A‑Sawahrah A‑Sharqiyah And A‑Sheikh Sa’ed Isolated From Rest Of East Jerusalem

A family evacuating their home, near al-Malih, northern Jordan Valley. Photo
A fam­i­ly evac­u­at­ing their home, near al-Malih, north­ern Jordan Valley. Photo

The vil­lages of a‑Sheikh Sa’ed and a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah have been arti­fi­cial­ly cut off from East Jerusalem by an eight-meter-high wall. Before this par­ti­tion was built, the two vil­lages formed a con­tigu­ous urban bloc with East Jerusalem and, in par­tic­u­lar, with the vil­lages of Jabal al-Mukabber and a‑Sawahrah al-Gharbiyah to its south with which they shared exten­sive fam­i­ly, com­mer­cial and cul­tur­al ties. A‑Sheikh Sa’ed is home to some 2,000 res­i­dents, and a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah, sit­u­at­ed some two kilo­me­ters to its north, has a pop­u­la­tion of approx­i­mate­ly 6,000.

In 1967, imme­di­ate­ly after Israel occu­pied the West Bank, it annexed exten­sive areas east of these vil­lages to the munic­i­pal area of Jerusalem. Although the two vil­lages were not includ­ed in the area annexed, dur­ing the first few decades after annex­a­tion this dis­tinc­tion had no impact on the res­i­dents’ lives. Passage between the annexed area and the remain­der of the West Bank was rou­tine and unre­mark­able. East Jerusalem served as the urban cen­ter for the res­i­dents of these two vil­lages, with many of them work­ing in the city. It also pro­vid­ed the res­i­dents’ health and edu­ca­tion ser­vices. In addi­tion, peo­ple who lived in the annexed area would some­times move into these villages.

This real­i­ty changed in the mid-1990s, when Israel began to sep­a­rate the vil­lages from the area of East Jerusalem by means of obstruc­tions and check­points. In 2003, a route for the Separation Barrier in the area was decid­ed, and on 26 August 2003 work began or erect­ing a tem­po­rary barbed wire fence. The res­i­dents of Sheikh Sa’ed appealed the course fixed, and in March 2006 the Appellate Committee for the Separation Barrier accept­ed their appeal. The com­mit­tee found that “in his­tor­i­cal terms, Sheikh Sa’ed forms a part of Jabal al-Mukabber, which lies with­in the area of Jerusalem”, and the route of the bar­ri­er was dis­pro­por­tion­ate and vio­lat­ed the rights of Sheik Sa’ed’s res­i­dents to life, lib­er­ty and dig­ni­ty. The Appellate Committee instruct­ed the state to reex­am­ine the course of the bar­ri­er in the area. However, the state appealed this deci­sion to the High Court of Justice, argu­ing that the com­mit­tee had ignored the secu­ri­ty-relat­ed ram­i­fi­ca­tions inher­ent in an alter­na­tive course that would annex the vil­lage to the area of Jerusalem. In 2010 the High Court of Justice accept­ed the state’s peti­tion, there­by approv­ing the course of the Separation Barrier in the area.

A-Sheikh Sa’ed checkpoint. Photo: ‘Amer ‘Aruri, B’Tselem, 11 Feb. 2015
A‑Sheikh Sa’ed check­point. Photo: ‘Amer ‘Aruri, B’Tselem, 11 Feb. 2015

The con­struc­tion of the Separation Barrier sep­a­rat­ed the two pop­u­la­tions in one fell swoop, leav­ing Jerusalem res­i­dents east of the bar­ri­er and the res­i­dents of a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah and a‑Sheikh Sa’ed to its west. Nearly a decade lat­er, the res­i­dents of the vil­lages remain iso­lat­ed and dis­con­nect­ed from their fam­i­lies, places of work and ser­vice cen­ters on the oth­er side of the Separation Barrier.

After the con­struc­tion of the Separation Barrier and check­points in the area, Israeli author­i­ties imposed a series of arbi­trary restric­tions on the res­i­dents of the vil­lages, exac­er­bat­ing the forced iso­la­tion, clas­si­fy­ing the res­i­dents into four sep­a­rate categories:

  1. 1,300 res­i­dents of a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah who hold Israeli iden­ti­ty cards, live adja­cent to the a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah Checkpoint, or work in inter­na­tion­al orga­ni­za­tions: The names of these res­i­dents are on a list main­tained at a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah Checkpoint. For the past year or so, they have been per­mit­ted to cross this check­point by car to go into East Jerusalem and return home. This arrange­ment is valid only from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.
  2. Residents of a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah and a‑Sheikh Sa’ed who hold Israeli iden­ti­ty cards (with a reg­is­tered address in Jabal al-Mukabber): These res­i­dents are per­mit­ted to cross a‑Sheikh Sa’ed Checkpoint as pedes­tri­ans (in both direc­tions) as well as a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah Checkpoint (only in one direc­tion – out of East Jerusalem). Alternatively, to trav­el by car, they must take a long, hour-long detour and cross at a‑Za’ayem Checkpoint.
  3. Residents of a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah who hold West Bank iden­ti­ty cards and entry per­mits to Israel can enter the city sole­ly through a‑Zaytun or a‑Za’ayem Checkpoints. They are pro­hib­it­ed to cross via a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah Checkpoint.
  4. Residents of a‑Sheikh Sa’ed who hold West Bank iden­ti­ty cards and entry per­mits to Israel are per­mit­ted to cross only at a‑Sheikh Sa’ed Checkpoint and only on foot.

