then​ation​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​i​l​h​a​n​-​o​m​a​r​-​a​n​t​i​-​s​e​m​i​t​i​s​m​-​a​i​p​ac/

A Suspect In New Zealand Mass Shootings Appears To Be A White Supremacist

In a man­i­festo, the alleged gun­man said he was moti­vat­ed by American extremism. 

Our hearts are bro­ken we grieve with the inno­cent vic­tims of hate in New Zealand.

YouTube player

A man accused of open­ing fire Friday at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, killing dozens of wor­ship­pers, appears to have been moti­vat­ed by white suprema­cy and extrem­ism that he saw in the United States.
During a news con­fer­ence, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison char­ac­ter­ized the alleged shoot­er as an “extrem­ist, right-wing, vio­lent ter­ror­ist.” Four sus­pects were tak­en into cus­tody Friday in con­nec­tion with the attack. The alleged gun­man was lat­er charged with mur­der. Read more here:https://​www​.huff​post​.com/​e​n​t​r​y​/​n​e​w​-​z​e​a​l​a​n​d​-​s​h​o​o​t​e​r​-​s​u​s​p​e​c​t​e​d​-​w​h​i​t​e​-​s​u​p​r​e​m​a​c​y​_​n​_​5​c​8​b​2​4​5​1​e​4​b​0​d​b​7​d​a​9​f​1​7​320

Not Only Have The Values Changed So Too Has The People…

One of the most dif­fi­cult things to accom­plish is to get peo­ple to think out­side their com­fort zones.
We, humans, are cer­tain­ly prod­ucts of our envi­ron­ment.
As for us Jamaicans who were raised on JLP and PNP ortho­doxy, see­ing rea­son out­side of the con­fines of those polit­i­cal blink­ers is near­ly impos­si­ble.
Unfortunately for the coun­try, because of this blink­ered men­tal­i­ty, the lead­er­ship of the two major polit­i­cal par­ties has very lit­tle to fear from engag­ing in cor­rup­tion and step­ping out­side the bounds of the law.

A rev­o­lu­tion­ary change is nec­es­sary, the immi­nence is up to the peo­ple.
I believe it was Norman Manley who was cred­it­ed with the state­ment quote;‘There can be no real vic­to­ry with­out a few bro­ken skulls.“
Whether Jamaica’s evo­lu­tion will be one of a pop­u­lar peo­ple’s upris­ing or an intel­lec­tu­al awak­en­ing is impos­si­ble to say.
But if the blood-let­ting and the car­nal­i­ty are to be halt­ed there will have to be a shift, a par­a­digm shift even,_______________ in the way we think, in the way we act, in the way we expect our coun­try to be run.
Presently there is lit­tle sign that we are even cog­nizant of the right path to take.
The new nor­mal is the dai­ly killings with the bod­ies of entire fam­i­lies wiped out by gang­sters.
The new nor­mal is lit­tle babies describ­ing in graph­ic detail the sex­u­al organs of their par­ents and the actions their par­ents engage in sex­u­al­ly.
The new nor­mal is the record­ing of that despi­ca­ble nar­ra­tion from a child no more than an infant and the pro­mul­ga­tion of it on social media for likes.

Often we hear of a desire to return to the way we were. It is incred­i­bly dif­fi­cult to imag­ine a return to the way we were when many who cre­at­ed the “way we were” are no longer around.
Through the pas­sage of time, death, immi­gra­tion, and prob­a­bly more con­se­quen­tial the change forced on the silent major­i­ty to remain silent, at the per­il of vio­lent death, our coun­try has changed for­ev­er.
When the mass of crim­i­nals and oth­ers being returned to the coun­try, some after a life­time of crime abroad, are added to the mix, it seems to me the sta­tus quo is here to stay.

These are the visa lines at the US Embassy in St. Andrews each day.

Contrary to the hyper­bol­ic argu­ments you hear and the faux attempts at patri­o­tism the vast major­i­ty of Jamaicans have told poll­sters they would emi­grate if they could.
In fact, those who make the loud­est noise about not leav­ing Jamaica have been those who have not been able to leave.
In 2015 alone The United States Embassy in Kingston con­firmed that Jamaicans spent J$3 bil­lion) try­ing to obtain visas to the United States.
And that is only to one coun­try. Every day Jamaicans line up at the British and Candian con­sulates as well as con­sulates of oth­er coun­tries try­ing to find a way to have a bet­ter life.
According to a 2016 sur­vey com­mis­sioned by Respect, Jamaica and the local office of UNICEF, 81 per­cent of Jamaica’s youth between 14 and 40 years of age would leave the coun­try imme­di­ate­ly if they could. 
The only coun­try they ruled out as a pos­si­ble choice was the nation of Afghanistan.
As far as Transparency International is con­cerned our coun­try is 84% cor­rupt.
These are only a few of the neg­a­tive trends which dic­tates that regard­less of who is in pow­er polit­i­cal­ly, the real­i­ty is that we are head­ed in the wrong direc­tion.
There seems to be no under­stand­ing that their eco­nom­ic sur­vival and growth is hinged on their abil­i­ty to remove vio­lent crime and cor­rup­tion from the soci­ety.
Failing which, regard­less of the smoke and mirrors and the mirages, the Island could be doing expo­nen­tial­ly bet­ter by attract­ing new Investments. Those Investments are out­side the Chinese takeover which is anoth­er iter­a­tion of slav­ery.
Nevertheless, the empha­sis is on whose par­ty is in pow­er so that scarce hand­outs may be derived.
It was sad when it first start­ed, it is sad today, yet the real­ly sad thing is that we appear to be frozen in accept­ing that we can­not change it.
Instead of root­ing out the mur­der­ers and demand­ing there is no more cor­rup­tion, soci­ety seem­ing­ly has evolved into accep­tance of cor­rup­tion and vio­lent mur­ders as its cho­sen path.

