A Black Man Was Found Dead After He Told His Mother He Was Being Chased. Police Said There’s ‘no Reason’ To Suspect Foul Play.

Rasheem Carter’s mother said that before he disappeared in October, he called in a panic to say white men were chasing him in trucks and hurling racial slurs.
_​_​_​_​note
By Melissa Chan

The fam­i­ly of a Black man who was found dead in Mississippi after he warned his moth­er that he was being chased by white men hurl­ing racial slurs demand­ed a fed­er­al inves­ti­ga­tion Monday after local author­i­ties said they had “no rea­son” to sus­pect foul play in the man’s death. Rasheem Carter, 25, was report­ed miss­ing Oct. 2 after his moth­er said he had sought help from police and fran­ti­cal­ly called her to say white men in three trucks were pur­su­ing him. That was the last day Carter’s fam­i­ly heard from him. On Nov. 2, author­i­ties said they found his remains in a wood­ed area south of Taylorsville, Mississippi. In a state­ment on Facebook a day lat­er, the Smith County Sheriff’s Department said it had “no rea­son to believe foul play was involved” though the case was under investigation.

Rasheem Carter
Rasheem Carter.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

On Monday, Carter’s loved ones and their attor­ney Ben Crump slammed local author­i­ties for stonewalling them for more than four months and for the ini­tial deter­mi­na­tion, say­ing they believe Carter was the vic­tim of a bru­tal hate crime. “This was a nefar­i­ous act. This was an evil act,” Crump said at a news con­fer­ence. “Somebody mur­dered Rasheem Carter, and we can­not let them get away with this.”

Rasheem Carter with his mother Tiffany Carter at his college graduation
Rasheem Carter with his moth­er, Tiffany Carter, at his col­lege grad­u­a­tion in 2016.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

Crump urged the Justice Department on Monday to take over the inves­ti­ga­tion as a civ­il rights case as he revealed pho­tographs of Carter’s skele­tal remains, includ­ing his skull and some ver­te­brae. “This was not a nat­ur­al death,” Crump said. “This rep­re­sents a young man who was killed.” Crump told reporters that he believes Carter’s head was sev­ered from his body and that his spinal cord was found in anoth­er loca­tion away from his head. “There is noth­ing nat­ur­al about this. It screams out for jus­tice,” Crump said. “What we have is a Mississippi lynch­ing.” Carter’s front teeth were miss­ing from the top and bot­tom rows, which Carter’s fam­i­ly said could indi­cate that he was assault­ed before he died. It’s unclear what prompt­ed author­i­ties to search the wood­ed area or what led them to deter­mine ini­tial­ly that foul play was not sus­pect­ed. The Smith County Sheriff’s Department did not reply to requests for comment.

The Laurel Police Department, which put out Carter’s miss­ing per­son­’s report, worked on the case ear­ly on after Carter’s fam­i­ly asked for assis­tance, Chief Tommy Cox told NBC News. But Cox said that Carter had not con­tact­ed his depart­ment for help before he went miss­ing, and that the Laurel Police Department hand­ed its inves­ti­ga­tion over to Smith County once it was clear it was out­side of its juris­dic­tion. Cox said his depart­ment pulled some phone records and may have inter­viewed some of Carter’s co-work­ers, but he declined to elab­o­rate fur­ther. “We tried to put our­selves in their shoes. It didn’t hurt us to do a lit­tle bit of work on it,” Cox said. “We did what we con­sid­ered to be the right thing. And then when it became obvi­ous which juris­dic­tion would be the lead, we turned it over to them.” The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation, which is assist­ing the sher­iff in its probe, said Carter’s autop­sy was com­plet­ed on Feb. 2 but declined to com­ment fur­ther, cit­ing the “open and ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion.” The FBI is not cur­rent­ly involved in the case, an agency spokesper­son said. Three mem­bers of Carter’s fam­i­ly said author­i­ties told them wild ani­mals may have torn his body apart.

