A Comprehensive Overhaul Of The Criminal Code Is Essential To Crime Fight

The solu­tions to Jamaica’s crime epi­dem­ic are not to be found in a sil­ver bul­let or mag­ic beans; they are in a series of com­mon-sense ini­tia­tives that I have writ­ten about for years. Common-sense mea­sures do not require much crit­i­cal think­ing; in fact, some of those ini­tia­tives are not nov­el ideas but ideas that have worked in oth­er countries.
Much of the answers lie in the Jamaican peo­ple, includ­ing past and present law enforce­ment offi­cers who left out of frustration.
It is impor­tant to note that the laws do not appro­pri­ate­ly deter crim­i­nal con­duct, and in many cas­es, they encour­age it.
We need a new Constitution; this means sev­er­ing the colo­nial ties with Britain, giv­ing our­selves a chance to embark on a bet­ter path toward self-suf­fi­cien­cy even in this ever-increas­ing inter­con­nect­ed world.
Thankfully the Government has now begun doing the work to get us on that track, and this means that this admin­is­tra­tion is listening.


I wrote for years that because the laws are old and archa­ic, they encour­age law-break­ing. For exam­ple, if the penal­ty for ille­gal fish­ing is ten dol­lars Jamaican, why would any­one not break that law and catch some fish and, if caught, pay the fine.
Thirty-one years ago, while I was a young cop, some of the laws were so archa­ic there was no rea­son to enforce them, so we did not both­er doing so. Enforcing them would not even gar­ner a con­vic­tion; judges would admon­ish and dis­charge defen­dants mak­ing a mock­ery of our officers.
Today, most of those laws are still there not updat­ed. This lapse, or rather acts of delin­quen­cy by the leg­is­la­ture, result­ed in two gen­er­a­tions of Jamaicans who are uncon­strained by the prospect of con­se­quence, so they do as they please.
Other laws are direct gifts to law­break­ers; there is no oth­er way to view them; ‘squat­ter’s rights, whose idea was it to leg­is­late that if one crim­i­nal­ly occu­pies some­one’s prop­er­ty over a cer­tain peri­od, they auto­mat­i­cal­ly become the own­er of the property?
Why would peo­ple who need a place to live not set up res­i­dence on oth­er peo­ple’s prop­er­ty? In many cas­es, they begin build­ing per­ma­nent struc­tures on land they know they do not own- land belong­ing to some­one else.


Given that green­light by the state to break the laws, Jamaicans embark on build­ing ille­gal set­tle­ments on cap­tured lands, some­times argu­ing it’s ‘Jah’s land’; of course, once they estab­lish ille­gal own­er­ship, no one dares set foot on the prop­er­ty, it is no longer Jah’s land but theirs.
For as long as I can remem­ber, admin­is­tra­tions of the two polit­i­cal par­ties have allowed urban sprawl across the cor­po­rate area and the entire coun­try. This is not unique to Jamaica, but oth­er nations are respon­si­ble for their problems.
These squat­ter com­mu­ni­ties became incu­ba­tors of vio­lent crime. It is easy to fol­low the nexus of how allow­ing for what is viewed as small, incon­se­quen­tial infrac­tions to metas­ta­size into mam­moth epi­demics like the one we are fac­ing today.
Allowing squat­ter com­mu­ni­ties from Sufferers Heights to Flankers and From Back-To to Riverton and places beyond has con­tributed sig­nif­i­cant­ly to the vio­lent epi­dem­ic of crime that has claimed the lives of tens of thou­sands of inno­cent Jamaicans over the last sev­er­al decades.
This result­ed from incom­pe­tent and acqui­es­cent poli­cies that encour­aged law­break­ing to solid­i­fy blocks of votes to attain and hold on to polit­i­cal power.
Lazy and incom­pe­tent leg­is­la­tors hired to make the right deci­sions spend their time fig­ur­ing out ways to defraud the pub­lic instead of mod­ern­iz­ing the nation’s laws.
Feuds that emanate from cap­tured prop­er­ty almost always end up with vio­lence as a solu­tion, vio­lence encour­aged and made pos­si­ble by a delin­quent state.


Simple fix­es like pass­ing laws with sun­set pro­vi­sions give law­mak­ers time to see how leg­is­la­tion works and whether to reau­tho­rize or allow them to expire.
There is no sur­prise that Jamaica is viewed as one of the most vio­lent places on earth; its gov­ern­ment, since 1962, has active­ly and unwit­ting­ly enhanced crim­i­nal conduct.
The present admin­is­tra­tion, too, approached the job of gov­er­nance with the same non­cha­lance as its pre­de­ces­sor, uncon­vinced that you can­not build a soci­ety in which there is ram­pant crime and corruption.
However, it seems clear­er nowa­days that the Andrew Holness admin­is­tra­tion, at least on the face of it, real­izes that Jamaica has no chance of com­pet­ing with­out an end to the ram­pant criminality.
So the jus­tice min­is­ter Delroy Chuch has tabled leg­is­la­tion that would add some teeth to mur­der con­vic­tions. Some argue cor­rect­ly it does not go near­ly far enough
It still isn’t law..


Who has a vest­ed inter­est in bring­ing back vio­lent mur­der­ers from prison except for tri­al lawyers? Where is the lob­by for vio­lence pro­duc­ers? What I am ask­ing is, whose cause is served by short­er prison sen­tences for those who have been found guilty of tak­ing the lives of others?
The Prime Minister recent­ly told William, a future king of England, “we are going our own way”, Good, and none too soon. That state­ment should have been uttered six­ty years ago back in 1962, not 2022.
I hope this is more than just words but action that will be fol­lowed up with a shiny new con­sti­tu­tion well debat­ed and backed up by expert advice and craft­ed using data. And for God’s sake, when I say expert opin­ion, I do not mean from the University of the West Indies..”
That Institution’s left­ist bull­shit has all but destroyed our coun­try and much of the Caribbean.
A new con­sti­tu­tion and updat­ed laws are Jamaica’s best chances of pro­pelling itself into the 21st cen­tu­ry, albeit already 22 years late. Jamaicans can obey laws; we do when we live in oth­er coun­tries; let us ensure that we build a nation of laws that pro­tects the weak and inno­cent and appro­pri­ate­ly sit­u­ate those who refuse to adhere to our social order.

.

.

.

.

Mike Beckles is a for­mer Police Detective, busi­ness­man, a free­lance writer, black achiev­er hon­oree, and cre­ator of the blog mike​beck​les​.com.