Residents of East Jerusalem who live in the city and wish to vis­it a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah or a‑Sheikh Sa’ed by car may do so sole­ly via a‑Za’ayem Checkpoint. Alternatively, on foot, they can leave Jerusalem via a‑Sheikh Sa’ed Checkpoint; how­ev­er, they can­not re-enter the city through this checkpoint.

These dra­con­ian, con­vo­lut­ed restric­tions severe­ly ham­per dai­ly life and main­tain­ing rela­tion­ships between the res­i­dents of the vil­lages and their rel­a­tives on the oth­er side of the Separation Barrier. Brothers and sis­ters, par­ents and chil­dren have been sep­a­rat­ed from each oth­er. Due to the con­sid­er­able dif­fi­cul­ties in cross­ing, many of them meet only rarely, on reli­gious hol­i­days or for fam­i­ly cel­e­bra­tions or mile­stones. Moreover, many res­i­dents have lost their jobs and find it dif­fi­cult to obtain the ser­vices they once received in Jerusalem.

The Separation Barrier has also cre­at­ed a prob­lem con­cern­ing bur­ial. The ceme­tery serv­ing both vil­lages is sit­u­at­ed in Jabal al-Mukabber, on the oth­er side of the Separation Barrier. In order to attend the funer­al of a res­i­dent of a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah or a‑Sheikh Sa’ed, vil­lage res­i­dents must enter East Jerusalem. Security forces at the check­point allow only fifty res­i­dents, includ­ing rel­a­tives of the deceased, to cross the check­point and take part in the funer­al. After the funer­al, rel­a­tives find it dif­fi­cult to vis­it the grave due to the restric­tions detailed above.

S.G., a mar­ried moth­er of five who lives in a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah, recount­ed the fol­low­ing to B’Tselem field researcher ‘Amer ‘Aruri:

I was born in Jabal al-Mukabber, East Jerusalem. In 1991 I mar­ried a man from a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah with a Palestinian iden­ti­ty card. At that time, a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah and Jabal al-Mukabber formed a sin­gle geo­graph­i­cal area. There were no mil­i­tary check­points and no Separation Barrier divid­ing rel­a­tives and peo­ple. Residents in both areas belonged to the same fam­i­lies. I gave birth to my five daugh­ters at hos­pi­tals in East Jerusalem…

Before mil­i­tary army check­points were put in place, I used to vis­it my fam­i­ly in Jabal al-Mukabber once a week. It took five min­utes to get from y home to theirs… Today I vis­it my fam­i­ly once every three months. Naturally, every vis­it involves delays at the check­point and ques­tions and answers about my iden­ti­ty card. Also my rel­a­tives, who used to vis­it me every week before there was a check­point, now come only on spe­cial occa­sions, such as reli­gious hol­i­days or dur­ing the month of Ramadan. My mom and dad are elder­ly and they can’t walk across the a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah Checkpoint to get to my home. They pre­fer to come by car, and that means they have to trav­el via a‑Za’ayem Checkpoint, and that’s a long trip.

N.G. was also born in Jabal al-Mukabber and lives with her hus­band in a‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah:

The check­point sep­a­rates me from my fam­i­ly. My mom is elder­ly and she’s gone blind. She can’t come to vis­it me on her own by cross­ing the check­point on foot. It’s too hard for her. So usu­al­ly one of my broth­ers dri­ves her through a‑Za’ayem Checkpoint – it takes them about an hour instead of being a five minute-dri­ve. It’s become so vis­its are only on hol­i­days, spe­cial occa­sions, and dur­ing Ramadan. Their most recent vis­it was on the hol­i­day of ‘Id al-Adha – eight months ago. Before the check­point was put in place, I’d just call them and invite them to pop over because I’d made one of their favorite dish­es, and they’d be here with­in five minutes.

The arbi­trary restric­tions imposed by the author­i­ties on the res­i­dents’ move­ments dis­rupt almost every aspect of their lives. They keep fam­i­lies apart and make it dif­fi­cult for res­i­dents to pur­sue their every­day lives. There is no jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for these restric­tions, secu­ri­ty or oth­er­wise. It is also dif­fi­cult to under­stand their under­ly­ing log­ic: Why was the num­ber fifty fixed as the num­ber of peo­ple allowed to attend a funer­al? Why can some­one use a par­tic­u­lar check­point only in order to return home, but is pro­hib­it­ed from using the same check­point to go to work?

Israel must remove the bar­ri­er, which arti­fi­cial­ly sev­ers an urban, his­tor­i­cal, and cul­tur­al con­tin­uüm and great­ly dis­rupts the lives of tens of thou­sands of peo­ple. Until it does so, Israel must per­mit reg­u­lar pas­sage between these vil­lages and East Jerusalem in such a way as to allow the res­i­dents of the iso­lat­ed vil­lages lead nor­mal lives.
A‑Sawahrah a‑Sharqiyah and a‑Sheikh Sa’ed iso­lat­ed from rest of East Jerusalem