Smith coun­ty Sheriff Joel Houston

He was in so many dif­fer­ent pieces,” said Yokena Anderson, a cousin to Carter’s moth­er, Tiffany Carter. “They want­ed to tell us that he went there and fell dead and the ani­mals were feed­ing off him.” But Carter’s moth­er said that her son was lucid about the threats he faced dur­ing their final phone calls, and that he was not under the influ­ence of drugs or alco­hol and had no his­to­ry of men­tal ill­ness. She had doubts her son’s death was an acci­dent even before she saw where his remains were found. “When I went on the scene, the Holy Spirit hit me and said this is foul play,” she said. “I knew then some­body had done some­thing to him.” Carter, a welder from Fayette, Mississippi, was in Taylorsville, about 100 miles away from home, work­ing a short-term con­tract­ing gig. His moth­er said he was sav­ing mon­ey to re-open his seafood restau­rant, which closed dur­ing the pan­dem­ic and which was named after his 7‑year-old daugh­ter, Cali.

Rasheem Carter with his daughter Cali
Rasheem Carter with his daugh­ter Cali, now 7.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

That was his goal,” she said. “That was why he went back out to work.” But while he was at the job site in October, Carter had a dis­agree­ment with at least one co-work­er and fled, fear­ing for his life, his moth­er said. “He said, ‘I got these men try­ing to kill me,’ ” Carter’s moth­er recalled him say­ing. She advised Carter to go to the near­est police sta­tion for help but even­tu­al­ly lost con­tact with him. Carter’s fam­i­ly and friends led their own search par­ties until his remains were dis­cov­ered. “I nev­er imag­ined going on liv­ing with­out my child,” Tiffany Carter said. “When I lost my son, I lost a part of me.” Carter’s loved ones said he worked hard to pro­vide for his daugh­ter, paid for her pri­vate school tuition and made his friends and fam­i­ly proud. “He kept all his promis­es,” Cali’s moth­er, Justiss White, said. “He called every day. They stayed on the phone for hours like teenagers. Every day, she brings him up.” Tiffany Carter pledged to con­tin­ue fight­ing for answers. “They thought this was going to be a child no one cared any­thing about,” she said. “They’re clear­ly mis­tak­en. Because he was somebody.

After facing backlash, Mississippi sheriff now says he hasn’t ruled out foul play in Rasheem Carter’s death.

By Melissa

A Mississippi sher­iff said Tuesday that he has not ruled out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of mur­der in the case of Rasheem Carter, months after ini­tial­ly say­ing there was “no rea­son” to sus­pect foul play in the Black man’s death. Carter, 25, was found dead last fall after he warned his moth­er that he was being chased by white men hurl­ing racial slurs. In an inter­view with NBC News, Smith County Sheriff Joel Houston defend­ed his ear­ly deter­mi­na­tion, say­ing no evi­dence at the time point­ed to homi­cide. But he said his depart­ment is still wait­ing on search war­rants to rule more defin­i­tive­ly. For the first time, the sher­iff revealed key aspects of the inves­ti­ga­tion, includ­ing the department’s process of rul­ing out poten­tial sus­pects. The inter­view came one day after Carter’s loved ones and their attor­ney Ben Crump slammed author­i­ties for stonewalling them for more than four months and accused the police of cov­er­ing up what they believe was a bru­tal hate crime. “Nothing is being swept under the rug,” Houston said Tuesday. “There’s noth­ing to hide.”

Rasheem Carter
Rasheem Carter.Courtesy Tiffany Carter

Carter was report­ed miss­ing on Oct. 2, after his moth­er said he had sought help from police and fran­ti­cal­ly called her to say white men in three trucks were pur­su­ing him. That was the last day Carter’s fam­i­ly heard from him. On Nov. 2, author­i­ties said they found his remains in a wood­ed area south of Taylorsville, Mississippi. In a state­ment on Facebook a day lat­er, the Smith County Sheriff’s Department said it had “no rea­son to believe foul play was involved,” though the case was under inves­ti­ga­tion. Carter’s loved ones and fam­i­ly attor­ney were dis­mayed by that swift deci­sion by the sher­iff and urged the Justice Department to take over the inves­ti­ga­tion as a civ­il rights case dur­ing a news con­fer­ence Monday. “This was a nefar­i­ous act. This was an evil act,” Crump said. “Somebody mur­dered Rasheem Carter, and we can­not let them get away with this.” The sher­iff said Tuesday that his depart­ment ini­tial­ly said that no foul play was sus­pect­ed to ease pub­lic con­cern after find­ing no ear­ly evi­dence that Carter had been chased. “It was just let­ting the local or gen­er­al pub­lic know that at this time no one else is believed to be involved,” he said. “It does seem to have caused unnec­es­sary headache, but we only have what the evi­dence tells us. At that time, the evi­dence didn’t sug­gest anything.”

