America’s Lessons Not Learned In Asia.


Whether the deci­sion to pull out of Afghanistan by President Joe Biden was the cor­rect one, par­tic­u­lar­ly when we see the images com­ing out of that coun­try, I will leave it up to the experts. This deci­sion, how­ev­er, will be debat­ed pure­ly from a polit­i­cal stand­point, with Republicans for­get­ting that Trump intend­ed to pull troops out as well.
On Monday, Biden told the nation, he stands square­ly behind his deci­sion to pull troops from Afghanistan even as he admit­ted in his speech that the coun­try’s fall hap­pened faster than he anticipated.

THE ENTRANCE GATE OF THE CANADIAN EMBASSY IS PICTURED AFTER THE EVACUATION IN KABUL ON AUGUST 15, 2021. (PHOTO BY WAKIL KOHSAR /​AFP) (PHOTO BY WAKIL KOHSAR/​AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES)

Biden argued that after two decades in that coun­try and over a tril­lion dol­lars spent in that coun­try: train­ing their mil­i­tary, cre­at­ing an air force, equip­ping that air force, and even pay­ing the salaries of the Afghan mil­i­tary — a force he said rivals NATO part­ners in size. America, he said, could not give them the will to fight for their coun­try. That is up to them.
I concur!!!

As the Taliban approach­es, store own­ers race to remove images of women from their storefronts.

America may have been jus­ti­fied in going into Afghanistan after September 11th, 2001; what hap­pened after­ward will for­ev­er be debat­ed for cen­turies long after we are gone.
The jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for going inside was the pol­i­cy of George Bush, Dick Chaney, Donald Rumsfeld admin­is­tra­tion. Fed by neo-cons, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Pearl guid­ed America’s deci­sions in Afghanistan and its mis­guid­ed deci­sion to enter a sov­er­eign Iraq under the lie that Saddam Hussien, that nation’s pres­i­dent had weapons of mass destruc­tion. Therefore America, as the world’s de fac­to police, was jus­ti­fied in going in to take them away from him.

Photos: Chaos in Kabul as Taliban take over
The Taliban as they rolled into Kabul.

They nev­er both­ered telling the nation at the time. Today, the US con­cedes that George Bush’s father, Herbert Walker Bush, US pres­i­dent #41, allowed Saddam Hussien to acquire those bio­log­i­cal weapons because the cal­cu­lus was that Iran was a more sig­nif­i­cant threat. In their minds, Saddam offered a coun­ter­bal­ance to the Islamic régime in Iran that had over­thrown the Shah and tak­en American hostages dur­ing the Carter presidency.
The authors wrote in a 2002 arti­cle writ­ten by Christopher Dickey and Evan Thomas, which now forms part of the Congress’ per­ma­nent record.

It is hard to believe that, during most of the 1980s, 
     America knowingly permitted the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission 
     to import bacterial cultures that might be used to build 
     biological weapons. But it happened.
America's past stumbles, while embarrassing, are not an 
     argument for inaction in the future. Saddam probably is the 
     "grave and gathering danger" described by President Bush in 
     his speech to the United Nations last week. It may also be 
     true that "whoever replaces Saddam is not going to be 
     worse," as a senior administration official put it to 
     Newsweek. But the story of how America helped create a 
     Frankenstein monster it now wishes to strangle is sobering. 
     It illustrates the power of wishful thinking, as well as the 
     iron law of unintended consequences.

These are the images that occurred on the streets of Saigon as America was forced to cut and run.

The United States learned noth­ing from its incur­sion in South Asia, and as we recall the rout in Saigon, it seems that there is a sense of déjà vu.

Bush, Chaney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Pearl, and oth­ers were shov­el­ing a bunch of non­sense down the throats of the ever-gullible pub­lic. They lied that they would change hearts and minds despite going in behind guns and bombs, killing and maiming.
We heard the news about Afghanistan that the US was greet­ed as lib­er­a­tors when they went into Iraq. None of this hap­pened because the oppo­site is that when you barge in with guns, you cre­ate enemies.
It was a load of crock then. It is a load of crock now.
You don’t go in and kill, then expect the same peo­ple to turn around and accept you with open arms.
That is why the American mil­i­tary nev­er fig­ured out why the Afghans they trained could not stand up to the Taliban?
Answer?
They did not want to.!!!
Frantic scenes at Kabul airport as Afghans try to flee Taliban | Reuters
Frantic scenes at Kabul air­port as the Taliban approached.
That is why mem­bers of the Afghan mil­i­tary America trained, from time to time, turned their weapons on Americans sol­diers and mur­der them.
They nev­er believed, and there­in lies the prob­lem. This fact effec­tive­ly for­mer­ly DEBUNKS the ideas that Richard Pearl, Paul Wolfowitz, and oth­ers per­pet­u­at­ed to the Republican Party, to George Bush, which became pub­lic pol­i­cy, lead­ing to the Afghan and the Iraq war.
There are no women in the streets' – the day life changed in Kabul | Afghanistan | The Guardian
The Taliban on the streets of Kabul.
The les­son of invad­ing a coun­try, then expect­ing that the natives will sud­den­ly become friends, has been a big lie that has been turned on its head time and again. The United States did not learn that les­son in south­east Asia, and it went into the Middle East to relearn a painful and expen­sive les­son over again.
.
.
.
.
Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.