We should nev­er grade our­selves against the world’s worst actors. Instead, we should look at what works for the best and see whether we can co-opt some of their best prac­tices and see if they can work in our unique sit­u­a­tion.
Make no mis­take about it, the Jamaica of yester-year is no more, not only has the val­ues changed, but the peo­ple have also changed.
The sad real­i­ty is that for many Jamaicans who yearn for the land of peace and seren­i­ty of the past, that ship has long sailed.

Now Joel Hamilton Apologizes For Crass Remarks But Appointment Still An Issue..

We have been on this sto­ry before Jamaican media got wind of it. We report­ed on it fac­tu­al­ly and we said that the com­ments attrib­uted to Joel Hamilton, (if the voice on the record­ing was in fact, his voice), demon­strat­ed (1) that he does not belong in the JCF, (2) that he has scant regard for the JCF as an institution,(3) he has even less regard for the men and women of the JCF whom he just got promoted/​appointed to join and lead.
We said that we would not ele­vate that dis­re­spect­ful out­burst on this site and we stand by that deci­sion.
Nevertheless, the fol­low­ing let­ter released by Hamilton today is a clear and unequiv­o­cal con­fir­ma­tion that the voice note in which Hamilton berat­ed the JCF and mem­bers of that Agency was repug­nant and utter­ly dis­re­spect­ful.
We believe that on that basis this man has no right to the rank and def­i­nite­ly should not be in the JCF.

Anderson

Even worse, we lis­tened to the Commissioner of Police as he addressed mem­bers of the JCF on the issue and the take­away is that Anderson spoke a lot of words but essen­tial­ly said very lit­tle.
He argued that he was not sure what the uproar was about, a clear indi­ca­tion that they expect­ed this to sim­ply slip by with­out any noise from mem­bers of the JCF.
After all, why would he not expect this to pass muster, the Police are not exact­ly known for stand­ing up for them­selves.
The disin­gen­u­ous thing ulti­mate­ly, is that Anderson’s asser­tion that every­one thought he would have brought along a whole group of sol­diers to take over senior jobs from senior JCF com­man­ders has no bear­ing on the events of the day.
Here’s the thing, Anderson made those argu­ments to jus­ti­fy his rec­om­men­da­tion for an Assistant Superintendent, an untrained JDF sol­dier who is his dri­ver to be accept­ed by the JCFand to be a police offi­cer of zero train­ing.
The lie in all of this, is that Antony Anderson could only have brought over senior mem­bers of the JDF to replace senior mem­bers of the JCF on one con­di­tion.
That they fire the senior offi­cers whose jobs the sol­diers would have tak­en. How exact­ly would they have pulled that off with­out cre­at­ing a major stink in the coun­try?
The pyra­mid scale of the JCF allows only for so many Deputies, and Assistants to the Commissioner as well as oth­ers in the gazetted Ranks.
So the idea that he did not bring but two peo­ple with him, is an attempt to prove a neg­a­tive. A total­ly fraud­u­lent asser­tion.
There is absolute­ly no way they could have pulled it off so that argu­ment is meritless.

Is the com­mis­sion­er of Police enti­tled to an Assistant Superintendent of police to head his secu­ri­ty detail?
That is the ques­tion for the coun­try to con­tem­plate.
If the present com­mis­sion­er of police who came to the JCF with­out any polic­ing expe­ri­ence does not trust the mem­bers of the JCF with his per­son­al secu­ri­ty and on that basis, he wants his long­time body­guard, does that, there­fore, mean that his secu­ri­ty is more impor­tant that the nation’s chief exec­u­tive?
Throughout my life­time the JCF Protective Services Branch has done a stel­lar job of secur­ing, not just Prime min­is­ters and min­is­ters of Government but oth­er dig­ni­taries as well.
To date, there has been no inci­dent that I know of which has cast a neg­a­tive light on the Protective Services Branch of the JCF.
Not even the US Secret Service has that good a record as, they have been accused of all kinds of mis­be­hav­ior in the exe­cu­tion of their duties, includ­ing get­ting drunk on duty and acquir­ing the ser­vices of prostitutes.

This is a bad sto­ry for Anderson and the Administration. Unfortunately, peo­ple are seg­ment­ed and brain­washed into com­plete feal­ty to the two polit­i­cal par­ties that they are unable to under­stand the harm these cor­rupt prac­tices are hav­ing on the coun­try.
So this too will blow over and the grum­bling will stop among the cops because Anderson pat­ted them on the back and every­thing is fine now.
But his dis­re­spect­ful Assistant Superintendent body­guard will still be in place and mem­bers of the JCF from the Rank of Inspector down will salute and say yes sir.
Such a pathet­ic sad affair, the kind which we read of in back­wa­ter banana republics.
Oh, wait just one minute.…..Banana Republic?