Carter, a welder from Fayette, Mississippi, was in Taylorsville, about 100 miles away from home, work­ing a short-term con­tract­ing gig. His moth­er, Tiffany Carter, said he was sav­ing mon­ey to reopen his seafood restau­rant, which closed dur­ing the pan­dem­ic and which was named after his 7‑year-old daugh­ter, Cali. “That was his goal,” she said. “That was why he went back out to work.” But while he was at the job site in October, Carter had a dis­agree­ment with at least one co-work­er and fled, fear­ing for his life, his moth­er said. “He said, ‘I got these men try­ing to kill me,’” Carter’s moth­er recalled him say­ing. She advised Carter to go to the near­est police sta­tion for help but even­tu­al­ly lost con­tact with him. On Tuesday, the sher­iff said his depart­ment inter­viewed “every­body involved” with Carter’s last job, includ­ing four to five peo­ple Carter had men­tioned to his moth­er as pos­si­ble threats. Houston said police “ruled them out” after deter­min­ing through phone records and GPS coor­di­nates that their devices were near­ly 100 miles away from Taylorsville at anoth­er job site when Carter was last seen alive. The sher­iff said Carter’s col­leagues and super­vi­sor men­tioned in their inter­views that Carter “had not been him­self” for about a week before he went miss­ing. “They said his whole demeanor had changed. They weren’t sure what was going on,” Houston said. “They just said he kept to him­self more. He usu­al­ly joked around, and in the last week or so they weren’t able to do that.”

Houston said Carter had “a cou­ple of ver­bal alter­ca­tions” with at least one co-work­er. But the sher­iff did not say what the dis­agree­ment was about or whether the alter­ca­tion prompt­ed Carter’s behav­ior change. Carter was last seen cap­tured on a pri­vate landowner’s game cam­era out in the woods on Oct. 2 after 4:30 p.m., Houston said, adding that he was the only per­son spot­ted in the footage. The sher­iff said the prop­er­ty own­er passed the image along to police when he found out about it in mid-October. Houston said it took about two weeks to search sev­er­al hun­dred acres, using cadav­er dogs. Along with Carter’s scat­tered remains, author­i­ties found inside his blue jeans some cash, bank cards, a driver’s license, a vape and a phone charg­er, though they nev­er recov­ered his phone. The sher­if­f’s depart­ment has sub­mit­ted a search war­rant to Google to deter­mine whether any devices pinged in the area where Carter’s remains were found around the time he went miss­ing. “It’s a last-straw-type deal to deter­mine if any­one else was with him or not,” he said. “It’s not uncom­mon to use this tool.” However, the process has been going on since mid-November, Houston said, and the depart­ment has had to revise, nar­row down and resub­mit their request sev­er­al times, includ­ing most recent­ly last week. Houston said that he wel­comes the Justice Department’s involve­ment and that he wants jus­tice for Carter’s fam­i­ly “just as much as the fam­i­ly does.” The Carters dis­agree. Three mem­bers of the fam­i­ly said author­i­ties told them wild ani­mals may have torn his body apart. “He was in so many dif­fer­ent pieces,” said Yokena Anderson, a cousin to Carter’s moth­er. “They want­ed to tell us that he went there and fell dead and the ani­mals were feed­ing off him.” Carter’s moth­er said that her son was lucid about the threats he faced dur­ing their final phone calls and that he was not under the influ­ence of drugs or alco­hol and had no his­to­ry of men­tal ill­ness. “I just know what my son told me,” she said Tuesday. “I don’t believe any­thing they say. It’s lies after lies.”